Quentin André

3.9K posts

Quentin André banner
Quentin André

Quentin André

@andre_quentin

Assistant Prof. of Marketing @ CU Boulder. Open science, research methods, managerial and numerical cognition. ❤️Python 🐍.

Boulder, CO Katılım Mayıs 2014
742 Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Woke up to the good news that our paper (w/ @nreinholtz) on group sequential designs is accepted at @JCRNEWS ! Want to learn more about designing more efficient and more informative studies? This blog post summarizes the key insights from our paper: quentinandre.net/post/more-effi…
English
7
10
65
34.7K
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Hallucinate cites? Claims that contradict the content of the paper? Conspiratorial tone implying her program of research was silenced by shadow forces? Loose understanding of statistics? How can a rigorous scientist show such lapses in judgment? Unless...
Daniël Lakens@lakens

New blog post: Evaluating Dr. Cuddy’s Claim that the Debunking of Power Posing is a Myth. daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/05/evalua… On an AI generated description of a non-existent study, incorrectly citing findings from studies, and the importance of scientific criticism.

English
0
2
8
3.8K
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
This is GPT-5.2, a model that is now 6 months old! Contemporary models are likely better at context management and nuance, although the lack of diversity would probably persist (mode collapse issue). Either way, we should move towards a "cyborg" model of peer-reviewing.
Ethan Mollick@emollick

Seems GPT-5.2 reaches expert level in peer review: 45 scientists took 469 hours evaluating human & AI reviews on 82 papers. "Surprisingly, current AI reviewers are competitive even with the top-rated reviewers in Nature’s official peer review..." though not without weaknesses.

English
0
0
4
792
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
@emollick What are, in your opinion, the most imaginative views on this? The "Coasean Singularity" paper is one of them in my view, but I'm looking for other perspectives.
English
0
0
2
165
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
@OlegUrminsky I can't derive a sense of moral superiority from your take, it is therefore incorrect.
English
0
0
3
36
Oleg Urminsky
Oleg Urminsky@OlegUrminsky·
"Smith et al, claim to test the effect of specifically X on Y. We propose that this is instead the effect of Z on Y. We replicate their result and then in a more precise test, show that properly controlling for Z eliminates the effect" -> able to present their paper from memory
English
2
0
6
265
Oleg Urminsky
Oleg Urminsky@OlegUrminsky·
The rare sensible take on Twitter! Authors are responsible for the accuracy of their work. That means reading *enough* of a cited paper to be confident that the claim being made about the paper is correct. That is a different type/amount of reading depending on the claim.
Stanislav Fort@stanislavfort

Lenka is correct here, Hunter is wrong. This is not a big deal. There are different kinds of citations in a paper on a spectrum from "I actually used this result in detail" (you read those carefully), all the way to "some people did something similar in this space" (you don't really read those in detail because they don't matter much for what you're writing anyway). What is the issue here exactly?

English
9
3
32
3.4K
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Claude is bearish on AI.
Quentin André tweet media
English
0
0
7
687
Quentin André retweetledi
Oleg Urminsky
Oleg Urminsky@OlegUrminsky·
The Journal of Consumer Research editorial team and Policy Board are deeply saddened by the passing of Professor Giana Eckhardt, a cherished member of the consumer research community and a longtime contributor to JCR as Co-Editor, Associate Editor, and author.
English
1
1
3
529
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Reviewers: If a study claims to be pre-registered, 👏read👏the👏pre-reg! Paper accepted in a top marketing journal, all the pre-registerations feature group sequential designs (which require testing against adjusted alphas). The reported results all test against .05.
English
0
0
4
526
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
1) Making claims on her website that HBS and Colada have used to dismiss the defamation claim, and will use to show she changed her version multiple times 2) Uploading a doctored file that HBS is now using to counter-sue her for defamation Shame Ackman's money can't buy brains.
English
0
0
4
177
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Gino's PR campaign is a masterclass in repeatedly stepping on rakes. Her legal team is trying to keep her communications with Lawrence Lessig out of discovery, claiming attorney-client privilege... Except Lessig said on his podcast he's not her lawyer! This is in addition to:
Quentin André tweet media
English
1
0
5
778
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Wake up babe, the new Edelman x Gino crossover just dropped.
Quentin André tweet media
English
0
0
3
614
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Quentin André tweet media
Brad Wilcox@BradWilcoxIFS

Great for @alexandracooper. But the lifestyle her podcast has sold comes at a real cost. More partners ≠ better marriages. Compared w/ those who married w/ no other partners: ✔️1–8 prior partners → 50% higher odds of divorce ✔️9+ prior partners → 165% higher odds of divorce

ZXX
0
0
7
1.4K
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
@Limatronique J'aime pas généraliser, mais globalement la probité intellectuelle des comptes avec "Elon Musk Fan" dedans c'est pas ouf.
Français
1
0
4
147
Limo
Limo@Limatronique·
"Marc Touati est pessimiste depuis l’après Covid"
Limo tweet mediaLimo tweet media
Crypto Matou@crypto_matou

C’est faux, il était justement l’un des rares optimistes après 2009 parce qu’il disait qu’avec la relance qui avait été faite ça allait forcément redémarrer. 99% des gens qui critiquent le “perma bear” de @MarcTouati n’écoutent pas ses analyses. Il est bear sur l’économie française depuis l’après-Covid et l’argent magique. Concernant l’économie mondiale il a fait des previsions classiques de 2-3% / an qui se sont révélées assez justes. Bref, comme souvent, ceux qui ne consomment pas un contenu sont les plus critiques à son sujet haha.

Français
2
0
20
2.8K
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
Just finished migrating my academic website to Quarto, with Claude Code's invaluable help. To celebrate, a new blog post: "What I Keep Flagging in My Reviews". Link in next post.
English
4
0
18
4.5K
David Hagmann
David Hagmann@davidhagmann·
@andre_quentin I also just redesigned my website with Claude. Simple YAML files that get rendered as a website. The code compiles a CV pdf, so I only have to update in one place. Automation is amazing! It pushes to Github and is hosted by Cloudflare (all free). dhagmann.com
David Hagmann tweet mediaDavid Hagmann tweet media
English
2
0
5
379
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
I've said it before and I'll say it again: The current system favors fraudulent research. Fraud is hard to discover, even harder to prove, and rarely (if ever) punished by journals and institutions. This needs to change. Until then, I won't review for this journal again. 4/4
English
2
6
153
12.6K
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
What's the point of "Research Transparency Statements" if they are no penalties whatsoever for misrepresenting your data? I'm honestly pretty fed up with the "transparency circus" in academia. 3/N
English
1
2
133
13.4K
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
I recently reviewed a paper for a journal, and realized researchers had not reported several DVs (all null results). They had scrubbed these measures from their materials, but left them in the data. I flagged this in my review, insisting that this is a clear violation of... 1/N
English
2
15
286
82.9K