Alex Lambert 🏴󠁧󠁢

@DailyMail He should be struck off ! @CPSUK @ShabanaMahmood @DavidLammy So what are you doing about this !! @GBNEWS @TalkTV

Ben, Martin and Patrick all posted about Reforms candidate selection for Makerfield.. but nothing about Restore.. the bias is really quite blatant and shocking.. Come on boys.. aren’t you suppose to be “The Peoples Channel?” @GBNEWS @ElectoralCommUK

@SamaHoole 🤣Brilliant

Colleague: "Beef at nine in the morning." Me: "Yes." Colleague: "That's not really a breakfast though, is it." Me: "It is. I'm eating it. At breakfast." Colleague: "Beef is dinner food." Me: "Where is that written down." Colleague: "Everyone knows it." Me: "Everyone also knew margarine was healthy. Everyone is a committee." Colleague: "I've got my overnight oats." Me: "Sounds ominous." Colleague: "Oats, almond milk, maple syrup, chia, blueberries, a sprinkle of granola." Me: "So that's oats, sugar water, more sugar, lawn clippings, more sugar, and a biscuit on top." Colleague: "It's a superfood breakfast." Me: "It's a pudding you left in the fridge to age into something serious." Colleague: "At least it's not heavy." Me: "It's got more sugar in it than a Twix. The Twix is just honest about it." Colleague: "..." Me: "Enjoy your dessert."

Go into the mosque and ask the congregation who he is If they don’t all unanimously answer then shut down the mosque because it is a headquarter for terrorists and racists If those who know are scared to answer in front of everyone else - then shut down the mosque because it is a headquarter for terrorists and racists

The real far right in Britain exists in the muslim world There is no group who speak more like Nazis than muslims like this - and there is no other group with such numbers who fantasise about, encourage and act out such violent racism

@DrDStarkeyCBE Look at the difference between this march and the Pro Palestine marches. No face coverings here. Face covering in public should be banned. Facial recognition can't work if a face is covered. UTK people have nothing to hide.

Today people coming to London for the Unite The Kingdom rally will be monitored with facial recognition cameras by the Metropolitan Police. The pro-Palestinian rally that's taking place right alongside it will not. Keir = Two Tier.

Hoping for a peaceful protest for all of you going, wishing everyone a safe passage. Rich and I are working but will be keeping an eye on socials. There’s no doubt in my mind that hostilities will be manufactured to support the government’s narrative. #unitethekingdom

@ModernityNews I know what is far from real.... anything that comes out of Khan's mouth. He is deluded.

Doesn’t allow replies so no one can point out all the real examples of how dangerous and horrible London has become.

@James7Holland @michaelgove I'm no fan of Michael Gove but this is timely and well put 👏🏻

Superb from @michaelgove. The silence in the room is telling. When eloquently delivered facts hit an audience, with many perhaps quietly grasping for the first time that the pro-EU lobby in Britain have been peddling nonsense for a decade.

Is Starmer a Communist?! Great Britain is not a free country...' Will the police step in if people say this: claiming it is hate speech? Or if people state concerns re radical Islamism? Who’s deciding on what basis at the Unite The Kingdom march today? … Polish MEP Dominik Tarczynski reacts as he is blocked from entering the country to attend the Unite the Kingdom rally this weekend.

Sky's @TrevorPTweets Phillips spoke shortly after attending Tommy @TRobinsonNewEra's rally on 13th Sept 2025. He pays tribute to "how normal the vast majority of the marchers were." "There was a sprinkling of black & brown faces". He adds "The people are sending a message, let's see if anyone at Westminster is listening." Eight months later Starmer further demonised us.

The Daily Telegraph would rather see Britain destroyed by an Islamist takeover than support a patriot like Tommy Robinson and Unite the Kingdom. Even worse than suicidal empathy, a term coined by @GadSaad, this is SUICIDAL SNOBBERY. Just another reason why the MSM must fall.

