bread.mega

40K posts

bread.mega banner
bread.mega

bread.mega

@bread_

@megaeth | @modernmarket_ | Grab a .mega: @dotmegadomains

onchain Katılım Ekim 2021
2.5K Takip Edilen58.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
We don't have enough quality blockspace.
English
11
1
60
12K
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
@machiuwuowo @0x_ultra It's all fun and games until the next update forces you to re-learn how to flash and install whatever 13-layer customizations you did so that you could get Courier New font on your notifications 🥲
English
1
0
3
95
machi the cat
machi the cat@machiuwuowo·
@0x_ultra i had fun installing every single custom rom on android back then but i doubt i would feel the same excitement now some things are better to be kept as memories
English
2
0
7
1.8K
ultra
ultra@0x_ultra·
you guys don't understand how exciting this is the jailbreaking scene has been semi dead with the last real bootROM exploit being checkm8 on iPhone X that was 2019, 7 YEARS AGO usbliter8 might lead to another full bootROM exploit based jailbreak for A12/A13 chips, which means up to iOS 27+! in the claude era this will bring a real resurgence of creativity to ios tweaks are coming back. sileo is coming back. the whole space is coming back and ill be honest this one is personal. i got into coding as a kid building tweaks. this space shaped me and seeing it come back feels like coming home
ultra tweet media
zip@zippgod24

Nice find with the usb controller modified the code no pi / pico required Mac and lighting cable demote with wvalue_sweep and ack

English
22
37
557
66K
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
The real-time blocks cannot (for EVM L1). Block time there is a function of consensus which is a function of RTT of node messaging. SVM already streams with shreds but has to deal with consensus impacts after that fact which make guarantees slightly weaker on those tx. Native oracles can definitely have some parallels but the specific implementation we have might be harder to achieve. I think that's fair.
English
1
0
0
37
MR.LIN 霖先生
MR.LIN 霖先生@BTCLIN·
MegaETH Terminal的失敗是路人皆知了 但我沒想到 @megaeth 居然也是玩這套來噁心用戶 獎勵切香腸一樣的給一半,也就算了 要人家去用他的什麼 MOSS 錢包掛登記 但不管是在電腦內生成的錢包地址還是用 account.megaeth所生成的地址 均出現以下錯誤 🤡 @bread_ y'all trynna play us like this?
MR.LIN 霖先生 tweet media
中文
5
0
10
3.9K
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
@BTCLIN @megaeth If you have one, sure. Don't buy one for it though - we anticipate having the Samsung fix in place relatively soon
English
1
0
4
259
MR.LIN 霖先生
MR.LIN 霖先生@BTCLIN·
@bread_ @megaeth I am using a Samsung phone for the passkey. So the current immediate fix is to use an iPhone instead?
English
1
0
0
332
banterlytics
banterlytics@banterlytics·
@bread_ @AzFlin can mega do that for MOSS? it takes 10 sec on moss to get quote on swap tab.
English
1
0
0
120
AzFlin 🗿
AzFlin 🗿@AzFlin·
“We have sub 10ms block times” But oh wait … an HTTP request is usually 300ms+ Hmmm 🤔
AzFlin 🗿 tweet media
barthazian.eth 巴特@Barthazian

my main gripe with the megaeth eco is almost all the dapps ive used other than @Euphoria_fi dont display the chain prowess of realtime, the front ends lag behind the chain so bad that it still feels like im still transacting on an L2. looking forward to the cohort of dapps and devs that come on exclusivly to explore the uniqe infra, we have enough copy paste products on L2s, give us that blazing fast experiments.

