Cain

2.9K posts

Cain banner
Cain

Cain

@_PeterCain_

My opinions are that of the world.

Katılım Ağustos 2017
515 Takip Edilen619 Takipçiler
Cain
Cain@_PeterCain_·
@aimeeterese I don't need any more reasons to dislike the abrahamic faiths but I appreciate it nonetheless.
English
0
0
1
35
Aimee Terese
Aimee Terese@aimeeterese·
Love is something humans can experience because we are made in the image of god. Animals are not and cannot.
English
22
1
28
2.8K
Cain
Cain@_PeterCain_·
@Moesawyrd I stumbled onto a kino street fight last week and wouldn't you know it, the women were there to ruin the experience for me.
English
0
0
3
71
Cain
Cain@_PeterCain_·
@BottomGroyper Where would we be if everyone did this during 2020?
English
0
0
0
36
Maverick
Maverick@BottomGroyper·
All right-wingers go offline for the next few years, it's just not safe. They're after us.
English
5
3
94
5.8K
Cain retweetledi
Kædiste
Kædiste@amantdelucy·
Polemics against Nazism form a sort of four-tier structure of obfuscatory facts (“they killed fellow whites”), lies (“they were militarily inept”), unfalsifiable scenarios (“they would’ve gone woke eventually”) and complete nonsense (“they would put you in a camp”).
English
5
53
461
11K
Ragnar
Ragnar@pikeypilled·
Notice how he avoids the peanuts
English
15
26
1.6K
77.9K
Cain retweetledi
Cain retweetledi
FischerKing
FischerKing@FischerKing64·
If President Trump was going to tank the economy to achieve something big for the people - mass deportations was the option. The disruption to the economy would have been serious, but long run the people would benefit massively. Smashing Iran - doesn’t help a single American.
English
331
929
7.6K
199.7K
Cain
Cain@_PeterCain_·
@eugyppius1 It's been 40 minutes. Where's the fucking update??
English
0
0
8
281
eugyppius
eugyppius@eugyppius1·
whale has continued to fight after the rescuers have left, he has pushed himself 40 meters further, needs to make it another 10 to the ditch. he is almost free.
eugyppius tweet media
English
7
4
183
7.5K
eugyppius
eugyppius@eugyppius1·
Young humpback whale stranded since Monday on a sandbar in the Bay of Lübeck. With luck and grace they will free him tonight.
eugyppius tweet media
English
27
21
685
44K
Cain retweetledi
tantum
tantum@QuasLacrimas·
The only way to preserve the good parts of the old "elite" consensus while discarding the bad parts is for the old elite itself to adopt RW populism. But this is very unlikely to happen, because the worst parts of the old consensus were a form of two-faced self-dealing that allowed the old elite to profit from public service and influence indirectly ("indirectly") to compensate them for avoiding naked corruption. Generally speaking the pattern here is some anonymous person or persons in the White House is doing insider trading on the timing of Trump announcements and may have made thousands of dollars; meanwhile Nancy Pelosi's net worth is nearly $300 million, widely believed to be almost exclusively from trading on Congressional information. A Trump official is traveling on "official business" and appears to be having more fun than most people do on their actual vacations, whereas a Democrat infrastructure bill with have $700 billion in direct giveaways to Dem constituencies with no deliverables attached with $200 billion in actual infrastructure. And on and on. Medicaid fraud, SNAP fraud, construction fraud, Burisma... So what is the pattern here? In general (and I think this pattern likely holds up in other countries as well), populist impropriety is more brazen, more vulgar, more clueless, and "elite" impropriety (quotation marks because we all know we're talking about people like Nancy Pelosi) involves gains that are are 3 orders of magnitude if not 6 orders of magnitude larger. The political hacks who understand the of not being brazen, not being vulgar, of consulting a lawyer before YOLOing, only very rarely embrace populism. Why? Because while they can advocate for murderers and rapists, or replacement migration, or transing kids without their parents' consent and still have a career in politics or media or NGOs, if one of these people puts on a MAGA hat they are setting their social networks on fire, because they are threatening those 6 orders of magnitude of "sophisticated" corruption. So anyone with an elegant aesthetic revulsion at crude ways of benefitting from politics is very unlikely to cut themselves off from future employment as a matter of principle. To breed a principled elite that is not tempted by any form of corruption, neither the petty forms because they're ugly and demoralizing, nor the masked forms because they cripple the state and mortgage its future, would be a massive undertaking. It is probably far too late for that. We just need to accept that realistically there is a choice between vulgar politicians and robber politicians.
Will Solfiac@willsolfiac

There is a genuine problem with 'right-wing populism' whereby those willing to break bad elite consensus rules are also likely to break good rules such as being against corruption. We need to carry on breaking the bad elite consensus, but without replacing it with third worldist self-dealing. I believe that the most important challenge for the right over the next few years is to develop leaders who can reach beyond simply being self-interested rule breakers to being rule makers, of a new, better type of rules. I do genuinely believe this is possible. There's nothing inherent that means integrity in public life needs to go along with support for insane, self harming immigration and social policies.

English
9
74
472
38.4K
captive dreamer
captive dreamer@captive_dreamer·
@LauraLoomer Laura, why do you keep bringing up Tucker's son? Who cares? He's not a public face and obviously wants to keep it that way and his job should not reflect on his father at all.
English
14
3
329
4.5K
Cain
Cain@_PeterCain_·
@Read_Acted Having some sheboon screen you every time you want to fly is overkill.
English
1
0
1
24
🐍 Ƥşץ𝕔𝔥𝕠pomp_Đ𝔦o̷͝ηуรǗ丂 ඏ
Ending TSA is a common sentiment but I’m against it. You cannot look me in the eye and tell me that people flying aren’t crazier ever—that the world doesn’t hate Americans more than ever. We’ve all seen the videos of the behavior. Security is painful for one reason and one reason only: racial sensitivity. Ai with access to cameras and federal data can profile risks extremely accurately. But that’s not allowed bc risks are disproportionately non-white. So Grandma 👵 and your 5 year old daughter have to get felt up to satisfy the bloodlust of the racial grievance lobby. But that doesn’t mean there are no threats. It doesn’t mean illegals aren’t flying and trafficking minors and narcotics. Security is painless when there’s no line, the scanners are modern, the staff is friendly, and ai is allowed to operate functionally. It’s not hard to solve the experience. It just might require higher hiring standards—and honest ai allowed to profile truthfully. Also more staff; I’ve never once seen an airport open all their security lanes at once. Infuriating. Also—Asking airlines to do their own security is completely silly and shows you haven’t thought about what you’re saying for 1 second. You want a security check at every gate instead of one streamlined room? Makes no sense
🐍 Ƥşץ𝕔𝔥𝕠pomp_Đ𝔦o̷͝ηуรǗ丂 ඏ tweet media
Kostas Moros@MorosKostas

I think Trump should just unilaterally scrap the TSA to be honest. The White House should announce that given Congress has decided not to fund it, it can't continue to exist. Do a transition period where it gets phased out, and airlines take over airport security once again. The Dems are basically doing a shakedown right now. If Trump doesn't cave on enforcing our immigration laws (which he was elected to do), then they will continue to make Americans suffer at airports, confident that many will ignorantly blame Republicans. All in service of illegal immigrants over American citizens, because they need illegals to shore up the population of failing blue states. Don't play into that nonsense. Call their bluff. Just announce TSA is being scrapped. What are they going to do, argue that scrapping an agency would be unconstitutional when THEY ARE REFUSING TO FUND IT? lol

English
11
2
53
3.2K
Cain retweetledi