Ádám Lippai

1.4K posts

Ádám Lippai banner
Ádám Lippai

Ádám Lippai

@alippai

The rainbow in the cloud Developer @worldquant, previously @tresorit Views my own, retweets are not endorsements He/him

New York Katılım Ağustos 2010
2.4K Takip Edilen458 Takipçiler
Ádám Lippai retweetledi
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka·
Every time you get a cancer biopsy, the lab makes a tissue slide that costs about $5. It shows the shape of your cells under a microscope, and every cancer patient already has one on file. There’s a much fancier version of that test called multiplex immunofluorescence (basically a protein-level map showing which immune cells are near your tumor and what they’re doing). It costs thousands of dollars per sample, takes specialized equipment most hospitals don’t have, and barely scales. But it’s the kind of data oncologists need to figure out whether immunotherapy will actually work for you. Right now, only about 20 to 40% of cancer patients respond to immunotherapy, and one of the biggest reasons is that doctors can’t easily tell whether a tumor is “hot” (immune cells actively fighting it) or “cold” (immune system ignoring it). Microsoft, Providence Health, and the University of Washington trained an AI to analyze the $5 slide and predict what the expensive test would show across 21 different protein markers. They called it GigaTIME, trained it on 40 million cells in which both the cheap slide and the expensive test coexisted, and then turned it loose on 14,256 real cancer patients across 51 hospitals in 7 US states. The results landed in Cell, one of the most selective journals in biology. The model generated about 300,000 virtual protein maps covering 24 cancer types and 306 subtypes. It found 1,234 real, verified connections between immune cell behavior, genetic mutations, tumor staging, and patient survival that were previously invisible at this scale. When they tested it against a completely separate database of 10,200 cancer patients, the results matched up almost perfectly (0.88 out of 1.0 agreement). Nature Methods named spatial proteomics (mapping where specific proteins sit inside your tissue) its Method of the Year in 2024, and specifically cited GigaTIME in a March 2026 update as a model that “democratizes” this kind of analysis. The full model is open-source on Hugging Face. Any cancer research lab with archived biopsy slides, and most of them have thousands, can now run virtual immune profiling without buying a single piece of new equipment.
Satya Nadella@satyanadella

We’ve trained a multimodal AI model to turn routine pathology slides into spatial proteomics, with the potential to reduce time and cost while expanding access to cancer care.

English
103
1.8K
11.1K
945.5K
mrdoob
mrdoob@mrdoob·
@lenis0012 I've some experience with three.js yeah.
English
20
5
259
12.6K
mrdoob
mrdoob@mrdoob·
Okay Claude, can you help me port Quake to Three.js? ... One hour later
English
226
220
3.3K
520.3K
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@_Felipe I do the same using Arrow or Arrow+msgpack instead of protobuf
English
1
0
1
935
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@andrewlamb1111 Other integrations in the iceberg ecosystem would be nice too eg iceberg-rust with pyiceberg or the new arrow-avro
English
0
0
1
70
Andrew Lamb
Andrew Lamb@andrewlamb1111·
I have heard from 3 people/projects in the last three days they are considering forks of iceberg-rust. I filed a ticket to see if we can figure out how to consolidate efforts: github.com/apache/iceberg…
Andrew Lamb tweet media
English
6
2
59
7.5K
Ádám Lippai retweetledi
Logan Kilpatrick
Logan Kilpatrick@OfficialLoganK·
Everyone saying AI is going to replace people clearly don’t work with great people enough
English
410
312
4K
413.3K
Ádám Lippai retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
A major mistake I made in my undergrad is that I focused way too much on mathematical lens of computing - computability, decidability, asymptotic complexity etc. And too little on physical lens - energy/heat of state change, data locality, parallelism, computer architecture. The former is interesting; The latter bestows power.
English
376
990
13.4K
1.2M
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@markchen90 @andrewkslo As a programmer I’d pick the 90% (the quantity) for programming questions. For law, medical, sports or literature which I know only a little I’d prefer a few 100% correct (the quality) answers. This is what the mini models are for, right?
English
0
0
1
97
Ádám Lippai retweetledi
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
it is (relatively) easy to copy something that you know works. it is extremely hard to do something new, risky, and difficult when you don't know if it will work. individual researchers rightly get a lot of glory for that when they do it! it's the coolest thing in the world.
English
561
1.1K
15K
1.8M
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@sama It should be more proactive, ask questions, remind me about things related to the previous discussions + a shared calendar with my family. While the full assistant features might be hard, it should try to learn about me with the least effort from my side
English
0
0
0
24
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
what would you like openai to build/fix in 2025?
English
9.9K
644
15.2K
5.3M
Ádám Lippai retweetledi
Scott Hanselman 🌮
Scott Hanselman 🌮@shanselman·
Here’s the thing folks. I’ve been coding 32 years. When something like this happens it’s an organizational failure. Yes, some human wrote a bad line. Someone can “git blame” and point to a human and it’s awful. But it’s the testing, the Cl/CD, the A/B testing, the metered rollouts, an oh shit button to roll it back, the code coverage, the static analysis tools, the code reviews, the organizational health, and on and on. It’s always one line of code but it’s NEVER one person. Implying inclusion policies caused a bug is simplistic, reductive, and racist. Engineering is a team sport. Inclusion makes for good teams. Good engineering practices makes for good software. Engineering practices failed to find a bug multiple times, regardless of the seniority of the human who checked that code in. Solving the larger system thinking SDLC matters more than the null pointer check. This isn’t a “git gud C++ is hard” issue and it damn well isn’t an DEI one.
English
197
1.5K
7.6K
360.9K
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@WholeFoods which is your best NYC location? I thought Bryant park is your flagship (even if it’s smaller), but it smells and looks like this several months now, so I guess I have to look for a different location.
Ádám Lippai tweet mediaÁdám Lippai tweet media
English
1
0
0
33
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@SamsungUS We did ofc, they promised to resolve it in 3 days. As the given item is still not shipping according to your website, we can have a bet if they’ll resolve it on Tuesday… what’s the PR stance on misleading customers intentionally (aka scam)?
English
0
0
0
9
Samsung US
Samsung US@SamsungUS·
@alippai Hello Ádám! Thanks for reaching out to us. We kindly recommend you reach out to our E-Commerce team at 1-855-726-8721 or live chat: smsng.us/3k96m3k as they're specialized in this type of inquiry and have the right tools and resources to help you with your concern. ^Han
English
1
0
0
39
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@xhochy Yes, I saw it's a little bit unfortunate setup. Thanks for doing the mundane work here
English
1
0
0
0
Ádám Lippai
Ádám Lippai@alippai·
@gabesas Add el a Hiltonnak. Bárhová mész a világon a levendulás cuccaik vannak mindenhol 🤢
Magyar
0
0
0
0
Gábor
Gábor@gabesas·
Van rengeteg levendulánk, mi a faszt csináljak vele?
Magyar
35
0
42
0