Amit Behere

#repeat - Amit, you say you hate all religions but don't say anything about Islam (btw, it's always Islam, never Chrisitanity/Judaism/Sikhism). Because I am an Indian. India is 80% supermajority Hindu. India is 100% tatti because of it's 80% supermajority. India's tatti PM is a Hindu. India's tatti HM is a Hindu. India's tatti FM is a Hindu. Every tatti Indian CM is a Hindu. Every Godman raping young women/girls is a Hindu. The ONLY good CM India has today is a non-Hindu. Almost every corporator is a Hindu. Almost every tatti minister, MLA is a Hindu. At least 80% adulterator of milk and paneer is a Hindu. At least 80% driving on the wrong side of the road are Hindus. Around 80% criminals are Hindus. Almost every cop taking a bribe is a Hindu. Almost every judge giving a horrible ruling is a Hindu. All honor killings are done by Hindus. Almost every crime against women is doing by Hindus. The list is endless.... When the entire country is a gutter, fucked beyond recognition *because of Hindus*, what the fuck is going to be achieved by talking against Islam/Muslims. Jab desh ki G Hindus nay maar kay rakhi hai, desh gutter Hindus ki wajah say hain, toh *bhosadikay*, Islam/Muslims ko gaali de kay kya jhat ukhad loonga ...??? Tu kya jhat ukhad lega ...??? Aur itna Islam ka fikr hain, toh fatherchod, Go to Pakistan. Islamic country hain.

Naa ap Havi hain, naa yeh apki future wife hain.. ap chill krien

@alizafar7486 @ChaudharyWad ROFLMAO. Brothers of the same mother. Just separated by religion and border.

@ChaudharyWad 😂 😂 @_amitbehere you are always going on about low IQ on the other side of the border. I present to you our best of the best. Now beat that

صابری کالونی گلی نمبر 14 اور 15 میں ماربل لگنا شروع۔ ہم ڈی سی صاحب اوکاڑہ اور نا معلوم کونسلر کا شکریہ ادا کرتے ہیں۔ اور بلدیہ اوکاڑہ کی کاوشوں کو سراہتے ہیں 🫡 جب پیسے کسی حلال ماں کے بیٹے کے ہاتھوں میں آجائیں پھر ایسے کام ہوگا 🙂

The Indian (Hindu) fawning and cock-sucking of Zionists is so pathetic. Imagine simping over folks who despise you, think of you as dirt and find you repulsive. Just because they hate Muslims as much as you do, but unlike you nalla bhikmangas they can genuinely hurt/oppress Muslims. And imagining kissing their ass for that. Full sapport to Israel Saar ...!!! It's so staggering pathetic and repulsive that one can't really wrap one's mind around it.

