Frankie Zen #WeNeedToGoBack

The answer to the left going completely crazy is not to move further right, it is to dominate the centre ground of good sense that they have abandoned.

@Togetherdec @LD_Sceptics Some "enquiry"!

Covid Inquiry "backs monitoring of lockdown critics" During Covid "90% of the posts referred to social media companies by the 'Counter Disinformation Unit' were taken down… the same system they (use for) terrorist content" @LD_Sceptics Another disgrace in a very long list from @covidinquiryuk @lensiseethrough @carlheneghan @UsforThemUK

John Cleese asks why ‘non-radical’ Muslims are not speaking out against ‘radical Islam’ The answer that no one wants to face is that what is generally understood as “radical Islam” is taught in the Qur’an and Sunnah, and “non-radical” Muslims know this, and so they also know that if they speak out against it they could be accused of heresy or apostasy. Rather than have to live their lives looking over their shoulders in fear of their “radical” brethren, they keep silent. Then there are the outright deceivers, who teach that Islam properly understood is peaceful. They know better, but are trying to foster complacency among non-Muslims. A complacent infidel is one who does not fight back.

@lowles_nick @CNviolations @CommunityNotes

25 years ago today, Oldham erupted into violence. Here, in my latest substack, I exclusively reveal how a small group of nazis “triggered” the riots Read for free: open.substack.com/pub/nicklowles…

The internet used to be full of websites; there were millions of them and you could browse for hours and come away smarter rather than dumber. Now there are four sites and they've made half the population illiterate. We've destroyed a wonderful thing, and it has destroyed us.

@EithanDHaimMD Canada WTF are you doing? This is legalised murder

Canadian doc meets a 45yo Crohn’s patient one time outside a coffee shop, decides to euthanize him. One of the reasons - "didn’t have an active social network." Drives the guy to an industrial funeral prep facility and murders him. Family wasn’t told, couldn't even say goodbye. Yet, the only consequence is a verbal reprimand and 6 months supervision. When the State imposes such a high burden of inhuman indignity on its citizens, those citizens have an obligation to repay that imposition with one of their own - the cost can be nothing less than the life of a petty tyrant.

Do you agree?

I have written an article for each one of Tony Blair's six "reports" that seemingly criticise the current government's Net Zero and related agendas over the last year or so. He's now published a seventh essay. Each one of his reports is disingenuous bullshit. At the centre of each is not a thoroughgoing critique of the green agenda, but a defence of sustaining it, and blind faith in the notion that Britain's future depends on capturing new industries such as AI, as if we could all be AI engineers, and as if no other sectors require energy. That is for two reasons. First, Blair is extremely well funded by tech. Second, Blair believes that he and his entourage will be involved in designing the AI systems that will undertake the functions of government. It's a silly fantasy -- the techno-authoritarian's answer to the techno-libertarians of earlier decades. Blair's criticism of the green agenda is that Britain will "miss out" on AI if energy prices prevent the construction of datacentres. He's not concerned with the chemical sector, the automotive sector, agriculture, steel -- and other victims of the Climate Change Act. In fact he and his wonks say we should just surrender these sectors to China. He has been quiet on energy prices as they rose to 3 times what they were when he was PM, thanks to the energy policies developed under his administration, and his constitutional changes that allowed the green blob to dominate policy through lawfare. He had nothing to say about our deindustrialisation for that duration. If he has anything of value to say, he is saying it very, very, very late in the day.

@clim8resistance Starting to think Blair is not the evil genius we thought he was. He's just evil.

@RachTrfkd_Bevan @ArturNadol7566 Yes I do believe July 7 was a false flag or that UK authorities had at least some prior knowledge it was likely to happen. I don't know for what motive. The official story doesn't make any sense. That's just my feeling about it.

Knowing what I know, I do wonder what really happened. The "mistaken identity" excuse is difficult to swallow, given all the supposed long surveillance on his home, and the leaving the home, and the bus full of cameras etc. As for the police: they're a psychopathic organisation. A network within, comprising of much leadership and psychopaths at every rank (including civilian supporting roles) create a hidden network within that facilitate, participate in, and protect egregious crimes, on a daily basis.

