Amanda Evans

146 posts

Amanda Evans

Amanda Evans

@amanda_evans

Katılım Eylül 2024
30 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
Amanda Evans retweetledi
South Dallas Foodie
South Dallas Foodie@SouthDallasFood·
I love this drunken, stoned man with my WHOLE ass heart ❤️😭😊😘
English
78
75
1.3K
65.9K
Amanda Evans retweetledi
Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺
The expression of the group of raccoons trying to stay perfectly still and “play dead” after being caught breaking into someone’s house makes me laugh so hard I can’t stop: They like:“No one sees us. Don’t move.” 😂🤣
English
173
2.2K
15.1K
468K
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@oksanka_luky I’m not sure how didn’t know of you before but now I’m a follower! I’ll for sure be tuning in. Thanks for your coverage.
English
1
0
1
138
Oksana Luk
Oksana Luk@oksanka_luky·
Please someone go live with me to read transcripts of Oberg’s testimony! I swear on everything I love everyone needs to hear it. Yes, it will be painful because the level of confusion and gaslighting is beyond comprehension. But once you start putting puzzle pieces of what she’s saying together, you’ll want to pull your hair out. I need one or two people 🙌🙌🙌
English
10
6
58
3.5K
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @TrueCrimeAudit Hey, DelphiResi…blocked me because your feelings got hurt? Cute. Did Google help you understand what a “paper tiger”is? Your vocab is sub-HS yet you’re criticizing the brief’s writing? Sit down, buddy. The irony writes itself.
English
0
0
0
11
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @TrueCrimeAudit I don’t think you’re here to actually hear what I think. But I’m curious…can you quote the specific “dumb” parts instead of just using vague insults. Which arguments are high-school level exactly?
English
2
0
0
13
DB
DB@TrueCrimeAudit·
Just read the #Delphi reply brief. Safe to say the #FreeRicky team were leaving the good snark for this round.
English
4
3
84
2K
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod To the butthurt DelphiResi5760 who blocked me: ISP didn’t thoroughly test other guns they zeroed in on Allen’s with a disputed, non-standard method the expert had never used before. Blocking me doesn’t make your falsities true. Explain or cope.
English
0
0
0
12
Oksana Luk
Oksana Luk@oksanka_luky·
I guess we will see if the appellate judges will agree with Brett and Alice. And it wasn’t a “Some Other Dude” defense strategy. It was a defense strategy that included at least 2 dudes that had been suspects and had very close connections to the victim and to the ritual related beliefs and practices. One of them confessed to the crime. Same with another suspect who was as the owner of the land on which the victims were found. Also confessed. Have you heard of Occam’s razor? It’s a the idea that the simplest explanation is usually the most likely to be true. Especially when it explains the facts just as well as a more complicated explanation. This case is a perfect example how this strategy was not implemented. Btw, did you know that Brett never actually tried even one case in any court? Zero trial experience. Would you take criminal trial related legal advice from him if it was your life or a life of your loved one?
English
2
0
27
333
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod He who blocked me, says I have no idea what I’m talking about, yet he highly values the accuracy of the WiFi data. Meanwhile, Logan’s statement directly conflicts with that data but he’s still completely convinced of its truth and reliability. That’s confusion or delusion or both
English
0
0
0
12
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod You just said “WiFi is very accurate” exactly. Logan’s phone/WiFi data clashed with his own statements and put him in the area later than he claimed. If you trust the WiFi accuracy, you can’t trust Logan’s timeline or the State’s version that cleared him. Get it now?
English
2
0
0
53
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod Maybe they should have been. It’s not the defense’s job to investigate & clear every lead. That was on the State from day one. Defense cannot be bared from using third party culprit evidence then faulted for not proving they did it. Franks hearing could have helped though.
English
1
0
0
28
Delphi Resident
Delphi Resident@DelphiResi5760·
@oksanka_luky @amanda_evans @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod Daniel Pearson was never a suspect though. Richard’s attorneys didn’t even try him as a 3rd party. Logan’s phone didn’t ping near the bridge you liar. The INTRO of the slides weren’t of the bullet, but they were included. You are fucking stupid.
Delphi Resident tweet media
English
2
0
0
55
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod They didn’t fit perfectly. If it was an obvious perfect match, why not show clear side by side photos to the jury? They skipped standard protocols comparing a racked/ejected unfired bullet to a spent one to get the outcome they wanted. Not science.
English
0
0
0
18
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod Defense was blocked from impeaching that vehicle/timeline evidence. The very things you’re using as “proof” are what the reply brief argues are complete defense violations worthy of reversal. That’s the point. You’d know if you actually read it.
English
1
0
1
25
Delphi Resident
Delphi Resident@DelphiResi5760·
@amanda_evans @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod Richard’s own attorneys didn’t argue that BG was the only man on the trails from 1:30-2:14 so shut the fuck up. Nobody was impeached for the vehicle, Richard accepted that it was his car. Bullet is a 100% exactl match, even a blind person can see that. Dumb bitch
English
4
0
0
79
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod Their ballistics evidence was junk because they skipped standard protocols. You don’t match a racked & ejected round to a spent bullet like that. Science still has to science in court. They forced it to fit what they needed and that isn’t credible.
English
0
0
1
17
Delphi Resident
Delphi Resident@DelphiResi5760·
@oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod You mentioned occams razor? You should apply that to Richard and you will see how simple this case actually is. Let’s see, the only man that was on the trails from 1:30 to 2:14… whose car is on video whose gun matches the bullet… seems pretty simple to me.
English
3
0
1
96
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod Def reply brief calls out State self-limiting timeline to Blair’s sighting only, then retrofitting everything to fit. Allen’s statements put him there earlier (~noon-1:30). Facts & other witnesses don’t align with their compressed “only man” window. Curated story, not reality.
English
0
0
1
19
Amanda Evans
Amanda Evans@amanda_evans·
@DelphiResi5760 @oksanka_luky @TurboUncloaked @ProsecutorsPod 😂 Resorting to “dumb bitch” now? You called the brief “HS kids trying to impress their friends” yet here you are throwing tantrums and calling names when asked for specifics. The lack of maturity is loud and you have no substantive argument.
English
1
0
0
24