Alvaro Martínez Vega

Cualquier similitud es mera coincidencia....y claro, lo que dicen algo similar a esto que ya pasó...son "negacionistaS"

@AKAjuanpa @espanolito_es @pabloharour @meidgd No existe izquierda sin socialismo y colectivismo. No existe izquierda sin que el gobierno intente meterse en la vida de todos.

@espanolito_es @pabloharour @meidgd A ver. Nadie dijo que los países nórdicos fueran comunistas. Se dijo que suelen ponerse como ejemplo de políticas impulsadas históricamente por la socialdemocracia, que es centroizquierda. Estás construyendo un hombre de paja para refutar algo que nadie afirmó.

Curioso cómo ‘la izquierda’ siempre es Cuba, pero nunca los países nórdicos con alto desarrollo humano, lol

@CountMoriarty @A1an_M I have checked it thats why I am saying that.

@amvtw @A1an_M So why haven't you checked it? Is that because the information would contradict what you've just said?

This story is actually even more misleading than I thought. The Lancet paper says that there were no deaths at all from cervical cancer between 2020 and 2024 in women aged 20-24. In vaccinated or unvaccinated individuals. But they're just assuming that reduction was entirely due to vaccination because the majority of people in that age group were vaccinated. And the success of the vaccine is based on their model of how many deaths were "expected". Even though there are any number of other possible explanations for the reduction, none of which were controlled for by the study, and one of which is very glaring - that young people may have been less promiscuous since 2020 due to being kept away from other people due to COVID lockdowns and social distancing, resulting in fewer HPV infections. More junk science from The Lancet.

@MickMacMathuna @A1an_M Coincidence?

@MickMacMathuna @A1an_M 👇👇👇

@CountMoriarty @A1an_M The problem is that cancer deaths were being lower and lower well before the vaccine, and even the rate was bigger before the vaccines. This is very easy to check.

@A1an_M Well, hpv is proven to cause cervical cancer, the vaccine removes hpv, levels of cancer disappear in the entire population (which is what you'd expect from a vaccine - remember not everyone had the smallpox vaccine) so by far the most obvious conclusion is that the vaccine works.

Yesterday, @ThaisEscufon was found guilty of “public insults” in France. She received suspended prison sentence and a fine for explaining on live TV how she was sexually abused by a migrant. This is how we have to live in Europe. They hate us.

Modern Nutritionist: "Your average lifespan is 30. Clearly the diet doesn't work." Paleolithic Hunter: "Thirty. Goodness. And how many infants did you stir into that figure?" Nutritionist: "What?" Hunter: "Half our babies die before five. Wolves, fevers, the occasional cliff. Does wonders for an average, that does." Nutritionist: "Still proves..." Hunter: "My grandfather is 72. Eats nothing but meat, walked 20 miles yesterday. But do go and tell him the wolf that took his cousin means his ribeye is killing him." Nutritionist: "But the average..." Hunter: "Five infants gone, five elders to 65. Comes to 30, and not one of us obliging enough to actually drop dead at 30. Maths is a marvel." Nutritionist: "That seems convenient..." Hunter: "What's convenient is blaming our supper for the sabre-tooth. Truly, the boldest thing I've seen anyone do with a calculator." Nutritionist: "Still..." Hunter: "Show me the one elder felled by mammoth steak. Take all the time you need. I've a spare five decades."

@josevico4 A ver pelotudo si tiene 77 cuanto tenia cuando gano Milei? Y quien gobernó los 50 anos anteriores? 🤡

No puedo ver el mundial porque tengo 77 años, tengo cáncer y tengo que seguir trabajando para poder llegar a fin de mes. Esto es la Argentina de Milei. Esto es lo que pretenden Ayuso y Abascal

Marx died in 1883 with two volumes of Capital unwritten and one fatal contradiction unanswered. Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk noticed. In 1884 he published the first volume of Capital and Interest, a history of every interest theory ever floated, and he treated the exploitation theory the way a pathologist treats a corpse: methodically, and without sentiment. Marx claimed that labor alone creates value, that the capitalist pockets "surplus value" by paying workers less than their product is worth. Sounds tidy. Then Böhm-Bawerk asked the question that collapses the whole structure. Why does a worker accept $90 today instead of waiting a year for the $100 his labor will eventually fetch in the finished good? Present goods are worth more than future goods. That is interest. Not theft, not a parasite skimming off the top, but the price of time itself. The capitalist who advances wages today for output that sells next year performs a service, and he earns the spread for bearing the wait and the risk. Böhm-Bawerk laid this out in 1889 in The Positive Theory of Capital, and the exploitation story had no reply. But the real execution came in 1896. Engels had finally dragged Volume III of Capital into print in 1894, and there Marx quietly admitted that commodities do not actually sell at their labor values: they sell at "prices of production" governed by an average rate of profit. Böhm-Bawerk pounced in Karl Marx and the Close of His System. Volume I said value comes from labor. Volume III said prices systematically deviate from labor. Marx had spent twenty years building a cathedral on a foundation he himself dynamited in the back pages. You cannot assert that labor determines value on Monday and that competition overrides it on Thursday and call the result science. A century of central planners ignored this and proceeded to starve Ukraine, wall off Berlin, and empty the shelves of Caracas. The theory was dead in 1896, but the bodies just kept arriving anyway, because nobody reads the footnotes before they reach for the gun.

