RH Trader

Ask your mentor to do this every single day. Then we'll talk. [London Live Execution] $NQ +155 ticks

A+ liquidity pools 1) Engineered Liquidity 2) Equal Lows $NQ

@IGotFX Correct.

@_rhtrader Don't you think it has something to do with the pricing strategies of the firms also? As CFD are relatively expensive so therefore it is easier to rotate (blow & re-buy) futures instead of CFD firms

No one cares about CFD’s anymore. Here are the exact reasons: 1) CFD firms don’t pay influencers anything close to Futures firms. A trader documenting his journey on Instagram with 200 followers made $1,200 in a month. Not possible with CFD’s. 2) CFD’s focus on ads and sales, while Futures control the culture You can see the comments in my previous post, not a single ‘influencer’ admits the rules are better. When it clearly is. Why? Because they don’t make money by doing so. Trading has become I bought 5 Apex/Lucid accounts, not I’m grinding 1 100K account with good risk management. 3) Financial incentive truly drives culture CFD’s need to come up with the Best Affiliate Program: History of Prop Space to take over. The program must benefit the influencers. - Culture will drive constant sales. - Constant sales will drive commissions. - Commissions will protect the brand. This is what futures firms do it best. And they did it with bad rules. Else, I see every firm switching to futures or CFD’s dying in the next 3-5 years.

@yusuf_trades If you didn’t pivot, then could be

@_rhtrader I think this is honestly one of the reasons my growth on Instagram (I actually have a following on there, check link in profile if you care) stagnated.

@Laker_trades Down right corner.

@_rhtrader Which pair

When will you believe? Thank you for keeping it to yourself.

@collinsmungomb It's literally clean.

@_rhtrader The chart looks like a clean textbook model in hindsight, but the actual execution environment this morning tells a different story. The spread gap between the bid and ask price is still wide and the candle delivery is highly erratic

M15 PO3 + D1 OHLC = High of the Day Keep this to yourself.

@vasil_ai Definitely.

@_rhtrader Very true. Also let’s not forget the USA audience as CFDs are harder there

@AMINULUKKA I don’t speak with low IQ individuals.

@_rhtrader How much were you paid to make this meaningless post?

@HassanFx_01 Some traders have their entire profile dedicated to futures accounts

@_rhtrader I do agree on that. Futures is just hype

@lun4rech0 🤝🏻

@_rhtrader 🔥🔥🔥🔥

@ooakCRT The top firms have no issues

@_rhtrader So true, but you forgot one more red flag about CFDs which is payout denials. Totally agree with ur points

This is going to ruin futures firms for you: Since T wants to compare $25K pro account from lucid let’s stick to that. 1) Lucid $25K pro account has a consistency rule of 40% in funded which is incorrect here. 2) I like how he mentioned about the target ratio being higher on CFD firms, but once again that’s not true. Futures firms sneakily add another phase in the name of ‘buffer’. In the Lucid $25K pro account the buffer is 26,100 additional to passing the initial evaluation. So to compare it: Standard CFD: • 8% target - P1 • 5% target - P2 • 10% - Maximum Loss Limit on both phases Funded - Request payouts at 1% profit or more. Futures: • 5% target - P1 • 4.4% target - Buffer • 4% - Maximum Loss Limit on both phases After completing the buffer is when you actually qualify for a payout, and once again an additional minimum amount must be made as per different firms. CFD firms are clearly takes the win here. And whenever a firm adds consistency to either of the phases the chances of traders passing the account reduces drastically, the reason why it was removed from CFD firms before. The one point I do agree on is the spreads and of course no USA. Hopefully this was eye opening to the few readers who don’t read up on the rules.

@FPX500 You should look in the mirror.

@_rhtrader hey dumbass, CFD is dead into the ground it's the worse thing to trade and always has been. Futures used to be niche and a big part of that is you needed a lot of capital to trade it, with prop firms that isn't the case anymore. 🤡

@Liq_Sniper Would still argue on the targets, but that would be the right direction.

@_rhtrader In my opinion, if futures added a static drawdown option, there would be no comparison. It would be the best choice.

Live now

Live in 25 minutes. Not discussing CFD v/s Futures. youtube.com/live/sxhrZ4GO0…

@tradertheory Compare Futures to CFD’s. I gurantee you’ll see a pattern 👀

How many funded account challenges have you failed in your trading career?

@Pedroisquiet Real traders know

CFD Firms mog when it comes to ROI

@PJtrades_NQ If you can’t frame higher timeframe direction and scalp on the 1 minute exclusively? Sure.

@_rhtrader The debate ends with “spreads”. Futures wins because of it every single time