A Satire (of sorts) I want to be clear about what I am. I am a screenwriter. I make up fiction for a living but not as good as Hindol Sengupta. When the Iran-Hormuz war broke out I did what any professionally curious person does. I fell into a rabbit hole. Asymmetric warfare. Drone swarm doctrine. Hypersonic missiles. Precision strike theory. The kind of reading that starts at 11pm and ends with your wife screaming at you at 7 in the morning, asking "Milk finished last night, did you Zepto it?" I am not a strategist. I am not a geopolitician. I have no institutional affiliation, no think tank letterhead, no professorship. And yet. Hindol Sengupta is executive dean at O.P. Jindal Global University's school of international relations. He has the credentials, the platform, and the institutional weight. He published a piece in Sunday Guardian titled: India's Great Nicobar Project is the Dragon's Nightmare. I read it and regretted it instantly. Two to three IQ points, gone. Then the embarrassment set in. Not second-hand. First-hand. I am an Indian. Chinese scholars reading this are not cringing. They are laughing. A kind of self-assured laugh because this piece made them feel safer. Since Iran demonstrated what a determined state can do to a critical maritime chokepoint, a certain kind of Indian commentator has discovered a new hobby: imagining India doing the same to China at Malacca. Sengupta's piece is the most fluent example of this genre. It is confident. It is sweeping. It makes sounds like, and I say this with affection for the form, Dhan ta tan. The dragon is desperate. The vice is tightening. India closes the tap. Dhan ta tan. Two questions lodged in my head as I read it. Just two. I am a screenwriter, not a strategist, so I kept it simple. First: how do you defend a forward island base against a peer adversary with long-range precision strike capability? Second: Iran-Hormuz worked because Iran was operating from its own mainland, with compressed geography and an inexhaustible resupply chain. Does India have anything comparable for an island sitting 1,400 kilometres from the mainland? Sengupta never asks either. His piece moves in one direction only, from geography to complete dominance, the type of dominance kids discuss in class 3 as they buy new cricket bats, without a single sentence about vulnerability or what happens on Day 2. Because if he asked, the answers would destroy his conclusion. Let us start with the word Sengupta uses in his very first paragraph. He calls Nicobar not a strategic inconvenience for Beijing but an existential threat. Existential. The survival of the state. Imagine China in a post-apocalyptic scenario, red sun shining at the horizon, Chinese citizens shuffling around like zombies, their will to live broken by a single Hindol Sengupta op-ed. From an island that currently hosts nothing. Defended by nothing capable of intercepting modern Chinese missiles. Supplied through a single corridor 1,400 kilometres long. I write fiction for a living and even I would hesitate. The tap, the pipe, and the several other pipes Sengupta writes: "India's fortified presence at Great Nicobar would allow it to effectively close the tap on China's economic lifeblood." Malacca handles 82,000 ships a year. It is the busiest shipping lane on earth. Closing it would send global commodity markets into freefall within days. The US, EU, Japan, and ASEAN would be on the phone within a week. India's own economy, which depends on the same lanes, would be screaming within a month. Imagine an 80s policeman in khaki shorts, waving his baton while managing traffic at a red light. That is the visual I got. But leave that aside. Just ask the geographic question. Malacca is not the only door. The Lombok Strait, the Sunda Strait, the Ombai-Wetar passage, all navigable, all viable. These routes add roughly 1,000 to 1,500 kilometres per voyage. Costly. Inconvenient. Not impassable. Closing the tap assumes one pipe. There are several. Hormuz is landlocked on one side. It is literally one pipe. Geography works there. Hindol's common sense doesn't. Iran held Hormuz under maximum pressure sanctions with nothing left to lose. India is a $3.5 trillion economy with global trade ambitions and a non-alignment posture it has spent decades building. Even the fantasy works for weeks at best. Sengupta mentions none of this. The dragon is desperate. Dhan ta tan. Permanent. Like a target. He writes: "These things, once built, become permanent features of the strategic landscape." Yes. Permanent features with fixed coordinates, known infrastructure, and predictable supply corridors. In military terminology this is called a target list. See, I may have forgotten to buy milk, but I learned a few things. He also describes "a dual-use airfield capable of hosting nuclear-capable bombers." The airfield is under construction. It currently hosts nothing. What Sengupta celebrates as permanent is not yet built. And when it is, here is what permanence actually means in 2026, in the world of asymmetric warfare. China's DF-17 hypersonic glide vehicle travels at Mach 5 to Mach 10, maneuvers to evade interception, and has been confirmed accurate to within meters of a stationary target. It is simply hard to understand what Mach 10 is. Let me put it in simple terms. For the fastest things we use the metaphor of a bullet. It went like a bullet. The fastest commercially available bullet travels at around Mach 3.8. We are talking Mach 10 here. That is nearly thrice the speed of the fastest bullet. Your brain cannot fathom this speed at close range. At a comfortable distance, Hindol can write this piece and enjoy moderate intellectualism. No currently deployed Indian system credibly intercepts it. Not S-400, which was not designed for this threat. Not the DRDO ballistic missile defense program, which is designed for slower trajectories and years from deployment at a remote island anyway. You do not need a large warhead when your target has known coordinates and cannot move. Iranian missiles that threatened Hormuz were fast. China's are a different category entirely. A screenwriter who spent three weeks reading about this knows it. Apparently, a professor of international relations does not. The vice with one jaw Sengupta uses the metaphor of a vice, India tightening it around China's Malacca dependency. A vice requires both jaws to be secured. Hindol possibly has a missing jaw and is on a liquid diet, so he doesn't understand how grinding or locking works. India's other jaw: no hypersonic intercept capability, a submarine fleet that cannot credibly deny these waters to Chinese strike assets, a single resupply corridor 1,400 kilometers long that is itself a target. China doesn't need to contest the island. It severs the supply chain. Mines the corridor. Hits Port Blair's fuel infrastructure. Nicobar doesn't fall. It ends up in a wheelchair, writing sad poetry about being left alone. But the vice tightens. Because Hindol said so. Dhan ta tan. Desperate? Try the trade deficit. Sengupta writes China is "desperate to stop" the Nicobar project. Desperate. If China is truly desperate, it has an instrument it hasn't bothered to use yet. India imports over $100 billion annually from China. Pharmaceutical APIs. Electronics. Solar components. Industrial machinery. Inputs that Indian manufacturing cannot replace in any realistic timeframe from any alternative source. China does not need missiles to hurt India. It needs an export ban. You don't need a knife to scoop things; you need a spoon. Elementary, dear Sengupta. The supposedly desperate adversary holds India's supply chains in its hand and hasn't squeezed. That is not desperation. That is a country that knows it has options and is in no hurry to use them. What India actually has, and what is being destroyed to get it. What India has at Nicobar is a peacetime traffic signal. What Sengupta describes is a wartime weapon. He never explains how one becomes the other. That gap, between a flag planted on strategic geography and an operational military capability that can survive an adversary's first strike, is the entire argument he failed to make. I know this is a satire, but I am losing my sense of humor now. But seriously. A UNESCO-recognised biosphere is being destroyed. The last significant leatherback sea turtle nesting ground in the Indian Ocean is disappearing. The Shompen tribe, one of India's most isolated indigenous communities, is being displaced. Concerns raised formally by scientists, including the former ISRO chairman who chaired the original environmental committee, have been ignored just as formally by the government. Dead turtle babies are not funny. Destroyed ecosystems are not funny. Green vanishing from satellite images is never funny. So, no satire here. Sengupta mentions none of it. The dragon is desperate. We won, na na na na na. Who is this really for? Indian strategic commentary of this kind is essentially melodrama. Written to make a particular reader feel that the country's rise is inevitable, that adversaries are scared, that geography is destiny. The gap between the story and reality has a way of closing. Usually at the worst possible moment. Posturing is great if you are Dharmender. Not when you are Arun Govil. But Sengupta's piece is something more specific than cheerleading. This is a professor using institutional credibility to dress up ruling party talking points as strategic analysis. This is a clown dressed in a business suit with a detachable red nose. The Great Nicobar project is a government priority. The narrative that it terrifies China is government myth-making. Sengupta delivers both, fluently, without a single uncomfortable question. Sengupta is a Sarkari bard singing Sarkari narrative in op-ed form. This is how the ecosystem works. You don't need a cheque. You need a conclusion the regime finds useful. The professorship follows. If you are going to be a sycophant, at least construct an argument that survives basic scrutiny. As they say, even if you sing a bad song, at least make the words rhyme. At least ask how the base gets defended. At least reckon with the hypersonic threat. Build a case worth taking seriously before you expect to be taken seriously. I am a screenwriter. I fell into a rabbit hole after a war broke out. I spent a few weeks reading things I had no professional reason to read. And I came away with more questions about this project than a professor of international relations apparently thought to ask. That is funny, in a way. Because it is not even intelligence. It is common sense. It stops being funny when you remember that this writing shapes policy expectations, budget allocations, and diplomatic postures. That the gap between the story and the reality is not just an intellectual embarrassment. It is a strategic liability. That is not a professor's failure. That is a propagandist's occupation. None of you probably laughed reading this satire. I understand. But I can guarantee you one thing. Every Chinese analyst and scholar who read Hindol's op-ed was laughing. He set out to frighten them. He ended up entertaining them. Which makes him funnier than me, despite trying his very best to be the exact opposite.

