Dominic Morgan

@AndyBurnhamGM Notice he didn’t say “for the better”

Politics isn’t working for places like ours. I will change that. #AndyBurnham #ForUs

@Femi_sorry I think you need to re-read the subtitles. Seems you missed it.

I will end Judaism. Jews need to leave the UK if they don't obey & assimilate. ⬆️ Hate speech, right? I should be on a list & banned from leading protests, right ? Tommy Robinson said it about Muslims 3 days ago. 👀 Where are the calls to ban his protests?

@Master_Debunker @Bushra1Shaikh Democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression, equality before the law, freedom of religion and association, voting rights, scientific rationalism, meritocracy, intellectual and artistic excellence, high trust/lower corruption societies with working infrastructure….

I've noticed hundreds of comments from British Patriots telling me that it is British culture to mock Jesus and Christianity. To Christians, are you ok with this?

@Bushra1Shaikh Doesn’t matter if they’re ok with it. That’s the point of freedom of expression.

@BBCNews 1. Huge crackdown on immigration, 2. Flood the market with new homes, 3. Incentivise entrepreneurship, 4. Elect politicians who’ve successfully run businesses, 5. No benefits for people with anxiety. 5. Prosecute corporate heads who endanger public safety.

What would make the UK a better place to live? A new project aims to find out bbc.in/4wzyRaL

@lewis_goodall This tells us two things: 1) the left has a very low bar for comms and 2) you’re out of touch.

One of the most effective bits of political communication on the left I’ve seen in a long time. A message and a powerful messenger.

@lewis_goodall Just seems like more of the same middle of the road dreck.

@AyoubKhanMP @metpoliceuk You don’t have a right not to be offended. I don’t think it was in good taste and I wouldn’t have done it personally but I support anybody’s right to mock, criticise and satirise all religions and ideas. That’s part of the deal of living in a free society.

The vile hatred displayed must be confronted not just by the @metpoliceuk but also by all political leaders with legal & moral consistency.

@LinaSeiche Zero specifics, zero data. Broad sweeping statements. Using your right to free speech given to you by the so called first world in order to critique it. Just a guess but you’re probably projecting your own sense of guilt and self dislike onto the external world.

First World arrogance

@linmeitalks Not sure who this guest is but this really lacks vita nuance in both the framing and the answer. Immigrants are not a monolith. So to paint them all as hard working entrepreneurs is disingenuous to put it charitably.

Do immigrants work harder than Brits?? Have Brits got lazy or lost hunger? There should NOT be 5 million people not working, claiming benefits (this doesn’t include those on disability/park time workers) People say there’s no jobs- so how did the last couple of million who entered the U.K. legally get jobs, as they are all working or the majority are. Immigrants tend to come from countries which have no safety net. If they don’t work they don’t eat. This level of hunger and drive is generated by NEED…. No other option. The English/or British rather, used to be like this. I speak to many English business owners and even they prefer to employ a migrant because the work rate is higher and they get the job done faster- less moaning, less sick days, less HR problems… Look at the social care industry - filled with migrants, hospitality, retail, construction etc Do we need to remove some of this safety net to get Britain working again? Subscribe to @atic5036/videos?ra=m" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">m.youtube.com/@atic5036/vide… Full convo out Friday

@linmeitalks I think you’re conflating civic with ethnic nationalism. I’m not sure if you’re doing it on purpose so I’ll give the benefit of the doubt but the key issue is and always has been CULTURE not race.

A question to ethnic minorities only! Is it wrong for British white people to say… Well actually we can see based on birth rates we will be outnumbered in 20-50 years and we don’t want that, so no we don’t want any more migrants of any kind and we want to see policy which strengthens and supports British natives to work harder and have more children.

@jprantac @stats_feed Great movie but not by almodovar.

@stats_feed Wild Tales by Pedro Almodovar.

What’s a 10/10 movie but hardly anyones heard of it?

@eyepodster @khalidi79397 I’d say it’s a mix of jealousy - Wherever Jews have found themselves, they’ve prospered - Plus the human mind’s need to reduce complexity down to a single cause.

@khalidi79397 Unlike nearly every nation in history, the Jews never conquered anybody, never enslaved anybody, never forcibly converted anybody, never expanded their territory, yet they are the most hated of all - why?

