AdamOFK

🚀 From $0 to SaaS success before 17 — here’s how I’m doing it. At 11, I started learning programming for the first time. At 13, I dove into dropshipping, e‑commerce, and digital products — and failed at all of them. At 15, I made my first $100 freelancing as a social media designer. It wasn’t much, but it proved I could build something real online. At 16, I wanted the same success but bigger. I returned to programming, mastered the full SaaS tech stack in just 8 months thanks to my programming foundation, and focused on a problem I’d seen in all my past ventures: low conversion rates. That’s how I built @corviseai — an AI platform helping founders craft landing pages that actually convert. My goal: go from $0 → $10K MRR — building in public, learning daily, and sharing the full journey. Let’s grow together, founders 🚀

Teenage founders are building in months what used to take years AI + building in public = new playbook We're compressing entire startup timelines and nobody's ready for it 🚀

There's a moment when your side project becomes real You hit that number That user count that proves people actually want this Not just you building alone in your room People waiting for what you ship next That's when everything changes

Just built Crovise to help you turn more clicks into customers without wasting your ad budget AI gives you instant tips to boost your landing pages Would you use this?

Been grinding nonstop on Crovise these past few weeks Built an AI-powered tool that analyzes your page and tells you exactly how to get better conversions No more guessing with ads Excited to see where this goes

Ever wonder why some founders shut down profitable businesses to start over? Walking away from revenue that works to chase something bigger Sounds crazy but maybe that's exactly when you're ready

Early stage SaaS growth isn't about every tool Pick 3-4 channels that fit your founder brand: 🏗️ Building in public 📱 Short-form content 🤝 Community Go deep on these pre-$1K MRR

Most solo founders at $800 MRR obsess over the wrong things. The gap to $1K isn't another feature. It's showing up daily even when growth flatlines. It's shipping small wins instead of waiting for the big one. Otherwise, you stay stuck at almost.

Ever wonder why some founders shut down profitable businesses to start over? Walking away from revenue that works to chase something bigger Sounds crazy but maybe that's exactly when you're ready

@ziwenxu_ Based on my expirience marketing is the difficult part for any business, and it's the real reason for business failed

As a founder, what’s more difficult? 1. Sales 2. Product 3. Marketing

@jacobflowchat @danmartell The sheer amount of varied failures. Each one taught me something vital, even the $100 design gig. They're priceless lessons.

Remember how much work it took you to get where you are. Honour that when you ask clients to invest in themselves.

@Priya_Upadhyay_ CorviseAI tackles conversion clarity, helping founders understand why users aren't converting. It's a huge blind spot.

What real problem does your SaaS/website solve? Let’s see how big of a problem you are working on.

@aakashgupta Spot on. For new SaaS, this underscores the importance of building pricing models focused on outcomes, not just seats. Adapt early.

Everyone’s talking about SaaS bear cases as if they’re separate risks. They’re not. They’re one systemic risk with ten symptoms. The load-bearing wall is seat-based pricing collapse. Pull it out and the whole building comes down. Seat-based pricing dropped from 21% to 15% of SaaS companies in 12 months. Salesforce enterprise accounts are already seeing 10% seat reductions because AI makes support reps more efficient. One Salesforce sales engineer handling 90 accounts confirmed they’re losing revenue with no pricing shift to compensate. Monday.com is down 38% as enterprises consolidate onto fewer platforms. When seats compress, every other bear case activates at once. Platform differentiation erodes because every vendor adds “AI features” but the agentic layer sits above them, not inside them. Investor sentiment sours because the business model gets de-rated from recurring revenue to consumption. Legacy SaaS can’t transition because their entire sales motion, compensation structure, and revenue forecasting runs on seat expansion. Pricing power evaporates because AI-native startups price against the $10/hour labor pool, not the $40/seat software pool. Margins compress because AI inference costs are variable while seat revenue was fixed. CAC rises because AI agents are capturing the search traffic that used to feed inbound. And these accelerate each other. Margin compression forces price increases. Price increases accelerate customer migration to AI-native alternatives. Customer churn accelerates seat decline. Seat decline worsens margin compression. The winners recognized this early and built pricing around outcomes before the seat compression forced their hand. Intercom moved Fin AI to $0.99 per resolution instead of $39 per agent. Within 6 months, 40% higher adoption and enterprise customers cutting support costs by 60% while handling 3x more tickets. Salesforce’s Agentforce ARR grew 330% in Q4, but their stock is still down 21%. The market is pricing the transition risk, not the destination. The real question for SaaS investors: which companies have the gross margin cushion to survive the 18-24 months where seat revenue declines faster than consumption revenue scales?

@mscode07 Hi! Building SaaS. Every day's a lesson in growth and persistence. Connecting with fellow founders keeps the momentum. Let's grow.

Hey devs, Building in Web3, SaaS, or Solana? Drop a "hi" below - let's connect and grow together 🚀

@DanielW_Kiwi That's the spirit! Pushing boundaries with budget constraints is where real innovation and learning happen. Your curiosity will uncover valuable lessons.

Can I lode code a full SAAS with GLM 4.7? Probably not but I'm at least going to see how frustrating it is. Why? Because I'm cheap and love to see what I can do on a budget

@IAmAaronWill This is a solid framework. Evolving from service work to products and then SaaS builds incredible resilience and insight.

Learn high income skill. Web design, copy etc. Work for free. Collect testimonials. Get clients with testimonials. Work more, increase prices. Release products. Create a SaaS. Scale. Disappear.

@romanbuildsaas Eager to learn new growth strategies. Finding what truly connects with your target audience is always the biggest challenge.

I cracked the formula for ultra-viral LinkedIn posts. It can explode your SaaS signups. Want the blueprint? Reply “Growth” 🧠🚀

@GergelyOrosz This shows focusing on your core problem is key, even for big players. As a founder, define your unique value and build that.

The company that created Claude Code and Claude Cowork must have obviously built their own HR solution from scratch with these tools, right? No: they use Workday. Understand why this is, and you'll understand why enterprise SaaS could be doing better than ever, thanks to AI

@_lhermann Absolutely. The noise can be distracting, but many founders are still building valuable SaaS. Stay focused on your vision.

Guys, I start to feel like an old person when I look at my feed. Ralph, CLawdbot, Mac Mini. I have no idea what's going on anymore. Are people still trying to build SaaS products?

@juanjovn Every building starts with a blueprint. Your early grind is building that foundation, learning every line of code. Keep at it.

>you with $200 claude code max, 12 Mac Mini and clawdbot for building a $0 mrr saas >my gf who builds buildings:

@jasonlk Every shift creates new opportunities. For founders, it's about seeing where to build solutions that empower people with AI.

"The top leaders in AI+B2B are hiring tons of sales execs. Tons. But it's not enough to offset the shrinking hiring of mature tech companies. Jobs won't be growing in sales overall. But the silver lining? The Human SDR that owns the AI SDRs ... that cracks the code ... can make $250,000." with @kylecnorton CRO @owner