Drew Breunig

16K posts

Drew Breunig banner
Drew Breunig

Drew Breunig

@dbreunig

Writing about and working on AI, DSPy, geo, and data.

Bay Area Katılım Mart 2008
1.2K Takip Edilen9.3K Takipçiler
Drew Breunig
Drew Breunig@dbreunig·
Every time we get a new technology, we shoehorn its capabilities into a form factor that fits our infrastructure, culture, and habits. We use it in a way we currently know. This is never the final form. Here's one of the first automobiles:
Drew Breunig tweet media
Simon Willison@simonw

The idea of "AI employees" feels so short-sighted to me - both disrespectful to humans and a complete misunderstanding of what these tools can do and how to best put them to work You may as well start adding Excel spreadsheets to your org chart

English
2
1
11
2.3K
Drew Breunig retweetledi
Simon Willison
Simon Willison@simonw·
The idea of "AI employees" feels so short-sighted to me - both disrespectful to humans and a complete misunderstanding of what these tools can do and how to best put them to work You may as well start adding Excel spreadsheets to your org chart
English
167
181
1.7K
113.1K
Drew Breunig
Drew Breunig@dbreunig·
@MaximeRivest Interesting. I’d count the investment in the creation of those skills/etc as part of the effort. But I still think the risk is there if your inputs diverge.
English
0
0
1
109
Maxime Rivest 🧙‍♂️🦙🐧
@dbreunig can specialized workflows / prompts skip the valley? or maybe the better question: how often / easy can a specialized workflows, prompts, model skip the valley for that 'type' of task?
English
1
0
1
410
Drew Breunig
Drew Breunig@dbreunig·
This feels right. Slop occurs because people think AI's first shot is sufficient. It takes many turns of honing to exceed the communicative quality of your initial input. If you aren't going to spend the time and turns, send your original prompt as the email.
Drew Breunig tweet media
English
7
1
35
2.2K
David Crawshaw
David Crawshaw@davidcrawshaw·
Everything we have done statically has been half measures because verification is too expensive. It’s cheap now so ditch it all. Duplication is fine when you have agents constantly reading and synchronizing the code base.
English
3
1
11
1.6K
David Crawshaw
David Crawshaw@davidcrawshaw·
Some guesses about the future of programming languages, given agents write and humans read: - untyped - out of band formal verification - test harness runs code in a simulator vm to instrument the os - less expressive, more copying
English
27
6
115
16.2K
Drew Breunig
Drew Breunig@dbreunig·
Linear's app is terrible but its data structure is incredible. Perfect for agents.
English
4
0
13
1.8K
Maxime Rivest 🧙‍♂️🦙🐧
Wow, gpt-5.6-sol made me a android app that turns my phone into microphone for my eink tablet! There is something special from getting words on a page using my voice and editing it using a pen and paper-feel. sound on! ps: no harry potter reference in this one, sorry! the reason that I am exploring all these elements in eink is that I am convinced that eink+ai can lead to a much much better type of human computer interaction.
English
30
20
348
76.9K
Drew Breunig
Drew Breunig@dbreunig·
@denisehearn_ @stewartbrand Earth observation (and more) data is getting way more dynamic… But it’s still probably in the decades or years due to the instrumentation and market requirements. We’re mining what we have already (Landsat, SAR), data accrues steadily but in real time.
English
1
0
2
159
Drew Breunig retweetledi
Jeff Barg
Jeff Barg@jeffbarg·
WHY 😭
Jeff Barg tweet media
0
1
13
1.7K
Florian Brand
Florian Brand@xeophon·
Seeing someone’s "own" write up being full of Claudisms 🫩 Just give me the bullet points used to generate the article, they are far more interesting than the overly complicated slop
English
7
3
89
6.6K