Zee Strong

@PopularLiberal This is Dan 👇🏻

MASSIVE BOMBSHELL: DAN GOLDMAN UNLEASHES TRUTH! Congressman Goldman just went live with FBI 302 receipts. Evidence shows Trump unzipped his pants, forced a 13-year-old’s head down, and when she bit his p*nis in self-defense, he punched her and called her a "B." The FBI interviewed her FOUR times while the case was buried. Pam Bondi lied to Congress, claiming “no evidence” of these crimes while sitting on files describing this exact assault. This is perjury and a cover-up for a predator. You don’t get to "save the kids" while your AG hides files of a child being beaten for fighting back. History will remember the enablers. We stand with the children who bit back.

@LangmanVince @Deidra8378021

These are the people who honestly believe they can take over the MAGA movement 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@richardosefton This is Richard 👇🏻

The man RAPED CHILDREN. LITTLE GIRLS. HE TOOK THEIR INNOCENCE AND WRECKED THEIR LIVES.

@ginamilan_ @AndrewJ9J

Candace Owens you’re a delusional bitch. Seek fucking mental help.

Today Be... @BarbyIngle @iPainOfficial

Today's I Am since @BarbyIngle ask...

Today Be... @BarbyIngle @iPainOfficial

Today's I Am since @BarbyIngle ask...

MAGA is dead Mark Levin is a traitor Ben Shapiro doesn’t speak for us This movement is over Never Vance. Never Rubio. America First

@CarriePrejean1 @sonni_hansen

MAGA IS DEAD

Do you still support Tucker Carlson or do you think he is a traitor?

@mtgreenee Maybe you're the one with the micro penis with that blonde butch body

I wholeheartedly support Megyn Kelly telling the world that Mark Levin has a micropenis. It’s the most deserved insult and I don’t care if it’s vulgar. And Trump’s gigantic defense of Levin only enraged the base more. People are DONE. MAGA destroyed by micropenis Mark Levin.

@mtgreenee You're Pond Scum nothing more

@alicebl29219301 @DEFendFURiously Stop watching The View Alice

@DEFendFURiously I hate this man with a different type of hate.. so bad I’m sure god forgives for it😡😡😡😡😡

Am I the only one who thinks this multiple times a day, "I hope he strokes out, falls off the top landing of the stairs when he gets out of his plane, or maybe chokes on a hamberder?" I mean, ANY. WAY. WILL. DO.

@DEFendFURiously Liberals are sick in the fukn head

“Do you believe that the Epstein files may have had something to do with Charlie Kirk’s assassination?” Wait, I thought Charlie was murdered so we could start WWIII with Iran for Israel?

@PamBaker1414 Without Fake/False Narratives Democrats Have No Narrative

Finally Trump's Fake war to distract the Epstein Files has backfired! SCJ'S will not give Trump immunity! Thx u Lord!

No, this claim is not true. It’s a piece of misinformation that’s been circulating on social media, often accompanied by a graphic or meme. There has been no 2026 Supreme Court decision ruling against absolute immunity for Donald Trump specifically in any “Epstein case” (referring to matters involving Jeffrey Epstein). No such case is currently before the Court, and no ruling has been issued this year on the topic. For context, the Supreme Court’s most recent (and relevant) decision on presidential immunity was in July 2024, in the case Trump v. United States. In that ruling, the Court held that former presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts within their core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision stemmed from federal charges related to the 2020 election, not anything tied to Epstein. Regarding Epstein-related matters, unsealed court documents from past civil cases have mentioned Trump (along with many others), but he has not been charged with any crimes in connection to Epstein, and there’s no ongoing criminal case against him on that front that would involve a new immunity ruling. Claims like the one you’re asking about appear to be fabricated or exaggerated for engagement, as seen in viral posts and dubious online sources, but they’re not supported by any credible reporting or official Court records.

@PamBaker1414 @SKraenzlei82443 Just curious as to how Uncle Tom, Clarence Thomas, voted bc his name is also in the Epstein files.

No, this claim is not true. It’s a piece of misinformation that’s been circulating on social media, often accompanied by a graphic or meme. There has been no 2026 Supreme Court decision ruling against absolute immunity for Donald Trump specifically in any “Epstein case” (referring to matters involving Jeffrey Epstein). No such case is currently before the Court, and no ruling has been issued this year on the topic. For context, the Supreme Court’s most recent (and relevant) decision on presidential immunity was in July 2024, in the case Trump v. United States. In that ruling, the Court held that former presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts within their core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision stemmed from federal charges related to the 2020 election, not anything tied to Epstein. Regarding Epstein-related matters, unsealed court documents from past civil cases have mentioned Trump (along with many others), but he has not been charged with any crimes in connection to Epstein, and there’s no ongoing criminal case against him on that front that would involve a new immunity ruling. Claims like the one you’re asking about appear to be fabricated or exaggerated for engagement, as seen in viral posts and dubious online sources, but they’re not supported by any credible reporting or official Court records.

@PamBaker1414 Hot 🥵 Dam‼️ how will Iran deal with foreign countries wanting to negotiate independently of the Whitehouse! The @SCOTUSblog decision is HUGE! Trump is likely to go off the rails because of it! Get The 25th Amendment ready🫡 bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

No, this claim is not true. It’s a piece of misinformation that’s been circulating on social media, often accompanied by a graphic or meme. There has been no 2026 Supreme Court decision ruling against absolute immunity for Donald Trump specifically in any “Epstein case” (referring to matters involving Jeffrey Epstein). No such case is currently before the Court, and no ruling has been issued this year on the topic. For context, the Supreme Court’s most recent (and relevant) decision on presidential immunity was in July 2024, in the case Trump v. United States. In that ruling, the Court held that former presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts within their core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision stemmed from federal charges related to the 2020 election, not anything tied to Epstein. Regarding Epstein-related matters, unsealed court documents from past civil cases have mentioned Trump (along with many others), but he has not been charged with any crimes in connection to Epstein, and there’s no ongoing criminal case against him on that front that would involve a new immunity ruling. Claims like the one you’re asking about appear to be fabricated or exaggerated for engagement, as seen in viral posts and dubious online sources, but they’re not supported by any credible reporting or official Court records.

@PamBaker1414 SCOTUS realizes the Iran War may well spin out of control