Zaid

2.8K posts

Zaid

Zaid

@_SaeedZaid

Katılım Ağustos 2024
249 Takip Edilen65 Takipçiler
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@ShaykhSulaiman Think of the bull in this picture as Iran minding its business and trying negotiations and diplomacy. The assh0le getting hored in the ass represents US, lzrahell and stupid Arab sellout
Zaid tweet media
English
0
0
1
144
Sulaiman Ahmed
Sulaiman Ahmed@ShaykhSulaiman·
BREAKING: The UAE is 'preparing to help the U.S. and other allies open the Strait of Hormuz by force', Source: WSJ
Sulaiman Ahmed tweet media
English
277
178
587
41.3K
Mark R. Levin
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·
ARM THE IRANIAN PEOPLE IMMEDIATELY! I've been calling for this for weeks on radio.  One thing we can do, which Reagan did in Afghanistan, Angola, and Nicaragua, is ARM THE PEOPLE in Iran so they are no longer butchered by these monsters without the ability to fight back!  They will rise up as a real fighting force, but they need weapons!  And it must be done IMMEDIATELY, especially if we are talking about ending our military operation in a few weeks!
English
2.7K
3.8K
11.6K
615.7K
Abier
Abier@abierkhatib·
Did someone else get their hands on the hard drive 😳
Abier tweet media
English
273
517
2.4K
32.9K
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@Partisan_12 Question is: what does this assh0le sellout know? Nothing other than selling out.
Zaid tweet media
English
0
2
1
245
The Resonance
The Resonance@Partisan_12·
Narco Rubio doesn't know that Iranians have free healthcare and education, while Americans do not😂
English
916
5.4K
17.9K
215.4K
Mark Slapinski
Mark Slapinski@mark_slapinski·
I'm still confused... Why is America at war with Iran?!
English
1.9K
445
4.1K
144K
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@abierkhatib The fact that the 2 perps were released on bail tells us more than a 500 page book does Does any honest person think their names would be kept from coming out if they were Muslims?
English
0
0
20
610
Abier
Abier@abierkhatib·
How’s that Jewish ambulances story developing? Have they found these “Iranian sleeper cells” yet or nah? 🤔
English
76
538
3.9K
42.1K
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@angeloinchina I'm afraid even then Russia and China will say: we want to keep our powder dry for something bigger
English
0
0
0
79
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@annmarie And then you both woke up?
Zaid tweet media
English
0
0
0
19
Annmarie Hordern
Annmarie Hordern@annmarie·
Just had a brief phone call with President Trump. He said Iran wants "to settle." And he reiterated the war is going well— "unbelievably well."
English
1.2K
177
1.1K
742.4K
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@AdameMedia I beg to differ... His skin will be roasted and made anew a million times so hw can feel the pain of his victims again and again God willing
English
0
1
2
66
ADAM
ADAM@AdameMedia·
He murdered a million Muslims and created the immigration crisis that brought Muslims to Europe and now he wants use the SAME propaganda to do it again. HeII won’t be hot enough for this demon.
ADAM tweet media
English
138
1.7K
3.6K
28K
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@caitoz This has been the policy of the only apartheid state in the world since 1948. Just that it's official now
Zaid tweet media
English
0
9
36
386
Caitlin Johnstone
For years Israel apologists have been admonishing me for calling Israel an apartheid state. For years liberal "moderates" have been saying it's extreme for me to call Zionism a fundamentally racist and murderous ideology. And yet, here we are. Spin this one, hasbarists. Go on.
Dyab Abou Jahjah@Aboujahjah

Israel has now become the first state to codify a death sentence that applies in practice to one ethnic group, while another is effectively shielded from it.