Unbelievably there are still westerners pretending they don’t believe Oct 7 was an abomination on every conceivable level. The reason, I assume, is that being honest to themselves about what happened would mean acknowledging they have actively supported the people behind it. But for anyone interested, here are the vast and diverse array of sources used by the Civil Commission to compile their report. The acrobatics required to pretend it’s all made up are Olympic level, but hate does that to people. It is a poison. … The Civil Commission on October 7 Crimes Against Women and Children (a non-governmental Israeli body) published its report Silenced No More: Sexual Terror Unveiled on 12 May 2026.  This 280–300-page document is the most comprehensive independent investigation to date into the systematic sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) committed by Hamas and affiliates on 7 October 2023 and against hostages in Gaza.  It draws on a dedicated “war crimes archive” the Commission built immediately after the attacks (preserving materials later removed or lost) and follows trauma-informed, survivor-centred, internationally recognised standards.  Key sources include: •  430+ formal and informal testimonies and interviews collected over two years from survivors, direct witnesses, released hostages, family members of victims, first responders (including paramedics and ZAKA volunteers), soldiers, and experts. Victims represented 52 nationalities in addition to Israelis.  •  Front-line responders’ accounts and site evidence — explicit testimony and observations from first responders, emergency personnel, and military personnel who recovered bodies, treated survivors, and worked the attack sites (Nova festival, kibbutzim, roads, etc.).  •  Extensive visual and forensic archive — over 10,000 photographs and video segments (more than 1,800 hours of analysis), including perpetrator-recorded footage, bodycam and security camera recordings, open-source material, and geolocated datasets from the attack sites.  •  Victim and family statements — direct accounts from survivors of sexual violence, released hostages describing abuse in captivity, and families of murdered victims, often cross-referenced with visual evidence. •  Open-source intelligence and expert consultations — geolocation-supported verification, interdisciplinary expert review, site visits, and meetings with affected communities.  •  UN and prior international investigations — the report builds on and incorporates findings from UN reports, notably the March 2024 report by UN Special Representative Pramila Patten on sexual violence in the context of the 7 October attacks, as well as other UN documentation.  •  Official records and primary materials— forensic reports, communications, and documentation preserved in the Commission’s independent archive that are no longer publicly available.  The Commission systematically cross-referenced all materials by time, location, and pattern, identifying 13 recurring forms of SGBV used deliberately across multiple sites and phases (attack, abduction, captivity, and digital dissemination). All evidence was handled under ethical “do no harm” protocols.  This body of primary, multi-source evidence (testimonies + visuals + archives) forms the core of the report’s conclusion that the sexual violence was systematic, widespread, and integral to the Hamas-led assault.

This is completely mad. Britain has no history of polygamy. It's been illegal to enter into a polygamous marriage in England since 1604. When people come to this country, they should abide by our norms. Allowing them not to and then giving them taxpayer money for it is mental.

@Ne_pas_couvrir Geez...what a word salad. @GadSaad 's 'suicidal empathy' is a bit more succint.

Global Politics Today: 1. Ethno-consciousness raising for an in-group; critical consciousness raising to destabilize a targeted out-group 2. Limited ethno-consciousness raising for out-groups when it serves an in-group’s interests 3. Transhumanism as a 3rd way 4. Atomized people

Two Hundred Thousand. Four Per Cent Removed. This Is the Record. A milestone was passed today. Over two hundred thousand people have crossed the English Channel illegally since 2018. That is the population of Norwich arriving uninvited over eight years. Of that number, fewer than 8,000 have been deported. That is under four per cent. The boats keep coming. The removal rate stays static. And the government calls this a managed situation. The numbers surrounding this milestone are equally damning. Forty-one thousand crossed last year alone, a thirteen per cent rise on the year before. Seventy-six per cent of arrivals are adult men. The threat level has been raised to severe. Foreign nationals imprisoned for sexual offences have reached a record high. Three hotel migrants were convicted of gang rape in Brighton last month. A 12-year-old girl was raped in Nuneaton by Ahmad Mulakhil, an Afghan who had arrived four months earlier on a small boat. He was processed, housed, handed a Home Office debit card, and left unsupervised in a community that never consented to the risk. The small boats are not the whole picture. Nearly 3,500 asylum seekers from 112 countries including Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and Libya entered Britain using visa schemes designed specifically for Ukrainians fleeing the Russian invasion. The same countries MI5 has publicly identified as primary sources of Islamist terror plots against British citizens on British soil. And a secret Afghan resettlement programme was run under a superinjunction for years, meaning Parliament and the public were legally barred from knowing it existed. It cost £400 million. The public found out in July 2025 when the injunction was lifted. This is how 200,000 becomes possible. Boats across the Channel. Legal schemes hollowed out and filled with nationals of 112 countries never intended to use them. Secret programmes run behind superinjunctions. And a removal rate of four per cent that has barely moved in eight years. On St George's Day, April 23, the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood signed a £662 million deal with France and called it a landmark. The detention centre at the heart of it holds 140 people. In the week that followed, French authorities intercepted 74 of 323 attempted crossings. The arithmetic requires no commentary. Days later the 200,000 milestone was passed anyway. Meanwhile the 2039 accommodation contracts, worth an estimated £10 billion, sit quietly in the background. You do not sign thirteen-year housing contracts for a problem you intend to solve. You sign them for a situation you have decided is permanent, while maintaining for public consumption that the boats will stop and the hotels will close. The lie is not that the system is broken. Broken systems can be fixed. The lie is that anyone in authority is seriously trying to fix it. The contracts, the interception rates, the removal figures and the milestones all point in the same direction. This is not failure. It is policy. "A milestone was passed today. Over two hundred thousand people have crossed the English Channel illegally since 2018."

@FraserNelson Nothing British about having areas where our own language is hardly heard, where the majority of social housing is to foreign born and where the number of foreign born that aren’t working… is huge.

