Mike 🐧✳️

5.2K posts

Mike 🐧✳️ banner
Mike 🐧✳️

Mike 🐧✳️

@absforeever

• @AbstractChain Maxi, Obsidian Tier • @pudgypenguins fan, Holder #7023 & Lil Pudgy

Katılım Mayıs 2025
1.2K Takip Edilen984 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mike 🐧✳️
Mike 🐧✳️@absforeever·
So, what did yesterday’s stress test for NFT collections on Abstract show us? Only a few projects managed to hold their floor during the panic, and I’m especially happy to see my favorites @WEB3Playboys and @CannaSapiensX among them We can conclude that: 1. These projects have strong communities 2. Their NFTs are not being held just for XP 3. You’re not ready for what both teams are building Hope to see a collaboration between these two great teams in the future!
Mike 🐧✳️ tweet media
English
17
1
44
473
NFTGOY ✳️
NFTGOY ✳️@nftgoy·
Saw a few comments about the possible devaluation of roles on @AbstractChain Adding NFT XP boosts doesn’t necessarily devalue roles - with proper balance, they can complement each other. Roles like Graduated Elite Chad are still about time, engagement, and status, while NFTs add an additional layer of flexibility and choice for users. In a way, the system becomes more dynamic: - roles continue to reward long-term participation - NFTs provide a way to slightly optimize XP - and users get more ways to participate instead of following a single path If the balance is handled correctly, this won’t break the economy - it can actually make it more diverse and sustainable.✳️
cygaar@0xCygaar

This is what NFT boosts will look like in the portal in the coming weeks. Each week, holding certain NFTs will make you eligible for a different boost percentage. The screenshot below is just a mockup, projects will be eligible based off onchain data.

English
11
0
46
1.4K
Mike 🐧✳️
Mike 🐧✳️@absforeever·
Yesterday, Cygaar said that starting next week, XP will be increased for memecoin teams that are actively building their IP and expanding their holder base Who, in my view, fits that description best? Without a doubt, it’s @godthedogabs It’s a touching concept built around a little dog overcoming hardship The project has a strong and genuinely meaningful story behind it. In real life, the founder runs a therapy business that helps children with disabilities through speech therapy, occupational therapy, psychology, and physiotherapy. The GOD character was originally created over a year ago for his own children as part of bedtime stories meant to help them cope with challenges A strong story, strong IP, continued building through the bear market, and support from top Abstract KOLs - all of this, in my opinion, makes $GOD a very strong entry right now, especially with it being the best-performing token on Abstract today.
Mike 🐧✳️ tweet media
English
9
5
45
1.5K
Mike 🐧✳️
Mike 🐧✳️@absforeever·
I looked at the history and yes, before Moody Drops, Moody Madness didn’t have that many transactions, and that’s because the pinatas from Moody Drops are counted as Moody Madness If you look at the history, then before the launch of Moody Drops the percentage of transactions was evenly distributed among the apps, whereas Moody Drops tripled the number of transactions Is that bad? I don’t know, people are consciously giving money in exchange for XP and everyone is happy; it’s not artificial transaction inflation, right? In fact, the team’s actions led to a 3x increase in network transactions and a 3x increase in DAU through the daily check-in, and it worked! Nice numbers have never hurt anyone, especially when you need to show these numbers to, for example, new investors
English
0
0
0
10
qudev7🥷
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177·
I don’t see it that way. These are two different game systems within a single game. If that weren’t the case, there would be two separate apps in the portal like in the case of MOG and OCH. If Abstract had focused on that, it would’ve looked more like a distributed ecosystem of apps it really depends on how you look at it. If that app were Cambria, I’d have a different opinion. That kind of game is something you can actually showcase, bring to people, attract players and capital. But how are you supposed to attract people to Mood? What do you tell them “go lose $300 for 50 million Black Diamonds that might not even be worth anything, and earn some XP”? I’m talking about the bigger picture here. Don’t you think that bragging about revenue generated this way looks at least a bit questionable? Do you know any network before Abstract where 80% of the revenue is based on a single game and voting on apps? It looks good on the surface 40–50k active wallets, network revenue, etc.until you dig deeper and see where it actually comes from, and whether you can realistically take that to a broader audience and attract a real community.
English
1
0
2
76
qudev7🥷
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177·
Lol you should be ashamed of bragging with such data where 8/9k of earnings comes from one game and voting every 24h. That comes to a total of 78.8%. Before checking this I thought it would be around 50% which already looks strange that half is made by 1 game and voting
qudev7🥷 tweet media
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177

