Amir Israel

@MarioNawfal He forgot 200 missiles a day on Israeli towns and cities by Hizbulla that attacked Israel first but he's always against Israel

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱🇱🇧 Bernie Sanders just posted: "While the world focuses on the destruction in Iran, we must not ignore what Israel is doing in Lebanon. 1,461 have been killed. 4,430 have been injured. 1.2 million have been displaced. Israel now occupies 14% of Lebanon. Enough is enough. No more US military aid to Israel." @BernieSanders

@MarioNawfal They can use google to find this information

🇷🇺🇮🇷🇮🇱 Russian intel reportedly handed Iran a hit list of about 55 Israeli energy targets, including the major Orot Rabin power station, to help cripple the country’s power grid. Zelensky says Russia shared everything with Iran. The Shahed drone experience, the tactics, all of it learned from the war on Ukraine. Source: RN Intel

@GutmanYotam יפה שהצלחת לכתוב את כל הפוסט הזה בעברית...

איך מתקפה על חברת סייבר ישראלית הפכה לקמפיין גלובלי שמסכן אלפי ארגונים? בשנים האחרונות מתקפות על שרשרת האספקה הפכו לאיום מרכזי, אבל הקמפיין של TeamPCP לוקח את זה צעד קדימה — הוא לא תוקף תוכנה, אלא את הכלים שמגנים עליה. במרכז הסיפור נמצא Trivy — סורק חולשות פופולרי שפותח על ידי חברת הסייבר הישראלית Aqua Security, ומשולב עמוק בפייפליינים ובסביבות ענן של אלפי חברות. המתקפה התחילה כבר בפברואר 2026, כשמתקיפים ניצלו חולשת קונפיגורציה ב־GitHub Actions כדי לגנוב טוקן גישה. למרות ניסיון תיקון, חלק מההרשאות נשארו פעילות — וזה בדיוק מה שאפשר להם לחזור. ב־19 במרץ הגיע השלב הקריטי: במקום להפיץ גרסה חדשה, התוקפים שינו גרסאות קיימות. הם עדכנו תגיות כך שיצביעו על קוד זדוני — מהלך מתוחכם במיוחד, כי רוב המערכות סומכות על tags ולא בודקות את הקוד עצמו. כך, בלי להטריג שום אלרטים, הקוד הזדוני נכנס ישירות לפייפליינים. ברגע שהוא רץ, הוא קיבל גישה למה שהכי רגיש בארגון: מפתחות ענן, טוקנים, סודות Kubernetes ו־SSH — ושלח אותם החוצה, כחלק מתהליך שנראה לגמרי לגיטימי. למרות שהאירוע זוהה תוך שעות, הנזק כבר התחיל להתפשט. חברות כמו Cisco ו־Mercor נפרצו בעקבות שימוש בגרסאות הנגועות, כשהתוקפים מנצלים את הגישה לסביבות הפיתוח כדי להגיע לקרדנציאלס ולמידע פנימי. ואפילו הנציבות האירופית נפגעה — לא דרך פריצה ישירה, אלא דרך שימוש בהרשאות שנגנבו מוקדם יותר. לפי ההנחיות שפורסמו על ידי Aqua Security, הצעד הראשון והקריטי ביותר להתגברות על המתקפה הוא זיהוי האם נעשה שימוש בגרסאות הנגועות של Trivy במהלך חלון הזמן הרלוונטי. ארגונים נדרשים לעבור על לוגים של מערכות CI/CD ולבדוק הרצות של גרסאות שהושפעו, במיוחד כאלה שנמשכו לפי tags ולא לפי commit hash. במקרה של חשיפה, אין להסתפק בהסרת הגרסה בלבד- אלא יש להניח שכל הסודות שנחשפו במהלך ההרצה כבר אינם בטוחים. לכן יש לבצע רוטציה מלאה של כל הקרדנציאלס, כולל מפתחות ענן, טוקנים, סודות Kubernetes ומפתחות SSH. בנוסף, יש לבדוק גישה חריגה למערכות ענן ולזהות שימוש לא מורשה בהרשאות. בצד המניעתי, ההמלצה המרכזית היא לצמצם תלות באמון עיוור במנגנוני אוטומציה youtube.com/shorts/Bly0tTG…