English
101
1.6K
4.5K
52.7K
Mark R. Levin
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·
YES, THE WAR AGAINST THE IRANIAN REGIME IS GOING VERY WELL Despite the fact that the war against the Iranian regime is going very well -- it is only a few weeks old, after all, and casualties are less than when we went into Panama to capture Noriega, rescued college students in Grenada, and virtually every other military action, the voices of despair -- some real, some contrived -- are seemingly everywhere. But are they really? First, the President's base has never been more solid, and that includes MAGA and the GOP generally. Second, the Democrats, including the Marxists and Islamists, are strongly opposed for a variety of reasons, including TDS, political exploitation, and a growing population of hate America constituencies (both homegrown and imported). They're a very loud crowd and overrepresented in the public square. Third, the Woke Reich isolationists oppose all military action and certainly any preemptive actions, even against a regime with a half-century record of killing American soldiers and citizens, and even when that regime is provably and unequivocably developing nuclear material and missiles to reach our shores (short of that, they can still explode a dirty bomb). They are ideological kindred spirits with the extremist left. Fourth, the public has been relentlessly fed negative stories and fearmongering by a nearly unanimous media and organized ops campaigns on social media. Fifth, the rising antisemitism and Israel-hatred serves as a useful tool of the Marxist-Islamist left and Woke Reich for scapegoating, claiming the President was forced in the war by the Jews. Sixth, the public cares about affordability and the military campaign is said to be a distraction (although if the operation came to an immediate halt, that issue would not disappear; indeed, it predates the military campaign). Seventh, the latest propaganda point is to blame the military operation for potentially costing the GOP the mid-term elections, should that election cycle be lost to the Democrats (although polls showed the mid-term elections to be a challenge before the military campaign). Eighth, it is easier to explain and understand military action taken after a catastrophic attack, which focuses the attention and demands a strong response. A preventive military campaign, based on explanations of threats and subject to even disingenuous debate, muddies the water for some if not many. Talk of the threats from Islamists prior to 9/11, and the need to go to war with al-Qaeda, wouldn't have galvanized the nation. No doubt, there are other reasons. There is constant pressure for the President to abandon the military campaign -- gas prices (which are temporarily up), claims of violating campaign promises against forever wars (this is hardly a forever war), the cost of the military campaign (of course, the cost of a nuclear Iran with thousands of ballistic missiles is incalculable), the charge that the war is illegal (it is not), that there was no imminent threat (the inexactitude with which one can precisely determine what's imminent or not is ridiculous, preemption is a better measure), and so forth. The geopolitical, economic, and national security consequences of an early or premature cessation (an off-ramp as they say) could be devastating. Few Presidents would seek a ceasefire and precipitous end under present-day circumstances. It would be stunningly unwise. The Iranian regime would have enough power as a police-state to continue on and rebuild, both domestically and internationally, and with the help of countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. It would be the biggest gift to the Axis of Evil imaginable, and a disaster for our national security. Opposition to nearly all military campaigns is a given, as history demonstrates. But let me suggest that in the current situation, much of it is politically partisan, ideological, emotional, contrived, and unwarranted. In each case, it is important to discern who is in opposition (both individuals and groups) and their motivations. Of course, they will claim good intentions and love of country. No doubt, some are. But for too many, that obviously is not the case. It is more sinister than not. In the end, victory has endless benefits, including political. And here, victory is the elimination of the current threat against us and our allies in the region, and the people of Iran. The opponents in our country want everything done yesterday, even though they wanted nothing militarily done at all in the first place. They had no and have no strategy as their previous approaches -- appeasement, massive payoffs, and the lifting of sanctions -- did nothing but further empower the regime. This is not intended to be a comprehensive review. More later.
English
1.4K
1.6K
6.5K
303.4K
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@caitoz The most self-unaware pos sob on the planet
Zaid tweet media
English
0
0
5
524
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@danpjsheehan And this is how their classification will be
Zaid tweet media
English
0
1
0
15
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@AmyMek Projecting much u sack of shit bitch?
English
0
0
0
2
Amy Mek
Amy Mek@AmyMek·
Give Islam an inch, and it will take your country.
English
1.9K
4.8K
30.5K
368K
Zaid
Zaid@_SaeedZaid·
@StateDept What a self-unaware dipshit
Zaid tweet media
English
0
0
1
2
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
SECRETARY RUBIO: Imagine if instead of spending billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, Iran had spent that money helping the people of Iran. They would have a much different country.
English
5.9K
2.4K
12.1K
1.2M
Zaid retweetledi
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Absolute bombshell. Pope Leo directly rebukes Pete Hegseth for trying to frame the Iran war as a Christian holy crusade. The Pope declares God will not listen to their prayers because their hands are full of blood. A devastating moral condemnation of the Pentagon.
English
1.5K
21.5K
108.8K
1.7M
Zaid retweetledi
The Muslim Cowboy
The Muslim Cowboy@MercifulMessage·
Never stop sharing Israel’s crimes Repost if you have a soul 😢
English
211
8.9K
14.3K
161.7K
Zaid retweetledi
The Maverick of Wall Street
The Maverick of Wall Street@TheMaverickWS·
Before the war: 1) Iran didn't control the Strait Of Hormuz, now it does 2) Iran oil was sanctioned, now it's not 3) Iran was not building a nuke, now it will 4) US bases in the Gulf were assets, now liabilities 5) Inflation was declining, now increasing Definitely winning!
The Maverick of Wall Street tweet media
English
1.6K
28.7K
97.2K
2.2M