lol

3.2K posts

lol banner
lol

lol

@alerityy

💖

Katılım Ocak 2023
840 Takip Edilen41 Takipçiler
lol retweetledi
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
Only a matter of time.
Ron Filipkowski tweet media
English
160
880
22.6K
186.8K
lol retweetledi
aaliyah
aaliyah@enchantingliyah·
i simultaneously wish i had a larger capacity to socialize but god does talking to people irritate the hell out of me when my environment doesn’t require me to converse with others
English
0
2
109
1.8K
lol retweetledi
Liam Nissan™
Liam Nissan™@theliamnissan·
@bennyjohnson You got caught working for Vladimir Putin to spread Russian disinformation inside the United States. I don't think you actually believe in God, Benny
English
36
204
4.9K
25.7K
lol retweetledi
Ryo Lu
Ryo Lu@ryolu_·
when software had a soul there was a moment around 2005 when using a Mac felt like touching something alive. the dock bounced. the genie effect swooped. exposé scattered your windows like cards on a table. none of it was strictly necessary. all of it felt like someone cared – not about metrics, but about the feeling of using a machine. software back then had texture. it had a philosophy. you could feel the person behind it. someone made a decision to make that icon beautiful, to animate that transition just so, to write that error message with a little warmth. apps had personalities. some were weird. some were over-designed in ways that would make a modern PM flinch. but they were alive. the web was the same. personal sites were genuinely personal. blogs felt like letters. forums had regulars. you knew who made what. the internet had neighborhoods, and each one felt different. nothing was optimized for scale. things were made by people who loved what they were making. somewhere along the way, we traded all of that for growth. A/B tests flattened the edges. design systems standardized the personality out. everything got faster, smoother, more consistent – and somehow less interesting. the quirks were removed because they didn't test well. the warmth got cut because it wasn't measurable. we optimized our way into a world of things that work perfectly and feel like nothing. now every app looks the same. every interface follows the same patterns. every product speaks in the same calm, frictionless voice, siloed in their own little islands. the humanity got rounded off. and then came AI agents. and the speed got inhuman. now you can generate an entire product in an afternoon. ship a feature before lunch. spin up ten variations before anyone's had their coffee. the gap from idea to code is basically zero. which sounds incredible. and it is. but there's a catch. when making things are too easy, the slop comes for free too. mediocre things don't look obviously bad – they look fine. they work. they ship. they pass review. and now there are infinite of them. the internet is filling up with software that functions but means nothing. interfaces that are correct but feel dead. products made by agents, reviewed by no one, shipped into the void. this is the thing that keeps me up at night. not that AI will replace people who care. but that it will drown them out. here's what I still believe: the best things are made by people who couldn't help themselves. someone who lost sleep over an icon. who rewrote the same line of copy twelve times. who added an animation nobody asked for because it made the thing feel right. that obsession – that's not inefficiency. that's the whole point. AI doesn't make that irrelevant. it actually makes it rarer and more valuable. taste is not a markdown skill. caring is not a parameter. the weird, specific, "soul" thing you put into something – that can't be programmed into existence. the path forward isn't to make more slop faster. it's to finally give people with real vision the tools to make the thing they always imagined but couldn't build alone. the designer who had the idea but couldn't code. the kid who saw something nobody else saw. the person who cared too much about something most people wouldn't notice. if we get this right, we don't get a faster factory. we get a renaissance. more strange, personal, opinionated software made by teams of people who care and mean it. that's still possible. but only if the people who care get the space and tools to actually express themselves – and don't just hand the wheel to the agent and walk away.
English
140
339
2.4K
397.3K
lol retweetledi
vivi
vivi@mooncatvivi·
can i come grocery shopping with you can we go on a walk together do you mind if i come over can we watch a movie together want to run errands together can we grab coffee can we hang out this weekend can i mean something to you
English
15
1.6K
8.3K
111.4K
lol retweetledi
Nostalgia
Nostalgia@NostalgiaFolder·
If you see this and feel nothing, I'm sorry for you
English
205
1.4K
8.2K
205.2K
lol retweetledi
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
@WhiteHouse Can you arrest Epstein’s co-conspirators instead of riffing on a porn site ?
English
1.3K
12.2K
154.9K
2.2M
lol retweetledi
Right Wing Cope
Right Wing Cope@RightWingCope·
Kash Patel aka “Spiderkash” has been viciously GOONING today while on his FBI jet 💀
Right Wing Cope tweet media
English
71
506
7.8K
164.3K
lol retweetledi
Right Wing Cope
Right Wing Cope@RightWingCope·
BREAKING: Kash Patel’s GOONER account has been discovered from a username leak 💀
Right Wing Cope tweet media
English
986
4.8K
77.4K
18.3M
lol retweetledi
Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassenstein@EdKrassen·
Let me get this straight: - Trump tore up the Obama Nuclear deal, saying he’d make a better deal. - Trump can’t make a better deal so he goes to war with Iran to get them to basically agree to the same things the Obama deal included. All because he hates Obama.
English
1.1K
3.9K
22.2K
304.2K
lol retweetledi
GrapheneOS
GrapheneOS@GrapheneOS·
@REALSGTPIPER @skylermzx GrapheneOS is highly usable and nearly all Android apps can be used on it. It has over 400k users who are nearly all very happy. Many people choose to use it in a very minimal way where they avoid using mainstream apps and services but GrapheneOS doesn't impose that on people.
English
16
15
492
20.1K