trebase

@LeeRespecter the entire premise of government is a fraud...

Clive Palmer has touched on a crucial point here, a generation of bureaucrats and politicians have built their careers on immigration. To stop now would mean admitting the entire project they sold us, and the careers they built from it, was a fraud.

@chuckastone @ausvstheagenda he almost seems human

@ausvstheagenda Albo is one of the few people who, when portrayed in AI Slop, actually gains depth, character and intellect.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wants aspiring entrepreneurs and business owners to stop making Ai memes of him taking 47% of their capital gains.

@carstendog a good problem to have

@_rebase Lol…. Over $200k (including franking credits value) taxable income isn’t humble. But good on them for accumulating that much in shares

This remains the worst boomer advice letter to Mr Whittaker. Someone complained that Westpac gave them 3 (not the normal 2) dividends in a year on their 60,000 shares & they had to pay actual tax. Let me repeat it, 3 dividends on their 60,000 shares, ie approx $140k in cash.

@_HelenDale @PetefromHayNSW @Liberty_Fund you might get put down for mange

@PetefromHayNSW @Liberty_Fund Why would you want to, tho?

Sall Grover is seeking leave to appeal to the High Court (there is no guarantee leave will be granted). However, an application alone is enough to make genderwoo a major political issue in the lead-up to the 2028 Federal election. 1/3

@AusGovGunFacts @WhosFibbing @AntiFeminismAU also an insult against black people... they like eating watermelon

@AntiFeminismAU Why? I thought watermelon was specifically anti-Greens Party? Green on the outside, red on the inside? WTF?

Under the new hate speech laws in Australia, it’s now illegal display any images of a watermelon in public because it’s considered antisemitic 😂 You can tell the cop is even embarrassed having to say it. What a joke this country has become.

@parnellpalme @TomisCrowley the more Labor spends the more Liberal policies cost

@TomisCrowley Why is wage earners keeping their earnings counted as a cost?

Friday arvo scoop to cap off budget week: Coalition policy could cost billions more than first suggested over first four years and was not formally costed abc.net.au/news/2026-05-1…

@RoadknightThe playgrounds sound dangerous... probably should have more soft-fall areas

Fake news. There are no machetes any more.

@john_macgowan it's hilarious that this is down to the unintended consequences of femitard hero Julia Gillard's adventurous approach to legislation... but I don't like what I see as the violation of the business owner's property rights.

I actually have no sympathy for women aggrieved by the Giggle v Tickle decision. As the Public Image Ltd song goes: "This is what you want, this is what you get." In the 30 years since Kimberlé Crenshaw published "Mapping the Margins" and birthed Intersectional Feminism those values have come to philosophically dominate every level of bureaucracy and academia. Women have acquired tremendous political, cultural and institutional power. Female tastes define our entire society. At an economic level, it's lead to the creation of whole skyscrapers full of pointless jobs, sinecures, crèches for the daughters of intersectionality to occupy. Pick me girls and "based" women have still benefited from this, even as they decry it. The ones that complain the loudest, the "TERFS" or whatever - they wouldn't have a shred of cachet in civil society were it not for 90s feminist metanoia. Despite all these changes women are not any happier than they were running around in hoop skirts demanding voting rights. Of course not. Go and read the literature. Female happiness, contentment, equality, these were never part of the bargain. Intersectional feminism describes infinite tesseracts of oppression and privilege that never end. The war will never be over. You will go to a International Women's Day Morning Tea, full of men in women's clothing, and you will be miserable and unable to say anything, trapped in a monolithic grievance complex, forever. That was the deal you signed on to. That was written on the tin. This is what you voted for. Still vote for. It is tempting to consider legislative solutions to this. But the people proposing them have never dealt with women prone to making bad choices. You have to let women wallow in their mistakes and understand the full weight of them. Otherwise they keep making them. This generation of women will have to be made to live with the bad decisions of their mothers. Maybe their daughters too, just to really drive it home. And to unmake the societal chaos intersectional feminism has wrought, men can't be the ones to fix it with a Bill or a regulation. Somewhere out there, a woman aggrieved at the fact the law no longer recognises women are even real, will write a monograph, like Crenshaw did in 1991, and then over 30 years, the process can run in reverse. Feminist philosophy undergoes various epistemic ruptures every 30 years or so anyway. They're due for another gestalt switch. Maybe the next one will be less shit and they won't accidentally delete their entire gender from the statue books. In the meantime: "This is what you want, this is what you get."

