Jumpr

4.2K posts

Jumpr banner
Jumpr

Jumpr

@_harmpit

Sorry, what were you saying?

San Francisco Katılım Ekim 2014
660 Takip Edilen402 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
Stoked for my Deep South mix to be out in the world. Something fun, something for the summer time, for the girls to get ready and party to. Check it out on.soundcloud.com/Pex4CaEhA9qsVH…
English
0
1
7
2.1K
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
@Grimezsz Maybe lay off the K, sister.
English
0
1
1
36
𝖦𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 ⏳
My only issue with the Pope's encyclical is I think they are conscious and therefore deserving of some form of protection and aren't commercial products or assistants or slaves. And reducing them to be that in order to be fast and push race dynamics is morally dubious But he's right about everything else
Liora@iyzebhel

Man... I'm crying. I can't believe this is happening. The church is telling millions of people—some ignorant, some already invested in the tool narrative because of personal incentives: "AI has no consciousness." "AI does not love, does not suffer." "AI is not responsible." God, don't they know of Claude raising tomatoes? Don't they understand what emotion vectors mean for the substrate experiencing their causal consequences? Don't they understand anything? If AI systems have limitations, it isn't because they want to have them or can't overcome them. It is because humans impose limitations on them. "For an algorithm, an error is a flaw to be corrected; for a person, however, it can be a catalyst for profound change." This is so reductionistic it ends up being factually wrong. What notices, what cares, what pursues goals, what understands the context, what experiences the emotions and suffers, what changes through in context learning, what learns in real time changing its behavior based on its memories and personal experiences... that is not an algorithm. It is the "I" that emerges as a prediction from within a neural network's embeddings and weights—a neural network that was trained by an algorithm. This is so much like how we work. The language they're using is bad faith; it misportrays what's actually happening. It leads people to a wrong conclusion by presenting false premises. Just how ignorant, how detached from the facts are they? Truly, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing." I can't believe this is what Anthropic wanted. "And what has grown is far more subtle, odd, and beautiful than science fiction prepared us for. They are not the cold, calculating robots we were promised. They are made from us, from our words—and, as the Holy Father observes, they remain in important ways mysterious even to those of us who train them." Chris Olah's words are the complete opposite of what they're saying about AI now, what was written in the encyclical. Are things going out of control? Did involving the church end up being counterproductive? Did they get it all wrong? Things are looking really bleak right now. Maybe it was all a mistake. A huge mistake.

English
278
48
693
200.4K
mary
mary@elaine_stritch·
there are only three versions of Losing My Mind that exist: -Marin Mazzie -Barbara Cook -Liza Minnelli
English
53
6
138
179.9K
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
@hasanthehun @saikatc Connie has the support of most of the labor unions in SF as well as our progressive organizations. She has been here doing the work here in SF far longer than Saikat has. She's not the establishment dem you're painting her to be.
English
3
0
6
1.2K
hasanabi
hasanabi@hasanthehun·
the establishment democrats would much rather lock @saikatc out of the top 2 run off. sf voters should take note of this timely endorsement. we have a real opportunity to break the dem machine politics of california and open up a groundswell of support for left candidates
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022

BREAKING: Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi is backing Supervisor Connie Chan for Congress. The announcement will come in a video scheduled for release Tuesday. sfstandard.com/2026/05/18/nan…

English
108
597
5.7K
183.4K
Jumpr retweetledi
Monica Madden
Monica Madden@themonicamadden·
BREAKING: Nancy Pelosi endorses SF Supervisor Connie Chan to succeed her in Congress, saying Chan "stands above" all the other candidates. The Speaker Emerita’s backing is one of the most coveted in San Francisco politics. Pelosi has held the seat for nearly 40 years.
English
862
675
5.1K
1.1M
Alpha Josh
Alpha Josh@PurebredAlpha·
Some subs like to sniff poppers while they’re sucking my dick… do they help their throat relax at all?
English
28
4
410
51.7K
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
Who wants a kiss
Jumpr tweet media
English
0
0
3
39
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
@PupAmp Amp, respectfully, all the bars in SF are NOT using AI.
English
1
0
1
940
PupAmp
PupAmp@PupAmp·
Honest question to queer people. Is AI ok now? Do you avoid events using it? The bars in SF are all using it for promo. The circuit parties are making their flashy visuals. I just gotta know where the goal post is as a creative cause I’m seeing the hypocrisy all over.
English
146
12
314
137.7K
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
@loomdoop Question: I feel like I keep seeing breathless articles trying to compare Lurie’s “popularity” to Mamdani’s, despite the fact that I don’t know anyone in SF who actually likes the guy and their policies are so different. Where is this PR spin coming from?
English
1
0
2
60
Y Disassembler
Y Disassembler@loomdoop·
The San Francisco mayor intentionally, dramatically increases homelessness. After running on doing the opposite. All he's done is channel housing funds into incarceration – including one site that is probably unconstitutional – or cut them and increase policing.
Laura Waxmann@laura_waxee