English
26
3
78
19.4K
Anomico
Anomico@Anomico5·
@bread_ @lex_node Bread, almost every dev who has built on Mega, apart from like 4, have either left or feel hung out to dry (and are willing to share their exp, either on the tl or dms). You guys have pushed your investors and main user base away. These aren't the fights you should be having rn
English
1
0
1
161
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
I'd classify Mega as its own category. (4) Generalized execution environment that implementation L2-only features to enhance the env [native oracle, real-time blocks, proximity markets] None of those features can be implemented as an L1, and all of those features lift the entire execution environment. Something accessible to all apps building on the chain and not solely things we decide to build. There is a material, structural difference between what we are + willing to implement that an L1 simply does not have the option to. Will take awhile but it'll show up.
_gabrielShapir0@lex_node

at this point there are two pmfs for L2s and one cuspy potential third pmf: (1) vertically integrated appchain (Hyperliquid) (2) chain distribution arm of a large corporate (Base) (3) skunkworks/reference implementations for corporates wanting to do #2 (arbitrum, zksync) MegaETH is pretty smart to pursue #1 at this point imo and maybe should've been doing that all along...

English
8
2
62
11.2K
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
@lex_node I'm going to chalk this up to text-convo being misconstrued. I honestly wasn't intended to make any of this a dunk - was just generally talking about tech definitions. I don't consider us an appchain and was saying why I thought that was the case. Sorry dude
English
2
0
1
539
_gabrielShapir0
_gabrielShapir0@lex_node·
bro please, I dumped $75k into MEGA and am one of the only fully locked holders, I don't need to be arguing with one of the team members that a blue sky is actually green as a 'correction' to a post where I was trying to defend your decisions while the entire timeline criticizes you
English
1
0
8
355
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
L2Beat seems to agree with me 🤷‍♂️ "A rollup that supports only a certain type of application or functionality. For example, a rollup that supports only ETH and ERC20 token transfers, or DEX swaps. This is in contrast to general-purpose rollups which support arbitrary computations." #application-specific-rollup" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">l2beat.com/glossary#appli
English
2
0
0
293
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
We're talking different components, and even what you're referring to has a credible path to being permissionless and public. MegaEVM: public github.com/megaeth-labs/m… Our stateless validator: also public github.com/megaeth-labs/s… Our database architecture: also public github.com/megaeth-labs/s… I just had my agent deploy a smartcontract to the chain while drafting this response (because it's public): mega.etherscan.io/tx/0x637a27ddb… That's the same execution environment anyone can operate from. Forced inclusion works on mainnet, and has worked since before mainnet launched: x.com/poptyedev/stat… I consider appchains restricted ledgers. You cannot deploy a random AMM or ponzu on HyperCORE ledger - because it is permissioned + private.
Crypto Safe@poptyedev

mega-swap-from-l1.poptyedev.com/xK9mZp4QwL7nYh… MegaETH Swap: Trade on MegaETH from L1 Buy and sell meme tokens on MegaETH directly from Ethereum mainnet. No bridging needed - just sign a single transaction and your swap executes on L2. Buy: Send ETH from L1 → receive tokens on MegaETH Sell: Approve once, then swap tokens → receive ETH on MegaETH All transactions are processed via the L1 Portal deposit system. Swaps typically confirm within 18-20 minutes. x.com/poptyedev/stat…

English
1
0
1
493
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
We are, but I consider an appchain something that is source-closed and/or permissioned. So yes, we will have 1st party apps, but no, it's not a restricted/permissioned execution environment. Could be splitting hairs but I think HyperCORE being permissioned allows for the appchain conversation there even though it too is sometimes just considered a chain. Just like Lighter - currently an appchain because it's just a single app with a permissioned ledger underneath it. Toly ripped Percolator onchain - doesn't make Solana an appchain.
English
2
0
2
859
_gabrielShapir0
_gabrielShapir0@lex_node·
@bread_ I thought you guys are focusing on developing first-party apps? That makes you an appchain primarily. I also think it's the right strategy Pretty much every chain is 'general purpose execution environment' but that doesn't describe the biz strategy.
English
1
0
10
1.2K
Stanislav Cifka
Stanislav Cifka@StanCifka·
We have worked with @megaeth for 18 months and my experience is very similar. Sorry to hear. It’s really bad feeling if you promise something to your community based on promise MEGa gave you and you can not deliver. I have the same problem😕
Shiro ˖◛⁺⑅♡@shiro57102