@brucelehr95 @SkullSpeedDeal they've weaponised low IQ

@SkullSpeedDeal The media release is just written by very low IQ staff and deliberalty antagonistic, showing a deep lack of understanding of how the act actually operates.

So has Tony Burke banned a group or an ideology? Is there a difference between "the organisation colloquially known as neo-Nazis" and an unrelated neo-Nazi?

@DavidLeyonhjelm @TopherField judges rule in line with whatever grows the power of the state

@TopherField It's actually the courts that made both decisions. And that's bad because judges are not elected and cannot be removed by those of us who disagree with them.

According to Australian courts, trans women must be given access to any and all spaces reserved for women, because they are the same. According to UK courts, women only spaces do NOT have to allow trans women, because they are NOT the same. I don't care which side of this you're on, can you see the absurdity of handing these sorts of definitions and decisions over to the government? Right now within the same Commonwealth we have mutually exclusive definitions of what a woman is. The problem here is that as a culture we 'worship' government, and I mean that quite literally, we allow government to play God, to make decisions and definitions that predate government, things that are defined in nature, in creation, things that are quite literally above the pay-grade of any human opinion. Government is a johnny-come-lately and has no business redefining the things that came before, things that were defined in nature, or defined in culture, long before we invented the monstrosity that is 'government'. Redefining 'marriage'. Redefining 'woman'. Redefining 'hate'. Redefining 'justice'. Redefining 'equity'. Redefining 'good' and 'evil'. Redefining anything and everything, remaking creation in its own image, seeking to 'perfect' us according to its own vision of perfection. This is what I mean when I warn of the 'idolatry' of government, the 'worship' of government. It is nothing more than the worship of power, they 'do' because they 'can', and because they 'can' they insist it's 'right'. Except that the UK courts, and the Australian courts, cannot both be 'right'. We are deep down the rabbit hole, somewhere between the Mad Hatter's party and the 'Off with his head' Queen of Hearts. This isn't about who made the 'right' decision, this is about the fact that we tolerate the government making such a decision at all.

@Lisa9Sophia @SenatorCash @capnfecklesword just change Gillard's stupid amendment

@SenatorCash @capnfecklesword How? Will you commit to a referendum to enshrine our biological rights in the Constitution?

The Full Federal Court’s decision in Tickle v Giggle confirms the original finding that the Giggle for Girls app unlawfully discriminated against Roxanne Tickle. The Coalition’s position remains clear: women and girls have a right to safe, private and fair single-sex spaces. That is not controversial. It is common sense. Single-sex spaces exist for important reasons - safety, privacy, dignity and fairness and the Coalition will continue to stand up for the rights of women and girls.

it would be better if you did nothing at all

@manxie017 @salltweets judges will always back the state

@salltweets How disappointing, what is wrong with these judges.

I am absolutely devastated Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia. It is women who are being discriminated against, not the men who claim to be us. But in a sense, nothing has changed: we will all wake up tomorrow & men will still not be women.

@salltweets respect the court... yeah, right

Please remember: Do not do audio/video recording or take a photograph of the live stream or you could be held in contempt of court by order of the court. Respect the court. 🩷

@CaroDiRusso he will make it that way

Albo insinuates citizenship is worthless. Good to know. #auspol

@tom_mende @SagarH62 almost brothers

@SagarH62 Barry

Only 1% cricket fans can recognise, who is running alongside Sir Viv Richards.. Can you guess name without the help of Google 👇

@zoecabina have to keep talking otherwise thoughts will intrude into their heads

Constantly amazed that the dumbest people speak the most

Have been talking to a 20 year old autistic socialist wearing a Palestine flag-Aboriginal flag-Irish flag t shirt I have lost so many brain cells

@Dollarydoos_ @EsotericCD AC/DC is basically Angus and friends

@EsotericCD i was about to say Fall Out Boy and then clicked through the nesting QTs to see that was the band that started the discussion

The Band - think about it. The guy who wrote 85% of the songs never sang a note on them.