Andrew Richards

643 posts

Andrew Richards banner
Andrew Richards

Andrew Richards

@andrewmrichards

Partner to Angela. Baker of sourdough etc. Occasional grower of vegetables. Butler to various cats. Owner of The IT Service.

Katılım Temmuz 2011
83 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@CharlieJustADOG @ianmiles The last time people started doing Nazi salutes, the US fought with us against them. The last time Russians invaded a neighbouring country, the US condemned them. The last time a war-time leader visited the oval office without a suit, a bust was made of him which Trump still has
English
1
0
0
51
Charlie the Dog
Charlie the Dog@CharlieJustADOG·
@ianmiles Why in the hell are activists in the UK mad at Musk? WTF do they care? Insanity.
English
228
1
746
21.9K
Ian Miles Cheong
Ian Miles Cheong@ianmiles·
Who is paying for these anti-Elon Musk ads in the UK? This one was put up in Tottenham.
Ian Miles Cheong tweet media
English
8.6K
4.8K
32.7K
1.8M
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
I think that name was last valid in about 1984! It's now the Dept of Health and Social care, I believe. I know it's now probably going to change again after today's announcement, but we may as well get it right!!
English
1
0
0
12
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@AndrewSparrow Hi Andrew - In your 09:48 update today, you said "Wes Streeting, the health secretary, will give an update on NHS England, where about half the HQ workforce is being cut to avoid duplication with the work done by the Department of Health and Social Security"
English
1
0
0
105
Tides of History
Tides of History@labour_history·
#OTD 1975. Margaret Thatcher becomes Tory leader - and Labour's re-election odds are cut to 2/5 "I think the quality of the debate will be raised because the Tory Party will be driven to the right and there will be a real choice offered to the electorate" - Tony Benn Thread 👇🏼
Tides of History tweet mediaTides of History tweet mediaTides of History tweet mediaTides of History tweet media
Tides of History@labour_history

#OTD 1975. Margaret Thatcher becomes Conservative Party leader. Seen as a party in terminal electoral decline, pundits wondered whether they could ever win again with their first woman leader A thread revisiting the contest, the state of the nation and how Labour responded

English
3
10
27
9K
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@TheNewsAgents Although I've agreed with your analysis that Labour shd get their skates on over rules on political funding, does the falling out between Musk and Farage show that they were right to chill and play the long game? Was the spat always inevitable, and is it terminal?
English
0
0
0
29
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@breeallegretti @NWJK - If you want a proper debate, why block me before I've even said anything to you? If not, then fine - make a statement and put your fingers in your ears rather than have a conversation.
English
0
0
0
17
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@breeallegretti I support this govt, and it's an important change to have seriousness and competence in government, shorn of gimmicks. But gawd he's a dull orator. Where's the energy? Where's the passion, the conviction?
English
2
0
0
170
Aubrey Allegretti
Aubrey Allegretti@breeallegretti·
Keir Starmer: Kemi Badenoch thinks if you do a couple of shift in McDonalds, you can become working class. By that logic, if I keep coming back here [to Pinewood Studios], I could be the next James Bond.
English
2
4
19
5.8K
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@cricketshow You asked people to send you voice notes - did I miss where you told us how? I've followed you since 2015, and haven't missed an episode, having listened to all 4 now. For the next pod - watching IND v NZ, AUS v IND and ENG v NZ, is winning at home now impossible?
English
1
0
0
26
Maven Politic
Maven Politic@MavenPolitic·
Corrected: People who pretend to have a high IQ: - Speak deliberately verbosely - Hide meaning through Jargon - Mangle thoughts & ideas People with actually high IQ: - Speak to their audience - Use precise language - Convey thoughts as clearly as they can conceive of them
Craig Weiss@craigzLiszt

People who pretend to have a high IQ: - Speak verbosely - Use jargon - Convey mangled thoughts & ideas People who actually have a high IQ: - Speak concisely - Use simple language - Convey thoughts clearly

English
7
3
80
4.6K
Susie Dent
Susie Dent@susie_dent·
Word of the day is ‘recrudescence’ (17th century): the return of something terrible after a time of reprieve.
English
2.8K
39.4K
193.7K
6.9M
Rory Stewart
Rory Stewart@RoryStewartUK·
So great to see this. When @campbellclaret and I talked to him @Schwarzenegger was holding off - hoping it seemed that Trump would not make it thru the courts to the finish line. But he does this gently+ powerfully. Let’s hope some American swing voters are still listening.
Arnold Schwarzenegger@Schwarzenegger