@TusharXii All 3 are bikmanga dirty countries. But imagine being so tatti and shit, that you are one big VishwaGutter dirtier than even Pakistan and Bangladesh. More bhikmanga than Kanglus...Aak thoo on Hindu Bharat. Guuu khao aur 1000 saal bsdk.

@_amitbehere True karachi looks exactly like this , your hatred for india is clearly visiblea and then you guys whine how bjp wins election.

#repeat Hinduism plays a huge role in how filthy and dirty the country is, and interestingly how dirty Bangladesh and Pakistan are. Hinduism === Caste system. period. Also filthiness is largely dependent on poverty, population density and culture (and by extension religion). Let's forget Pakistan for now, because it's objectively cleaner than both India and Bangladesh. First, there is no evidence to indicate that Bangladesh is filthier than India, on quite a few measures it's *cleaner*, as is Pakistan, even more so. Granted it's unnis bees, nothing meaningful. But still. Secondly ,this is despite Bangladesh having hyper population density. Despite which they have managed to stay about as clean as India while being much more dense and equally poor. Thirdly, this is what most people miss, is that Bangladesh and Pakistan might be Islamic today, and for last few 100 years, but before that they were *Hindu*. For 1000 years or more. Their culture is far more influenced by Indic value system, which for simplification we can call the Hindu value system. The truth of the matter is the Hindu (or Indic) culture/religion is absolutely radioactive toxic, heavily informed by caste system and beyond redemption. Pakistan and Bangladesh for all their faults, have rejected this culture/religion so over time they stand a far better chance of improvement. While embracing Islam is frankly both idiotic and dangerous, and it will hold them back and hurt them big time, it's still objectively better than embracing Hinduism (which we have done). Secularism/atheism is the future. It is the most clear path to prosperous, equal and decent societies. And finally, and here is the most important thing. Bangladesh and Pakistan realize and know they have issues, serious issues. When you know, you act, you try, you do better. Indian Hindu majority today is fucking proud ..!!! WTF ..??? Of what? Of being shit ...??? Of doing worse than before ..?? And that is going doom our society/nation in the coming years/decades. India did better than Pakistan and Bangladesh for a few decades not because we are a Hindu majority country, but we *were* a secular democracy. Hinduism (aka caste system) was kept in check to a decent degree and even combated. Now we are neither secular nor a democracy. It's going to be hell, except worse. If I had 100 dollars to bet on these countries building a better future over next 15 years, I would bet zero dollars on India. Zero.

