A third-worlder

8.9K posts

A third-worlder banner
A third-worlder

A third-worlder

@a3rdworlder

» Based asf » Sky-level IQ » Shitposter » Retweets are definitely an endorsement » 🖕🏻

Nigeria Katılım Ocak 2025
1.4K Takip Edilen259 Takipçiler
Jason Ai. Williams
Jason Ai. Williams@GoingParabolic·
I watched this live. When he went into that spin I was like man this is crazy. He is dead. They the. Cut the video. Wow. He made it.
English
182
1.3K
14.4K
761.1K
Invisidon
Invisidon@QuantumAlteredX·
ZXX
646
2.3K
13.1K
79.7K
I-Ridethe55
I-Ridethe55@PatrickT1023·
@MarioNawfal It's all to get his free money from the fed. Without some bull shit fake trips to the moon how else would they justify STEALING trillions from us??? That's all this space shit is, an excuse to steal and fuck us out of money.
English
4
1
11
566
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
Gwynne Shotwell says SpaceX wants a Moon settlement and manufacturing facility within 10 years, ideally five. The plan includes building AI-powered satellites and data centers directly on the lunar surface through NASA’s Artemis program.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

Stainless Steel Starship

English
419
800
5.2K
10.3M
DavidHaller
DavidHaller@CBurnzy32·
@a3rdworlder @ManaByte Hey it's perfectly okay to question things so long as you are willing to listen and learn! Sounds like that's you!
English
1
0
1
2
A third-worlder
A third-worlder@a3rdworlder·
@MCDLXXXVII Lol. I acknowledge my ignorance on this subject. We learn everyday. I appreciate the correction buddy
English
1
0
0
4
A third-worlder
A third-worlder@a3rdworlder·
But no satellites in any of their pics, EVER.
Jeremy@ManaByte

Earth isn’t flat, the Moon landing wasn’t faked, and space isn’t some CGI dome. These claims fall apart the moment you look at the technology we use every day. None of it works unless Earth is a sphere in a real cosmos. Start with GPS. Your phone calculates your position by comparing timing signals from satellites orbiting Earth. Those satellites move at precise speeds and altitudes that only make sense in a real vacuum. If Earth were flat or if space were fake, GPS would fail instantly. No navigation, no rideshare apps, no airline routing, no global timing systems. The entire system depends on orbital mechanics that match what physics predicts for a spherical planet. Satellite internet, satellite TV, and weather forecasting all rely on the same reality. We watch storms form from orbit. We track hurricanes across oceans using data from satellites operated by different countries and private companies. These systems agree with each other because they are observing the same real planet from space. If space were fake, every meteorologist, every aerospace engineer, every telecom company, every airline, and every military on Earth would have to coordinate a perfect lie for decades. That is not possible. Now to the claim that NASA fakes photos of Earth. This is one of the easiest conspiracy theories to debunk because NASA is not the only source of Earth images. Not even close. Dozens of countries and private companies have their own satellites that photograph Earth constantly. Weather satellites from Europe, Japan, India, and South Korea all produce their own full‑disk images. Private companies like Maxar and Planet Labs take high resolution photos of Earth every day for commercial clients. Amateur radio operators receive live images directly from NOAA satellites using equipment you can buy online. None of these systems rely on NASA. None of them match a single centralized source. Yet they all show the same spherical Earth from different angles at different times. If NASA were faking Earth photos, every other space agency and every private satellite operator would have to fake them too. They would also have to coordinate the lighting, cloud patterns, storm movements, and surface features in perfect sync. That is not happening. The simplest explanation is the correct one. Multiple independent systems are photographing the same real planet. The Moon landing is even harder to deny once you look at the tech. We still interact with the equipment the astronauts left behind. Observatories fire lasers at the retroreflectors sitting on the lunar surface and receive the return signal at the exact predicted intervals. This is not a theory. It is a measurement that universities and independent facilities repeat all the time. You cannot fake a laser return from nearly 240,000 miles away. Even the internet used to spread these conspiracies relies on space infrastructure. Undersea cables carry most traffic, but satellites handle the rest. The timing, routing, and handoff between systems only work because the satellites are actually in orbit. If space did not exist, the global communications network would collapse. The irony is simple. The technology that flat Earth believers and Moon landing deniers use to post their claims is the same technology that proves them wrong. The evidence is not hidden. It is built into the functioning of the modern world. You can reject the conclusions, but you cannot reject the infrastructure that makes your phone, your internet, your weather alerts, your maps, your flights, and your entire digital life possible. These conspiracies do not just fail scientifically. They fail technologically, mathematically, and logistically. They only survive when people stop paying attention to the systems they rely on every day.

