𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌

16.9K posts

𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌 banner
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌

𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌

@aitche_

32y • 9-5 software dev • here trying to understand different perspectives · 🇺🇸 · have a nice day

Katılım Şubat 2020
762 Takip Edilen271 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌@aitche_·
Social Media is the new Yellow Journalism
English
0
0
1
236
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌
@Gingerjaggoff @Fat_Electrician I quoted a number I was taught in HS economics. Probably out of context. Sorry. Good for you finding a real number. My point is still valid. Commercialized innovation would not exist without public research/data/investment. Including military
English
0
0
0
12
Dave
Dave@Gingerjaggoff·
@aitche_ @Fat_Electrician Private and publicly traded Businesses funded 75% of our R&D in 2023 vs the 18% funded by the government that same year. The rest is supported by universities and nonprofits. making up that 90% statistic is intellectually dishonest, when the real answer was real easy to find🤷
English
1
0
0
16
The Fat Electrician
The Fat Electrician@Fat_Electrician·
Hey, remember that time we implemented income tax only for the top 3% of Americans? Then it applied to everyone, and the top 3% hired accountants to use loopholes to avoid it. And it to this day fucks everyone else? History repeats itself, thats issue.
Bernie Sanders@BernieSanders

Ok, Jamie: Let me clear things up for you. If my 5% wealth tax on billionaires was enacted you’d owe $135 million more in taxes & a family of 4 making $150,000 or less would receive a $12,000 payment. Oh, and you’d still be worth more than $2.5 billion. Seems pretty fair to me.

English
177
1.1K
11.5K
208.9K
Dave
Dave@Gingerjaggoff·
@aitche_ @Fat_Electrician Well there are countless examples of innovation that has gone on to save Millions.
English
1
0
0
26
ChristIsKing25
ChristIsKing25@RedneckSniper76·
@Fat_Electrician Remember that time they implemented income taxes and it was ruled unconstitutional so they amended the constitution to allow income tax? Then they implemented it and said it was a temporary tax… still paying that same temporary tax today
English
3
0
4
520
Dave
Dave@Gingerjaggoff·
@Fat_Electrician No one can answer this question! If taxing the rich is the goal, What is the incentive for an entrepreneur to become successful? Where is the drive for innovation? Why should someone be motivated to be better? All this does is stifle future innovation 🤷
English
3
0
4
309
Matthew Puddister
Matthew Puddister@mattpuddister·
The capitalist media doesn't support investigative journalism because the Epstein class doesn't want people investigating their crimes or realizing that we don't actually live in a democracy.
Aidan Regan@Aidan_Regan

The death of investigative journalism is a core part of the democratic malaise. Imagine how much better our democracies would be if journalists spent their days on corporate corruption and money in politics - instead of poll numbers and political soap operas.

English
1
3
4
125
Joseph Rizzo
Joseph Rizzo@jlrizzoii·
@aitche_ @mattpuddister You can't separate economy and governance. But problems of goverance are not unique to economic systems. Saying that goverance problems only arise out of capitalism is at best a utopian argument.
English
1
0
0
13
Matthew Puddister
Matthew Puddister@mattpuddister·
Saying monopoly capitalism isn't "real capitalism" is extreme cope. Under capitalism, free competition always transforms into monopoly. The postwar boom was a historical anomaly. We need to nationalize industries like airlines and democratically run them under workers' control.
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)@adamscochran

Well you see: * We started bailing out big businesses, and ignoring anti-competition laws. * Businesses deemed "to big to fail" no longer needed to compete on customer satisfaction. * They optimized for the short-term quarterly KPIs of the stock market and shareholders. * Other businesses had to follow suit just to be competitive. And so America moved from real capitalism, where consumers vote with their wallets, to a post-capitalist oligarchy, where the wealthy buy votes. This was entrenched with Citizen's United allowing unlimited dark money into politics, preventing laws from rolling this back. So businesses went from competing for happy customers, to competing to make the most dollars for those who owned the government. And the enshittification of America was cemented. Real capitalism is what we had in the 1970s with strong unions, a growing middle class, reasonable taxes and businesses that provided quality goods and services. Oligarchs spent a fuck-ton of money telling you that what you have today is capitalism and that you must either defend it (or hate all capital) because it keeps you in-fighting between political parties instead of being angry at them. When we realize that good capitalism involves social programs, labor, and businesses that do right by consumers - we can get back to this world. We can have leg room again!

English
11
16
136
2.1K
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌
@jlrizzoii @mattpuddister The solution for what you are talking about is not no regulation. All markets that are able to be monopolized need to be regulated. Or someone will win it and wield monopolistic pricing power. Yes, regulators themselves can be corrupted. A secondary market dynamic.
English
1
0
0
11
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌
@jlrizzoii @mattpuddister Ok. I agree with that. I don't agree with OPs original assertion that all markets tend towards monopolies. Only goods that are monopolistic in nature are able to be monopolized. Most markets are not. Like the one for tomatoes.
English
1
0
0
12
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌
@jlrizzoii @mattpuddister It's a statement of economic principles. In reality it's possible the cell phone market in Canada is poorly regulated, leading to harm to consumers. Those can be different things.
English
1
0
0
14
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌
@jlrizzoii @mattpuddister The government has a responsibility to ensure companies that produce a naturally monopolistic product (like a utility) do not leverage monopolistic pricing power, if that's what you mean. Capitalistic markets only function well with regulation, after all.
English
1
0
0
15
Joseph Rizzo
Joseph Rizzo@jlrizzoii·
@aitche_ @mattpuddister Except the government can and does create situations that distort the market where market is dominated by small number of companies.
English
1
0
0
17
Lewis 🇺🇸
Lewis 🇺🇸@ctjlewis·
Is Pangram useful? Sort of, but not for the customers it's selling to. It should be selling to Palantir and the government, not to schools. The false positive rate is also much higher than "1 in 10,000." pangram-report.vercel.app
English
21
2
95
14.2K
teddy
teddy@thndrBddy·
How many fucking taxes pay for roads? All of them? Do all the taxes pay for roads? Why can’t anyone come up with any first example other than roads? The question is rhetorical because the answer is obvious; people have no fucking clue what the government does with our tax dollars
English
32
0
51
4.4K
Rushi
Rushi@rushicrypto·
I’m very confused about the number of people who think “property tax” is a sales tax on you home rather than taxes to pay for public services you use every day. “I paid off my home why do i still pay property taxes?!?!?” Oh, did you also stop using the roads and libraries and sidewalks and parks? Not worried about fires anymore?
English
3.6K
472
6.9K
1.1M
𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡 📌
@mattpuddister 1. An oligopoly. You are correct to point out that utilities are generally monopolistic products. Unlike tomatoes, which are a commodity. 2. Nice try, but Monsanto does not grow a single tomato.
English
1
0
1
50
Matthew Puddister
Matthew Puddister@mattpuddister·
@aitche_ 1. Canadians pay some of the most expensive phone plans in the world because three companies—Bell, Rogers, and Telus—own 90% of the phone market. What is that if not monopoly control? 2. Monsanto holds a dominant position in the tomato industry. seedalliance.org/2008/who-owns-…
English
1
0
4
75
Matthew Puddister
Matthew Puddister@mattpuddister·
@aitche_ What private-sector industries today are not dominated by a handful of giant corporations?
English
2
0
5
105