adetox

@XFreeze Yeah because the top achievement of our engineering is a BULLETPROOF car that is not safer for people and pedestrian. Keep saying that as a feat. Only in amurica!

Joe Rogan really bet Elon Musk $1 that he could pierce the Cybertruck with his compound bow it literally exploded against the stainless steel exoskeleton and it barely scratched it 😂

@elonmusk still pumping the stock, eh?

Tesla will be one of the companies to make AGI and probably the first to make it in humanoid/atom-shaping form

@nicbarkeragain It's not just they're not willing to do it. It's conceptually wrong since it's like growing a sane child by babysitting it one hour a day instead of actually parenting him 24/7. Or trying to learn anything by reading instead of doing.

"AI will generate all the code, and senior programmers will review it" is basically a mantra at this point. I'm fortunate enough to know a number of top tier programmers personally, and precisely 0% of them want to spend their time reviewing AI generated code (myself included)

@malinverno_luca @DarioBressanini Certo. Facciamo fare vibe coding ai CEO che fanno la loro app. Convinti che ora basti quello. Poi mettiamo in produzione e vedi un po' non ci sono più i dev perchè li stiamo umiliando dicendo che non ci servono più

@adetogni @DarioBressanini Verissimo, ma dipende dallo scope, IMHO. Nel senso... se é un MVP per aiutare me, dove security, optimisation scalability ecc sono poco rilevanti, il vibe coding fa miracoli (modulo che tu testi la logica del codice in modo accurato).. se devi andare in prod, si salvi chi puó...

Sono stupefatto: sto sperimentando con la generazione di codice tramite AI. Ho chiesto di scrivere da zero degli algoritmi di simulazioni di computational physics (dove devi prima capire cosa sono e cosa fanno prima di programmare). Ha fatto tutto! Io ci avrei messo un mese. 😱

@aakashgupta So basically this full scale investment by one OF THE BEST coding engine managed by the founder themselves (so the most advanced tool and team that we can have) matches my direct experience which is shared by literally EVERY coder I've been talking with. It does NOT roi positive

Sounds incredible until you read the fine print. The compiler generates less efficient code than GCC with all optimizations disabled. It doesn’t have its own assembler or linker. It can’t produce a 16-bit x86 code generator. And Carlini himself says it has “nearly reached the limits of Opus’s abilities.” New features and bugfixes kept breaking existing functionality. So what did $20,000 and two weeks actually buy? A compiler that passes 99% of GCC’s torture tests but can’t match the output quality of a tool that’s had 37 years of human engineering. That’s the constraint nobody’s pricing in. The real story is in the cost curve, not the capability demo. $20,000 for 100,000 lines means $0.20 per line of generated code. A senior compiler engineer costs roughly $150/hour. At maybe 50 polished lines per hour for something this complex, that’s $3/line. AI just did it at 15x cheaper, and it will only get cheaper from here. But the code isn’t equivalent. The AI version needs a human to finish the assembler, fix the linker, optimize the output, and prevent regressions. Those are the hardest 20% of the problem, and they represent 80% of the engineering value. Anthropic built the demo. Shipping the product still requires humans. This tells you exactly where we are in the autonomous software timeline. AI can now produce impressive first drafts of complex systems at trivial cost. Turning those drafts into production software still requires the judgment that costs $300K+ per year in compiler engineer salary. The gap between “compiles the Linux kernel” and “replaces GCC” is measured in decades of accumulated engineering wisdom that no model has internalized yet. The companies that understand this will use agent teams to generate the 80% and hire engineers to finish the 20%. The companies that don’t will ship $20,000 compilers that produce slower code than a free tool from 1987.

@catturd2 Can you point one state of USA that you would concede in case someone attacks you? I mean, for the peace.

Zelensky says he can't give up any territory because it's in their Constitution. What part of their Constitution says he can be a forever dictator?

@GuntherEagleman Gunter is a female until proven

Michelle Obama is a man. If not, community note this post with proof.

@GuntherEagleman Hopefully no

51 weeks ago Trump was shot in the face. 32 weeks ago Trump was making fries at McDonalds. Today he is signing the BBB with B2’s flying over. There will never be another one like him.

@charliekirk11 define "third world"

It's time to ban third world immigration, legal or illegal. We've reached our limit and we have a huge cultural, educational, housing, financial, and essential services problem to fix now because of it. We need a net-zero immigration moratorium with a ban on all third worlders.

@SchoenDavid oh. Because he said so. Must be legit

I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein’s defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!

@JoeyMannarinoUS @elonmusk Oh please any person with 1% of brain functioning knew that two narcissistic sociopaths cannot work together. Too many roosters in the hen

@elonmusk Elon, we need you guys on one team.

This is what he said about Jared

@RonFilipkowski Oh boy where are my popcorns...

I think we’re making some progress now on this therapy session.

@charliekirk11 "With activist judges, what is even the point of having a president?!" Democracy 101. Were you sitting at the last desks playing candy crush at school?

🚨BREAKING: In a sweeping new ruling, the U.S. Court of International Trade has just blocked President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs, saying that authority is with Congress. With activist judges, what is even the point of having a president?! FACT CHECK: While the Constitution grants Congress the power to impose tariffs, Congress delegated much of that power to the Executive Branch in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows for adjustments to tariff rates without needing Congressional action. Courts have given the executive branch broad authority to negotiate trade, that is until now.

@elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @DOGE Funny that everyone calls you very intelligent. What kind of intelligence you have? You fell completely into his trap. He just wanted your money, he has zero interest in "saving" money for the gov. Or maybe it was on purpose, just enough to slash the proceding towards you.

As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending. The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.

@thatsKAIZEN So...you are paying 30% more of imported goods (which are A LOT), and you call it a win? Biden's one were targeted, like ANY SENSIBLE TARIFF should work, drumpf's one are blanket. Sure you're winning?

Chinese tariffs on the U.S. are now 10% - lower than they were under Biden. U.S. tariffs on China are now 30% - higher than they were under Biden. The tariffs now favor the U.S. more. This wouldn’t have happened by asking nicely. Calling this a loss is pure partisanship.

@_iBodik_ @BehizyTweets or the *american* individualism and extreme capitalism. You want no strings, no control on companies, 'free market', here you have uncontrolled leeching of people's health for *profit* and only profit.

@BehizyTweets I'm tired of this pathetic and childish behaviour when he blames everyone around, except himself.

President Trump is fully exposing Europe's free healthcare scam. It's never been free cause AMERICANS were paying for it one way or another. "This means American patients were effectively subsidizing socialist healthcare systems in Germany, in all parts of the EU."

@papasteve06 @BubbaSiemens @Kasparov63 Well you are considering the total population instead of the eligible ones and the actual voters. He won 77M vs 75M,so technically more than half.

@adetogni @BubbaSiemens @Kasparov63 US population is 347 million. 77 million voted for Trump. More likely 1/4 supported Trump. Even less now of course, like 1/6. 🙌😂

Please.

@BubbaSiemens @Kasparov63 Almost half. Not 1/3

@Kasparov63 We live in a time where a self-made billionaire who doesn't know what a trade deficit is, slaps orange goop on his face and behaves like a petulant toddler in front of the world and 1/3 of the country admires and respects him. How is this real?

@Bubblebathgirl "he holds the cards". So you're fine with your president taking sovereignity from another country with blackmail? Is that your idea of "winning"? In your mind you'll be satisfied where you can call 100% of the world USA?

Canada PM Carney tries to act tough and say Canada is not for sale. The fact he even has to defend that position (and his body language) projects weakness. The US doesn’t need Canada. But Canada needs the US. Trump has all the most powerful cards.