Max Drawdown
576 posts





Laser Photonics has reached a stand-still right above the diagonal support. Interestingly enough this PR was released yesterday: "LASE Group's Fonon Technologies Advances to Next Phase of U.S. Air Force Battle Lab Evaluation for Laser Shield Anti-Drone Technology" tradingview.com/news/reuters.c… Any news on even a small US Air Force contract or this lining them up for further defense contract competitions will cause volatility to return to the upside. On the risk management side I don't want this to drop too far below the diagonal, even on a potential liquidation wick, as it's still a micro cap company.



"You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!" - A Few Good Men 1992 Why did this movie quote from 34 years ago resonate so strongly with so many people? Because people unironically can't handle the truth. The truth makes them uncomfortable. The truth challenges their made-up belief system. The truth requires you to neutralize your ego to be receptive to it. Only those who speak the absolute unfiltered truth will receive the most vile of hatred, slander and abuse. It's Biblical in a sense. I joined X a few months ago because I felt like I can speak and share my own truth here. I don't need new friends and social media will never be my career. I have already experienced that simply disagreeing with someone on the valuation of a company will result in people blocking or slandering me. God forbid you start mentioning the factually incorrect slop and course-selling posters. This is not because of me though, it is because my observation makes them uncomfortable. It challenges their belief system. If I am able to debunk claims made by their favorite stock influencer, what does that tell them about their (likely irresponsibly large) positions in the same stocks this influencer told them to buy? On the other side of this spectrum lie companies, people and ideas that make them uncomfortable. This is because they expose uncomfortable truths in unapologetic manners. Why did they not want to go near $PLTR below $20, but do they feel comfortable now that other people tell them it's okay to own? It is ego and assumption that will cost you money in the financial market. Stop looking for others to confirm your bias and start challenging your belief system. This is why a real trading strategy requires back testing and consistent methods of data processing. While I mostly dabble in the financial side of things I believe this phenomenon exists across every aspect of humanity. We are seeing the same in the fitness and sport industry. People cling to a status of being "natural" or "clean". This resulted in the "fake natty" syndrome that is especially predominant in bodybuilding. This gaslights people, especially teenagers, into believing they will achieve similar results without enhancements. This leaves them disillusioned at best, and results in them taking horrible health decision at worst. Similarly everyone that's not themselves involved in the relevant sport seems to be "surprised" when their idols and heroes turn out to have been performance enhancing drugs. More so than surprised though, they feel offended. They feel offended because their belief system was challenged, and this implicitly tells them something about their perception. This is why The Enhanced Games have attracted so much hate (free publicity) and slander based on misconceptions and lies. It exposes an underlying truth that is uncomfortable to most people. Real growth can only happen outside of the comfort zone. Learn to endure discomfort. Learn to be wrong and adapt. I did not plan this post, but I was inspired to write it just now since @C_Angermayer started following me. I realize it differs a lot from my usual trading setups. Nevertheless I believe this is much more important than any single setup. I have been following his fund @ApeironInvests for quite a while, initially due to their investment thesis surrounding companies conducting research in psilocybin. If anything is able to remove the egotistical filter standing between you and reality it would be psilocybin. While I have not taken any large quantities in several years I still actively micro dose. It means a lot to me being such a small and new account on X to have him follow and engage with me. Quality over quantity. TLDR; - Unapologetically speak and live your truth - Allow your ego and belief system to be challenged - Buy $ENHA - Follow @C_Angermayer and @ApeironInvests








I just sold ~5% of my $NBIS at $290! Celebrating being up 1,100% in 13 months! Current situation: I’ve taken my initial investment out and have now sold around 12% of my $NBIS position in total. I can now ride all my remaining shares for free! My next PT is $1,000! I believe we can get there by the end of 2027 or early 2028! Forever grateful @nebiusai ❤️






Agreed! It’s nice to remember your thesis during a market crash. From my own personal thesis, if $AAOI hits $1.4B quarterly revenue start of Q3 2027. Which is annualized $5.6B off a $8B MC. Is it “over” for the company if that revenue ramp hasn’t even shown up in the quarterly earnings… when it’s 2026? Same applies to my CPO sector exposure like $SIVE, an architecture shift led by $NVDA. If scale out volume ramps from H2 2026 into 2027, and scale up heavily volume ramps into 2028. Is it “over” that $0 -> $91B TAM expansion (per GS) hasn’t even hit yet? With robotics like Agility, is it over in 2026 if the listing hasn’t even happened yet and humanoids haven’t ramped? I personally think current market conditions are a reflection of liquidity and leverage, not individual fundamentals. It’s brutal for everyone to see KOSPI, TW, Nikkei, and AI, space, robotics sector stocks crash recently. Especially when there’s a lot of irrational behavior stemming from those leverage. In the end, we can’t tell you what stocks to buy, what timeframe you should sell, how to size your positions, or what you should do. Only share personal thoughts or research and track if they get validated over time. So it’s extremely important to build your own thesis, since everyone has unique risk tolerance or investing timeframes. And that usually leads to having higher conviction during crashes.





$XFAB is back in my area of interest. Downside risk here is limited right below the Fibonacci support level below my marked diagonal.


I got many questions about why I sold $SIVE today. Bought at 8 SEK. Took profits at 80 SEK on the way up. Sold at 75 SEK, this was a 10-bagger. Sold purely on TA. 75 SEK was a key level of defence. Once it broke, I sold immediately to protect the gains. It’s already trading at 67 SEK now. I have nothing against the company; I’m still long-term bullish and may look to jump back in lower or higher. I warned my subscribers before I sold and alerted them the second I executed. With the cash, I opened a new position today.

$NBIS - seems like Nebius doesn't have the power to break the $222. It's becoming more likely to see lower prices before bouncing. Wave c would bring us down to roughly $170 imo. I cut the position at $215.2 today. Wave c isn't confirmed yet though.





