Link

1.4K posts

Link banner
Link

Link

@_Link_

Christian. Husband. Father of Five. Former Green Beret.

Katılım Nisan 2022
233 Takip Edilen9.6K Takipçiler
Adam Hart
Adam Hart@Hartlander_·
Catholics: “Wow Protestant leadership is retarded and disorganized, you should all come home to Rome!” The PCA - Does everything in its power to prove them right.
English
1
1
25
2.5K
Link retweetledi
Adam Hart
Adam Hart@Hartlander_·
Here is Anthony Bradley with insulting condescension for a brother in Christ dripping from every response. Will he be disciplined by the PCA? “But whoever says, “You fool!” shall be in danger of hellfire” - Mathew 5:22
Adam Hart tweet mediaAdam Hart tweet mediaAdam Hart tweet media
English
6
2
40
1.1K
Psalm Warfare
Psalm Warfare@PsalmWarfare·
Some denominations are like: “We won’t ordain women pastors.” But also: “We will not tolerate masculine pastors.”
English
4
5
100
906
Link retweetledi
Stephen Wolfe
Stephen Wolfe@PerfInjust·
“[Do not] be too much disturbed, when we see the pastoral office assumed by ignorant asses.” Calvin (on Jer. 27:16)
English
15
65
565
15.4K
Link retweetledi
The Jolly Brawler
The Jolly Brawler@TheJollyBrawler·
Gentlemen, Christ our Lord has made things abundantly clear for those with eyes to see. Over the last several years, and with violent acceleration over the last year, the denominations have made one thing plain: They are at war with godly men and with God’s created order. This week, we saw it with Dr. Garris. Last week, we saw it with Dr. Schlebusch. The bar is incredibly low: “Will this church refrain from punishing a Lutheran or Reformed man for refusing liberalism and acting like a man?” No denomination has been able to clear even that bar. The denominational machines have protected cowards, hirelings, climbers, and wolves, while serious men are left asking where they can take their wives and children on Sunday. It seems increasingly clear that we must stop treating these corrupted structures as if they are the only possible path forward. These corporations are not the Church. They do not own the Church. They do not validate the Church. They do not create, sustain, or protect the Church. It is time to put denominationalism on the shelf, starve the parasites bleeding our churches dry, and rebuild faithful Christian life outside the machines. If God wills, future generations can decide whether those machines are worth reclaiming.
The Jolly Brawler tweet media
English
21
54
346
8.7K
Link retweetledi
Andrew Isker 🌳🪓
Andrew Isker 🌳🪓@BonifaceOption·
Calling a comically arrogant man “arrogant” and mocking him for constantly bragging about his Ph.D. is “unwholesome speech” worthy of suspension from ministry if you are a gelding like the “men” in this presbytery. What a farce. If this were the 16th Century, someone like Luther would write a pamphlet blasting them as the PCA (Presbyterian Catamites of America).
Sean McGowan@irishpresby

@TheRhetorRick

English
17
45
593
11.9K
Link retweetledi
Thomas Booher
Thomas Booher@ptomer·
The PCA is an absolute woke joke, as is most of NAPARC. May God rebuke those evil men and this absurd miscarriage of justice. Indefinite suspension for allegedly "mean tweets". And let's be real. It is mostly because Anthony Bradley is black, but they won't admit it. Just reverse the races though.
Sean McGowan@irishpresby

At trial, the Rio Grande Presbytery (PCA) found Rev. Zachary Garris NOT GUILTY of Charge 1 regarding his comments on slavery from June 2024. However, Garris was found GUILTY of Charge 2 for “unwholesome speech” per Ephesians 4:29, based on a 2023 interaction on X with Anthony Bradley. The Presbytery has indefinitely suspended him.