@mosheifargan @YairNetanyahu x.com/i/status/20408…

עו"ד יצחק עמית בעוד מופע של תועבה סיכן את חייהם של השוטרים בהפגנה. באיזו זכות האדם הזה וההרכב הזה מעזים לכפות על שוטרים לסכן את חייהם? מותר לסכן שוטרים כדי ששמאלנים יפגינו? פושעים משפטיים. שהנבלות האלה יסכנו את עצמם. * בכוונה התעלמתי מעניין חילול השבת; הסתפקתי בתועבה אחת.

@YinonMagal x.com/i/status/20408…

איך השופט עמית מחליט כמה אנשים יכולים להתקבץ במקום מסוים? נגיד, למה בהבימה 600 איש ובכותל 100? על מה הוא מסתמך? מה השיקולים? שיענה מהר בבקשה, זה פיקוח נפש🙏

@Shelton_TN @MarioNawfal Hizbulla took responsibility for this hit this morning. They claimed it was an Israeli vessel...

@MarioNawfal Won't be surprised if it has been hit by Israel, to rope in more players into its genocide on Lebanon.

🚨 BREAKING: 🇱🇧🇬🇧🇮🇱 Hezbollah reportedly struck a British warship with a missile off Israel’s coast, misidentifying it as Israeli. The vessel is assessed to have sustained damage. UK is a NATO member... Source: Israeli Channel 14

@BillAckman @X I just wish your daughter would be healthy. Nothing is more important in life

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

@JustCharlie7109 @MarioNawfal I have zero knowledge of that... but anyhow, these missiles need be built fast anyhow.

@amirisrael @MarioNawfal 🤣 🤣 🤣 you fuxing reject you have no clue what the US military has

🇺🇸 The U.S. has reportedly burned through more than 1,000 of its most advanced cruise missiles in 5 weeks, going from 2,300 to roughly 425 available for everything else. They're raiding Pacific stockpiles to keep the Iran campaign running, which means the deterrence signal to China just got significantly quieter. Lockheed Martin can't build these fast enough. They take years to restock. Only one war to spend them. Source: Bloomberg

@Cappyarmy For some reason, I've never seen The NYT calling Hamas or Hizbulla using civilian houses and other buildings as a war crime...

US soldiers are being ordered to live in hotels and offices spaces instead of on big base so they’re safer from missile strikes. NYT says it’s a violation of “law of war” , this is exactly what Ukraine and Russia do , it’s the only way to really do distributed operations .

@TallyGotliv בגלל שכמובן מפריעות לך רק ההפגנות כנגד הממשלה ולא שאר ההפרות ההמוניות בבני ברק ובמרכזי הקניות יש לי רעיון- כל מי שרוצה להפר את ההנחיות יוכל לעשות זאת על אחריותו -יחתום על מסמך שהוא לא יקבל פיצוי מהמדינה וישלם על הוצאות רפואיות במקרה אסון. שיפגינו, שיקנו ויחגגו על אחריותם

בג״ץ במופע הפקרות מחפיר!! שופטי בגץ ״הנאורים״ מסכנים את בטחון המדינה ואת חוסנה של המדינה בעת מלחמה, תוך התערבות ברוטלית עם אפס הבנה בהחלטת המשטרה ופיקוד העורף באשר לאישור מצומצם להפגנה בעת מלחמה. בגץ החליט היום (בשבת) שפיקוד העורף שאמון על בטחון הציבור בעת ירי טילים על ישראל לא מאזן מספיק את הזכות להפגין.. בגץ קובע דיון ליום חמישי הקרוב בשעה 09. מומלץ למשמרות המהפכה לעקוב באדיקות על מיקומי ההפגנות והיקף האנשים שמפגינים לטובת איראן בחסות החלטת בגץ. מדינה בהפרעה. או יותר נכון - מדינה בהפרעת בגץ

@MarioNawfal Lebanon started this war (again)

@bevcott @MarioNawfal Before 1979, we had direct flight between Tel Aviv and Tehran. And Israeli embassy in Tehran and good relationship. In 1979 the IRGC took over and called for the distraction of Israel as their main goal. Have I missed anything?

