Matthew Abrams, MD

172 posts

Matthew Abrams, MD banner
Matthew Abrams, MD

Matthew Abrams, MD

@abrams_md

Husband | Father | GI Radiation Oncologist at @BIDMChealth | @Harvardmed | Gastrointestinal Oncology Program | #MedEd | #RadOnc | Tweets my own

Boston, MA Katılım Şubat 2020
96 Takip Edilen189 Takipçiler
Tyler Olson, EA
Tyler Olson, EA@olsonplanner·
What’s the best piece of financial advice you’ve ever received?
English
18
0
7
8.2K
Tyler Olson, EA
Tyler Olson, EA@olsonplanner·
Academic docs who actually want to do research are getting squeezed HARD. The system says it values discovery. The paychecks say: “More RVUs, less thinking.” Let’s talk about the quiet collapse of the research track in medicine.
English
12
32
280
37.6K
Tyler Olson, EA
Tyler Olson, EA@olsonplanner·
Attendings - How do you know your comp is fair?
English
4
0
1
4.5K
Jeff Ryckman
Jeff Ryckman@jryckman3·
Thrilled to share that I’ve been promoted to Associate Professor! Endlessly grateful to those who’ve supported me along the way, too many to tag, and more generous than I could ever deserve. I’m looking forward to continuing to grow, learn, and give back in whatever way I can.
English
50
7
227
6.9K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Krishan Jethwa
Krishan Jethwa@KrishanJethwa·
🚨SPRING-01🚨 🔍Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer RCT: 25 Gy x 5 ➡️ CAPOX +- Sintilimab 🔥+ Sintilimab demonstrated: ✅⬆️pCR 59% vs 33% ✅No significant adverse surgical or safety signals Time to explore with organ preserving approaches⁉️ #ASCO25
Krishan Jethwa tweet mediaKrishan Jethwa tweet mediaKrishan Jethwa tweet mediaKrishan Jethwa tweet media
English
2
33
70
8.4K
Matthew Abrams, MD
Matthew Abrams, MD@abrams_md·
@NiuSanford ctDNA is the classic scenario of make a product then determine its usefulness. All it does is provide anxiety to patients
English
0
0
1
37
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford@NiuSanford·
DYNAMIC III: another study showing ctDNA prognostic, but not predictive.
 At this point, the main scenario I see for ctDNA guiding treatment decision making in CRC is potentially selecting patients for non-operative management after chemo/chemoRT in rectal cancer.
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel

ctDNA-guided adj CTx escalation in stage III CRC #ASCO25 🔎Primary analysis of the ctDNA-positive cohort from the randomized AGITG DYNAMIC-III trial 👉mRFS 29 vs 36 mo 👉CTx escalation does not improve outcome 🧐 ctDNA very helpful to understand risk groups, but we need better CTx @myESMO

English
7
6
35
4.4K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Daniel E Spratt
Daniel E Spratt@DrSpratticus·
X-torial: Cleaning up the misinformation about @JoeBiden and #ProstateCancer that I am reading everywhere. The purpose of this is to provide education from someone who treats and studies PCa for a living, lead the USA @NCCN PCa guidelines, hold leadership in @NRGonc @theNCI @US_FDA and dedicated my career to help men and their families suffering from PCa @nytimes @WSJ @FoxNews @CNN @NBCNews @Reuters @ASCO @PCFnews @DeptofDefense
English
26
147
366
85.3K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer·
✨ Practice-changing for gallbladder cancer? A randomized phase 3 trial from 🇮🇳 evaluated NACTRT vs NACT in locally advanced GBC (T3/T4, N1, liver infiltration). Results: ✂️ R0 resection: 51.6% (NACTRT) vs 29.7% (NACT) p=0.01 ⏳ Median OS: 21.8 vs 10.1 mo HR: 0.56 (95% CI 0.37–0.84), p=0.006 ⏱ EFS: 10.6 vs 4.9 mo HR: 0.58 (95% CI 0.39–0.85), p=0.006 5-year OS: 27% vs 18% Grade 3+ post-op morbidity: similar (~18–28%) Conclusion: NACTRT significantly improves resectability & long-term survival in unresectable LAGBC. #GIonc #GallbladderCancer #ASCO25 #OncoTwitter @NiuSanford @5_utr @ASCO
English
4
40
105
9.7K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
JHatch
JHatch@Hatchisyodaddy·
@olsonplanner Have been told it’s probably not necessary right out of residency. Any rule of thumb for when it is time to start looking into it? 1M net worth?
English
3
0
1
1.7K
Tyler Olson, EA
Tyler Olson, EA@olsonplanner·
Physicians - How much umbrella insurance do you have?
English
3
1
1
4.1K
Matthew Abrams, MD
Matthew Abrams, MD@abrams_md·
@NiuSanford I’m much more likely to offer it now, especially if any concern for excess toxicity
English
0
0
3
157
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford@NiuSanford·
PLATO ACT 4: Ph II RCT of 50.4 vs. 41.4 Gy for T1-2 (<4 cm) N0 anal SCC. No difference in 3-year local recurrence (primary endpoint) or OS, & better toxicity/QOL with dose-reduction. Should 41.4 Gy be a SOC option (ahead of Ph III DECREASE trial reporting)? #ESTRO25
Ane Appelt@cancerphysicist

PLATO ACT 4 results for dose de-escalation in early-stage anal cancer are out! Prof Sebag-Montefiore presents on the plenary stage at #ESTRO24 3-year locoregional failure 16.4% for standard dose IMRT vs 12.4% reduced dose IMRT Reduced dose IMRT is safe & effective! #radonc