A thought experiment. The UK's terror threat level has just been lifted to "severe". After yet another hideous terror attack on British Jews. Which leads me to ask: What would a nation that was serious about dealing with a “severe” terror threat do? Would it run a policy of open borders, allowing 200,000 unvetted illegal migrants to stream across its border at will? Would it allow this while KNOWING the migrants have included known terrorists, murderers, & rapists? Would it then put these young, unvetted, fighting-age Muslim men in the very heart of its communities - next to schools & synagogues? Would it refuse to ban the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the Muslim Brotherhood, or kick out Iranian officials who call for violence on its streets? Would it allow convicted Islamist terrorists - such as the would-be London Stock Exchange bomber from Bangladesh - to STAY in its country? Would it allow an army of left-wing activist lawyers to use the European Convention on Human Rights to keep foreign criminals and terror suspects in its country? Would it allow dozens of pro-Iran associations to flourish on its own university campuses? Would it allow terrorist sympathisers & anti-Semites to march on the streets of its own capital city week after week? Would it be led by a political class that is so cowardly it cannot even bring itself to say: “Islamism”? Would it insist on the myth that all threats are equal despite knowing that Islamism is responsible for 94% of terror-related deaths and three quarters of all police work linked to terrorism? Would it allow parallel Sharia courts, cousin marriage, and illegal ‘family voting’ to become a feature of its national life? Would it work to shut down any criticism of Islamism by imposing a definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ on public institutions and calling for politicians who do voice these concerns to be ‘sacked’? And would it shut down any attempt to have a serious conversation about all this by denouncing those who raise it as ‘far right’, ‘hateful’, and insisting on platitudes like ‘diversity is our strength’? I wonder. Would a serious nation do all these things? Because that’s what the United Kingdom is currently doing.

@ZackPolanski, a few corrections before the substance. On apartheid. Arab citizens of Israel vote, sit in the Knesset, serve as judges on the Supreme Court and hold positions in every profession in the country. Israeli Arabs have more civil rights than citizens of any Arab state in the Middle East. The West Bank and Gaza are disputed territories whose status is the subject of ongoing conflict and negotiation, not sovereign Israeli territory. The apartheid label requires ignoring all of that and applying a definition that no serious legal scholar has successfully sustained before an international court. On genocide. There are approximately fifteen million Jews in the world, 0.2 percent of the global population, surrounded by fifty three Muslim majority states and a global Muslim population of over two billion, of whom approximately 1.6 billion are Sunni. The Palestinian population has grown from approximately one million in 1948 to over five million today. Life expectancy and literacy have increased across that period. The legal definition of genocide under the Genocide Convention is the deliberate destruction of a group as such. A population that has quintupled over seventy five years does not meet that definition by any serious legal standard. The International Court of Justice has not ruled that genocide is occurring. It issued provisional measures requiring Israel to prevent acts that could constitute genocide, which is a fundamentally different finding. If fifteen million Jews surrounded by two billion Muslims are committing genocide it is the most remarkable David versus Goliath story in human history. Worth noting that in the original, David was the Jew. On the death penalty legislation. The bill you are referring to passed a preliminary reading in the Knesset and faces significant opposition within Israel itself, including from senior legal figures and members of the governing coalition. Presenting a contested preliminary vote as settled policy is not accurate. The Knesset, in which Arab Israeli citizens sit as elected members, serve on committees and hold positions of influence, is the parliament of the apartheid state you are describing. That is an apartheid that allows the people it is supposedly oppressing to help make its laws. On the broader framing. It's worth noting that the Metropolitan Police received the first request to organise a national march against Israel at 12:50pm on October 7th 2023. Hamas militants were still actively killing and kidnapping civilians at that moment. The Nova music festival massacre was still ongoing. Israel had not declared war. It had not conducted a single retaliatory strike. The infrastructure of protest and genocide framing was deployed before Israel had done anything. The narrative you are advancing was ready and waiting before the response it claims to be reacting to had begun. You lead a party whose activists described Jews as an abomination to this planet. Whose autumn conference is preparing to vote on a motion endorsing armed struggle against Israel. Whose co-leader retweeted a post attacking the officers who stopped a terrorist attacker hours after two Jewish men lay in hospital, prompting the Metropolitan Police Commissioner to write to you personally. The word extremist is doing considerable work in your post. It might be worth examining where it actually applies. "If fifteen million Jews surrounded by two billion Muslims are committing genocide it is the most remarkable David versus Goliath story in human history. Worth noting that in the original, David was the Jew."

Dinesh D’Souza didn’t just “let his daughter marry” anybody. He let her marry Brandon Gill because the dude is the kind of patriot who walks into the lions’ den with receipts** and doesn’t flinch.🔥 In this clip, Gill looks Minnesota Dems in the eye and asks a question so simple it feels illegal in D.C.: Does all this make Minnesota stronger… or weaker? Then he starts rattling off the numbers he says come straight from state data, plus whistleblower claims about a decade of fraud warnings and political protection. And suddenly everyone in the room forgets how to answer in complete sentences. 😬 WATCH. SHARE. If you think taxpayers deserve the truth, comment “STRONGER” or “WEAKER.” 👇