So why does "indigenous vs. colonizer" almost always mean Europeans, and almost never Bantu, Turks, Arabs, Slavs, or Han Chinese? A few reasons, in descending order of how much they actually explain: 1. Recency and documentation. European expansion happened in the era of the printing press, photography, census records, and treaties. The Bantu expansion left no paperwork. The Arab conquests are 1,300 years old and mythologized as religious destiny rather than conquest. When the receipts exist, the case is easier to make, and Europeans left receipts. 2. The winners wrote the framework. Modern human-rights language, postcolonial theory, and the very category of "indigenous peoples" were built in Western universities after WWII, primarily to process European guilt over European empires. The tool was designed for one job. Asking it to evaluate the Arab conquest of Egypt or the Turkic conquest of Anatolia is like asking a tax form to diagnose a disease. It wasn't built for that. 3. Christendom is critique-able; other civilizations aren't. You can write a bestseller attacking Western Christian civilization from inside a Western university and win awards for it. Try writing the equivalent book about Arab-Islamic conquest from inside Cairo or Istanbul. The asymmetry isn't about history. It's about which societies tolerate self-criticism and which punish it. So the critical literature piles up on one side and barely exists on the other. 4. The Soviet inheritance. Cold War-era anti-colonial framing was deliberately shaped by Moscow to delegitimize the West while giving its own empire and its allies' conquests, a pass. That framework outlived the USSR and still structures a lot of academic and activist vocabulary today. 5. Race makes it legible. European colonizers usually looked different from the colonized. Turkic conquerors of Anatolia, Arab conquerors of the Levant, and Bantu expansionists in Africa generally didn't look dramatically different from the populations they absorbed. The visual contrast made European empire easier to narrate as racial, and once a story has a clean visual, it travels. 6. And finally, Jews. The framework's selective application reaches its most absurd point when a people indigenous to a specific land, with continuous presence, language, religion, and archaeological record tying them to it for three thousand years, get labeled "colonial settlers", while the actual seventh-century conquerors who Arabized the region get labeled "indigenous." At that point the framework isn't describing reality. It's laundering a conclusion. The label isn't tracking who got there first. It's tracking who it's currently fashionable to blame.

@lilyjayofficial I think what you’re failing to grasp is this: controlled legal migration is fine so long as migrants want to assimilate. What a lot of Brits are opposed to is uncontrolled, illegal migration from cultures which do not share liberal values and do not want to integrate.

Is anti immigration ACTUALLY the answer UK?🤔

@MrWinMarshall Great bit of reporting. Very balanced. Shows that despite the polarisation in worldviews there is a shared set of concerns. We need more reporting that seeks to understand and find common ground.

Tommy Robinson March vs Palestine Protest: I Spoke to BOTH Sides…

@JMNewsNetwork_ Some of these are fair critiques of some aspects of capitalist economies. But which Islamic countries can you point to where people enjoy as much freedom, equality before the law, equal opportunity and economic prosperity? Just 1 or 2 countries.

A white man outlines the reason why the West fears Islam.

@Variety Oh I do love it when actors lecture the public on geopolitics.

Javier Bardem says in #Cannes that genocide being committed in Gaza "is a fact." "You can fight against, you can try to justify it... it is a fact. If you justify it with your silence or your support, you are pro-genocide. Those are facts for me." variety.com/2026/film/fest…

@DoubleDownNews Oh fuck off. Total victimology. The pro Palestinian marches have inconvenienced people in London for the last 3 years.

"Tommy Robinson could have organised his demo on any weekend, but chose a day coinciding with the annual Nakba Day march. Rather than push for date of Robinson march to be changed, Met Police ordered the route of Nakba march to be moved. To allow tens of thousands of Robinson's supporters, who have track record of violence, to descend on London the same day as a peaceful anti-genocide march is an act of gross irresponsibility on the part of the Met" @PulaRJS

@michaelmezz @DeSchutterO If you look at the whole of history, has poverty been the exception or the rule?

defenders of capitalism love to say that it has freed billions of people from poverty. UN Special Rapporteur @DeSchutterO explains the absurdity of this argument and how the conditions of capitalism require poverty and inequality to exist:

@chunkymark homophobic on three levels.