English
4
29
63
10.4K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Stanislav (Stas) Lazarev, MD
Stanislav (Stas) Lazarev, MD@StasLazarev·
⚡️⚡️NEW STUDY - presented today at #ARS2025 in an oral talk by MS2 Yarelis Roque-Reyes from UCC School of Medicine, PR 🧠💥 Does whole brain RT (WBRT) help patients hospitalized with symptomatic leptomeningeal disease (LMD)? Our @MountSinaiRO study suggests: rarely — and in reality, it may be more harmful to patients’ quality of life and end-of-life care. 🧵👇 #radonc #neuroonc #endoflifecare #ARS2025 LMD is a devastating CNS complication with 3–6 mo survival. WBRT is often used for palliation — but for patients sick enough to need hospital admission, we asked: 👉 Does it actually help? We reviewed 58 such patients (2014–2023). Here’s what we found ⬇️ 📊 Symptom response after WBRT: ❌ 74% worsened ➖ 21% no change ✅ Only 5% improved 💀 Short-term mortality: 40% at 30 days 60% at 60 days 76% at 90 days 📉 ECOG declined in 79% ⏳ 30% spent >⅓ of their remaining lifespan on treatment — often in the hospital 🎯 Our takeaways ➡️ In hospitalized patients with symptomatic LMD, WBRT provides little to no clinical benefit ➡️ with few exceptions, best supportive care — not burdensome WBRT — should be the priority ➡️time to rethink WBRT in hospitalized pts with LMD? 👏 Congrats to Yarelis Roque-Reyes on her #ARS2025 oral talk! @sindhu_kunal @MountSinaiRO @QuadShotNews
Stanislav (Stas) Lazarev, MD tweet media
English
7
45
86
12.3K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Ralph Weichselbaum
Ralph Weichselbaum@rweichselbaum·
@RabbiWolpe When I was a resident, Harvard took money from Krupp I naïvely thought this has to be a different company/family than the one that funded the third Reich. This was in the early 70s. I was wrong should’ve known.
English
0
1
7
704
Joe Y Chang
Joe Y Chang@JoeChangMD·
I was called about my patient who was diagnosed with highly curable stage I adenocarcinoma in February 2023. We recommended SABR or surgery, but she declined standard care and pursued alternative plant-based treatment instead. Now, She developed diffuse brain metastasis. SAD!
Joe Y Chang tweet mediaJoe Y Chang tweet media
English
46
28
161
49.6K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Jeff Ryckman
Jeff Ryckman@jryckman3·
All due respect, but it is relatively common knowledge that radiotherapy works for many months after it has been delivered. One must not conflate pCR, especially short term pCR, after radiotherapy as a surrogate for LC or residual tumor. This has been well demonstrated across many disease sites. For reference, MISSILE cut at 10 weeks s/p RT while SABR-BRIDGE cut at 4.5 mo post-SBRT (range 2-17.5 mo). Take anal cancer, for example. When biopsied at 3 months, if positive, 3/4 of patients with positive biopsy converted to negative biopsy by 6 months. Of course, the whole specimen was not removed, so there is a potential there could be "residual," but robust data supports very high cure rates in the long term (~85%, generally speaking) with CCRT alone for anal SqCC. Receipt here: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC53… Take prostate cancer, for example. Post treatment biopsies are essentially not recommended until two years after radiotherapy. Receipt here: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33558660/ Take RCC, for example, where routine post-treatment biopsy is not recommended as it is not predictive of patient outcome. Receipt here: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38181809/ So, why should lung cancer be any different? Similarly to RCC, if post-treatment biopsies after lung RT do not predict outcomes, is this meaningful to patients or multidisciplinary discussion? Radiotherapy can also induce cellular senescence, where the cell will no longer divide but can still make proteins at low levels. We must not perpetuate misinformation suggesting short-term pCR is predictive of patient outcomes after RT, as it harms existing biases against radiotherapy. I have seen this fallacy posted repeatedly on X, so I felt it was time to address this head-on.
Brendon Stiles@BrendonStilesMD

@TonyFelefly @5_utr @biniamkidaneMD @ajuloorimd Unfortunately, MISSILE and SABR-BRIDGE didn't show the same w/ full pathology...clearly we need more research and effects may be tumor/site specific!

English
3
16
73
9.3K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Gustavo
Gustavo@gusviani·
🎙 Randomized Trial 🚨: SBRT vs. RFA for Recurrent Small HCC—Is It Time to Rethink Local Treatment? @OncoAlert 🔬 Study Highlights: 📌 Phase III trial, 166 👥 with recurrent HCC (≤5 cm, single lesion). 📌 Randomized to RFA (n=83) or SBRT (n=83) Key Outcomes: ✅ Local progression-free survival (LPFS): •2-year LPFS: 92.7% (SBRT)🏆 vs. 75.8% (RFA) (HR: 0.45, p=0.014). ✅ Progression-free survival (PFS): •Median PFS: 37.6 months (SBRT) vs. 27.6 months (RFA) (p=0.19).👌 ✅ Overall survival (OS): •2-year OS: 97.6% (SBRT) vs. 93.9% (RFA) (p=0.83).👌 ✅ Safety: Comparable acute and late adverse events.👍 📣 Implications for Practice: SBRT demonstrated ⬆️ local control while maintaining similar safety and OS compared to RFA.
Gustavo tweet media
English
5
80
184
18.7K
Matthew Abrams, MD retweetledi
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford@NiuSanford·
Our comprehensive assessment of NCI cooperative group trials is out in @JNCI_Now! If you are involved or enrolling in coop trials, please consider reading. A 🧵of our major findings. 1/12 academic.oup.com/jnci/advance-a…
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford tweet media
English
4
59
112
22.8K