Ale Ferrari

@NorthstarCharts Happy to be part! Thank you for the offer! 🙌🏻

@aferrari Thank you so much 🙂

Final Day - Our membership prices will never be this cheap again. Check out our Trustpilot reviews here 👇trustpilot.com/review/northst… and our results here 👇 x.com/NorthstarChart… x.com/NorthstarChart… x.com/NorthstarChart…

Caught up with @karpathy for a new @NoPriorsPod: on the phase shift in engineering, AI psychosis, claws, AutoResearch, the opportunity for a SETI-at-Home like movement in AI, the model landscape, and second order effects 02:55 - What Capability Limits Remain? 06:15 - What Mastery of Coding Agents Looks Like 11:16 - Second Order Effects of Coding Agents 15:51 - Why AutoResearch 22:45 - Relevant Skills in the AI Era 28:25 - Model Speciation 32:30 - Collaboration Surfaces for Humans and AI 37:28 - Analysis of Jobs Market Data 48:25 - Open vs. Closed Source Models 53:51 - Autonomous Robotics and Atoms 1:00:59 - MicroGPT and Agentic Education 1:05:40 - End Thoughts

I think I finally figured out why OpenClaw is amazing and took off like wild fire and why Peter is a genius, as Altman called him. And it's actually a different way of looking at it. It's not a DeepSeek moment for agents. It's a Napster moment. And just like Napster it will eventually force the industry to change. In essence when Napster came out the entire world told the music industry we don't want to buy CDs anymore and if you don't provide us a digital download experience we are just going to take it until you do. It forced the industry to create Apple Music and eventually Spotify. Both essentially killed most music piracy by making it ubiquitous and cheap and good. But it forced change. The same will now happen to software. Here's why: In essence OpenClaw lets you take what vendors don't want to give you: Unified access to countless applications. We all want a personal assistant that can talk to freaking everything and do anything for us in the digital world. But vendors don't want this. They want you locked into their bullshit. For example, none of the messaging platforms want bots on there. None. They all have explicit policies against them and make it hard to do this. WhatsApp doesn't want you on there. Signal. Telegram's bot father is garbage. It's all designed to keep bots out. They were designed for a pre-agentic era when bot = spam. Many other things are like this. The API layers are gated, hoop-jumping bullshit. Go get an enterprise account and wait for approval and yada yada. Want access to WhatsApp? Get a business account and attach a number (what small business has a real number anymore 😂) and messages can't come from a person, etc. Google ads? It's not just an auth, it's go get a special manager account and create an enterprise key and blah blah blah. It's a horrible experience because it was all designed for corporations to control access. Now people are saying, make your app easy to access and accessible to me and my machine avatars and do it in a headless way or you will be dead. Peter hacked around all this by making everything command line in the classic Linux style and using things like an open source library that reverse engineered the web version of WhatsApp. It's all a bit house-of-cards-y because he had no choice. At my company we had a similar idea early (and failed). Basically we wanted to make the best multimodal/computer using model because then it doesn't need an API or access hoops. You just go through the human interface layer and ain't nobody going to stop you. We failed because we weren't big enough and it's really a job for the mega-labs to solve because it is a hard problem and costs a shit ton of money. Peter was much smarter. Make it all command line because that is ready now. Use any reverse engineered library or project or proxy available come Hell or high water and make it work by any means necessary even if it is hacky. In short, he signaled to the software world that they better change and change fast or we are going to do this anyway and you can't stop us. Of course some are foolishly trying. Meta is banning Claws on WhatsApp, etc. They will all try to build their own gated, controlled, enshittified version of this thing. They will fail. And eventually everyone will offer a clear, easy way to get access via API for agents or they will be gone. In essence OpenClaw gave people what they wanted, which was an app connected to everything, even when most of the vendors don't want you to have this.

Landing pages de SaaS costumam converter entre 3% e 15% para cadastro, segundo o meu claude. Mas eu to com 36.2% de MÉDIA desde o lançamento do projeto (quase 2 meses). Aqui está o segredo: 1. Faço analises de CRO, copy, focada em conversão 2. Não uso dark patterns 3. Analiso concorrentes, mercado, e posicionamento Entre muitas outras coisas, que agora você pode conseguir também na sua LandingPage, basta usar o awesome.codar.me

@jspujji AI

I recently spoke to a marketer who ran a $40M brand with just two designers and ONE AI process. I paid him 6 figs to build these systems for my companies. He chains together 7 AI tools: creative brief → image gen → scale winning assets. All run by 2 offshore designers. I’m giving away his entire operating system for free. Comment “AI” and I’ll send it.

The world is a museum of passion projects

Cursor’s Ambassador program turns one soon Comped Ultra plan, private Slack group with team, funding for events, and merch. Still working through our backlog of applications, but inviting new members every few weeks. Apply to join!

Who is configuring #Openclaw from scratch for the third time this week? I am. 😆

A bit over a year later: • Cursor: $2B annualized revenue w/ 300+ people • Lovable: $300M annualized revenue w/ 150+ people • Mercor: $500M annualized revenue w/ 200+ people

@etnshow @sequoia @JulienBek cc @GrowthXAI @danielvlopes @santilli It appears to be a perfect fit for this thesis.

Sequoia (@sequoia) Partner @JulienBek tells us why the next $1Trillion company will be a software company masquerading as a services firm: "Ultimately, if you look at the TAM today, for every dollar that you spend on software, $6 are spent on services". "If you sell the tools, the models are getting better and better and so you're at risk... whereas, if you sell the services, you're actually delivering outcomes." "Until now, we could really just go after the $1, but now with services first and human at the centre, we think you can capture the six".

@javilopen Crazy.

Nano Banana 2: "Logo that says "javilopen" on a white background, black rectangle with rounded corners, imperfect white letters, Tim Burton style, clean."

Soon will be obvious.

@benln You rock, Ben! Let’s keep it up! 🤘🏻

1 year at Cursor today Grateful to support such a special community and work with such an incredible team

@blasgoro @Apple I can imagine how genuine is your ask. Seems very legit. Not even a little automated.

@aferrari @Apple hi Ale genuinely curious how your work measures conversions just sent a quick message

It's a joke. Default dictation in MacOS is laughable! Sad miss from @Apple.

I know I’m not the only one Mon-Fri: zoom zoom email email gsheet gdoc Fri-Sun: ssh tmux vi codex playwright openclaw npm claude git ollama cursor

I'm growth marketer trying to help companies thrive, and in 2026 one of my core tools is @cursor_ai. Not a CRM, CMS or Photoshop. It's a AI DEV tool. Crazy times ahead! PS.: an automated content classification system is coming alive.

@ssujeeth45 @NorthstarCharts Silver follows gold.

@NorthstarCharts How about silver

☑️CAPITAL ROTATION = a new GOLD BULL ERA. ☑️Oil has its bull era when gold does. ☑️ $8000+ gold & $250+ oil are reasonable targets ☑️There are good reasons to think we spike much higher than that before it's all over.

@Shadda101 @_baretto The world in general, is very different to 20 years ago, sadly.

@robinebers Hoping you get a way to leave!

what the actual fuck… on the day i somehow managed to gtfo airport gets bombed my neighborhood gets hit can this fucking stop now please? stay safe!