@amirisrael @MarioNawfal How far back would you go?

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Joe Kent: Trump needs to restrain Netanyahu if he wants any kind of off-ramp from Iran war "Every single time that Trump says he wants some form of a de-escalation with the Iranians, the Israelis go and take major strikes against Iranian energy or other key Iranian targets. No negotiations with the Iranians will be successful until the Israelis are restrained." Source: @piersmorgan

@DoriSaysItAll @YairNetanyahu שרון פיטר את כל השרים שהתנגדו לממשלתו. האם ביבי פיטר אי פעם שר שיצא נגדו?

יש לנו הרבה מה ללמוד מארה״ב. שם מי שלא מתיישר עם מדיניות הממשלה, מפוטר. פשוט ככה. בלי היסטריה, בלי קמפיינים, בלי איומי סרבנות ובלי מקהלת פרשנים שמייללת על קץ הדמוקרטיה. רק בישראל פקידים מתנהגים כמו שליטים, וכל ניסיון להזיז אותם הופך ל״ליל גלנט״ . דמוקרטיה זה לא פקידים שמנהלים את המדינה מעל הדרג הנבחר, דמוקרטיה זה שהממשלה קובעת ומי שלא מיישם הולך הביתה. כל השאר זה פשוט מאבק לשמר כוח, לא לשמור על הדמוקרטיה.

@Rimanero הוא רק לא אומר שהם יסכימו לרדת מהתוכנית להשמדת ישראל.

זריף בפוריין אפיירס: מתווה שלום איראני-אמריקאי (המתעלם מעויינות המשטר בטהרן לישראל). ״איראן ניצחה במלחמה, אבל פלישה קרקעית תזיק לה. די. עליה לוותר בגרעין ובהורמוז תמורת הסרת העיצומים והסכם אי-התקפה עם וושינגטון; להתחייב שלעולם לא תחתור לנשק גרעיני; ולדלל את האורניום המועשר״

@bevcott @MarioNawfal Depends what is "first" 1. Iran used it's proxies Hamas, Hizbulla and Houthis to fire first on civilian 2. When Iran declares on a weekly basis their main mission is the end of Israel, what would you do you do?

@amirisrael @MarioNawfal Didn’t Israel strike Iran first? Genuine question.

@MarioNawfal Hizbulla attacked Israel in Oct 8th unprovoked to help Hamas - firing at Israeli towns. After losing again, Lebanon signed a cease fire and Hizbulla will be disarmed. They clearly didn't comply with this. Hizbulla attacked again this month . What should Israel do this time?

@MarioNawfal Israel entered Lebanon in 82 because of daily attacks and rocket launchers on the border towns. The PLO has NEVER ever agreed to a Jewish state. They agreed to one "clean" Palestinian state and to one mixed state.

🇮🇱🇱🇧 ISRAEL DESTROYED THE PLO IN 1982 TO STOP A PEACE DEAL American political scientist Norman Finkelstein says Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 because the PLO was pursuing a two-state solution. 15,000-20,000 killed, overwhelmingly civilians. South Lebanon occupied until 2000. "Everything they did in Gaza, they had already done in Lebanon in 1982." @normfinkelstein

@avishai_matia @YinonMagal היא לא פקידה אלא שרת המשפטים. ביבי יכול לפטר את שר המשפטים מתי שהוא רוצה

טראמפ פיטר את פאם בונדי התובעת הכללית אחרי שנה וחודשיים ככה זה במדינה דמוקרטית מתוקנת: המנהיג הנבחר מפטר את הפקידה שלא עמדה בציפיותיו בישראל זה לא אפשרי. כי ישראל אינה מדינה דמוקרטית מתוקנת לא בגלל ביבי. בגלל בית המשפט העליון

A @guardian visual guide shows how traffic is shifting to Iranian-controlled corridors, with Windward data revealing how ships are being sequenced through these new routes or going dark to navigate the conflict. okt.to/Tizl4q