English
2
5
101
3K
Peyton Smith
Peyton Smith@Psmitty916·
@WVPitt @WVPitt Too bad the Nazis in the chat don’t understand that using AI to ask if AI lied is redundant because AI can lie about lying 😂…thanks for the report Ben… looking forward to seeing how this year’s Synod turns out. ~SDG
English
2
0
0
44
Benjamin Glaser
Benjamin Glaser@WVPitt·
As was noted weeks ago the paper isn't official until it is adopted by Synod. Changes are made, corrections are noted, and things fixed as needed. Hence why this "gotcha" is as ignorant as the poster. x.com/WVPitt/status/…
Link@_Link_

Ask yourself if @WVPitt is being honest. Links to both papers and the @GeoffVScott + @pactuminstitute video where they first discuss that original paper had one false citation and false accusation. I had Claude check. 34 substantive edits. Every citation I checked, was completely fabricated. I didn't check all of them. Feel free to do so. Summary Version 1 ("10_Moderator_Committee_Kinism.pdf") — 29 pages Version 2 ("Kinism Special Committee of Synod 2026 Report.pdf") — 28 pages The second version is a later revision: footnotes have been renumbered upward (e.g. fn 2 → fn 4 in the early pages, fn 60 → fn 62 by the end), text has been re-flowed, and the page footer was changed everywhere. Two new sourcing footnotes were inserted at the top, so every later footnote slides by two. Systemic / mechanical differences Page footer text changed on every body page — "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index 10" → "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index Number XX Page Number" (a placeholder; the indexer hasn't been filled in yet). ~24 page footers affected. Total page count: 29 → 28, because text reflowed more tightly. Footnote numbering shifts by +2 through most of the paper (two new footnotes were added on p. 4). Substantive prose changes (34 distinct edits) Editorial / wording: "former U.S. based reconstructionists" → "U.S. based former reconstructionists" "in Grace Presbytery, Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" → "in Grace Presbytery: Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" (comma → colon) "daughter of Pharoah. The latter two being" → "daughter of Pharoah, the latter two being" (period → comma) "as Kinism is not as clear and relatable" → "as Kinism. How that is is not as clear and relatable" (sentence break + added clause) "Linnaeus is positively cited by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" → "This kind of enthno-nationalism which marks nations into ethnic silos is positively encouraged by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" "Dabney fully understood he was a target of Woodrow's pamphlet" → "Dabney had tussled with Woodrow many times" "It is also worth noting that the post-war PCUS sided with Girardeau over and against Dabney" → "Sadly the post-war PCUS did not go with the stream advocated by John Adger and others" "Robert Mackenzie takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" → "Nathan Ristuccia takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" (and "Mackenzie notes" → "Ristuccia notes") "no supporter of the segregation found in the American South" → "no supporter of the type of segregation found in the American South" "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose." → "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith and others, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose and a better picture of the times is worth consulting." Deleted sentence (p. 17 of v1): "In fact, Christ had Ammonite blood as well, since Naamah, the mother of Rehoboam, was an Ammonite (1 Kings 14:21)." — removed entirely from v2. Citation / footnote source changes: Footnotes 2 and 3 (new) added, citing Pactum Institute "Christian Race Realism" Parts 2 and 3 (Nature, Scripture). Old