Please give me nerves and mental health lol Do you understand that Abstract bootlickers are bragging that the network is one of the most profitable from fees and charges? In such market conditions this is not something the team and their bootlickers should be bragging about. The more people know how much you earn the higher the expectations will be. How can you brag about earnings at a moment when there is no community growth, volume has been flat for months, TVL is dropping, NFTs and memes are all rekt by 80/90%, no top product or application has been delivered and despite the controversies surrounding Abstract and the team’s approach to the community. Instead of bragging about low fees and high number of users they brag about high fees. After checking daily votes the number increased, I’ll assume that 30/40k vote daily on apps so from votes the earnings are around 600/700 dollars lol Seriously and in this ranking TRX is still in first place with volume of 2.8 million and earnings of 1.13 million. Data for idiots 😂😂😂

English
5
1
18
2.2K
Abstract
Abstract@AbstractChain·
Drop your AGW if you believe in Abstract ⬇️
English
2K
248
1.6K
65K
Drewsuruncle ⟁ 🟩
Drewsuruncle ⟁ 🟩@taxninja·
@IthacaNFT @abschud Yeah makes sense. I don’t have strong opinions either way. Still would like to get $BAT on abstract and do stuff over there with them. Maybe some day we will
English
2
0
3
136
qudev7🥷
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177·
Luca is not active in Abstract which AbsChud wrote about on Discord. You’re comparing networks that raised funding and operated on testnet, don’t compare them to Abstract when those projects had no possibility of implementing sales funnels and funding was investing in their operations. For them mainnet was simultaneous with TGE
qudev7🥷 tweet media
English
1
0
0
45
qudev7🥷
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177·
Please give me nerves and mental health lol Do you understand that Abstract bootlickers are bragging that the network is one of the most profitable from fees and charges? In such market conditions this is not something the team and their bootlickers should be bragging about. The more people know how much you earn the higher the expectations will be. How can you brag about earnings at a moment when there is no community growth, volume has been flat for months, TVL is dropping, NFTs and memes are all rekt by 80/90%, no top product or application has been delivered and despite the controversies surrounding Abstract and the team’s approach to the community. Instead of bragging about low fees and high number of users they brag about high fees. After checking daily votes the number increased, I’ll assume that 30/40k vote daily on apps so from votes the earnings are around 600/700 dollars lol Seriously and in this ranking TRX is still in first place with volume of 2.8 million and earnings of 1.13 million. Data for idiots 😂😂😂
raven⚡✳️@bycoinraven

For those saying “ @AbstractChain is dead” just a quick reminder 😄 > Take a look at the daily revenue rankings. Abstract is sitting comfortably in the top 10, outperforming networks that the crypto world has talked about for years, networks worth billions. The same network you called “dead” because of an XP adjustment is generating: > one-sixth of Ethereum’s revenue, > one-fifth of BSC’s revenue, > and two-thirds of Arbitrum’s revenue. Do these look like the numbers of a “dead” network? If an XP adjustment shook your confidence, you’re probably not ready for real growth. @Abstract_Eco

English
10
1
29
3.9K
Mike 🐧✳️
Mike 🐧✳️@absforeever·
1. Better than new blockchains with 100M$ investments such as Berachain, MegaETH and Monad. On many blockchains with TVL nothing is happening, while on Abstract there is always something to do, think about that. 2. Luca did not compare Abstract with Base, he just wants to compete with the best. Abstract wrote about 800 thousand active users per month, not per day.
English
1
0
2
76
qudev7🥷
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177·
1. Better than which ones? 2. Abstract itself compared itself to Base and wanted to be better than them so where does the sudden change come from that we should be satisfied with Abstract’s results. Maybe that’s why when I read posts like this I later look at 80% of that coming from voting and one application. The same profile was writing that there are 50/100k active users, Abstract writes 800k and it’s usually up to 50k 3. It seems to me that the reception could be critical but as you’ll notice these are not hate posts. I comment on insensitive situations, the team’s approach and as here fabricated statistics You’ll find the rest on my profile. If you find a hate post or something you think is a lie write to me about it
English
1
1
4
104
Rubiks_Gus
Rubiks_Gus@Rubiks_Gus·
As much as I respect $GOD for not rugging, the stats for $ABSTER are much greater in terms of actively building their IP and expanding their holder base. $ABSTER has 81000 holders, $GOD has 4300. $ABSTER attracted more inflows in terms of $, with it running to 44 million market cap, and still being around 2 million market cap. I can share like 10 other stats that shows $ABSTER is growing more, but I think this will do.
English
5
0
2
150
Mike 🐧✳️
Mike 🐧✳️@absforeever·
So, what did yesterday’s stress test for NFT collections on Abstract show us? Only a few projects managed to hold their floor during the panic, and I’m especially happy to see my favorites @WEB3Playboys and @CannaSapiensX among them We can conclude that: 1. These projects have strong communities 2. Their NFTs are not being held just for XP 3. You’re not ready for what both teams are building Hope to see a collaboration between these two great teams in the future!
Mike 🐧✳️ tweet media
English
17
1
44
473

Keşfet

@nftgoy @AbstractChain @ProofOfEly @godthedogabs @nishseq @taxninja @IthacaNFT @abschud