Henry Nowak is murdered by an immigrant, his family, and the police. A man is nearly beheaded by an immigrant. A report shows 250,000 UK children have been raped by immigrants. UK PM Keir Starmer responds with a social media ban, digital ID, and proposed VPN ban. Why? He wants the Muslim vote. A sick man.

La dictad cubana acaba de descubrir (y admitir) que incluso en uno de los regímenes mas represivos del planeta los Controles de Precios NO FUNCIONAN Ahora que dirá mi amigo Kuka Trosko?

“But it will be different this time!” No. No it won’t. Communists seize power promising to liberate the productive forces. But they never grasp that abolishing private property destroys the incentive structures that make production possible in the first place. Without ownership, people no longer bear the costs or capture the rewards of their effort. Why innovate, maintain, or risk capital when the returns are socialized and losses are someone else’s problem? Entrepreneurship is the market’s trial-and-error engine whereby ideas compete in real time against actual consumer demand. Failures are liquidated quickly while successes that best serve people scale and survive. On the other hand, central planners have no prices, no profits, and no losses to guide this discovery process. They guess in the dark until the system starves. Every communist regime has proven the point.

SHOCKING SENATE EXPOSÉ: Pediatricians are getting PAID BONUSES to jab your kids — and they’ll DUMP your family if you say NO! In explosive testimony before Sen. Ron Johnson’s subcommittee, Polly Tommey and Dr. Brian Hooker just blew the lid off the vaccine racket: Pediatricians pocket **$200–$600 PER CHILD** in bonuses for hitting vaccination quotas. Some are raking in **OVER $1 MILLION A YEAR** pushing shots. Refuse? They drop you like a bad habit. Parental rights? Crushed. Ethics? Non-existent. The fear-mongering lies they feed terrified parents: - “Your newborn will BLEED OUT without Vitamin K!” - “Your child will DIE of cancer without the HPV shot!” This isn’t healthcare — it’s a **greedy, quota-driven medical cartel** treating your babies like profit centers. They don’t care about your child’s health. They care about their **BONUS CHECKS**. Parents: **WAKE UP.** Do your own research. Say NO to experimental shots. Protect your kids from this corrupt system. This is medical tyranny for profit.

@DS_Lighthouse @gualterio_2000 @IreneMontero "Mayores responsabilidades" = "le podemos robar mas" 🤡

@gualterio_2000 @IreneMontero No tiene nada que ver una cosa con la otra, los precios dinámicos los establecen las empresas para beneficiarse a costa del consumidor. Los impuestos son una obligación fiscal: quien genera mayores ingresos tiene mayores responsabilidades en beneficio de la ciudadanía.

Lo que nos faltaba, “precios personalizados”

@ngelGonzle35654 @IreneMontero Esta es la perfecta prueba de que la izquierda es una enfermedad mental.

@IreneMontero Los impuestos ya son así e incluso tú has propuesto hacer lo mismo con los contribuyentes como las multas en función de la renta o aumentar aún más la cotización a la SS si ganas más de X dinero. En el fondo es similar y un doble rasero ... porque lo hace el estado...

@IreneMontero Pero que HDLGP, en serio? Pero paga que te cobran mas impuestos porque puedes pagarlos y porque el estado de 💩 conoce todos tus datos, ahi no pasa nada verdad? La izquierda es una enfermedad mental. PD . - Eso de los "precios dinamicos" es delirante.

"Scotland HPV vaccine study flawed" - explaining how the Scotland data on HPV was misrepresented to show an effect that wasn't real blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-hpv-vacc…

There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand. To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted. The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up. The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable. Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group. It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial. It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available". There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative. This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10… @PGtzsche1 @MaryanneDemasi @SenatorAntic @DrJulieSladden @Fynnderella1 @missyTHX1138 @RWMaloneMD @RetsefL @BrokenTruthTV @RMConservative

We're missing something really important in the "where did all the pregnancies go?" question. That is, what happened to teenage pregnancies - a constant for nearly 30 years - which suddenly fell off a cliff in 2007... The year the HPV vaccine rolled out. @BretWeinstein