single footnote pointed only to Part 1. Old fn 8 (Rushdoony, Institutes of Biblical Law + Ingram, The World Under God's Law, 1959) → new fn 10 (Perry Wilkins, "Rushdoony's Kinism" + Ingram, Essays On Segregation, 1960) — different book by Ingram, different year, different secondary source. Old fn 9 (three Mark R. Rushdoony Chalcedon magazine articles) → new fn 11 (Mark R. Rushdoony YouTube lecture + "Ask Chalcedon: Race" blog post) — completely different sources. Old fn 10 (Thornwell 1873 ed. + Guy Prentiss Waters + Hart) → new fn 12 (Thornwell 1850 ed. + Alan Strange instead of Waters + different Hart citation, Ordained Servant 7 no. 3 instead of 15). Linnaeus pages: "10–12" → "194ff" (fn 13/15). Old fn 14 (J. Philippe Rushton, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, 1995) → new fn 16 (Richard Lynn, Race Difference in Intelligence, 2015) — different author/book. Old fn 15 (Schlebusch, "Linnaeus and the Reality of Kind") → new fn 17 (Schlebusch, "The Particularity and Universality of Ethno-Christocracy") — different Pactum article. Old fn 16 (Dabney, "Review of 'Address on African Colonization'", SPR 1852) → new fn 18 (Dabney, A Defense of Virginia, 1867). Old fn 17 (John B. Adger, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1850) → new fn 19 (Abner Addison Porter, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1851) — different author and year. Old fn 20 (Dabney, "The Strategy of the Evolutionist", Jan 1885) → new fn 22 (Dabney, "The Caution Against Anti-Christian Science Criticised by Dr. Woodrow", Oct 1873). Old fn 21 (Girardeau, "Address on the Relation of the Church to the Colored Population", 1871) → new fn 23 (Girardeau, "On Ecclesiastical Relations to Freedmen", SPR 1867). Calhoun page range: 245–250 → 221–232 (fn 22 → fn 24). Old fn 23 entirely deleted: "Report on the Ecclesiastical Relations to the Colored People", 1871. New "Ibid, 231" footnote added (fn 25). Old fn 25 (Robert Tracy McKenzie, Ad Fontes, April 25, 2023) → new fn 27 (Nathan Ristuccia, Ad Fontes, November 29, 2022) — different author and date. Davis Carlton article: date "May 28, 2012" → "January 19, 2011" and URL changed accordingly (fn 26 → fn 28). Old fn 27 (Vos letter to Johannes Vos, April 24, 1893) → new fn 29 (Vos, "The Wonderful Tree", Kerux 6 no. 2, 1991) — different Vos source. Old fn 29 (Chad Van Dixhoorn, "The Westminster Assembly and the Eighth Commandment") → new fn 31 (Westminster Assembly, Annotations upon all the Books of the Old and New Testament, 1651, on Ex 21:16). Old fn 31 (Gillespie, A Treatise of Miscellany Questions, 1649) → new fn 33 (Gillespie, Wholesome Severity Reconciled with Christian Liberty, 1645) — different work. Carleton Coon page range: "655–660" → "645–656" (fn 34 → fn 36). Old fn 37 (Davis Carlton, "Aesthetics: Kinism vs. Alienism", Oct 21, 2014) → new fn 39 (Ehud Would, same title, Oct 22, 2014) — different author and date. Old fn 38 (Morton H. Smith, "The Biblical Case for Segregation", Southern Presbyterian Journal, May 1957) → new fn 40 (Morton H. Smith, "The Racial Problem Facing America", Presbyterian Guardian, Oct 1964) — different Morton Smith article. Old fn 39 (Lucas, pp. 185–190, + Joseph A. Pipa Jr., "The PCA at 40") → new fn 41 (Lucas, pp. 189–218, + Scott Cook, "Bury the Dead (Including Morton Smith) with Honor", Aquila Report, 2018) — different page range and different secondary source. In total: roughly 34 substantive content edits plus the systemic footer/page-count/footnote-numbering changes. The most consequential are the 19 citation swaps (different authors, dates, books, or articles), the one deleted sentence about Rehoboam's Ammonite mother, and the rewording about post-war PCUS / Adger vs. Girardeau. The footer placeholder ("Index Number XX Page Number") shows v2 is still pre-publication.

