Anatoly Lubarsky

@heyharhayy @AmitSegal >>That literally shows that his intent is to be economically prosperous. Don’t be close-minded.<< No - it does not show any economical intent. Don't be naive.

@heyharhayy @AmitSegal >>and selling Syrian land/ports/etc. ever since he came into power<< False: they did not sell any Syrian land or Syrian ports.

Syrian President: We tried direct and indirect negotiations with Israel. We reached good points, but Israel changed its mind at the last moment.

@heyharhayy @AmitSegal >>Al-Sharaa’ is getting economic benefits<< Economic benefits? Seriously? He is jihadist. He does not care about this stuff.

@anatoly @AmitSegal Al-Sharaa’ is getting economic benefits and the expended buffer zone lands in return… that’s my point.

@AmitSegal >>but Israel changed its mind at the last moment<< 🙏

@heyharhayy @AmitSegal >>in return for withdrawal and normalization (recognizing Golan as Israeli), would work!<< This will never happen! >>if Anwar Sadat could normalize<< He got Sinai in return.

Please use this chance to normalize with al-Sharaa’. Demilitarized southern Syria, aid route to Druze region + intel cooperation, in return for withdrawal and normalization (recognizing Golan as Israeli), would work! @AmitSegal if Anwar Sadat could normalize, then this guy definitely can. Please don’t miss this historic opportunity!

@Osint613 >>U.S. national average retail gasoline prices have crossed $4 per gallon for the first time in more than 3<< Fake story. The price has not crossed $4 per gallon. In 2022 the record was $5.

U.S. national average retail gasoline prices have crossed $4 per gallon for the first time in more than 3 years, GasBuddy data shows, as the U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran continues to roil global energy markets.

@AmitSegal >>“the largest American aircraft carrier in the world that cannot be sunk”<< Very bad idea to establish American base on the Israeli soil. The "carrier" quote is lifted from the WW2 era (about England and not by Churchill) winstonchurchill.org/publications/f…

Israel has invited the United States to relocate some of its regional bases from countries such as Qatar to Israel. But that raises a question: Why is the U.S. regional headquarters in a country that actively sponsors terrorism? It’s a relatively recent development. For decades, Saudi Arabia served as the U.S.’s regional headquarters. It was from there—not Qatar—that the U.S. assembled forces and ultimately launched the Gulf War to liberate Kuwait. After 9/11 and the Iraq War, the U.S. sought a host with fewer political constraints and a location that would recruit fewer jihadists by being farther from Islam’s two holiest sites. Qatar fit the bill: no political complications, billions of dollars in subsidies, and the ready-to-use Al Udeid Air Base. Now, more than twenty years later, Israel is positioning itself as the U.S.’s new home away from home. The Israeli security establishment sees an opportunity to “reshape the map” of U.S. military positioning in the Middle East. There are several advantages to this move. For one, Israel has the strongest air defense in the region. The New York Times reported Thursday that missile attacks on Qatar have forced “many American troops to relocate to hotels and office spaces throughout the region,” with much of the land-based military “fighting the war while working remotely, with the exception of fighter pilots and crews operating and maintaining warplanes and conducting strikes.” Meanwhile, IDF forces haven’t missed a day of work. Another advantage is the close alliance between the U.S. and Israel. They’ve been conducting joint operations, gone on foreign trips together, and built a relationship where coordination is seamless. Isn’t it time to move in together? After all, the U.S. and Israel share strategic goals in the region, and operating from Israel means the U.S. doesn’t risk hitting targets that would be rebuilt by the same country they launched from. Qatar has not always been a cooperative host. In April 2025, Qatar (along with Saudi Arabia and the UAE) would not allow American warplanes to use Gulf bases or airspace to strike Iran. Earlier this year, a prominent Qatari royal called the U.S. “merely a tenant of a military base in Qatar” and warned, “do not act as if you are doing us a favor.” While this may have been largely rhetorical, Qatari sentiments have grown more ingratiating since missile strikes began, and it is not a sentiment the U.S. is likely to encounter in Israel. But there are a few disadvantages as well, the most prominent being geographical. Israel is roughly 1,000 miles west of Qatar. Sure, that means fewer missiles can reach it, but it is more useful for the U.S. if they want to fly over Beirut—less so for strikes on Tehran. Qatar also subsidizes the upkeep of its base to the tune of billions of dollars. Israel’s defense budget hit record highs this year, but an extra few billion is still significant for a country without endless oil wealth. Regional allies are unlikely to be thrilled either. Some, like Turkey, would be opposed out of that early-2000s distaste for Israel, while others—Kuwait, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia—may object simply because it means American help is now farther away. The U.S. and Israel are currently negotiating this proposal. U.S. Central Command is unlikely to fully relocate from Qatar, but there could very well be a new U.S. base established. As U.S. Secretary of State Alexander Haig famously said, Israel is “the largest American aircraft carrier in the world that cannot be sunk”—and the U.S. may finally be looking to put that to use. To read the rest of today's newsletter click the link below. amitsegal.substack.com/p/its-noon-in-…

