Zack Jamplin

713 posts

Zack Jamplin

Zack Jamplin

@ZackJamplin

Founder of @cosmos Max value extractooor, occasionally business stabby 🔪

Katılım Mart 2022
197 Takip Edilen104 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Zack Jamplin retweetledi
Zack Jamplin
Zack Jamplin@ZackJamplin·
I am the sun of the @cosmos solar system
GIF
English
1
1
8
0
Zack Jamplin
Zack Jamplin@ZackJamplin·
How about you give back all the money you took out of $OSMO? Go ahead and drop it in the community pool
English
1
0
8
325
Sunny Aggarwal 🧪
Sunny Aggarwal 🧪@sunnya97·
Cosmos Labs has turned Cosmos into a ghost town. They came in with the expressed intent of “killing the old Cosmos” but failed to present anything remotely interesting to replace it. There’s so much exciting stuff happening in the world right now. Privacy, Sovereign AI, End of Pax Americana. The time for cypherpunk crypto is now. But instead ATOM has pivoted to enterprise sales. A billion dollar market cap for what is now effectively a consulting dev shop. And that too, one that hasn’t even been able to land any deals of note.
English
56
19
195
41.3K
Long(er) Time Hodler🇸🇦 🟩
Okay, Will the real $Atom hatoooors please step forward. Spit hate under this post and NOT delete theire reply in the coming weeks/months? Want to see how many of you are real. Thanks in advance $ATOM to $100
English
12
4
75
6.3K
Zack Jamplin
Zack Jamplin@ZackJamplin·
Easy to armchair quarterback rn, any path will take time. Was definitely the right move to kill old Cosmos. Sunny and friends pulled hundreds of millions from the community’s pockets. Not sure if Cosmos Labs will pull it off, but they definitely shouldn’t listen to old Cosmos
English
0
0
1
56
Mike Dudas
Mike Dudas@mdudas·
extremely risky for l1's to aggressively try to make winners with capital, co-marketing and privileged technical support rather than amplify organic winners
English
43
6
245
54.2K
cami
cami@camiinthisthang·
up 1000 followers in the last few days mostly driven by two videos you need to be storytellingmaxixng or be stuck in the permanent underclass forever
cami tweet media
English
4
0
23
1.5K
Zack Jamplin retweetledi
Hokage
Hokage@73lV_·
organic crime pump 👀📈 how much was the buy back? how much revenue was generated from USDm? we need a clearer structure around what you mean by “programmatic.” will future buybacks be based on specific revenue milestones, or what exactly determines when the next buyback happens??
MegaETH@megaeth

On May 7th, the MegaETH Foundation completed its first MEGA buyback, using all net rewards accrued from the USDm issuer up until the end of April. Current USDm supply sits at $480M. We intend future buybacks to be programmatic and onchain.

English
14
2
64
8.9K
Zack Jamplin retweetledi
Anon Vee
Anon Vee@AnonVee_·
buy onchain dump offchain just like MOVE playbook
Anon Vee tweet media
English
10
2
86
5.9K
|| Tommy.mega || Σ:
|| Tommy.mega || Σ:@EltommytoC·
I'm really angry to see this, and especially to see Jawz's responses. It's shameful. And that was before I learned that some people bought tokens before the launch. It's ludicrous and unprofessional for a so-called DeFi product @blackhaven. I won't put another penny into this project. They could have at least shared the mechanism objectively before the launch. It's shameful.
Zera | ∑:@zera_chielo

@Jakeronthia_ @blackhaven @bread_ I hope Bread will not go with the narrative "Read the document before buying." Shit is launching 30+ mins before the official announcement. These wallets made quite good amount.

English
11
1
36
6.1K
Zack Jamplin
Zack Jamplin@ZackJamplin·
Is anyone actually surprised by this? People like this have zero intention of creating products that are useful. They very carefully and painstakingly design products to extract from you.
GIF
Zera | ∑:@zera_chielo