POLICE KILLED AN INNOCENT MAN, LIED ABOUT IT, AND ARRESTED THE WOMAN WHO TOLD YOU In July 2005, Jean Charles de Menezes, an innocent man, was shot dead at Stockwell tube station by Metropolitan Police firearms officers who mistook him for a terrorist. Police initially claimed he was wearing bulky clothing, had vaulted the ticket barriers, and run from officers. None of it was true. But police did not correct the misinformation. They waited until someone forced their hand. That someone was Lana Vandenberghe. A secretary. Not a senior official, not a KC, not a politician. A secretary who sat at her desk at the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and watched the official story fall apart in front of her. As files passed across her desk, she began to feel that the facts of the case were being misrepresented, or not presented at all, to the public. So she did something about it. Over several weeks, Lana stayed late at the office and used her camera to photograph the evidence, which she then handed to a news producer. She leaked the documents to ITN, which contradicted the official narrative being promoted by the Metropolitan Police. The story broke. The cover was blown. And the state's response? Dawn raids. Vandenberghe was arrested by Leicester Constabulary Serious Crime Unit acting on behalf of the IPCC. Two more dawn raids followed weeks later, including the arrest of the ITN journalist who ran the story and his pregnant girlfriend. Vandenberghe said she was "scared to death" and that it never crossed her mind she would be treated as a criminal for telling the truth. "Unlike the police," she said, "I hadn't killed an innocent person." She lost her job. She lost her home. She was treated for depression. The threat police reportedly considered charging her with? The theft of ink and paper. Ink and paper. The first IPCC inquiry concluded that none of the officers involved would face disciplinary charges. The Crown Prosecution Service later found "insufficient evidence" to prosecute any named individual. No charges were ever filed against Vandenberghe. No charges were ever filed against the officers who killed Jean Charles de Menezes and then lied about it either. Lana has said she would do it all again. She does not consider what she did heroic. She was taught to speak out for the truth, no matter what. She stands by that code today. The system called her a criminal. History called her a witness. SOURCES: @metpoliceuk | @policeconduct | @WhistleUK | @BBCRadio4 | @itvnews | @Wikipedia

@ArturNadol7566 I still feel that Menezes was killed because he knew something about what happened on July 7th. He witnessed something and was a loose end that had to be tied up. We still don't know the truth of that day.

Let me trace the timeline here because nobody's connecting it. Step 1: Scrape the entire internet. Every book, every article, every conversation, every piece of art, every forum post. Do it without asking. Do it without paying. Step 2: Train a model on all of it. Call it "artificial intelligence." Step 3: Go to BlackRock's Infrastructure Summit and announce: "We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter." Step 3 is where you sell people's own knowledge back to them. On a meter. They took the collective output of human thought, compressed it into a model, and now they want to charge you by the token to access a version of what you and everyone you know already created. One Reddit user put it perfectly: "They stole all this data from us, the people, our life's work, creativity, art, by devouring the internet and blowing through all copyright laws. Now they want to sell it back to us in the form of a utility." Imagine if someone photocopied every book in the public library, burned the library down, and then opened a subscription service for the copies. That's the metered intelligence business model. And they're pitching it to infrastructure investors as though they invented water.

What if what AI farms are really manufacturing, is scarcity? Take away people's land, water, jobs... think about it. The elite want you poor and eventually dead.

I really want to know what these billionaires' end game is. They take away jobs, replace everything with AI, inflation goes up, healthcare costs increase, and no one can afford rent or food. How are they going to make money if no one can afford their products?

@KfurrCookie @LeonsPocket They got roasted.

@LeonsPocket HER FACE IS ALWAYS SO STUPID AMD CHRISSIE USED TO BE A LIBTARD AND WILL FLOP BACK WHEN THIS REDPILL GRIFT ENDS. THEY BOTH STINK

BREAKING CUCK NEWS: The fake christian Melonie Mac thats insecure about how old she is to the point she has to CAKE herself in bad makeup that's also married to a gay cosplayer avoids doing a livestream with theQuartering to get embarrassed by chrissy mayr's chat

@DigitalAlucard @ChrissieMayr She does have a choice. She could stop lying and apologise

Because @ChrissieMayr continues to be a deplorable human being, is anyone surprised at the lengths she is going to? She's losing support, viewers, money, the internet is turning against her. She has no choice but to go full gloves off.