@YinonMagal >>בחשבונות המיוחסים למוסד נטען כי<< החשבון הרשמי של המוסד בטוויטר הוא @mossad_fa כל השאר מזוייפים

דיווח: בחשבונות המיוחסים למוסד נטען כי ישראל הפציצה את מנהרת הטילים הענקית הזו ליד מיצרי הורמוז

@Diesol @Artedeingenio With all respect, what exactly is the "work" here - writing a prompt? You don't own these characters, and this content is not copyrightable. AI combines and repackages characters that don't belong to you.

@Artedeingenio Nice work! My first time seeing it as well.

It’s striking. This animated short I posted last Sunday only got around 8,000 impressions, plus a few more from being pinned on my profile for several days. The algorithm must not have considered it good enough to show to more users. But today someone shared it, and it’s already close to 37,000 impressions. Just another example of how poorly the algorithm works, and how quality content often doesn’t get the reach it deserves, even with an account like mine with over 52,000 followers.

@Osint613 >>Nuclear weapons are off the table (for now)<< They still have 460kg of enriched 60% uranium. >>Salvos of hundreds of missiles at once are off the table.<< 2 or 3 big underground missile facilities are blocked entrance but not destroyed.

I had this thought today: The existential threat from the Islamic regime is gone. Nuclear weapons are off the table (for now). Salvos of hundreds of missiles at once are off the table. What’s left? Single missile launches. That’s not existential. That’s manageable. The threat has fundamentally shifted. What’s next? A few more weeks of hitting targets, potential op to open the Hormuz, and hopefully the Iranians get what they need to finish this off.

@BiggerTruth @StateDept @RealCandaceO @POTUS >>Approximate transcript (best I could tell):<< The transcript is off. She says that our soldiers suffer from PTSD returning home and those countries don't get better. Then she says that the war in Iraq main motive was to build a military base on top of Babylon, etc.

Perhaps @StateDept should look into why @RealCandaceO is going on a Russian state-owned domestic propaganda news outlet to project an image that @POTUS is a lying tyrant and defending our enemies. Approximate transcript (best I could tell): "The one thing we could be sure is that we are being perpetually lied about everything. Eg we are being lied about what the United States are doing in Venezuela, why exactly they are suddenly so interested in Greenland. Most of Americans took up supporting Trump because he said he wouldn't drag the US in to another war, go guns-a-blazin to interfere in another country's business and focus on domestic issues... *Something about big pharma being a bigger culprit in drug trafficking than Venezuela and US abandoning either a military facility or a weapon in Greenland during the Cold War"

@Oraibtz @DVATW >>It’s intellectual bankruptcy dressed as toughness.<< That sounds like AI. Try harder 😄

