Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
Gumi@ポケマス
2.4K posts
Gumi@ポケマス
@a1232909
反對Terf，反對incel プロセカ にゃんこ大戦争 ポケマス 消滅都市 メルクストーリア 離線版 Taiwanese
Katılım Temmuz 2012
405 Takip Edilen136 Takipçiler
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
最新情况：发布“最高法院最新涉性少数信访回复”的微信公众号相关文章已被微信平台删除，部分账号被屏蔽封禁。
1. 中和彩虹说：账号已被屏蔽
2. 出色伙伴：此内容因违规无法查看
3. 骄傲声浪：此内容因违规无法查看
4. ActionForlove为爱行动：此内容因违规无法查看
目前此信访回复发布的相关来源均已被删除。
删除不意味着信访回复本身是假或者是P的，具体可以看我上一条的分析；但恐怕要让一些觉得中国对性少数的态度已经彻底改变，或者用中国的改变来支持自己对本国左右翼观点不满的老外们失望了。
已经被删除的部分文章链接：（无法访问只是作为来源证明已被删除）
mp.weixin.qq.com/s/U1VX7omSTbnM…
mp.weixin.qq.com/s/M_JM_6xYOlOE…
中文
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
很多朋友被迫使用蹩脚的英文反驳西方左派夸大中国LGBT权益保护的叙事。不要使用英文，用中文，用我们自己的语言。
只需要一句话：每当中国政府提及“宪法”的时候，都是“公关辞令”和“外交宣传”，而非司法实践。
然后引用2017年反对司法独立和2008年废止宪法司法化的官方立场就行了。
たける♪ホモなおっちゃん@takeru820515
おっと🧐 中国の司法制度において「法律や行為が憲法に違反しているか」を判断する違憲審査権は裁判所にありません。 よって【事実ではありません】 台湾の事例：2017年 香港の事例：2023年 と混同してるっぽいフェイクニュース
中文
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
Celebrating IDAHOBIT in China is impossible due to censorship. With conversion therapy & 'gender correction' schools still active, this state propaganda is vile—it erases the real suffering of the queer community
NPOMV | Zine@npomvtt
🏳️🌈✊️ VITÓRIA! Pela primeira vez, o Supremo Tribunal Popular da China proibiu discriminação por orientação sexual, identidade de gênero e expressão de gênero em julgamentos, incluindo os termos de forma escrita na proteção legal contra discriminação. A sentença reconhece que insultos e humilhação por esses motivos podem gerar punições e indenizações, que empresas não podem discriminar em contratação, demissão ou ambiente de trabalho e que escolas podem ser punidas por bullying contra estudantes LGBTQIA+. O Tribunal afirmou que vai continuar padronizando decisões sobre direitos dessas minorias e incluirá dignidade humana e direitos da personalidade na formação de juízes.
English
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
J.K.罗琳一直在以「保护女性」为旗号塑造自己的公众形象。她张口闭口就是「女性」——女性空间、女性权利、女性安全、女性体育、女性的所有东西。
那么，当英国改革党在幕后发起反堕胎权运动时，她在哪里？
沉默。
当改革党主张让英国退出《欧洲人权公约》——这个保护女性免受家庭暴力、强迫婚姻、名誉犯罪和国家歧视的法律框架时，她在哪里？
沉默。
当那些她选择与之站在一起的政治势力正在系统性地剥夺女性权利时，她又在哪里？
一片死寂。
这个女人拥有超过1300万粉丝、十亿美元级别的商业帝国、个人法律基金，甚至最高法院大法官都愿意听她说话。她不缺平台，她不怕争议。她已经反复证明，只要她想，她就能大声说出那些尖锐的话。
她只是不想说这些。
这个模式一点也不微妙。她资助的每一场运动、支持的每一个法律案件、发表的每一次公开声明，都只围绕一个主题。不是广义上的女性。具体而言，仅限于跨性别者。当话题转向堕胎时，她消失了。当话题转向《欧洲人权公约》时，她消失了。当话题转向改革党的社会保守主义——这种倒退数十年的立场将剥夺女性权利——她照样消失了。
《欧洲人权公约》并非抽象的法律文件。它是为这个国家的女性提供了具体保护的法律框架。它支撑着女性不受国家保护而遭受家庭暴力的权利。它支撑着生育权的相关判例。它支撑着反对强迫婚姻和人口贩运的保护措施。它支撑着隐私权、身体自主权、法律面前人人平等的权利。
改革党想退出这个公约。
这个公约也保护跨性别者。问题就出在这里。
因为唯一能合理解释罗琳为何在所有其他女性权利议题上保持沉默、却把财富倾注在单一议题上的原因就是——她的运动从来不是关于女性的。它从来都是关于跨性别者的。女性只是她用来包装的幌子。排斥跨性别者才是真正的目标。
一个在2025年真正关心女性权利的人，一定会对改革党大声疾呼。她会资助法律挑战来对抗堕胎限制。她会大声捍卫《欧洲人权公约》。她会明白：当你所支持的政治力量正在拆解保护女性免受国家和暴力侵害的法律架构时，你却保持沉默——那么你就不能声称自己在捍卫女性权利。
除非你在乎的权利根本不是广义上的女性权利。
除非你在乎的只是将跨性别者排除在公共生活之外的那一部分。
在这种情形下，沉默就变得完全合理了。
跟随沉默。它会告诉你那些冠冕堂皇的话所隐藏的一切。
她还纳闷自己为什么会失去朋友。我私下和她的三个老朋友聊过。他们对她的评价简直糟糕透顶。
所以，她也许是你的英雄，但在我看来，她根本不算什么好人。
Daniel Lismore@daniellismore
JK Rowling has built a public identity around protecting women. She talks about women constantly. Women’s spaces. Women’s rights. Women’s safety. Women’s sport. Women’s everything. So where is she on Reform UK’s behind the scenes campaign against abortion rights? Silence. Where is she on Reform’s position on removing the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights, the legal framework that protects women from domestic violence, forced marriage, honour crimes and state discrimination? Silence. Where is she on the broader rollback of women’s rights being driven by the exact political forces she has chosen to align herself with? Complete silence. This is a woman with over thirteen million followers, a billion dollar franchise, a personal legal fund and the ear of Supreme Court justices. She is not short of a platform. She