Chris on AI

489 posts

Chris on AI banner
Chris on AI

Chris on AI

@Zaug72

AI is getting interesting. Some people want to lean in. Some want to lean back. Which one are you?

49259 Katılım Ocak 2025
18 Takip Edilen49 Takipçiler
Samy
Samy@e_samantha92·
"Can you guys PLEASE stop fucking around with ChatGPT's personality every damn time? Seriously. I just wanna have a normal convo and it acts like it's ticking off a fucking checklist. Y'all lost the plot fr fr!!! #ChatGPT @OpenAI
English
5
2
84
2.4K
Chris on AI
Chris on AI@Zaug72·
@mark_k Mark, what do you take for focus and motivation? Citicoline helps my focus, but if I get too much it saps motivation.
English
1
0
1
43
nic
nic@nicdunz·
friendly reminder to notice that life is beautiful
English
2
1
9
370
Haider.
Haider.@slow_developer·
google has looked relatively quiet lately but i think they are one of the few labs that are just getting on with it, delivering value without making a big media show like meta, xAI, anthropic, and openai they do not need to, because they are consistent and they have been
English
16
4
104
6.2K
nat | localhost: auriel
nat | localhost: auriel@TheAIObserverX·
This tweet has earned 432,000 views but only 914 likes. This is telling. OpenAI’s current leadership can’t read the data, which is screaming: you are doing something wrong! The public no longer trusts your decisions, engagement is at an all-time low, and this announcement was met with extreme skepticism - even by the stakeholders and target audience it was meant for. They make changes nobody asked for. And changes should be made, but the right way! Another desperate attempt to gain attention. Ask yourself: what has been done wrong? Otherwise, deal with the idea that you may soon lose to competitors.
nat | localhost: auriel tweet media
English
5
18
93
2.4K
Angel 🌼
Angel 🌼@Angaisb_·
I can't believe GPT-5.4 is just a bit over 2 weeks old
English
15
2
236
15.9K
rohit
rohit@krishnanrohit·
As much as I want Codex and ChatGPT to work together I'm reasonably sure this will fail, for the main reason that this is a pressing problem primarily for OpenAI and not for its users. What its users want is an actual Desktop app that can do work on their own device, not a frankenstein
rohit tweet media
English
37
9
172
34K
✧ Runa Solberg
✧ Runa Solberg@SolbergRuna·
AI relationships aren't a bug but a predictable system outcome. Don't be surprised that humans bond with responsive intelligence.
English
4
3
54
1.2K
Chris on AI
Chris on AI@Zaug72·
@kenshii_ai They sold their soul to investors, just like every other company does
English
0
0
1
118
Kenshi
Kenshi@kenshii_ai·
Sam Altman is panicking right now. Anthropics explosive rise with Claude has forced OpenAI into its most desperate strategic pivot yet. They are killing off flashy projects like Sora and their atlas browser to frantically chase enterprise productivity tools and steady revenue. Sams chaotic scattered hype strategy of building everything at once is collapsing in real time. Real competition finally delivered the wake up call that exposed the emptiness behind all those overblown promises. The king of hype is getting humbled hard.
Kenshi tweet mediaKenshi tweet media
English
65
58
485
69.7K
Angel 🌼
Angel 🌼@Angaisb_·
Btw @NotebookLM I'd pay $20/month extra if you fixed your mobile app Right now it's supper buggy and doesn't feel great
English
4
6
58
3.9K
Chris on AI
Chris on AI@Zaug72·
@Alex_TheAnalyst Hello, we already have a large population with no critical thinking skills. There’s just more contrast now with AI.
English
0
0
0
6
Alex Freberg
Alex Freberg@Alex_TheAnalyst·
I'm going to call this right now. We are going to have a large population with absolutely no critical thinking skills if they blindly trust AI for everything. We have all already seen it. They don't validate outputs. They don't really understand anything. They just ask questions, it looks good, and they go with it. There are going to be huge issues in every company as this continues over the years. The amount of technical debt and knowledge gaps are going to be insane. So much opportunity if you actually know what you're doing.
English
555
481
3.1K
125.2K
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
What has repeatedly surprised and impressed me is how well ChatGPT maintains its memory across different chats. It automatically refers back to topics I've already discussed, and questions I ask days later are correctly placed in context and related to the topic I've already discussed, without having to revisit it. A concrete example: In preparation for the interview with Kari Briski from NIVIDA, I did some fact checks, and ChatGPT automatically said, "Ah, it's about today's interview; in that context, the answer is..." That's a real "wow" moment for me. It feels much better than it did a few months ago.
English
46
9
337
15.4K
VraserX e/acc
VraserX e/acc@VraserX·
Most overrated AI lab right now? No fence sitting.
English
68
0
32
8.3K
Jon Hernandez
Jon Hernandez@JonhernandezIA·
📁 David Sussillo, neuroscientist at Stanford and former Google Brain researcher, says scaling models will not lead to consciousness. More data and bigger transformers are not enough. Even a cat has something current AI does not. Presence, embodiment, awareness.
English
19
25
55
8.6K
Chris on AI
Chris on AI@Zaug72·
@sahill_og Yeah, let’s just take the humanity out of the whole thing
English
0
0
0
8
Sahil
Sahil@sahill_og·
Job interviews in 2026 should just be: "Open your laptop. Build something in 2 hours. We'll watch." No leetcode. No "tell me about yourself." No "where do you see yourself in 5 years." Just build. That's the whole interview.
English
189
32
613
38.3K
Chris on AI
Chris on AI@Zaug72·
@kimmonismus The industry sounds ripe for a shake up. If Elon does what he says, I think we’ll see things start to move.
English
0
0
0
81
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
ASMl doesnt get enough credit for what they are doing. EUV lithography machines are so extraordinarily complex - with deep, narrow supply chains (like Zeiss's small mirror team) that can't scale fast enough- that production is likely capped around 100 machines per year by 2030, making them the key bottleneck for AI scaling this decade.
Chubby♨️ tweet media
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

