


akoijam sunita
5K posts






Sajibu Cheiraoba greetings. Wishing everyone a wonderful year.






Vishwa Nath-Delhi Press Award for Fearless Journalism 2025 | The Longlist The Media Foundation Awards | IIC, 20 March, 6 pm @AnantGuptaAG, @anmolpritamND, @annavetticad, @sighyush, @Basantrajsonu, @lal__kal, @soumya_pillai, @sukanyashantha



The Supreme Court has directed the Centre and all State governments along with all institutions receiving public funds, either partially or fully, to dissociate the chairperson of NCERT social science curriculum, Professor Michel Denino and his two other associate members who were behind the Sub-chapter in part 2 of the Class 8 NCERT Social Science textbook 'Corruption in the Judiciary', in any manner for the purpose of preparation of curriculum or finalisation of text book for the next generation. A bench led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant also directed all of the aforesaid authorities to disassociate Professor Denino, along with his team, from the preparation and inclusion of the Chapter, from rendering any service in any institution, which would mean payment to them from public funds. “At the outset we have no reason to doubt that professor Michel Danino along with Ms Diwakar and Mr Alok Prasanna Kumar either does not reasonable knowledge about Indian judiciary or they deliberately knowingly misrepresented the facts in order to project a negative image of Indian judiciary before students of Class 8 who are at an impressionable age. There is no reason as to why such persons be associated in any manner with preparation of curriculum or finalisation of text book for the next generation. We direct union, all states, all institutions recieving state funds, to disassociate them from rendering any service which would mean payment to them from public funds”, the Court noted.












We're back with 3rd round of TRC Investigative Reporting Fellowship. If you have a story to be told, write to us. Our Fellow will receive Rs 1 Lakh for the report. Last date for submission: 31st December 2025 Check details below. reporters-collective.in/trc-investigat…

The incumbent leadership of Press Club of India @PCITweets has put out a statement against my request that the club spend at least 5% of its revenue from liquor to support disadvantaged journalists across the country. They disagree with me. Here is my response in the images below. I stand by my recommendation and reassert with deeper conviction, data and argument. 5% of PCI's alcohol sales revenue should be committed towards disadvantaged journalists across the country. I suggest two ways to do it with existing resources that will perhaps provide even more for the staff. One can read the PCI's leadership's statement here: x.com/PCITweets/stat… PS: Am glad, this has kicked off the debate in public square even if its in a tone i wish my friends leading the club at the moment will, at least retrospectively, find to be undignified in the way it paints the opinion of just another member (like they all are) as some form of dissent against the institution itself. The government is not the nation, I believe.



The Press Club of India @PCITweets had a revenue of Rs 10 cr from sale of alcohol, beverages and food in the last financial year. Other income was nearly Rs 1 cr. 5% of sale revenue spent on fellowships for disadvantaged journalists would provide Rs 50 lakhs for the fraternity. If all of 'other' revenue was reseveed for fellowships it would provide Rs 1 cr nearly to fellow journalists across the country. In my view, this is the least PCI must do to claim its position as a representative body fostering journalism in India. 👇