is not afraid of controversy. She has demonstrated repeatedly that she will say difficult things loudly when she wants to. She just does not want to say these things. The pattern is not subtle. Every campaign she has funded, every legal case she has backed, every public statement she has made has had one subject. Not women broadly. Specifically and only transgender people. When the conversation moves to abortion she is absent. When it moves to the ECHR she is absent. When it moves to Reform UK’s social conservatism, which would take the rights of women backwards by decades, she is absent. The European Convention on Human Rights is not an abstract legal document. It is the framework that has delivered concrete protections for women in this country. It underpins the right not to be subjected to domestic violence without state protection. It underpins reproductive rights cases. It underpins protections against forced marriage and trafficking. It underpins the right to private life, to bodily autonomy, to equal treatment under law. Reform UK wants to remove the United Kingdom from it. It also protects transgender people. That appears to be the problem. Because the only coherent explanation for Rowling’s silence on every other women’s rights issue while spending her fortune on this one is that her campaign was never really about women. It was always about transgender people. Women were the framing. Trans exclusion was the goal. A person who genuinely cared about women’s rights in 2025 would be screaming about Reform. They would be funding legal challenges to abortion restrictions. They would be speaking loudly about the ECHR. They would understand that you cannot claim to defend women’s rights while staying silent as the political movement you have empowered works to dismantle the legal architecture that protects women from the state and from violence. Unless the rights you actually care about are not women’s rights in general. Unless they are specifically the right to exclude transgender people from public life. In which case the silence makes perfect sense. Follow the silence. It tells you everything the statements do not. She wonders why she lost friends. I’ve spoken to 3 of her old friends in person. And they had the worst possible for us to say about her. So she may be your hero but it seems to me that she’s not a very nice person.
中文
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
JK Rowling has built a public identity around protecting women. She talks about women constantly. Women’s spaces. Women’s rights. Women’s safety. Women’s sport. Women’s everything.
So where is she on Reform UK’s behind the scenes campaign against abortion rights?
Silence.
Where is she on Reform’s position on removing the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights, the legal framework that protects women from domestic violence, forced marriage, honour crimes and state discrimination?
Silence.
Where is she on the broader rollback of women’s rights being driven by the exact political forces she has chosen to align herself with?
Complete silence.
This is a woman with over thirteen million followers, a billion dollar franchise, a personal legal fund and the ear of Supreme Court justices. She is not short of a platform. She is not afraid of controversy. She has demonstrated repeatedly that she will say difficult things loudly when she wants to.
She just does not want to say these things.
The pattern is not subtle. Every campaign she has funded, every legal case she has backed, every public statement she has made has had one subject. Not women broadly. Specifically and only transgender people. When the conversation moves to abortion she is absent. When it moves to the ECHR she is absent. When it moves to Reform UK’s social conservatism, which would take the rights of women backwards by decades, she is absent.
