Andrew Lehti

Lehti, Andrew (2025). Cognitive Impasse [Visual]: Stages of Mental Rigidity, Dissonance, and Bias. figshare. Figure. doi.org/10.6084/m9.fig…

@GermanicFren Because they're indoctrinated. It's no different than telling a Christian that Jesus isn't real. NASA is their Jesus.

people get so mad when we point out how fake NASA is. maybe instead of getting mad at us for noticing discrepancies like every other fake thing the government has lied about to keep you all mentally enslaved - people should instead ask themselves why they get so irrationally worked up and angry about challenging the narrative. could it be they have been brainwashed with propaganda through years of subversive media to react this way? I think so.

@AFC_Murph @ThisIsJay216 Because it's slowed down. The distance between frames is atrocious because they're not even consistent. They look like complete morons too. But yeah. The sand and astronauts fall ±40% depending on the video.

@ThisIsJay216 Moron Explain how the dust particles kicked up by the rover are behaving exactly as if they were under lunar gravity, if this was all in a film studio. Can’t fake that How is does a country achieve so much, but simultaneously be filled with so many fucking idiots

Grown me can’t believe ppl actually thought this bullshit was real… do you see this contraption 😂 😂😂😂😂

@ThisIsJay216 Yep. It's so embarrassing that some people actually believe NASA.

This is how all the retards in the comments sounds defending this film shot by Stanley Kubrick

See reason I blocked you here: x.com/i/status/20400… I would love to have a debate, but any legitimate question you asked is already in the Q and A which is like 20 pages. The fact that you keep misconstruding, making up shit that has already been answered (while also trying to make it seem like you even understand the material) is the reason you're blocked. People like you are insufferable.

@fsdfzs54435pg @JDGrandstaff @ThisIsJay216 Does that bother you? I just refuse to waste hours on twitter arguing with an absolute moron who will discuss everything but the actual evidence.

@fsdfzs54435pg @JDGrandstaff @ThisIsJay216 Right... It is based on a lie. It's called the moon landing. And how paranoid are you that you think people are lying, and wasting time massive amounts of time just to try and deceive you? You're trying to win an argument by sophistry because you have no actual refutation.

@fsdfzs54435pg @SmicersRight @Jenny_1884 You seem to be thinking that the converging shadows, and 180° of shadows are bundled together. They're not. That's a reading comprehension issue on your part.

Why has it taken 50yrs to just go around the moon? Is anyone else starting to question whether the moon landing really happened?

@fsdfzs54435pg @JDGrandstaff @ThisIsJay216 You still haven't addressed the actual evidence. You're just hopelessly lost.

@fsdfzs54435pg @JDGrandstaff @ThisIsJay216 🤗🤗🤗🤗 the best slop.

@fsdfzs54435pg @JDGrandstaff @ThisIsJay216 No. They just count for a slight variance. But and again. That's not how this works.

@fsdfzs54435pg @JDGrandstaff @ThisIsJay216 And believe me. I have spent years trying to find a photo of the sun that would appear in the same way that it does in the moon landing photos. It just simply does not.

No. That's just not how color, intensity, and light work. If you can see it, and it's captured, it's going to have the same basic forensic principles. This is how the sun is supposed to look under forensics. ISS, Apollo Orbit, ISS, Artic from Earth. The only difference is different glare and obstruction. Study how they look.

@fsdfzs54435pg @JDGrandstaff @ThisIsJay216 Now compare them side by side with the sun from the moon landing photos.

@fsdfzs54435pg @Moonpans @michaelshermer Do you understand how image forensics works? I'm embarrassed for you. Do you think there's secret invisible data between the colors of a digital photo vs. an analog/scanned photo?

Dear No Moonies: If we never landed on the moon what is your explanation for these images taken by the Chandrayaan-2 probe from the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), when it mapped the lunar surface in detail in 2021?

@jantoin @SmicersRight @Jenny_1884 And yet we're a nation that has 55% of ourselves distrust progress ourselves? That's worse. There's no motive/desire to hate ourselves.

@andylehti @SmicersRight @Jenny_1884 They’re good. And they’re bad. Examples for both camps can be given. But if a nation comfortably believes the moon landing was fake, of their rivals, I would expect that to be a lot higher than 55%.

@Moonpans @michaelshermer No, no. That's not the sun. The sun doesn't create a small isolated and concentrated hotspot. Only a directional light source can do that.

@andylehti @michaelshermer It is a composite of a dozen or so separate images stitched together. And some had sun glare

Uhh no. I very much believed in the moon landing. I was able to re-evaluate my beliefs. You don't think I had to undergo an unbearable amount of cognitive dissonance? A visceral feeling of anxiety, impending doom, and guilt which lasted for days and tetered off after weeks. There's a reason people can't change their beliefs very much, it's because it's painful. But I prioritize truth more than my being comfortable.

@andylehti @Jenny_1884 Why on Earth having 'gotten away' with the 'fake moon landings', would they then fake 5 more attempts? It doesn't make sense. 12 people have been to the moon put there by people much cleverer than you or I. The only difference is you fear what you can't comprehend.

@StanGeeMan @latestinspace Okay Trump Supporting Boomer

@andylehti @latestinspace Fake and gay

Timelapse of Artemis II's trans-lunar injection burn, officially putting the crew on course for the Moon