Adrian Kolody

The tickers are $BTCDOM $ETHDOM $USDTDOM $SOLDOM and $BNBDOM Live on @base you can trade dynamic, true market dominance. Don't settle for a basket, act on the purest calculation in the world. This is just the beginning, more to come soon

@moonlessgod Market Dominance

purple alchemist of the black sun

@Obesepotato_hl This is unironcially 90% of the people who raise VC money in crypto

Crypto founders after raising money from VC

@marshallrichrds *turns on SnD on rust*

Get in, we’re building MW2 heartbeat sensors.

@CryptoAlchemX @perpotelli Im joining the party fellas

@perpotelli Appreciate that. Glad to have you on board. 👊 More dominance TA coming your way soon.

$BTC.D Still in the range. Focus on RSI.

@VietnamPenguin @0xsseb @grvt_io Totally normal activity, please close your eyes. Nothing to see here!

Hello @0xsseb. Could you explain why ~28% of the $SOPH token supply is sitting in @grvt_io deposit contract? Weren't those tokens supposed to be locked? Are you using them as collateral for perp trading? debank.com/profile/0xbed1…

@Hsports_HD Sunderland

Who's going to stop this Chelsea team?

@ajey_eth @lightoorfun Shoot me a DM Would love to play with it and give feedback there

Guys, I’m currently building @lightoorfun a multi-DEX trading terminal. I’d love to get your feedback. 1. If you were to trade through my platform instead of directly on Lighter, what’s the first thing you’d expect from the experience? 2. If you were building this for the long term, what would you focus on the most? 3. What do you think is a fair trading fee in bps, and why? Your feedback will directly influence what I build next. Please drop ur any suggestions…..

@andyyy They are just trying fud lower for better entry or they are pan-handling for deals from other perp platforms twerking on the TL

People are saying Hyperliquid metrics aren't great right now. Really depends where you look. HIP-3 volume is at ATHs, priority fees are higher than ever and kicking in, and DAUs are nearing ATHs. Just a matter of perspective. Its still very early in the broader adoption curve for Hyperliquid and $100, $200, $200 per hyperliquid:native is simply a matter of time.

Declan Rice was invisible throughout the WC but showed up when it didn’t matter. Gunner.

@Jim_Knox589 Holy shit you chart xrp.d? What a world

$XRP.D Guys??

@Tradermayne @blknoiz06 Or Warlord That works too

@Tradermayne @blknoiz06 I will literally skin you alive and bend you over in Halo 2 lockout BR's

Yo

@lunanomacrypto If higher lows keep stacking, then the 4 year cycle might have survived its most stressful test ever.

$OTHERS.D We’re about to mitigate that weekly demand zone. Then we chop bullish...clean higher lows, building tension. And suddenly… one massive impulsive move to the upside. Stay patient. The move is coming.

@wiggercult D O M I N A N C E MENTIONED

Brainstorming new marketing ideas

@DanReilly92 Is that Gary V?

Fair play I wasn’t expecting him to nail it

Tether Dominance Outlook 3rd lower high before a nuke here or watching for a sweep of the local highs Bulls don't want to see $USDT.D reclaim 8.8% Dom for a chance at a local reversal for Bitcoin and Alts in the near term imo.

@Havochl_ Literally the most important chart in crypto IYKYK

another good chart to keep an eye on

$HYPE ranging here is actually making life easier, just accumulate the lows of the range and stop overthinking it.

@tempst0 Ooof, gotcha This is rough

@akolody47 the current rfq model still relies on OLP as the intraday settlement layer for opening/closing trades before they get hedged out, and that only works with legit trades ofc

Horrible to see the Ostium exploit, bad for everyone in the industry and really sucks. The protocol lost approximately $23.7 million from its OLP vault on Arbitrum across several txns. Traders on Ostium trade against a liquidity vault that acts as counterparty to every position, so trader profit is paid out of it. The hack essentially let fake/fabricated profitable trades via oracle exploit get paid out in USDC from the vault: - open a BTC/USD position with USDC margin - fulfill the open order at $5K/BTC using a fabricated self-signed low opening price - close the position - fulfill the close order at $60K/BTC using a fabricated self-signed high price Inside the first batch call of trades alone, five cycles of this paid out $10K, $90K, $800K, $7M, and $5.3M for a total of $11.86M 2nd attack: $4.5M 3rd: $3.6M 4th: $2.7M 5th: $1M Ostium uses a signed oracle. The verifier takes a price report, recovers the signer from the signature, and checks that the signer is on an authorized list. It validates the signer's identity, not whether the price is accurate. The attacker held an authorized oracle-signer key and a registered keeper (PriceUpKeep) forwarder, which is the role that fulfills pending orders. Both of these roles should only be granted by Ostium governance/timelock and cannot be self-assigned. This was a key compromise, not a market-based oracle manipulation (no flash loan, no manipulation of a spot price on a thin pool. Whether the key was stolen externally or misused by someone with access is not yet confirmed. The attacker has since swapped into ETH and is distributing out large amounts to various wallets. The vault currently holds approximately $9.0M, down 72.5% from $32.7M immediately before the attack.