Vasil Ivanov | 🇧🇬

@ZamcoCapital Don’t forget to use his code while you doing it 😂😂

I have $1.7M in payouts and i’ll tell you, that is NOT true. You can literally spend less than $1500 and get paid $100,000 within a month from a futures propfirm.

@_rhtrader Very true. Also let’s not forget the USA audience as CFDs are harder there

No one cares about CFD’s anymore. Here are the exact reasons: 1) CFD firms don’t pay influencers anything close to Futures firms. A trader documenting his journey on Instagram with 200 followers made $1,200 in a month. Not possible with CFD’s. 2) CFD’s focus on ads and sales, while Futures control the culture You can see the comments in my previous post, not a single ‘influencer’ admits the rules are better. When it clearly is. Why? Because they don’t make money by doing so. Trading has become I bought 5 Apex/Lucid accounts, not I’m grinding 1 100K account with good risk management. 3) Financial incentive truly drives culture CFD’s need to come up with the Best Affiliate Program: History of Prop Space to take over. The program must benefit the influencers. - Culture will drive constant sales. - Constant sales will drive commissions. - Commissions will protect the brand. This is what futures firms do it best. And they did it with bad rules. Else, I see every firm switching to futures or CFD’s dying in the next 3-5 years.

@ZamcoCapital Good luck getting consistent profits that way from prop firm when you are not influencer. You will get restricted and marked as "toxic" trading beaviour really fast.

Let me tell you HOW to make consistent profit with futures Propfirms ⬇️ I can only do this on Futures Propfirms. They are literally a CHEATCODE for making consistent profit. Once the buffer is made and there is no DLL, its a matter of negative RR to keep up a high win rate which helps with psychology. Yes I risk the WHOLE balance every trade, however with probabilities, the negative RR will allow me to win most trades and get paid out a couple times before I breach the account eventually from that one loss. But who cares at that point? Been paid $45,000 from this account in the process, I can buy another set of evals from the payouts and repeat the process. Its THAT simple.

@Patrickwieland @BrettSimba what is htis homo shit

YOOOOOO @BrettSimba this better not be the big news coming sir please no 💀 tjr.net

@marryevan999 😀😀😂😂😂😂😂

This trader used Claude to build a QUANT Bot and made +$81,323 on Polymarket. 25,511 predictions in 54 days with a 46% win rate. How is this strategy generating around $1,506 per day? The logic is surprisingly simple: 1. It runs a fast market-making model focused only on short crypto “Up / Down” markets. 2. The system doesn’t need both sides at once. It starts accumulating one side when prices become dislocated, then completes the position later if the opposite side becomes cheap enough. 3. The edge comes from temporal arbitrage, partial hedging, and constant inventory rotation across nearby windows. Some of the biggest trades: • $1,277 → $2,516 (+$1,239 | +97.0%) • $1,059 → $2,205 (+$1,146 | +108.2%) • $1,372 → $2,487 (+$1,115 | +81.3%) The entire profit curve is built on one small edge, repeated thousands of times. 🎁 GIVEAWAY I’m giving away the complete Claude prompt and workflow behind this QUANT Bot. To enter: Follow @marryevan999 Repost Comment “QUANT” I’ll DM a few winners in 24 hours.

@MoonDevOnYT Question for the audience : why the author is showing us that he found “mind blowing “ strategies and not keep it for himself in secret ?

Fable 5 created some mind blowing trading strategies for me

@MoonDevOnYT If it was that good you will keep it to yourself 🤫

i basically cracked tradingview so my ai agents can rip through every public indicator and brute force the alpha. your manual charting is completely dead if you arent using claude to automate massive backtests while you sleep. stop drawing random triangles and watch me deploy an army of bots to extract real edge before this gets banned.

@DailyLoud Bombaclat

@Patrickwieland @ajtradinglucid

@ajtradinglucid IM THE LEADER!!!!

The only thing I want to be the leader in is my crusade against prop firm expose accounts. I am formally declaring a holy war against these bot spamming, engagement farming, rage baiting parasites,

@TraderSumo1 @arjoio You will need to have backend access to firms purchase database , as people can generate invoices with AI image generation so it will be really hard to be verified

@arjoio Should literally just build a competitor site , but force all reviews to provide proof of purchase and KYC.

And before the rug pull, this is how they gamed their way to 4.6 stars on Trustpilot: Just ask support a simple question, and they'll ask you to leave a 5-star review with their name in it. Template: “Thank you (name) for the great support!” Hard to trust Trustpilot alone.

@Juno_trader @Patrickwieland @ajtradinglucid cause he is trading influencer , and by sharing his profits etc many people will decide to buy challenges there with the assumption that they can make the same withdraw size, however they most probably will be put in live :D

@Patrickwieland Why isn’t he in live yet? @ajtradinglucid

CHA CHING 40% Off LucidPro! 1 DAY TO PASS!! Use Code: PW tinyurl.com/muu892eu

@Patrickwieland regular person will be put in live :D

Hello guys, I want to add one more CFD firm to my portfolio with accounts. Im currently using @fundingpips and they are the best. Can someone recommend me reputable firm that chance of getting scammed or bullshit rules is small

@lanto_trades Happy end ?

-$79k You know what that means. Run it back.

@khushman As it’s not profitable long term approach , you will never use negative RR on your personal account. You using Negative RR on challenges as you can essentially “game” the system as the balance is not real and even if you lose the account you just lose the fee for the challenge.

@vasilivanovai uhhh why

if you are trading props, necessarily look into negative RR 1x $100,000 LucidFlex cost: $157.5 payout so far: $7,500 if you can figure out what i did with this account you are a GENIUS

@Djevans703 @AmasPFT @Tradesyncer He has money to afford this, he can buy tons of challenges

@AmasPFT @Tradesyncer +1183 a day is not slow and steady. You are way over leveraged and probably on the good side of variance. $150-$300 days is slow and steady with very light draw down.

Slow and steady I built my buffer Now it’s time To secure My payout

@tradermike1234 It really depends of the volume of trades your system provides. Also there is fees - commissions, slippage etc that you need to account for. On paper 1:1 seems really profitable yes

1:1 risk reward 60% win rate Is enough to retire your bloodline for generations to come

@forexbyvishnuu @Finn_QTFunded @QtFunded Those mf kers think of anyway to deny payout 😂😂

Lost the trading data? @Finn_QTFunded @QtFunded Delayed the payout. Then expected me to start over for another 30 days. That’s not a resolution. #QTFunded #Forex

@Benjamin_SMC You forgot to post your affiliate discount code

it’s so easy to deceive people man this space needs help. this is obviously fake bro 😂😂 a old photo of my apex PA and a screenshot with no exacutions