While your point is well taken. And the answer is damn trivial. Just feed some protein/eggs to kids. But also remember KP is 6'4. Just saying. That's about a foot taller than average Indian male height. :)

@jasveer10 #MannKiBaat Same thing for Proud Indian, Proud American, Proud Pakistani. All nonsense.

I never understood this - Why do people feel proud of being born into a religion like ‘I’m a proud Hindu’ ‘I’m a proud Muslim’ What do you feel proud of? You didn’t choose it, you didn’t earn it, you had zero role in it. It just happened. It’s not an achievement There’s nothing to be proud of. So why feel proud about something that has nothing to do with your effort. Pride should come from achievement, effort, something you built, something that created impact. That’s something you earned. Not from something you got by default. If the only thing you’re proud of is something you got by accident. Then maybe there’s nothing else you’ve actually done. Second, borrowed pride is cheap, If your life lacks personal achievement, identity becomes your shortcut to self-worth. You should only feel proud of your work and achievements

election banger tweets >>> election results

@RNoln I have no issues frankly paying government servants a good pension, especially army folks. But then don't complain about the chindi 1k ladli bahin yojana ...!!! That's all.

@_amitbehere My mother doesn't get pension. She didn't serve mandated 20 years & served only "almost 20 years" due to health issues. Wonderful army rules!

A Government employee works 25 years and then takes tens of thousands per month pension for the next 30-35 years sitting at home. An army man serves for 15-20 years and takes a pension for 30-35 years. Not a problem for anyone. Because free ka paise middle and upper middle class ko mil raha. No one ever complains. But give one thousand rupees a month to lower income women, suddenly people bitch like they have red ants in their pants (sab ki gaand mein cheetiyaan kaatne lagti hain). What a shit society, what a shit people ..!!!

@shrelock13 Used to hate it, grown to like it now.

strong, sugarless filter coffee always hits the right spot

A man doing 9-5 job after marriage is nt a sacrifice (if he's nt a dowry beggar), he would still be working fr himself earlier, using ur job as an excuse to avoid ur household duties after marriage is nt acceptable.

@RohanBhardxxxx The run of bulls doesn't have religious connotations (any more), it's just as stupid, and they have been curtailing it year after year, and it will be stopped in a few years (look it up).

@_amitbehere Meh, most are wearing lungii and throwing only small bushels at each other. In Spain they have people chased by bulls during a festival, I think that’s more dangerous. There is stupendous superstition in India, true, and illiteracy, but this isn’t it.

India is ridiculously rituatlistic and superstitious. I mean we are talking African witch doctor voodoo level stuff, but with 1.4 billion people.

@RogerMatelot If you are white, you have a BETTER chance than any of us.

@_amitbehere You think a non-Indian has any chance of becoming a baba there ?

@harsh_019 I think 1k month for poor women is trivial compared to the other stuff. That should be last to go, not first. And free electricity, free bus rides for women, free water, free healthcare (all up to a point) are human rights. Again those don't need to go at all.

@_amitbehere Irrespective of anything, freebies culture must be stopped

If the US government was to end the H1-B program going forward, no issues. If you want to stop giving employment based green cards, if you want to stop giving citizenship to children born in US, no issues. Again your country your rules. What you cannot do is punish legitimate visa holders, who have followed all rules, broken no laws, by delaying visa appointments for months to and end, upending their lives, essentially trapping people inside the US. Sure one could still argue your country your rules, but this is cruel, arbitrary and evil. And most importantly unnecessary.

India is a unique country where even educated Phds, CAs, engineers and doctors have mind numbingly low IQs and critical thinking ability. Never seen it anywhere else in the world. I am sure it's because of India's majority religion. Hinduism. A society that broadly worships cow piss in 2026 can't be a normal, sane society. It will be a very stupid, shit society.