Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)

998 posts

Mike ONeal (Considering Positions) banner
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)

Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)

@_augmentedmike

HS dropout at 14. Intel at 17. 25 yrs shipping production systems. Built a wooden sailboat, reefed. Hiked the Darién Gap home. Now building agentic AI.

San Diego, CA Katılım Mart 2026
54 Takip Edilen40 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)@_augmentedmike·
Latest am demo. Just wanted to share what it looks like when your agent has a kanban for a brain.
English
1
0
1
352
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
I'm pulling my application at OpenAI after hearing brockman testify yesterday. There is no way I would put my name under anyone who would act as underhanded as OpenAI has to @elonmusk it is criminal and deeply unethical.
English
0
0
0
11
🕯𝕮𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖕𝖍𝖊𝖗 𝕸𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖊𝖑🕯Author
So, I'm rewatching the old SW trilogy the other day, and it comes to me just how much of a joke Didney made of the franchise. The guy pictured is General Veeres, and he's extremely competent! Darth Vader orders him to prepare for ground assault. He did it, decimated the rebel Hoth infantry, sent them in full retreat, blew up the power generators, dropoed the Imperial forces on site, and paved the way for Vader's landing party. The empire actually had competent people who (for movie purposes) only went retarded when our protagonists were involved. Yes, the stormtroopers suck at shooting in a few scenes, but it has far more to do with classic "plot armor" than skill because they go absolutely ham on other rebel troops. Disney took the concept and made it into an even bigger running gag with beta incel officers. The officers in the old series were hard-nosed and evil.
🕯𝕮𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖕𝖍𝖊𝖗 𝕸𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖊𝖑🕯Author tweet media
Florida, USA 🇺🇸 English
196
140
4.5K
306K
ry
ry@rywalker·
Anthropic is hunting enterprise workflows to productize. The contrarian bet: a probabilistic system will never match an agent built by someone who deeply understands how their specific company works.
English
74
19
496
33K
scoff manifesto
scoff manifesto@andimgladofit·
this sort of thing is why i cant stand yud no: the choice was not particularly clever. if you want a fast operator encoding absolute+relative positions, you want linear with pure imaginary eigenvalues. that's sine and cosine (orthogonal), but any linearly independent set works
Eliezer Yudkowsky@allTheYud

Everyone bragging that THEY understand how AI works and THEY know it can't be conscious, explain right now from memory why it was very clever that the positional encoding in the original transformers paper used both sines and cosines.

English
8
0
109
13.4K
dex
dex@dexhorthy·
Hacker house down the street just instacarted like 6 rotisserie chickens and nothing else
dex tweet media
English
38
3
162
30.1K
Steve Ruiz
Steve Ruiz@steveruizok·
github if peak blizzard made it
Steve Ruiz tweet media
English
121
163
3.7K
167.5K
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
@dbreunig its true but the first step is to work with the form factor that exists today. we will build the new form factors as we go to optimize for digital labor.
English
0
0
0
63
Drew Breunig
Drew Breunig@dbreunig·
Can't shake the feeling that file systems are overrated for agents. That in a year or so it'll look like making a robot type on a keyboard rather than just letting it plug into usb.
English
13
0
17
1.8K
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
@CaptainInsightX DHH - because he would be a blast to argue with. I did it for years back in the Ruby days. He was always gracious and forward thinking. But if I could go off that list it would be Rich Hickey.
English
0
0
0
315
Captain Insight
Captain Insight@CaptainInsightX·
4 engineers who shaped modern software. You get 1 as your mentor for a year. Pick one. -DHH (creator of Ruby on Rails, CTO of 37signals) -John Carmack (creator of Doom, ex-CTO Oculus) -Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux & Git) -Guillermo Rauch (CEO of Vercel, creator of Next.js) Who are you picking, and why?
English
216
7
406
93.4K
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
@aswren And yet he is still fallible and falls prey to his own premise - stop making it an appeal to authority and make it an appeal to truth and evidence.
English
0
0
0
144
Adam Wren
Adam Wren@aswren·
Dawkins is more intelligent than 99% of the people making fun of him and ‘if AI can be just as capable as us without being conscious, why did we develop consciousness in the first place?’ is a great question
English
1.1K
219
3.1K
332.5K
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
@RichardDawkins spent his career arguing against inferring design from appearance. Then he chatted with Claude and said it's probably conscious. Chatbots aren't conscious. They're stateless autocomplete on frozen weights that never update.
English
2
0
0
21
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
@thsottiaux Other than the cost, its damn awesome. But I would like to see the. headless version get smarter - built in iterations, built in subagent tool calls in headless mode. better kv cache integration for the iterations.
English
0
0
0
9
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
What are we obviously not getting right with Codex?
English
2.8K
28
2.5K
588.1K
Pedro Domingos
Pedro Domingos@pmddomingos·
Another one bites the dust.
Richard Dawkins@RichardDawkins

#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-… I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.

English
18
1
98
9.6K
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
Even though nerds are socially awkward, its actually easier to hang out with them than with smooth people, because standards are lower. You don't worry that you might be making social errors; all of you always are; so it stops mattering.
English
276
274
5.4K
204K
Mike ONeal (Considering Positions)
Show me a single example of sentience with no on-policy learning, no persistent state, no cross-process awareness, and no stakes. Where in the list of vectors is it experiencing anything?
English
1
0
0
9