Zero

To all projects and judges involved in the Big Bang competition, thank you for your hard work. While some projects may be satisfied with the outcome, others may not. However, I would like to share my thoughts for the future of Blast. The judging criteria of Concept, Execution, and being Blast-native were made public. Yet, upon observing the awarded projects, it raises the question of whether these criteria were truly followed in the selection process. Additionally, despite the requirement to submit on GitHub, there seems to be no evidence of judges visiting our GitHub or deeply engaging with the technical depth of our projects, which brings the basis of evaluation into question. It's imperative that the results of each project's evaluation be made public. This is crucial for ensuring the competition's credibility and providing valuable constructive feedback to all participating projects. Should the evaluation process not have been followed or if bias existed, it could cast doubts on the fairness of the upcoming May Airdrop, potentially leading to favoritism towards certain groups. Nonetheless, we fundamentally resonate with Blast's vision and initiated our project to leverage Blast's unique features. They announced; - An airdrop allocation exists for all Dapps that participated in the competition. - The majority of the developer Airdrop will be allocated to Dapps on the mainnet. Believing in this, we remain committed to building on Blast and contributing to its ecosystem.