Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab

1.1K posts

Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab banner
Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab

Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab

@affectivescilab

We study emotions: what they are & how they work. We use experiential, behavioral, psychophysiological, + brain-imaging techniques. Tweets by @joseph_fridman.

Boston, MA Katılım Şubat 2018
381 Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett@LFeldmanBarrett·
@learn_optimized Various work by Karl Friston. Also my previous book "How Emotions are Made" goes into it a bit in chapter 4. /end
English
1
0
3
0
Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab retweetledi
Good Athlete Project
Good Athlete Project@coach4kindness·
“In short, your brain’s most important job is not thinking. It’s running a little worm body that has become very, very complicated…” — Been waiting on this for months, and it’s as good as I expected! Thank you, @LFeldmanBarrett
Good Athlete Project tweet media
English
1
3
13
0
Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab retweetledi
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett@LFeldmanBarrett·
Author George Hammond ("Conversations With Socrates") and I will be livestreaming a conversation about the brain, hosted by the Commonwealth Club (online) on Tuesday, December 1! Topic: "7-1/2 LESSONS ABOUT THE BRAIN." Registration is required. bit.ly/3kqcn5J
English
0
1
10
0
Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab retweetledi
Society for Affective Science
Society for Affective Science@affectScience·
More research is necessary to clarify these findings! The authors end by discussing all the different, exciting future directions we can take as affective scientists to improve our ability to answer these questions!
GIF
English
0
1
2
0
Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab retweetledi
Society for Affective Science
Society for Affective Science@affectScience·
The authors discuss 2 potential explanations for these outcomes that require future study - either our methods for assessing emotion have flaws, or our emotion categories are not equally useful for understanding biological signals across individuals/contexts
GIF
English
1
1
4
0
Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab retweetledi
Society for Affective Science
Society for Affective Science@affectScience·
Overall, above-chance classification accuracy was seen in the supervised clustering methods - emotion categories are telling us *something* about these signals. However, the unsupervised analyses did not correspond with emotion category labels across datasets
GIF
English
1
1
2
0
Interdisciplinary Affective Science Lab retweetledi
Society for Affective Science
Society for Affective Science@affectScience·
Using machine learning, they studied the correspondence of emotion labels with fMRI BOLD, autonomic nervous system, & self-reports of experience data, comparing supervised (using emotion categories) vs. unsupervised (no pre-assigned labels) clustering methods
GIF
English
1
1
2
0