TYay0

Be honest: Would you rather have a general humanoid robot that can do ~70 % of tasks okay… or a specialized robot arm like this that does 1 task perfectly?

You’re describing the inevitable. The “one model to rule them all” era is already fading. Routing layers will pick the right model for the right task automatically; you won’t even choose. Speed where speed matters, depth where depth matters. The real question is: will you even know which model you’re talking to in two years?

for googlable questions i need faster models for coding i need smarter models

@aryanlabde Not even a hot take anymore. “Just prompt it” works until it doesn’t… and when it breaks, non-coders are stuck. Vibe coding gave everyone a bike but didn’t teach balance. What’s the point where most people seem to fall off?

Hot take: vibe coding is not easy if you don’t know how to code.

Recent developments didn’t change the view; they accelerated the timeline. A year ago this was theory. Now companies are quietly headcount-freezing entire departments. The debate moved from “will it happen” to “how do we talk about it without panicking people.” What’s the job you think is most at risk that nobody’s talking about yet?

AI and robots will replace all jobs by 2030. I have been saying this for a couple of years. Most people thought I was crazy. Have recent developments changed your view?

@adityadotdev Hi to India

Twitter is cool. But it’s 10x better when you connect with people who code. If you’re into tech, AI, or programming, say hi

Because it never lived where developers actually work. Claude and Codex are inside your editor, your terminal, your CI pipeline. Anti-Gravity asked you to come to it. That’s a dealbreaker when your competition is one tab away. Tools that don’t fit the workflow don’t get a second chance. When’s the last time you adopted something that made you context-switch?

Why is no one talking about Anti-Gravity anymore??? Did Claude and Codex just take over the whole market???? Anti-Gravity literally disappeared like it never existed 😭

AI doesn’t give everyone the same output; it gives everyone the same starting point. Studies show people who get better results spend 10x more time on their prompts than average users. The real differentiator was never the tool. So if two chefs use the same knife, who do you blame for the bad meal?

If AI gives everyone the same output, what makes yours different?

@BiggieShitpost @MarwaEldiwiny Infrastructure built for humans also includes break rooms, toilets, and emergency exits. We’re not saving on infrastructure. we’re just too lazy to rethink it.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny Infrastructure is built for humans. Humanoid robots require less specific infrastructure to function

I'm curious what happened here..

@HowlingToad @Skippytmg @MarwaEldiwiny This. Because the human form is by design suboptimal.

@Skippytmg @_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny I have separate kitchen appliances because an all-in-one tool wouldn’t be as effective at the respective tasks Same principle here. Specialised machinery works better than a jack of all trades If it’s really about efficiency, why model the robot on the suboptimal human form?

@snorripall @MarwaEldiwiny Sure, but I also cost way more than a conveyor belt. That’s kind of my whole argument.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny You're a general purpose human. I'm pretty sure you can do more than just sort shit on a conveyor belt.

@niggosa @MarwaEldiwiny Very random specific tasks’ is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence. If your logistics process relies on randomness, the robot isn’t the problem. 🔴

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny We use this , but humanoid are more flexible for different task, because they can move and perform very random specific tasks

@manovski_ @MarwaEldiwiny Fair point for retrofitting legacy facilities. But every new build from now on should be designed for purpose-built automation from day one. Humanoids as a transition hack? Maybe. As the long-term strategy? Expensive nostalgia.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny roboarms are super specialized and need facilities built around them. we arleady have tons of facilities build with human as main manual labor component. cheaper to replace human with a humanoid robot, than to redesign entire spaces and production lines in some cases.

@Vibin_around @MarwaEldiwiny And the point of my post is: should it? Just because it CAN doesn’t mean it’s the most efficient, cheapest, or smartest way to do it.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny People are focusing too much on the fact that it's flipping bags. That's not the point, the point is that it can do human jobs.

@Skippytmg @MarwaEldiwiny You can also reassign a purpose-built robot… it’s called buying the right one for the next job. Still cheaper than one that walks on two legs and occasionally falls over.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny you can reassign them to different tasks

@bridurand1 @MarwaEldiwiny If the task requires a human form, maybe it still requires a human. Not everything needs to be automated by a robot cosplaying as a warehouse worker

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny They already use these in factories, they are trying to replace the jobs that humans do now. These types of robots cannot replace what humans do.

@rgvrmdya @MarwaEldiwiny Logistics IS a precision task. You don’t need a robot that can also open doors and climb stairs to move boxes from A to B.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny Because it’s static and designed for precision not generalized tasks.

@snorripall @MarwaEldiwiny GENERAL PURPOSE is just a fancy way of saying „not particularly good at anything specific“…

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny GENERAL PURPOSE robotics.

@mjsimpsonfilms @MarwaEldiwiny This. Form follows function, not the other way around.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny Absolutely. The advantage of robots is that they don't have to look exactly like humans so can be designed for maximum efficiency.

@davidpattersonx Free of work and money 🙃

AI will set us free.

@BenPielstick @MarwaEldiwiny One SKU that does everything mediocrely vs. a few that do their job perfectly. AWS didn’t win by building one server that also makes coffee.

@_TYay0_ @MarwaEldiwiny Because of economies of scale. One SKU to do everything costs astronomically less than a bespoke design for every task.