I’m a MegaETH maxi, and I have to admit that the ecosystem is not in a good state right now. Several shady apps are operating openly on the chain, and the biggest red flag to me is: @blackhaven. I’ll try to explain this most simple way possible: 1. Blackhaven initially marketed itself as the “first ICO” on MegaETH and opened registration for the $HVN presale through Sonar. 2. Shortly after, the team disappeared for nearly two months. Their last activity was on February 17, and they only returned on April 30 to announce that the ICO would be cancelled in favor of a different launch model. 3. On May 2, a token called $RBT suddenly appeared on the market. Multiple wallets had already accumulated large positions before any official public announcement was made. 4. More than 30 minutes later, Blackhaven officially announced that the app was live. By that point, $RBT had already been actively trading for a while. 5. After the announcement, MegaETH users began using the app and “BOND” their $USDm into a token that had already been accumulated cheaply by early wallets. 6. In reality, the “BOND” here basically means "BUY" into the market plus a time lock. The front-end UI was highly misleading. 7. The community was never properly educated beforehand on how the mechanism actually worked. Most users believed they were early participants locking funds in exchange for discounted tokens. To be fair, a 15% discount for a 30-day lock sounded extremely attractive. Yes, people fell for it. 8. The token price eventually surged above $30, then these shady early wallets began heavily dumping. Some wallets made profits of up to $45,000, while community funds remained locked. 9. If the team had good intentions, they could have clearly explained the flywheel and launch structure from the start. Instead, critical details were hidden inside a single document link that most users never even noticed. To me, that reflects malicious intent. 10. The community raised concerns across X, Telegram, and Discord, but the situation was handled very poorly, leading to even more victims. 11. Blackhaven then disappeared again for four days before returning on May 6 with an “educational thread.” By then, the damage had already been done. It felt more like damage control. 12. The token price has now fallen roughly 500% from the levels where many community members bought in. 13. Users who bonded their funds will only receive their $RBT tokens after 7–30 days, and the value will be based on the market price. MegaETH seriously needs stronger quality control and better user protection before allowing projects like this to operate within the ecosystem. All of this controversy, damage, and loss of trust happened for barely $300K+ TVL. That is simply not worth damaging the MegaETH brand over. I realized this is a long read. If you reach this point, thank you. 🙏 The left picture is some of the community's loss. The right picture is the shady wallet's profit.

English
0
0
0
53
Zack Jamplin retweetledi
votesa ■
votesa ■@votesa·
Blackhaven on @megaeth literally encoded a soft rug into their bond contract every @blackhaven bond auto-routes 10% of your USDm to a wallet the team spends "at their sole discretion" not my words. their docs. the actual mechanic: → you bond USDm, get RBT vested over a fixed term → 90% flows to backing reserves (the part that secures RBT) → 10% flows to a separate "protocol reserves" fee address → from there, quote, "core contributors will transfer out the fees... based on operational needs at their sole discretion" translation for normal humans: a multisig the team treats as an expense account. no DAO. no vote. no vest. no cap. no public ledger of what gets pulled or when. every 10M of TVL = 1M straight to the team. zero accountability. pure greed. i had to re-read this three times. ten percent. of the body of the deposit. not of yield, not of fees, not of profits. of the principal. who signs off on this?? and the whole thing is wrapped in MegaETH points fomo. "bond your stables, farm ecosystem points, get the airdrop bro." the points are the cheese. the 10% skim is the price you pay for sniffing them. cherry on top: their main price defense (BAM, the arb module that buys back RBT below NAV) is "not guaranteed to be live at launch." direct quote. so the team is already collecting their cut while the actual stability mechanic doesn't even exist yet. for context: even OlympusDAO, the OG bonding protocol that everyone called a ponzi, never took a 10% cut of principal to a discretionary team wallet. their fees ran through DAO governance. and the part that genuinely stings: this is the protocol getting positioned as MegaETH's "reserve layer." this is what the chain wants to be known for? NGMI for MegaETH.
votesa ■ tweet media
English
25
13
167
31.9K
Zack Jamplin
Zack Jamplin@ZackJamplin·
@cosmoshub Fun fact: when Skip were acquired Tarun said he wrote his Skip angel check to zero because Cosmos is a zero and they do not stand a chance. He’s happy to take some cash out of the treasury though.
English
0
0
0
15
munch.mega
munch.mega@munchPRMR·
Anyone know why MegaETH is pumping so hard ?
munch.mega tweet media
English
39
3
123
14K
Zack Jamplin
Zack Jamplin@ZackJamplin·
weird that all the Sunny shills trying to vilify Cosmos Labs while it’s clear as day that sunny is the one who is straight rugging here
GIF
Cryptovert 3.0@Cryptogripped

#cosmos's main dex, the first to show us the power of IBC is now a to become a shell. Sunny and his team are tapping out. #cosmos penny-pinchers complained about the cost; This time the question is how much will it cost the #cosmos without a functioning dex?

English
0
0
0
33