English
15
1
10
4.1K
𝕻𝖔𝖘𝖙𝕸𝖎𝖑𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖊
Once again: Kinism is just White people expressing the same in-group preference every other race celebrates
Link@_Link_

Ask yourself if @WVPitt is being honest. Links to both papers and the @GeoffVScott + @pactuminstitute video where they first discuss that original paper had one false citation and false accusation. I had Claude check. 34 substantive edits. Every citation I checked, was completely fabricated. I didn't check all of them. Feel free to do so. Summary Version 1 ("10_Moderator_Committee_Kinism.pdf") — 29 pages Version 2 ("Kinism Special Committee of Synod 2026 Report.pdf") — 28 pages The second version is a later revision: footnotes have been renumbered upward (e.g. fn 2 → fn 4 in the early pages, fn 60 → fn 62 by the end), text has been re-flowed, and the page footer was changed everywhere. Two new sourcing footnotes were inserted at the top, so every later footnote slides by two. Systemic / mechanical differences Page footer text changed on every body page — "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index 10" → "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index Number XX Page Number" (a placeholder; the indexer hasn't been filled in yet). ~24 page footers affected. Total page count: 29 → 28, because text reflowed more tightly. Footnote numbering shifts by +2 through most of the paper (two new footnotes were added on p. 4). Substantive prose changes (34 distinct edits) Editorial / wording: "former U.S. based reconstructionists" → "U.S. based former reconstructionists" "in Grace Presbytery, Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" → "in Grace Presbytery: Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" (comma → colon) "daughter of Pharoah. The latter two being" → "daughter of Pharoah, the latter two being" (period → comma) "as Kinism is not as clear and relatable" → "as Kinism. How that is is not as clear and relatable" (sentence break + added clause) "Linnaeus is positively cited by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" → "This kind of enthno-nationalism which marks nations into ethnic silos is positively encouraged by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" "Dabney fully understood he was a target of Woodrow's pamphlet" → "Dabney had tussled with Woodrow many times" "It is also worth noting that the post-war PCUS sided with Girardeau over and against Dabney" → "Sadly the post-war PCUS did not go with the stream advocated by John Adger and others" "Robert Mackenzie takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" → "Nathan Ristuccia takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" (and "Mackenzie notes" → "Ristuccia notes") "no supporter of the segregation found in the American South" → "no supporter of the type of segregation found in the American South" "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose." → "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith and others, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose and a better picture of the times is worth consulting." Deleted sentence (p. 17 of v1): "In fact, Christ had Ammonite blood as well, since Naamah, the mother of Rehoboam, was an Ammonite (1 Kings 14:21)." — removed entirely from v2. Citation / footnote source changes: Footnotes 2 and 3 (new) added, citing Pactum Institute "Christian Race Realism" Parts 2 and 3 (Nature, Scripture). Old single footnote pointed only to Part 1. Old fn 8 (Rushdoony, Institutes of Biblical Law + Ingram, The World Under God's Law, 1959) → new fn 10 (Perry Wilkins, "Rushdoony's Kinism" + Ingram, Essays On Segregation, 1960) — different book by Ingram, different year, different secondary source. Old fn 9 (three Mark R. Rushdoony Chalcedon magazine articles) → new fn 11 (Mark R. Rushdoony YouTube lecture + "Ask Chalcedon: Race" blog post) — completely different sources. Old fn 10 (Thornwell 1873 ed. + Guy Prentiss Waters + Hart) → new fn 12 (Thornwell 1850 ed. + Alan Strange instead of Waters + different Hart citation, Ordained Servant 7 no. 3 instead of 15). Linnaeus pages: "10–12" → "194ff" (fn 13/15). Old fn 14 (J. Philippe Rushton, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, 1995) → new fn 16 (Richard Lynn, Race Difference in Intelligence, 2015) — different author/book. Old fn 15 (Schlebusch, "Linnaeus and the Reality of Kind") → new fn 17 (Schlebusch, "The Particularity and Universality of Ethno-Christocracy") — different Pactum article. Old fn 16 (Dabney, "Review of 'Address on African Colonization'", SPR 1852) → new fn 18 (Dabney, A Defense of Virginia, 1867). Old fn 17 (John B. Adger, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1850) → new fn 19 (Abner Addison Porter, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1851) — different author and year. Old fn 20 (Dabney, "The Strategy of the Evolutionist", Jan 1885) → new fn 22 (Dabney, "The Caution Against Anti-Christian Science Criticised by Dr. Woodrow", Oct 1873). Old fn 21 (Girardeau, "Address on the Relation of the Church to the Colored Population", 1871) → new fn 23 (Girardeau, "On Ecclesiastical Relations to Freedmen", SPR 1867). Calhoun page range: 245–250 → 221–232 (fn 22 → fn 24). Old fn 23 entirely deleted: "Report on the Ecclesiastical Relations to the Colored People", 1871. New "Ibid, 231" footnote added (fn 25). Old fn 25 (Robert Tracy McKenzie, Ad Fontes, April 25, 2023) → new fn 27 (Nathan Ristuccia, Ad Fontes, November 29, 2022) — different author and date. Davis Carlton article: date "May 28, 2012" → "January 19, 2011" and URL changed accordingly (fn 26 → fn 28). Old fn 27 (Vos letter to Johannes Vos, April 24, 1893) → new fn 29 (Vos, "The Wonderful Tree", Kerux 6 no. 2, 1991) — different Vos source. Old fn 29 (Chad Van Dixhoorn, "The Westminster Assembly and the Eighth Commandment") → new fn 31 (Westminster Assembly, Annotations upon all the Books of the Old and New Testament, 1651, on Ex 21:16). Old fn 31 (Gillespie, A Treatise of Miscellany Questions, 1649) → new fn 33 (Gillespie, Wholesome Severity Reconciled with Christian Liberty, 1645) — different work. Carleton Coon page range: "655–660" → "645–656" (fn 34 → fn 36). Old fn 37 (Davis Carlton, "Aesthetics: Kinism vs. Alienism", Oct 21, 2014) → new fn 39 (Ehud Would, same title, Oct 22, 2014) — different author and date. Old fn 38 (Morton H. Smith, "The Biblical Case for Segregation", Southern Presbyterian Journal, May 1957) → new fn 40 (Morton H. Smith, "The Racial Problem Facing America", Presbyterian Guardian, Oct 1964) — different Morton Smith article. Old fn 39 (Lucas, pp. 185–190, + Joseph A. Pipa Jr., "The PCA at 40") → new fn 41 (Lucas, pp. 189–218, + Scott Cook, "Bury the Dead (Including Morton Smith) with Honor", Aquila Report, 2018) — different page range and different secondary source. In total: roughly 34 substantive content edits plus the systemic footer/page-count/footnote-numbering changes. The most consequential are the 19 citation swaps (different authors, dates, books, or articles), the one deleted sentence about Rehoboam's Ammonite mother, and the rewording about post-war PCUS / Adger vs. Girardeau. The footer placeholder ("Index Number XX Page Number") shows v2 is still pre-publication.