I don’t really do endorsements. I’m not shy about sharing my views, but I hate politics and don’t trust most politicians. I also understand that people want to hear from me because I am not just a celebrity, I am a former Republican Governor. My time as Governor taught me to love policy and ignore politics. I’m proud of the work I did to help clean up our air, create jobs, balance the budget, make the biggest infrastructure investment in state history, and take power from the politicians and give it back to the people when it comes to our redistricting process and our primaries in California. That’s policy. It requires working with the other side, not insulting them to win your next election, and I know it isn’t sexy to most people, but I love it when I can help make people’s lives better with policies, like I still do through my institute at USC, where we fight for clean air and stripping the power from the politicians who rig the system against the people. Let me be honest with you: I don’t like either party right now. My Republicans have forgotten the beauty of the free market, driven up deficits, and rejected election results. Democrats aren’t any better at dealing with deficits, and I worry about their local policies hurting our cities with increased crime. It is probably not a surprise that I hate politics more than ever, which, if you are a normal person who isn’t addicted to this crap, you probably understand. I want to tune out. But I can’t. Because rejecting the results of an election is as un-American as it gets. To someone like me who talks to people all over the world and still knows America is the shining city on a hill, calling America is a trash can for the world is so unpatriotic, it makes me furious. And I will always be an American before I am a Republican. That’s why, this week, I am voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. I’m sharing it with all of you because I think there are a lot of you who feel like I do. You don’t recognize our country. And you are right to be furious. For decades, we’ve talked about the national debt. For decades, we’ve talked about comprehensive immigration reform that secures the border while fixing our broken immigration system. And Washington does nothing. The problems just keep rolling, and we all keep getting angrier, because the only people that benefit from problems aren’t you, the people. The only people that benefit from this crap are the politicians who prefer having talking points to win elections to the public service that will make Americans’ lives better. It is a just game to them. But it is life for my fellow Americans. We should be pissed! But a candidate who won’t respect your vote unless it is for him, a candidate who will send his followers to storm the Capitol while he watches with a Diet Coke, a candidate who has shown no ability to work to pass any policy besides a tax cut that helped his donors and other rich people like me but helped no one else else, a candidate who thinks Americans who disagree with him are the bigger enemies than China, Russia, or North Korea - that won’t solve our problems. It will just be four more years of bullshit with no results that makes us angrier and angrier, more divided, and more hateful. We need to close the door on this chapter of American history, and I know that former President Trump won’t do that. He will divide, he will insult, he will find new ways to be more un-American than he already has been, and we, the people, will get nothing but more anger. That’s enough reason for me to share my vote with all of you. I want to move forward as a country, and even though I have plenty of disagreements with their platform, I think the only way to do that is with Harris and Walz. Vote this week. Turn the page and put this junk behind us. And even if you disagree with me, vote, because that’s what we do as Americans. vote.org

English
133
226
2.2K
216.2K
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@lewis_goodall My instinct is that the whole thing is a giant mistake. They had planned to protect WOKING people - those in the town near where Keir grew up. But then there was a typo in the manifesto....
English
0
0
0
27
Lewis Goodall
Lewis Goodall@lewis_goodall·
The term “working person/people” is nebulous and was always going to become a problem, given fiscal constraints. But there’s been a fair bit of feigned ignorance adopted by much of the coverage this last week or so. Everyone knows the difference between income derived from wealth/assets and income derived from labour, which is basically what the term is driving at. And given how much labour has become taxed versus wealth, it’s a good thing we’re talking about it.
English
289
410
2.4K
269.8K
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@sourav_b88 @AatifNawaz @NeelamAofficial I thought cricket was supposed to be a civilised sport? What happened? A team had a bad day - they'll have a good one soon, and no doubt bad and good ones after that. Is there really the need f9r such vitriol?
English
0
0
2
639
Aatif Nawaz
Aatif Nawaz@AatifNawaz·
Cricket really is a great equaliser. Some days you're laughing at another team. The next day, everyone's laughing at yours.
English
387
418
5.7K
437.8K
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@MarinaHyde A (genuine) question for your Q&A. How does podcast monetisation work in a world (deep voice, obvs) where I can pay £95 for the whole of Amazon Prime (inc free delivery etc), Netflix for £60, or a single podcast for £80? Did the idea of patreon etc fail?
English
0
0
1
177
Marina Hyde
Marina Hyde@MarinaHyde·
Joyfully announcing the Rest Is Entertainment Club! To all who asked to listen ad-free – you can now. You can also hear the Q&A early, get the newsletter archive, & early ticket access to future live events. Plus, there will be BONUS EPISODES!
Marina Hyde tweet media
English
12
3
55
34.3K
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@AndrewSparrow 👍 Just to be clear, I wasn't implying that you were being unfair at all. But I think it's an interesting discussion - she's not elected, takes no public money, and in today's world is thankfully not just an adjunct of her man! No comment either way from me, but worth a thought.
English
0
0
0
13
AndrewSparrow
AndrewSparrow@AndrewSparrow·
@andrewmrichards I haven't said they always are wrong. But I think ppl would worry if they felt someone was trying to curry favour with the PM by buying stuff for their spouse, and no one knew about it. (Not that I think that is really what happened here.)
English
1
0
0
17
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@AndrewSparrow I have a question regarding the issue of #frockgate. Why is it inappropriate for the spouse of the PM to accept gifts from a 3rd party? Yes, of course it's possible that they might not be offered but for his job, but are the PM and her not separate entities?
English
1
0
0
17
Andrew Richards
Andrew Richards@andrewmrichards·
@BBCSport #bbctennis - Is the Wimbledon commentary box right next to the radio commentary? There's a constant bubble of chatter in the background, which is a bit distracting... 😒
English
1
0
2
66