The European Convention on Human Rights is not an abstract legal document. It is the framework that has delivered concrete protections for women in this country. It underpins the right not to be subjected to domestic violence without state protection. It underpins reproductive rights cases. It underpins protections against forced marriage and trafficking. It underpins the right to private life, to bodily autonomy, to equal treatment under law.
Reform UK wants to remove the United Kingdom from it.
It also protects transgender people. That appears to be the problem.
Because the only coherent explanation for Rowling’s silence on every other women’s rights issue while spending her fortune on this one is that her campaign was never really about women. It was always about transgender people. Women were the framing. Trans exclusion was the goal.
A person who genuinely cared about women’s rights in 2025 would be screaming about Reform. They would be funding legal challenges to abortion restrictions. They would be speaking loudly about the ECHR. They would understand that you cannot claim to defend women’s rights while staying silent as the political movement you have empowered works to dismantle the legal architecture that protects women from the state and from violence.
Unless the rights you actually care about are not women’s rights in general.
Unless they are specifically the right to exclude transgender people from public life.
In which case the silence makes perfect sense.
Follow the silence. It tells you everything the statements do not.
She wonders why she lost friends. I’ve spoken to 3 of her old friends in person. And they had the worst possible for us to say about her.
So she may be your hero but it seems to me that she’s not a very nice person.
English
@toddppwow 用文理分類真的有夠莫名其妙的
我國文就學時期都在前段班，英文完全不行
數學電學還算不錯，但碰到生物就死
但直接化簡為文科跟理科，根本看不出每科需要的能力不同啊（
中文
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
這個狀況很常看到有人討論，其實有一個很關鍵的問題大家可能沒有發現，就是支撐傳統味道的那條食材供應鏈慢慢斷掉了。
高雄某知名麵線焿的第三代是小老闆的學弟，這家也是邁邁市長的愛店，他曾經很無奈的表示過：「跟阿公的做法完全一模一樣，只是很多食材原料的供應商第二代沒有意願接手，現在只能用替代的原料，再想辦法做出接近原本傳統的口味」
Liming 👻😤👽🏍️🛩️📷🐱@liming_h
阿嬤手指不插進湯裡就不對味🤣
中文
医療の政治化、そしてマイノリティの排除。国家が率先して人権を蹂躙するこの現状、本当に正気の沙汰とは思えない。胸糞悪すぎる。
U.S. Department of Justice@TheJusticeDept
Justice Department Secures Landmark Resolution to End Pediatric “Gender-Affirming Care” and Create Detransition Clinic “The Justice Department will use every weapon at its disposal to end the destructive and discredited practice of so-called ‘gender-affirming care’ for children,” said Acting Attorney General @DAGToddBlanche. “Today’s resolution protects vulnerable children, holds providers accountable, and ensures those harmed receive the care they need.” 🔗: justice.gov/opa/pr/justice…
日本語
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
🌟作品分享🌟
新款小娃
尺寸:大 (加上頭髮高度13.5cm)
臉部方案混搭
一個設定很帥氣的男生歐!
頭髮也是比較細緻的那種，
我很努力地去剪裁一些細節!✂️
褲子其實有故意畫牛仔褲的感覺呢!
明天又能分享刺繡過程了🥰
不過最近會分享得比較慢
主要是因為 ，我還在繡!!!!
後面很多刺繡類型都接近幾乎全部都要刺繡 !
但我會努力加油的!
那麼今天也祝福你們平安健康快樂!🩷
願你們能被世界溫柔對待
中文
Gumi@ポケマス retweetledi
太多宅宅還真的沒有辦法思考任何稍微複雜一點的事情。竟然如此多人無法理解為什麼「支持女性權利」和「反對以色列屠殺」並不互相矛盾，大概在他們的好天真世界觀中二極對立的正義與邪惡是綁定特定制服的吧。現在的小學生看的節目應該都比他們的世界觀複雜寫實多了。
facebook.com/groups/acgzone…
中文
@imtransfat 就...，也不是我要分什麼好女權壞女權
但.....，這種就是非蠢即壞的
或是又蠢又壞
不是什麼事情套上女權之名就不用被批評，尤其還是在攻擊及造謠弱勢上更是如此（不管是身障，性工作者，還是男同都是交織的弱勢身份阿）
中文
某些女權真的可以不要把所有性產業以健全順直男為中心欸，我就覺得「手天使」也可以發展成專門給殘障人士的性產業，而且通常手天使的專業程度也能幫助女性藏障人士解決性需求，到底為什麼殘障男士需要解決性需求就是噁？所以殘障人士是不需要解決性需求是不是？你腦殘不代表全世界都要跟你一起腦殘欸
中文