English
1
0
17
502
Link
Link@_Link_·
Ask yourself if @WVPitt is being honest. Links to both papers and the @GeoffVScott + @pactuminstitute video where they first discuss that original paper had one false citation and false accusation. I had Claude check. 34 substantive edits. Every citation I checked, was completely fabricated. I didn't check all of them. Feel free to do so. Summary Version 1 ("10_Moderator_Committee_Kinism.pdf") — 29 pages Version 2 ("Kinism Special Committee of Synod 2026 Report.pdf") — 28 pages The second version is a later revision: footnotes have been renumbered upward (e.g. fn 2 → fn 4 in the early pages, fn 60 → fn 62 by the end), text has been re-flowed, and the page footer was changed everywhere. Two new sourcing footnotes were inserted at the top, so every later footnote slides by two. Systemic / mechanical differences Page footer text changed on every body page — "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index 10" → "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index Number XX Page Number" (a placeholder; the indexer hasn't been filled in yet). ~24 page footers affected. Total page count: 29 → 28, because text reflowed more tightly. Footnote numbering shifts by +2 through most of the paper (two new footnotes were added on p. 4). Substantive prose changes (34 distinct edits) Editorial / wording: "former U.S. based reconstructionists" → "U.S. based former reconstructionists" "in Grace Presbytery, Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" → "in Grace Presbytery: Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" (comma → colon) "daughter of Pharoah. The latter two being" → "daughter of Pharoah, the latter two being" (period → comma) "as Kinism is not as clear and relatable" → "as Kinism. How that is is not as clear and relatable" (sentence break + added clause) "Linnaeus is positively cited by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" → "This kind of enthno-nationalism which marks nations into ethnic silos is positively encouraged by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" "Dabney fully understood he was a target of Woodrow's pamphlet" → "Dabney had tussled with Woodrow many times" "It is also worth noting that the post-war PCUS sided with Girardeau over and against Dabney" → "Sadly the post-war PCUS did not go with the stream advocated by John Adger and others" "Robert Mackenzie takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" → "Nathan Ristuccia takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" (and "Mackenzie notes" → "Ristuccia notes") "no supporter of the segregation found in the American South" → "no supporter of the type of segregation found in the American South" "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose." → "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith and others, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose and a better picture of the times is worth consulting." Deleted sentence (p. 17 of v1): "In fact, Christ had Ammonite blood as well, since Naamah, the mother of Rehoboam, was an Ammonite (1 Kings 14:21)." — removed entirely from v2. Citation / footnote source changes: Footnotes 2 and 3 (new) added, citing Pactum Institute "Christian Race Realism" Parts 2 and 3 (Nature, Scripture). Old single footnote pointed only to Part 1. Old fn 8 (Rushdoony, Institutes of Biblical Law + Ingram, The World Under God's Law, 1959) → new fn 10 (Perry Wilkins, "Rushdoony's Kinism" + Ingram, Essays On Segregation, 1960) — different book by Ingram, different year, different secondary source. Old fn 9 (three Mark R. Rushdoony Chalcedon magazine articles) → new fn 11 (Mark R. Rushdoony YouTube lecture + "Ask Chalcedon: Race" blog post) — completely different sources. Old fn 10 (Thornwell 1873 ed. + Guy Prentiss Waters + Hart) → new fn 12 (Thornwell 1850 ed. + Alan Strange instead of Waters + different Hart citation, Ordained Servant 7 no. 3 instead of 15). Linnaeus pages: "10–12" → "194ff" (fn 13/15). Old fn 14 (J. Philippe Rushton, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, 1995) → new fn 16 (Richard Lynn, Race Difference in Intelligence, 2015) — different author/book. Old fn 15 (Schlebusch, "Linnaeus and the Reality of Kind") → new fn 17 (Schlebusch, "The Particularity and Universality of Ethno-Christocracy") — different Pactum article. Old fn 16 (Dabney, "Review of 'Address on African Colonization'", SPR 1852) → new fn 18 (Dabney, A Defense of Virginia, 1867). Old fn 17 (John B. Adger, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1850) → new fn 19 (Abner Addison Porter, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1851) — different author and year. Old fn 20 (Dabney, "The Strategy of the Evolutionist", Jan 1885) → new fn 22 (Dabney, "The Caution Against Anti-Christian Science Criticised by Dr. Woodrow", Oct 1873). Old fn 21 (Girardeau, "Address on the Relation of the Church to the Colored Population", 1871) → new fn 23 (Girardeau, "On Ecclesiastical Relations to Freedmen", SPR 1867). Calhoun page range: 245–250 → 221–232 (fn 22 → fn 24). Old fn 23 entirely deleted: "Report on the Ecclesiastical Relations to the Colored People", 1871. New "Ibid, 231" footnote added (fn 25). Old fn 25 (Robert Tracy McKenzie, Ad Fontes, April 25, 2023) → new fn 27 (Nathan Ristuccia, Ad Fontes, November 29, 2022) — different author and date. Davis Carlton article: date "May 28, 2012" → "January 19, 2011" and URL changed accordingly (fn 26 → fn 28). Old fn 27 (Vos letter to Johannes Vos, April 24, 1893) → new fn 29 (Vos, "The Wonderful Tree", Kerux 6 no. 2, 1991) — different Vos source. Old fn 29 (Chad Van Dixhoorn, "The Westminster Assembly and the Eighth Commandment") → new fn 31 (Westminster Assembly, Annotations upon all the Books of the Old and New Testament, 1651, on Ex 21:16). Old fn 31 (Gillespie, A Treatise of Miscellany Questions, 1649) → new fn 33 (Gillespie, Wholesome Severity Reconciled with Christian Liberty, 1645) — different work. Carleton Coon page range: "655–660" → "645–656" (fn 34 → fn 36). Old fn 37 (Davis Carlton, "Aesthetics: Kinism vs. Alienism", Oct 21, 2014) → new fn 39 (Ehud Would, same title, Oct 22, 2014) — different author and date. Old fn 38 (Morton H. Smith, "The Biblical Case for Segregation", Southern Presbyterian Journal, May 1957) → new fn 40 (Morton H. Smith, "The Racial Problem Facing America", Presbyterian Guardian, Oct 1964) — different Morton Smith article. Old fn 39 (Lucas, pp. 185–190, + Joseph A. Pipa Jr., "The PCA at 40") → new fn 41 (Lucas, pp. 189–218, + Scott Cook, "Bury the Dead (Including Morton Smith) with Honor", Aquila Report, 2018) — different page range and different secondary source. In total: roughly 34 substantive content edits plus the systemic footer/page-count/footnote-numbering changes. The most consequential are the 19 citation swaps (different authors, dates, books, or articles), the one deleted sentence about Rehoboam's Ammonite mother, and the rewording about post-war PCUS / Adger vs. Girardeau. The footer placeholder ("Index Number XX Page Number") shows v2 is still pre-publication.
Link tweet mediaLink tweet mediaLink tweet mediaLink tweet media
Benjamin Glaser@WVPitt

