Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱

2.6K posts

Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱 banner
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱

Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱

@anibalgoedi

Katılım Şubat 2021
1.2K Takip Edilen418 Takipçiler
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱@anibalgoedi·
@Little_amiinah @JuliusElum Read Robert Miner “high probability trading strategies” and Tom Hougaard “Best loser wins” you will be ok with that. Maybe some clonazepan helps at first (with a doctor supervision)
English
0
0
1
29
little amiinah
little amiinah@Little_amiinah·
@JuliusElum I have taken risk that makes me think I have spiritual problems like a demon is making me take risks that sucks all my money away and I’m left broke because of it I hope it pays off trust me i very stupid and daft to some people
English
2
0
4
335
Julius Elum
Julius Elum@JuliusElum·
When you're POOR take lots of RISKS. I mean "risks that make you appear stupid". You can't exit poverty playing it safe 😡
English
50
77
573
13K
Joe Wu
Joe Wu@joewu_official·
You know the sentiment is at extreme lows, when tribalism is almost gone. All that’s left is people gloating about selling their #crypto for silver. Ironically, the more fear, the more likely the bottom is near / in. Kudos if you are still around, $EGLD family! #EGLD
English
15
10
136
2.6K
Healthy Pockets
Healthy Pockets@healthy_pockets·
⚠️ ALERTA: GROENLANDIA HA AVISADO A SUS CIUDADANOS QUE SE PREPAREN PARA UNA POSIBLE "INVASIÓN" TRAS LAS AMENAZAS DE EEUU 🤯‼️ C: @Daily_Cripto
Healthy Pockets tweet media
Español
24
25
262
19.1K
Digitoys
Digitoys@Digitoys·
Who's holding some Cryptoys? This could be you if you drop a screenshot below.
Digitoys tweet media
English
106
13
148
5K
alkimiadev
alkimiadev@alkimiadev·
@AshCrypto There was a case with an influencer in Argentina being found dismembered in a suitcase a few years ago. This is part of why I was against X making our country public. Not everyone lives in large countries and people will do barbaric things for realtively small amounts of money
English
3
2
10
2K
Ash Crypto
Ash Crypto@AshCrypto·
🚨BREAKING: 🇺🇦 21-year-old Danylo Kuzmin, son of Ukrainian deputy mayor was murdered on november 26th in Vienna for $200,000 in crypto assets. He was beaten and forced to disclose his cryptocurrency wallet passwords, and burned alive in his car by two Ukrainian suspects. Be careful about revealing your wealth.
Ash Crypto tweet mediaAsh Crypto tweet media
English
639
625
4.9K
808.8K
Julius Elum
Julius Elum@JuliusElum·
If by tomorrow, if my $FLM, $KDA and $PERP didn't pump as predicted, I will sell it off as against 12th delist date.
English
17
9
112
12.5K
RPXRP
RPXRP@XRPFREEE·
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 🐳🐳🐳🐳XRP HIDDEN IN PLAIN SITE MASTER DECODE🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳🐳 THE CLOCK IS SOLVED ⏱️ 1988 Economist phoenix → 2018 → 2025. The $10 bill post hides 11/14 and mirrors to 11/20. Base-10 reset, same story told twice. Here’s the clean math 👇 #XRP #ISO20022 #MrPool #Ripple (Economist → 2025) Economist date (cover): Jan 9, 1988 The article says “~30 years” → 2018 (it’s printed on the coin). Add a full 7-year cycle: 2018 + 7 = 2025. Result: 1988 → 2018 → 2025 (seed → first realization → completion). How we get 11 (the month): The only year on the coin is 2018 → 2+0+1+8 = 11. That’s your November marker baked into the artifact. Phoenix coin: “10” (rollover) → 11 (the new base). 10 ➜ 11 is the reset. $10 bill serial: NJ06066052A Extract the embedded date pair: 6+5 = 11, 6+6+2 = 14 → 11/14 That also equals 156 days after 6/11/24 (post date). Half-cycle mirror = mid-cycle ignition. Complete the mirror with 11/20. Now you have 20 | 25: – “20” from 11/20 – “25” from the serial sums (0+6+0+6+6+0+5+2 = 25) → 2025 And yes: 1+1=2 | 20 → ISO 20022. Sequence: Seed 6/11/24 → 11/14/24 (midpoint) → 11/20 mirror → 2025 completion. Two artifacts, one clock: Economist (1988→2018→2025) + $10 bill (11/14→11/20→2025). Base-10 reset, public bridge online. #XRP #WeThePeople #QFS #Ripple “10 ➜ 11: The Reset.” 1988→2018→2025 and 6/11→11/14→11/20. Two artifacts. One timeline. @XRPee3 @XRP_DigiGold
RPXRP tweet media
English
23
117
572
46.9K
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱 retweetledi
OneDex
OneDex@OneDex_X·
Mark your calendars 🛠️ 🛠️Monday, November 10th. 🛠️Get ready to test the OneDex CLMM, the first CLMM ever launched on MultiversX.
OneDex tweet media
English
55
142
353
37.7K
Vive con Propósito.
Vive con Propósito.@PropositoyVida·
Si este perro fuera tuyo ¿Cómo lo llamarías?
Vive con Propósito. tweet media
Español
2K
149
2.5K
207.8K
Julius Elum
Julius Elum@JuliusElum·
