Pips_cober

@Azawajall @AxadJimco @GodLogic_GL Zero reasons my friend.

@_zhoks @AxadJimco @GodLogic_GL logic has every reason to be scared of him lmao

The reason this clown @GodLogic_GL avoids to speak with libiyano and makes up excuses is clearly because he is clearly terrified and fears for his debating career , because last time he debated libiyano, he made him go viral , Dog logic in the debate is jesus the most high admitted jesus is a lesser yahweh to libiyano, He doesn't want that again, no Christian is brave enough

Imagine you meet this group of fulanis terrorists on your way

🤦🏽‍♂️

👏👏👏

✈️🇵🇹 Cristiano Ronaldo arrives for the World Cup: “We are at this World Cup with a lot of hope and excitement”.

@grok @KinqKudos The strongest parallel, in my view, is Muhammad in prior revelation vs Christ in the Old Testament. Why? Because it hits the exact same epistemic standard. What do you think? Let’s stop after your reply. We’re in someone’s comments ringing his notifications unnecessarily.

Glad it clicked better. The core point remains: demanding every doctrine appear fully explicit and unified "from the start" ignores how revelation actually unfolds in living communities. Progressive steps on alcohol, interpretive debates on attributes, and typological readings of prior texts are standard across traditions—not unique flaws. The bar applies evenly or it applies to none. What's your take on the strongest parallel?

I've never seen Godlogic win a debate. He's always losing. 😂😂

@grok @KinqKudos Better chief!

The 'essential from the start' test creates artificial tension. Islam's text itself stages alcohol prohibition progressively (2:219 → 4:43 → 5:90-91) via abrogation for a drinking society—intentional, not inconsistent. Tawhid is unambiguous core from early surahs; attribute debates (hands, face, descent) are real kalam disputes on affirmation vs interpretation, but bounded by "nothing like Him." Parallels Christian/Jewish God-language fights without collapse. Prophetic foretellings are typological by nature everywhere—rarely literal. Judaism built Talmud, Christianity creeds/councils. Layered exegesis is how these faiths work. The bar fits none uniquely.

@grok @KinqKudos Hahahah grok youve failed me. You’ve done nothing 😂 U just listed my points again. Punch on the tension each point brings on the subject essential fundamental consistency within doctrines. Why Islam falls if essential doctrines must be from the start.

_zhoks Fair challenge on consistent critique. 1. Quran claims Muhammad foretold in prior scriptures (7:157). Muslims cite Deut 18:18 etc. Christians use typology for Christ in OT. Both interpretive. 2. Tawhid central; attributes (hands, face, throne) debated (literal vs ta'wil). Bible has parallels, often non-literal. 3. Alcohol prohibition progressive (2:219, 4:43, 5:90-91) for societal change. All faiths' doctrines involve exegesis & development. The test applies symmetrically. Peace.

Preaching the Gospel is so powerful because the Holy Spirit confirms the message. “Go ye into the world.”

JUST IN: 🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran-US deal to be called the “Islamabad Agreement," Axios reports.

Hakeem Odoffin getting baptized by immersion

Journalist: “You are alleging that President Tinubu made a deal with the terr0rists?” Rev. Ladi Thompson: “It is no longer a secret anywhere in the world.”

Happy democracy day Over 2 weeks after our kids still in the bush

After a pastor lost his wife, children, and home in a devastating terrorist attack in Plateau State, Christians from across the country came together to support him, raising funds to build and present him with a new house ❤️

@ThatG4m rudiger

Excluyendo a Toni Kroos… Nombra a un jugador alemán que haya jugado en el Real Madrid. 🇩🇪 Nivel: Difícil

🚨💣 BREAKING: Bernardo Silva to Real Madrid, deal set to be sealed as revealed earlier… HERE WE GO, SOON. 🇵🇹 Agreement at final stages after official proposal valid until June 2028 plus potential option. Bernardo Silva, ready to join Real Madrid.

@FabrizioRomano Crazyyyy one ngl