Calling for the assassination of a foreign minister isn’t strength it’s reckless, short-sighted thinking. Policies built on killing leaders don’t eliminate problems. They multiply them. Every assassination creates martyrs, fuels retaliation, and drags entire regions deeper into chaos. History has proven this again and again. If you normalize that logic, don’t be surprised when it comes back the other way. Today you cheer it, tomorrow you condemn it when it hits your side. Serious nations deal with conflict through strategy, pressure, and diplomacy not by fantasizing about killing individuals like it’s a video game. This “kill him” mindset isn’t power. It’s intellectual bankruptcy dressed as toughness.

Why is he still alive?

@GasBuddyGuy >>BREAKING: Arizona has just broken its all-time record high for diesel, reaching $5.93/gal<< Fake: Arizona's all-time statewide average record high for diesel is $5.942 per gallon, reached on June 19, 2022

BREAKING: Arizona has just broken its all-time record high for diesel, reaching $5.93/gal, according to GasBuddy data.

@contentsparks1 @CrusadeTactics @marklevinshow >>Bob Lazar (2019) had 13M and Musk (2018) had 30M after the same period of 1.5 years<< And as I already said - these are the peaks. Rogan benefited by far more from these guests than vice a versa.

@contentsparks1 @CrusadeTactics @marklevinshow >>Trump has less views than the Bob Lazar interview<< It's been roughly a 1.5 years since the Trump interview and it has 60M+ view on YouTube. Bob Lazar (2019) had 13M and Musk (2018) had 30M after the same period of 1.5 years 🙂

There he goes again ...  His game is to spend a few days, weeks, or months hitting this, then a few days, weeks, or months hitting that, so he's viewed as a straight shooter when, in fact, he's a manipulator.  Endorses Bernie Sanders then Donald Trump.  Now, Trump not so much.  Nothing principled, consistent, rational.   mediaite.com/politics/hilla…

@CrusadeTactics @contentsparks1 @marklevinshow >>Rogan has had the number 1 podcast for YEARS.<< So what? Trump brought 5 times more viewers than his average episode.

@anatoly @contentsparks1 @marklevinshow Bro what are you talking about lmao Rogan has had the number 1 podcast for YEARS. Years before the Trump episode and years after it. He gave Trump a bugger audience than anyone on the planet.

@CrusadeTactics @contentsparks1 @marklevinshow >>Musk in 2018 has 20+ million more views than Trump.<< That actually breaks your own argument. If Musk got even more views than Trump on Rogan, then Musk was the draw too. Same point.

@anatoly @contentsparks1 @marklevinshow What? Rogan has been the most listened to weekly media for the last 6 years 🤣 Musk in 2018 has 20+ million more views than Trump.

@CrusadeTactics @contentsparks1 @marklevinshow >>He put Trump on the biggest internet platform on earth.<< Trump was the reason that episode blew up. It was not Rogan who gave Trump those huge numbers. Trump was the draw and gave those views to Rogan, not vice versa.

@anatoly @contentsparks1 @marklevinshow He put Trump on the biggest internet platform on earth.

@contentsparks1 @marklevinshow >>that reached one hundred million people before the election... Definitely benefited Trump.<< Sure, it benefited Trump. But the huge views were because of Trump, not because of Rogan. Trump was the draw and gave those views to Rogan. And Rogan monetized it very well.

@anatoly @marklevinshow He also hosted him on his podcast that reached one hundred million people before the election. Definitely benefited Trump.

@demishassabis @GeminiApp @GoogleAIStudio >>Perfect background music for flow state at 2am - made with the new Lyria 3 Pro.<< Well... IMHO it heavily borrows from Robert Miles - Children youtube.com/watch?v=CC5ca6…

Perfect background music for flow state at 2am - made with the new Lyria 3 Pro. Google AI subscribers can try it in the @GeminiApp and developers can build with the API in @GoogleAIStudio - have fun!!