I can’t stand watching people speak with absolute entitlement about situations they really know nothing about. I feel like I’ve stayed quiet long enough. The constant disrespect, the daily assumption that my silence equals to weakness, it’s become unbearable. Not just for me, but for everyone who actually believes in me and trusts me. I did not “leverage” Megaeth to mint out Netizens. It was the other way around. So if you think this, stop being delusional and so incredibly disrespectful, i've had enough. Let me be crystal clear: the team reached out to me in October and asked if I could launch something on @megaeth because they were “not satisfied with the NFT projects that were already on the chain, in terms of taste and culture”. It appeared to be very clear since the beginning how netizens could’ve been a great opportunity for the ecosystem to flourish. We were defined as the key to reach a new audience and stop stagnating. We were supposed to be the catalyst and the first brick for a new cultural development and the mint itself was meant to be an event of wider adoption. My aim was, from the start, to create a space where people could feel part of something for the first time, welcome as their unfiltered selves. Just pure art, pure culture. I believed in Mega, and I trusted their team with my work, my reputation and my efforts. But it didn’t take long for them to show their real nature. Mainnet was supposed to launch in November. I worked night and day, without breaks, to meet the deadline, only for the launch to be delayed repeatedly without proper notice (mid-November, late November, early December, and so on, until February). The constant disorganization and inconsistent communication made everything incredibly difficult. We had to coordinate an entire project under uncertainty, which even prevented us from announcing a firm mint date until the very last minute. I poured my soul into Netizens because that’s what I always do and I thought we all shared the same mission. Despite all the sugarcoated praise, they were, in reality, not ready to embrace the kind of culture they were asking for, and that we finally brought. Instead of trusting the vision, they chose mediocrity and neutrality. They let people attack me daily, calling me a scammer, undermining everything while I was doing all in my power to make the chain look good. All our efforts felt invisible. Promises were constantly made and broken. We were used for attention and clout, then quietly discarded every time any existing “community” felt threatened by something superior and actually relevant outside their small bubble. I was lied to countless times, the team was clearly not coherent or transparent with us and it started being obvious how they were just promising the same exact things to everyone else. Every time we raised real issues, we were either ignored for days or given empty reassurances that solved nothing. I had made it clear that I would rather leave than stay where I felt unwanted and unappreciated. I thought they understood. I’m no longer sure they ever did. Four days before launch, I was still questioning whether the mint should even happen, given the terrible state of the chain. When I shared my doubts with the team I was told “it’ll be fine because you’re you.” I was then called delusional for thinking netizens looked to me like the only reason for people to come to mega. Turns out the delusional ones were them. They couldn’t even sit still and let the magic happen. Couldn’t trust. Couldn’t support. And especially could not protect the few projects they themselves said deserved it, even up to today. Instead, they enabled the noise, the yes men, the total NPC behavior, all while claiming to be pro-innovation “gen-Zers”. However, It’s ironic how the same people who watched me get disrespected in silence suddenly praised me after we successfully minted out or after I worked at the EF mandate. After all these months passed, the team has gone silent, they haven’t done anything for netizens if not disappointing us. On top of all they’ve acted as if we brought nothing to the chain, turning all my work to dust. As if Netizens mint didn’t bring an insane momentum, that they were not able to make the most of. I’m exhausted from taking the blame for other people’s mistakes. Most atrocious of all, we were never even warned about Terminal shutting down, despite it directly affecting us. Terminal was always presented as our flywheel. We were told to push it hard to our community, it should’ve been our main focus for the future. Guess what? They just let us down again, empty handed. Because they lied to us, we ended up lying to our community. When we questioned about their plans after Terminal ended, they lightheartedly said, “Oh well, we don’t have any plans for NFTs!” It feels like all my efforts were wasted. I feel fooled and disrespected. They leveraged my reputation and my name for their benefit, without any regard for the consequences on me or the people who trusted me. It’s simple soulless behavior. To those who still think they can have a word on this, double check your sources. Question what you’re told. I defended myself when people painted me as the villain for simply pushing back against lies. I was told to stay quiet “to avoid conflict.” As if the internet wasn’t built on friction, on real time conversation, on calling out what’s broken. As if I could just pretend all those words didn’t break my heart. I refuse to waste any more energy trying to save people who don’t want to be saved, as much as I refuse to be disrespected further. I have more important things to do. I have to draw. And that’s irrelevant for so many people But its so relevant for me. And hopefully, I can still do something good for everyone That’s all I’ve always hoped for. You will not bring me down, ever If there’s something that will outlive this, is my art. Forever. Let it be a scar. congrats on fumbling something genuinely special. The curse is real. Have fun dealing with the consequences. @megaeth