We fixed a footnote. That's hardly "altering" the report, and it certainly is not slander. Making editorial corrections as needed is a necessary part of putting together a paper. We also fixed R.L. Dabney's middle name and corrected another misspelling. Things happen.

English
7
11
62
15.2K
C.Jay Engel 🌲
C.Jay Engel 🌲@contramordor·
@MeruOnX Another sign that diversity and multiculturalism is tearing us apart
English
2
4
376
2.8K
Meru
Meru@MeruOnX·
MAGA racists have become active on X. Indians, get ready for an online hate campaign. Remember to give it back with interest. Don’t let anyone bully you. It’s all paid.
English
305
153
1.2K
35.8K
Link retweetledi
benkreis
benkreis@benkreis·
Generalization: Women want intimacy through emotional connection and conversation. Men want intimacy through physical touch and sexual closeness. So, which group do you think is going to be more concerned about body count when dating and marrying?
English
0
1
7
263
Link
Link@_Link_·
I don’t condemn the man in the pew who is blind to the idols of our day. I gladly condemn the so-called shepherds who rabidly worship the false idols of our day.
English
0
2
18
314
LordTemplar
LordTemplar@LordTemplar1·
While its possible that AI is responsible for feeding false quotations and incorrect links, its also possible these people have been collecting links for years now, pasting them into word documents as they draft writeups against Kinism. And when the links die, they don't know.
Link@_Link_

It is highly likely that the ARP committee chaired by @WVPitt used AI to draft this document.