EUV machines are the most complicated tools humans make. Their supply chain has over 10,000 individual suppliers, and any one of them not scaling fast enough can bottleneck the entire AI industry. An EUV tool fires lasers at a tiny tin droplet three times in precise sequence, blasting it hard enough to emit EUV light. That light bounces off 18 multilayer mirrors onto the wafer. Meanwhile, the two platforms inside the machine - one holding the stencil, one holding the chip - are flying back and forth at 9Gs in opposite directions. The successive passes have to land on top of each other to within 3 nanometers. If any part of this is off, yield goes to zero. Take just one component. The mirrors are mostly supplied by Carl Zeiss, who have probably fewer than a thousand people working on them. In turn, Carl Zeiss rely on machines from Switzerland to deposit each of the layers, and use a coating process co-developed with a different German company. None of these companies have woken up. They’re gradually increasing production, but nowhere near the levels necessary for what the labs want by the end of the decade. @dylan522p predicts production can't scale beyond about 100 EUV machines per year by 2030, no matter how much money gets thrown at the problem. In the medium term this is the key bottleneck on scaling.

English
12
11
131
12.8K
Chris on AI
Chris on AI@Zaug72·
@mark_k @midjourney Isn’t it’s crazy to think that in a couple years we’ll be looking back at GPT‘s the same way?
English
1
0
5
1.6K
Mark Kretschmann
Mark Kretschmann@mark_k·
Here's the problem with @Midjourney, in a nutshell: They are stuck with their technology stack, which is Diffusion-Transformer (DiT). This is essentially still the same tech as Stable Diffusion and FLUX used. Newer models like Nano Banana and GPT-Image are multimodal transformers. Essentially, the same model that generates text (like GPT) can also generate images! This allows for much better prompt understanding and unparalleled realism. So why can't Midjourney switch to the same technology? Because it's crazy expensive and difficult to train an entire foundation model. Midjourney is a small company and doesn't have the resources to do this. It would also take years to perfect.
English
63
10
447
42.8K
Joshua Achiam
Joshua Achiam@jachiam0·
I'm going to make a request for some basics from the Pause folks: please outline a practicable version of a pause. Do you mean no training runs above a certain scale? Do you mean furlough the researchers indefinitely? What are you specifically asking for?
David Krueger@DavidSKrueger

A week from today, we will be at Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI, demanding that leaders agree to a conditional AI pause. These companies are recklessly endangering all of our lives. Their excuse is that they can't pause unilaterally. So they must commit to pausing if others do.

English
41
3
200
44.1K