English
26
2
201
68.2K
as required.
as required.@0xasrequired·
fair enough, but I think the foundation should really push it as the premier primitive on the chain it's difficult to figure out that it does spot as well, on first pass, it looks like some weird perp dex that uses a lending market to provide leverage imo there should be a clearer separation between perps and spot, for example account margin and risk of liq shows up on the spot tab too. I guess this is required if wcm does portfolio margin, but it just has this intangible jankiness to it. I think hypercore does a better job of combining spot and perps is @worldmarketsinc integrated into aggregators and lending market liq bots? This composability is the primary unlock for fully onchain CLOBs on general purpose chains because it means that they only need to worry about liquidity because taker volume comes for free with ambient aggregator and liq orderflow another small tip: they should clamp the orderbook UI price range to the lowest and highest liquidity blocks to mask the thin liquidity rn, otherwise a user would be put off by the empty space on the book. This is what hypercore does
as required. tweet mediaas required. tweet media
English
2
0
3
170
bread.mega
bread.mega@bread_·
That's a structural problem with the HL eco + chain more than commentary on on the strategy. Ventuals is just a powerlaw outcome and is ~normal for any successful sector. Uniswap has killed off thousands of other DEX at this point - it just happens for something where success is largely determinant on things that "beget" one another (like liquidity). Non-core failures are downstream of the execution environment of hevm not being consumer friendly at all on its own (slow blocks, low gas, etc). Our execution environment is magnitudes beyond the landscape for teams willing to take advantage of it and those apps will/should be able to stand on their own once in place. Nothing is stopping them, and the difference is anything we build could have always been built by any other team because it's using the exact same programmable blockspace.
English
0
0
3
104
Beiu
Beiu@0xbeiu·
@lex_node we see a problem even with the hyperliquid appchain thesis most apps are launching, users come for speculation and when incentives stop the apps eventually shutdown (ventuals is the latest example)
English
3
0
6
862
Beiu
Beiu@0xbeiu·
MegaETH is gone (the way we knew it) It looks like a web 2 startup now, at least to me - happy to be proven wrong All the NFTs circus is futile - they don't care abt it more than a user with a 10$ investment All the talk about the chain becomes less relevant to me Let's see if the team will build some in-house apps that can run It's all about specific apps now: For us, the users, where we can have an edge an earn from it For the team, where they can go to market - because as of now, crypto looks dry and web 2 doesn't seem interested in what crypto natives build Crypto culture and the community look like a thing of the past
English
20
2
69
9.2K
Fman
Fman@feynyman·
@bread_ many such cases lol
English
1
0
1
66
Fman
Fman@feynyman·
Sometimes people send me stuff and say "my agent did this" like it completely absolves them of responsibility for the quality of the work. If you can't properly evaluate your AI's work and are blindly sending people slop then that reflects poorly on you, not your agent
English
1
0
3
383