English
4
0
6
579
Link
Link@_Link_·
Link@_Link_

Ask yourself if @WVPitt is being honest. Links to both papers and the @GeoffVScott + @pactuminstitute video where they first discuss that original paper had one false citation and false accusation. I had Claude check. 34 substantive edits. Every citation I checked, was completely fabricated. I didn't check all of them. Feel free to do so. Summary Version 1 ("10_Moderator_Committee_Kinism.pdf") — 29 pages Version 2 ("Kinism Special Committee of Synod 2026 Report.pdf") — 28 pages The second version is a later revision: footnotes have been renumbered upward (e.g. fn 2 → fn 4 in the early pages, fn 60 → fn 62 by the end), text has been re-flowed, and the page footer was changed everywhere. Two new sourcing footnotes were inserted at the top, so every later footnote slides by two. Systemic / mechanical differences Page footer text changed on every body page — "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index 10" → "Special Committee of Synod on Kinism Index Number XX Page Number" (a placeholder; the indexer hasn't been filled in yet). ~24 page footers affected. Total page count: 29 → 28, because text reflowed more tightly. Footnote numbering shifts by +2 through most of the paper (two new footnotes were added on p. 4). Substantive prose changes (34 distinct edits) Editorial / wording: "former U.S. based reconstructionists" → "U.S. based former reconstructionists" "in Grace Presbytery, Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" → "in Grace Presbytery: Michael Hunter and Eric Hancox" (comma → colon) "daughter of Pharoah. The latter two being" → "daughter of Pharoah, the latter two being" (period → comma) "as Kinism is not as clear and relatable" → "as Kinism. How that is is not as clear and relatable" (sentence break + added clause) "Linnaeus is positively cited by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" → "This kind of enthno-nationalism which marks nations into ethnic silos is positively encouraged by the Kinist Pactum Institute where Michael Hunter, Bret McAtee, and Michael Spangler are fellows" "Dabney fully understood he was a target of Woodrow's pamphlet" → "Dabney had tussled with Woodrow many times" "It is also worth noting that the post-war PCUS sided with Girardeau over and against Dabney" → "Sadly the post-war PCUS did not go with the stream advocated by John Adger and others" "Robert Mackenzie takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" → "Nathan Ristuccia takes apart the sloppy use of this letter" (and "Mackenzie notes" → "Ristuccia notes") "no supporter of the segregation found in the American South" → "no supporter of the type of segregation found in the American South" "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose." → "Though some demur from the idea that Morton Smith and others, for example, actually agreed…for their purpose and a better picture of the times is worth consulting." Deleted sentence (p. 17 of v1): "In fact, Christ had Ammonite blood as well, since Naamah, the mother of Rehoboam, was an Ammonite (1 Kings 14:21)." — removed entirely from v2. Citation / footnote source changes: Footnotes 2 and 3 (new) added, citing Pactum Institute "Christian Race Realism" Parts 2 and 3 (Nature, Scripture). Old single footnote pointed only to Part 1. Old fn 8 (Rushdoony, Institutes of Biblical Law + Ingram, The World Under God's Law, 1959) → new fn 10 (Perry Wilkins, "Rushdoony's Kinism" + Ingram, Essays On Segregation, 1960) — different book by Ingram, different year, different secondary source. Old fn 9 (three Mark R. Rushdoony Chalcedon magazine articles) → new fn 11 (Mark R. Rushdoony YouTube lecture + "Ask Chalcedon: Race" blog post) — completely different sources. Old fn 10 (Thornwell 1873 ed. + Guy Prentiss Waters + Hart) → new fn 12 (Thornwell 1850 ed. + Alan Strange instead of Waters + different Hart citation, Ordained Servant 7 no. 3 instead of 15). Linnaeus pages: "10–12" → "194ff" (fn 13/15). Old fn 14 (J. Philippe Rushton, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, 1995) → new fn 16 (Richard Lynn, Race Difference in Intelligence, 2015) — different author/book. Old fn 15 (Schlebusch, "Linnaeus and the Reality of Kind") → new fn 17 (Schlebusch, "The Particularity and Universality of Ethno-Christocracy") — different Pactum article. Old fn 16 (Dabney, "Review of 'Address on African Colonization'", SPR 1852) → new fn 18 (Dabney, A Defense of Virginia, 1867). Old fn 17 (John B. Adger, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1850) → new fn 19 (Abner Addison Porter, "The Unity of the Human Race", SPR 1851) — different author and year. Old fn 20 (Dabney, "The Strategy of the Evolutionist", Jan 1885) → new fn 22 (Dabney, "The Caution Against Anti-Christian Science Criticised by Dr. Woodrow", Oct 1873). Old fn 21 (Girardeau, "Address on the Relation of the Church to the Colored Population", 1871) → new fn 23 (Girardeau, "On Ecclesiastical Relations to Freedmen", SPR 1867). Calhoun page range: 245–250 → 221–232 (fn 22 → fn 24). Old fn 23 entirely deleted: "Report on the Ecclesiastical Relations to the Colored People", 1871. New "Ibid, 231" footnote added (fn 25). Old fn 25 (Robert Tracy McKenzie, Ad Fontes, April 25, 2023) → new fn 27 (Nathan Ristuccia, Ad Fontes, November 29, 2022) — different author and date. Davis Carlton article: date "May 28, 2012" → "January 19, 2011" and URL changed accordingly (fn 26 → fn 28). Old fn 27 (Vos letter to Johannes Vos, April 24, 1893) → new fn 29 (Vos, "The Wonderful Tree", Kerux 6 no. 2, 1991) — different Vos source. Old fn 29 (Chad Van Dixhoorn, "The Westminster Assembly and the Eighth Commandment") → new fn 31 (Westminster Assembly, Annotations upon all the Books of the Old and New Testament, 1651, on Ex 21:16). Old fn 31 (Gillespie, A Treatise of Miscellany Questions, 1649) → new fn 33 (Gillespie, Wholesome Severity Reconciled with Christian Liberty, 1645) — different work. Carleton Coon page range: "655–660" → "645–656" (fn 34 → fn 36). Old fn 37 (Davis Carlton, "Aesthetics: Kinism vs. Alienism", Oct 21, 2014) → new fn 39 (Ehud Would, same title, Oct 22, 2014) — different author and date. Old fn 38 (Morton H. Smith, "The Biblical Case for Segregation", Southern Presbyterian Journal, May 1957) → new fn 40 (Morton H. Smith, "The Racial Problem Facing America", Presbyterian Guardian, Oct 1964) — different Morton Smith article. Old fn 39 (Lucas, pp. 185–190, + Joseph A. Pipa Jr., "The PCA at 40") → new fn 41 (Lucas, pp. 189–218, + Scott Cook, "Bury the Dead (Including Morton Smith) with Honor", Aquila Report, 2018) — different page range and different secondary source. In total: roughly 34 substantive content edits plus the systemic footer/page-count/footnote-numbering changes. The most consequential are the 19 citation swaps (different authors, dates, books, or articles), the one deleted sentence about Rehoboam's Ammonite mother, and the rewording about post-war PCUS / Adger vs. Girardeau. The footer placeholder ("Index Number XX Page Number") shows v2 is still pre-publication.

ZXX
0
0
3
467
Link
Link@_Link_·
Oof..
Link tweet media
Benjamin Glaser@WVPitt

@vdmlaw1 Mark, have you ever filed a brief in court that had to be refilled after a typo was found in it? The claim didn't change. You can make a mountain out of a molehill, but I'm not playing silly immature gotcha games.

3
2
24
1.4K