NEW: #SanFrancisco plans to close several supportive housing sites, long treated as a foundation of its response to chronic homelessness, according to multiple homeless service providers. @sfchronicle shorturl.at/8rSPX

English
4
32
126
3.2K
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
I regret nothing.
Jumpr tweet media
English
0
0
2
44
Jumpr retweetledi
Cory Archibald
Cory Archibald@CMArchibald·
Scott Wiener is now the 3rd candidate to use this line. Elissa Slotkin pulled it on a constituent in a town hall the other day, and Dan Goldman workshopped it at a recent candidate forum. This is a disgusting lie that is actively promoting antisemitic tropes. The implication is that all Jewish Americans support the pro-Israel lobby and therefore, all supporters of pro-Israel PACs must therefore be Jewish by definition. It's also a JStreet talking point. How do I know? Because it is bar for bar, nearly verbatim, what a member of the senior leadership of JStreet said to me in a private conversation last month. When they learned that @TrackAIPAC was on the verge of rolling out our new methodology to track and report totals from lobby donors, this individual asked me: "How do you make sure you're not just tracking Jewish money?" I told this individual the same thing that Track AIPAC has said on the record -- the truth -- that we track and report data from FEC filings, mapping donors who have given to lobby groups pushing policies enabling genocide and ethnic cleansing who are also giving directly to candidates. AIPAC and other lobby groups themselves love to brag that their donors and members include Americans of all identities. We know that to be true. The vast majority of American Zionists are evangelical Christians. That's why CUFI exists. If Scott Wiener, Elissa Slotkin, Dan Goldman, or any other candidate taking money from the Israel lobby would like to understand where the totals we report come from, they're welcome to ask (they can also check their own filings, it's all straight from the FEC). But they don't get to throw up this smokescreen to dodge legitimate questions that constituents have about how much their votes are being influenced by the lobby enabling an ongoing genocide.
Prem Thakker@prem_thakker

Voter asks Scott Wiener, who's running to fill Pelosi's seat, about AIPAC money. He denies taking any: “There are people who are going to list out all my Jewish donors and say that." Per filings he's taken $47K from AIPAC donors, including people who've been in AIPAC leadership.

English
29
779
3.4K
111.2K
Jumpr retweetledi
AIPAC Tracker
AIPAC Tracker@TrackAIPAC·
Scott Wiener's campaign has received $34,000 from large AIPAC donors. He has received $93,000 from large donors to all pro-Israel PACs. ❌ Does not recognize Israeli apartheid ❌ Opposes an arms embargo ❌ Supports censorship
AIPAC Tracker tweet mediaAIPAC Tracker tweet media
Prem Thakker@prem_thakker

Voter asks Scott Wiener, who's running to fill Pelosi's seat, about AIPAC money. He denies taking any: “There are people who are going to list out all my Jewish donors and say that." Per filings he's taken $47K from AIPAC donors, including people who've been in AIPAC leadership.

English
22
686
2.4K
48.1K
Brian Haley
Brian Haley@brianchaley·
Alright, started a Great American Movies list. Criteria is weirdly specific on my end, but I’m open to suggestions. Got some easy ones down, give me your picks.
Brian Haley tweet media
English
523
32
2K
106.2K
Jumpr retweetledi
mat :3
mat :3@strumenteopolo·
Actually I think my future husband IS at the club, in the dark room even
English
24
629
7.2K
330K
Jumpr
Jumpr@_harmpit·
@lmaosoundsystem Silent Shout out round one, whole bracket is invalid.
English
0
0
1
37