English
3
0
0
7K
A third-worlder
A third-worlder@a3rdworlder·
@CBurnzy32 @ManaByte I really do appreciate your taking out time to explain. And fr, it does make sense to me. Personally, I'm open to learning and relearning. Facts and logic matter over feelings & intuition.
English
1
0
1
4
DavidHaller
DavidHaller@CBurnzy32·
@a3rdworlder @ManaByte Not your bad. I get how easy it is to question everything seeing we have been lied to by our govt for so damn long about a number of things but there is a very rational and viable explanation why you wouldn't be able to see objects that small from such a distance. Cheers.
English
1
0
1
7
DavidHaller
DavidHaller@CBurnzy32·
@ManaByte What @a3rdworlder fails to also recognize is that the satellites we can see from Earth are about 100 miles away, this photo......40,000 miles away or 400 times further away. Satellites would never be visible at this distance, they wouldn't be larger than a singular pixel even
English
1
0
1
52
Robert
Robert@rdalt02·
@a3rdworlder @ManaByte They’re absolutely tiny compared to the scale of earth in those photos. Do you think bugs don’t exist because there aren’t any in pictures from the top of a skyscraper?
English
1
0
1
20
A third-worlder
A third-worlder@a3rdworlder·
The world is a 2-D disc and not a 3-D globe; that's why there's an ice wall solely at Antarctica, beyond which you get sucked DOWN into the abyss, what you can call the bottomless pit. Drill far enough into the earth and you go into freefall. Space is above, not around.
English
0
0
0
37
A third-worlder
A third-worlder@a3rdworlder·
@PilotNorm14 @ManaByte Bro, I'm going to mansplain it to you. Satellites are not roughly the size of a car. They're significantly bigger.
English
3
0
0
102
Norm
Norm@PilotNorm14·
@a3rdworlder @ManaByte I’ve seen plenty of them. I do this every week. They’re all satellites. Mostly starlink now a days, but satellites none the less. Nice attempt at trying to sound smart, but a swing and a miss. Eat less crayons.
English
1
1
10
124
A third-worlder
A third-worlder@a3rdworlder·
@PilotNorm14 @ManaByte Next time you see a flickering light in the skies from the earth and assume it's a satellite THE SIZE OF A FREAKING CAR, think about this retarded comment of yours.
English
1
0
0
137
Norm
Norm@PilotNorm14·
@a3rdworlder @ManaByte Next time you’re on a plane 7 miles above the surface, take a picture of a car on a road. Roughly the same size as a satellite, and only 7 miles up. Then answer your question yourself. You can do it buddy! Eat less crayons!
English
1
1
18
127
The Disrespected Trucker
The Disrespected Trucker@DisrespectedThe·
If Trump is removed from office after the midterms, would you be involved a a revolution?
English
453
202
288
20.8K
JOSH DUNLAP
JOSH DUNLAP@JDunlap1974·
Who has more class?
JOSH DUNLAP tweet media
English
227
16
60
4.4K
Breadman
Breadman@BTCBreadMan·
My best friend is 36 years old. He’s a really smart dude in general. High IQ, good test scores. But this dumb mother fucker truly and deeply believes that we never landed on the moon. How do I gently explain to him that I can’t be his friend anymore because he’s retarded?
English
754
6
293
27.4K
A third-worlder
A third-worlder@a3rdworlder·
You can run in these 3x faster than you can run in Crocs
A third-worlder tweet media
English
0
0
0
23