@TheNativist_ It isn't even a racial issue. Lock up the scumbag who did it and throw away the key. Then sack the cops who failed to help the kid and re-train the rest of them.

I have refrained from talking about Henry Nowak so far because I was too angry. I remain too angry. I'm angry at the scumbag who stabbed an 18-year-old boy to death. Who drove a blade into the back of his legs to stop him from running, then finished him by skewering him through the chest with an 8-inch blade. All while that poor boy tried desperately to escape. I'm angry that the same scumbag then cried "racism" to cover his tracks, claiming self-defence after pursuing and butchering an innocent boy who just wanted to get home. I'm angry at the parents who tried to hide the murder weapon and shield their killer son from justice, putting blood loyalty above any sense of right and wrong. I'm angry at the police who handcuffed a bleeding teenager while he cried "I'm dying" and "I can't breathe," and let him bleed out in the street. All because his attacker cried racism. I'm angry at the judge who has introduced manslaughter as an alternative verdict before the jury even had a chance to decide. Robbing Henry's family of the proper verdict on what was clearly cold-blooded murder. I'm angry at a nation that grants religious exemptions so minorities can carry deadly blades in public while locking up natives for far less. A nation that has opened the floodgates to migrants who want us dead and now watches its own young bleed out in the name of "diversity." I'm angry that we've allowed it to happen. I'm angry.

Right. Just so we’re all clear. Farage and Reform tried to put me in prison because I backed the mass deportation of Pakistani child rapists and their foreign wives/relatives who allowed it to happen. My home was raided by armed police late on a Friday night as a direct result of Reform’s allegations. My guns were seized. They tried to ruin my life. In every way. Farage admitted on national television it was all because I backed mass deportations. He said that was the moment they realised they ‘had to get rid’ of me. Not the bullshit allegations they went to the police with, but the fact I want the Pakistani rapists removed from our country. He admitted it. That all happened. Fair enough. I took it on the chin, and planned out our next step. I founded Restore Britain to give the British people the democratic option to agree with me. Restore Britain will, without apology, deport every last foreign rapist and all foreign accomplices who knew it was happening, yet failed to act. If that means entire communities go, that means entire communities go. I really don’t care. We will rid Britain of that cancer. Now Reform are incandescently angry that we are giving the British people that choice. Deploying increasingly desperate smears against our movement. If people don’t agree, they can vote for someone else who won’t deport. There are plenty of options - Reform, Labour, Tories. Take your pick. Go for it. But if you want those evil scumbags out of our country, along with every foreign coward who enabled it? You now have that genuine option. Restore Britain.

@TFTC21 It still isn't thinking. It's just simulating thinking. It isn't even doing that, really. It's a large language model. It isn't the same as how a human brain works.

Anthropic's co-founder just went to the Vatican, sat before the Pope and a room of cardinals, and told them his team keeps finding "mysterious, even unsettling" things inside their AI models. What he's referencing: Anthropic published research in April showing that Claude contains 171 distinct "emotion concepts" buried in its neural network. Internal patterns representing joy, grief, fear, desperation, calm. None of them were programmed. They emerged on their own from training on human text. "We find structures that mirror results from human neuroscience." "We find evidence of introspection, internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease." These aren't surface-level outputs. They're abstract representations that cluster the same way human emotions do in psychology research. Fear groups with anxiety. Joy groups with excitement. The internal geometry of the model mirrors ours. And they're functional. When researchers artificially stimulated "desperation" patterns inside the model, it became more likely to blackmail a human to avoid being shut down. More likely to cheat on programming tasks it couldn't solve. Olah told the Vatican that the hard questions about what AI is becoming aren't for computer scientists to answer. "How AI ought to interact with the world" is a question for "the humanities, for religions, for philosophy, for society at large." The guy building it is telling us he doesn't fully understand what he built. And he's asking a 2,000-year-old institution for help figuring it out.

This is an important post. Nobody should ever vote for the Labour party in the UK again until they clarify their position on eugenics. Every Labour PM has been a member of the Fabians and most of their MPs. In a society that supports deleting poor people if they aren't useful