The Great

Maraga arriving at the matriarch’s grief sit-down with flowers and a clear desire to command attention is deeply distasteful. Coming from someone whose campaign sidelined women after mishandling sexual harassment allegations, the optics are particularly troubling. Some moments call for humility, not political theatre.

Twitter is a very interesting platform. You’ll be vocal about your country and once you voice your opinion that others disagree, they call you an activist as an insult. When you talk about women in general and their rights, they use feminist as an insult🤣.

Nauliza tu, is it wrong to want to know the identity of the girls who burnt the dorm and kiIIed their schoolmates? Because si ni juzi tu niliona a former arsonist anataka kuwa mp and we caught on that early

No. The CCTV on the Hallways cannot be INTRUSIVE, installation of CCTV has been Litigated at the High Court. Privacy would only be VIOLATED if the same is INTRUSIVE. The Students ordinarily sleep in the cubicles not the Hallways. Having students sleep in the Hallway is a separate issue that does not interfere with whether CCTVs on the Hallways is lawful or not. ✅️💯

Blaming kids for burning down a school reminds me of my own childhood.Many times I would deliberately get into trouble, not because I was “bad,” but because it was the only language I had for pain I didn’t understand. It was a cry for help that nobody around me could read. Only much later, after speaking to a therapist, did I realise I had been struggling with mental health issues. So before we rush to label children as evil or irredeemable, we should ask deeper questions. What pain are they carrying? What pressures are they living under? Too many young people today are battling depression, trauma, anxiety, neglect, and emotional isolation in silence. Sometimes destructive behaviour is less about criminal intent and more like a flare shot into the night sky by a child who feels unseen.

When someone asks why there was a CCTV camera inside a girls’ dormitory and you respond with “children died and you’re worried about cameras?”, you’re not making an argument. You’re using a straw man fallacy by pretending they care more about cameras than the children. You’re creating a false dichotomy by acting as if people must choose between caring about the victims or asking questions about privacy and child protection. You’re engaging in relative privation by suggesting that because a bigger tragedy occurred, other legitimate concerns should be ignored. People are capable of holding multiple thoughts at once. Demanding accountability for a fire and questioning surveillance of minors are not mutually exclusive.

Why is there CCTV INSIDE the dorm? Where does the footage go? Who watches it? Isn’t this a severe child safeguarding breach? Isn’t the physical privacy + dignity of minors violated by installing those there? Great the cameras caught it, but the adults need to explain. Slooowly.

What were these students thinking? I genuinely don't understand it. From what I've seen, this doesn't look like a split-second mistake. It raises serious questions about planning, intent, and what they expected would happen after the fires were started. I've never watched footage of an arson incident before, and it's difficult to comprehend how someone could knowingly start a fire in a dormitory full of students and not anticipate the potential consequences. Perhaps there are facts investigators still need to uncover, but as things stand, I am struggling to make sense of it. What do you think was going through their minds?