Andy Spicer

Sporting fields, pitches, and courts are an empty stage. Every once in a while, they give us a glimpse of the incredible things people can do. Things that a moment before, you were certain were impossible, and then, they weren't. facebook.com/reel/123731080…

@Sophie2078 Sadly, that particular trait is usually self correcting.

Sometimes I’m stupid enough to believe in love.

@NatashaCL7 I see that you've been giving @ginacarano pointers!

@ginacarano Gina, you look fantastic, fit, and happy. It's great to see you thriving in spite of all the unearned hate you've had to deal with.

Been waiting for this moment for 8 months. ♥️

@NatashaCL7 @RaminNasibov YES!

Post a picture YOU took. Just a pic. No description.

@itsmommymaster I'm so sorry. There are no words.

Today is a month since you passed. Diagnosed on the 19th March. Gone by the 15th of May after being in a coma after 2 weeks of chemo. I never got to say goodbye. My heart is so broken. I hope God shows you my heart and my eternal love and adoration for you.

Quiet moments heal loud weeks.

@NatashaCL7 🇺🇸

Drop a 🇺🇸 if you’re proud to be an American! 🙌🏽

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk @marquistrillx I don't need a dm, just post it here.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk @marquistrillx Cant DM you, just followed you no option to DM. Send me a message. I have sources

The answer is NOT 12 Can you get it right?

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk Provide one identifiable, credible reference that states your position. Other than that, I'm bored and I'm out.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk Literally just gave you a detailed thesis level answer and you question my education. Im no liar. I am slso not wrong.

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk @marquistrillx Show me a textbook that says what you say. Just one.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk @marquistrillx When you write 3(6) instead of 3 x 6, you are using 'implied multiplication.' In higher math, gluing a number to a parenthesis means they are a single team. You have to finish dealing with that team before you can bring in outside operators like division

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk No you don't, not a chance.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk I have a masters level education in engineering and I assure you everything I am saying is accurate. The equation is badic and simple.

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk @marquistrillx Language is nuanced at all levels and the rules and definitions change over time. Math does not. Your hurt ego doesn't change the facts. It's ok to get something wrong, we all do. It's easier to admit when you do if you don't call people names and curse at them first.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk @marquistrillx strict PEMDAS is not "wrong," but it is incomplete—like a basic grammar rule you learn in third grade that doesn't work for advanced writing

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk Maybe a video will help you. This Math Problem Tricks Everyone! 12÷61+1 youtu.be/zZefs3BTmSU?si… via @marquistrillx

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk In higher-level mathematics and physics, multiplication by juxtaposition (putting terms next to each other without a \(\times \) or \(\cdot \) symbol) is treated as a higher priority than standard division.

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk Maybe you'll believe WolframAlpha.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk However it is NOT written your way. It is implied in a mathematical equation it is bound to the parenthesis. Curious what is your level of mathematics?

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk It doesn't matter how it's written. The P in PEMDAS refers to the items inside the parens. There is no meaning inferred by leaving out the multiplication symbol.

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk No, there is no "bound together." That could equally be written as 3*(3+3). They are equivalent, no difference. The lack of the * is a convention and does not change the equation at all. You really need to do some reading. You are making a fool out of yourself.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk You are exhausting, you really don’tnunderstand what I am saying, your explantion shows that. The way it is written 3(3+3) is bound together. If the equation was 18 \ 3 * (3+3) you would be correct. the equation as written is 18 / [3(3+3)]

@EricGol32882594 @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk In case you are still confused, lol.

@andyspicer @objectivityrox @Emma_J_RealTalk Andy honestly maybe STFU, the equation is ridiculously easy. I have already explained to you why. Instead of using basic level algebra READ my explanation and then as it goes right past your comprehension….leave it there.

@shouq_al90149 I don't know. We should do an experiment.

Would you do??