I finally want to call this signal publicly. I called it for my X subscribers & Facebook private group members. It's going to print so hard. $BLUAI pump will be very ballistic🔥💰 You can buy on SPOT or long on futures. $25 million market capitalization, great utility, Binance Alpha TGEs and Ai narrative. That's easy 500% pump. Momentum building🔥💰 Take entry now on this dump opportunity at the current Market capitalization. The stoploss is $0.01720 The pump loading will be mad🔥💰 The best part is that the risk is very low.
Julius Elum tweet media
English
40
38
295
29.4K
Cata B.
Cata B.@catalin_beres·
🚨 #MultiversX projects that endure... Still here. No hype, no noise, just those who keep building. 🔥 🚀 MarketCap Titans 🤑 $WOJAINU @Woja_inu $2.1M 🦫 $BOBER @BoberCTO $962K 🐒 $EAPES @EAPESCLUB $209K 👨‍⚕️ $DRX @DoctorX_Meme $206K 🤵‍♂️ $VILLER @viller0214 $123K 🙋‍♂️ $VICTOR @SVictorUniverse $93k 🔥 Rising Giants 🦆 $KWAK @kwakdotlol $60K 🐓 $TCX @CollectionistX $43K ❎ $PADAWAN @X_Padawan_$38K 🐻 $RARE @SuperRare_Bears $36K ☣️ $REWARD @HodlTokenClub $30K 🧔‍♂️ $MINCU @MINCUtoken $27K 🦮 $BOD @thebodcoin $25K ⏸️ $HODL $24K 🌟 Breakout Stars 🏨 $BATES $16K 🦋 $XMPH @xMorPH_ESDT $16K 🌰 $NUTS @token_nuts $12k 🌀 $HYPE @Hype_lfg $12K 🦝 $JOJO @JoJoRacoon $12K 🕤 $TIME @BoredApeXClub $12K 🐕 $BOBY @boby_mvx $12K 🃏 $PXC @XperiencePoker $11K 🧅 $ONX @OnionXLabs $10K 🤡 $FEDUP @Fedup_clown $8K 🦁 $ROAR @ROARHighSpeX $8K 💎 Hidden Gems 👀 $BEMI @BemilioMaker $8K 🪶 $OWLX @OwlCitizensX $8K ⚽️ $GOAL @GalacticXsocios $8K 😻 $ROXY @RoxyOn_X $7K 🎭 $DRAMA @DramaMvX $6K 🐶 $BONEZ @CryptoPittz $6K 🟢 $GLONK @glonk_lol $6K 🤬 $ELMO @BurnifyApp $6K 🦝 $JLN $5K 🐦 $WOODY @WOODY_EX $5K 🌍 $BTCGREEN @BTCGREEN2024 $4K ⚡ Emerging Forces 🫒 $OLV @OliveMVX $3K 🪙 $TOM @TomCoinMvx 💶 $100x @100xMvx 🐶 $KURO @KuroInu2024 🐂 $BULLY @bullymvx 🦝 $FRED @FREDONMVX 🫏 $LOLO @Profetas666 🐸 $XPEPE @xPEPEonMVX 💩 $SHTC 🦝 $RACOON @RaccoonMVX 🤖 $BARNARD @SBACoreX 🦇 $BATEMAN @batemankoin 👨🏽 $BLAZZORD @BlazzordTV ⚔️ Warrior @XwarriorMVX
Cata B. tweet media
English
26
24
70
4.5K
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱@anibalgoedi·
@crypto_div 2. Goes away. Now we have: $koson, $gng, $tada, $crt, $qwt, $ash, $ride!!! 😭 usd was diluted in other tokens… now there are less projects, less people. I only kept my Onefinity tokens. Egld is a blockchain for not more than 6 millon supply.
English
3
0
1
38
DivXMaN
DivXMaN@crypto_div·
My Thoughts on MultiversX’s Proposed EGLD Tokenomics Changes My initial thoughts to MultiversX’s new EGLD tokenomics are mixed. I understand the rationale, and see it's benefit in the long term- but I’m concerned about the increased risks for existing investors. Currently, EGLD has a capped supply of approximately 31.4M tokens. Staking rewards come from issuance that decreases over time, supplemented by transaction fees. This is a scarcity driven model- similar to Bitcoin’s supply/demand dynamics and is what attracted investors who believed in MultiversX’s tech. All of us expected value growth as demand increased. The key problem has been that DeFi adoption faltered industry wide, and MultiversX has struggled to attract users, leading to a consistent decline in EGLD’s value despite its limited supply. The key fact- scarcity doesn’t drive value without demand. The new tokenomics aim to address this by shifting from scarcity to a growth model. Here are the key changes: Supply Cap Removal & Inflation: - 31.4M EGLD cap would be eliminated - 9.47% annual tail inflation rate, minting roughly 2.8M new EGLD per year based on the current supply. - 10% of base transaction fees burned- creating deflationary pressure that scales with network usage. - “Reflexive Strategic Investment” minting process could add up to 9.42M EGLD if price hits thresholds ($20, $35, or $50). These tokens would be locked for 3 years for strategic initiative use like institutional partnerships and market expansion. Emissions Allocation: Newly minted EGLD would be distributed as follows: - 50% to normal staking rewards - 20% to an Ecosystem Growth Fund (DAO managed grants for builders, tied to user adoption and TVL) - 20% to a Growth Dividend Fund (rewards for users particpating in active yield ie. deploying staked EGLD in DeFi via liquid staking derivatives) - 10% for protocol sustainability and development These allocations could be adjusted annually via governance votes. High Level Growth Mechanisms: - Staking yields 9-12% APR, to help increase staking ratio to over 65% - Transaction fees split into base fees (90% to dApp builders, 10% burned) and priority fees to validators for faster processing. - Protocol revenue to fund open market EGLD buybacks, which are then staked. - Create a positive feedback loop: Higher usage generates revenue, buybacks reduce supply and boost staking, while growth incentives attract more activity. - Tie EGLD’s value to ecosystem utility vs. scarcity alone. This entire change proposal screams utility vs. scarcity. Scarcity didn't work, and the lack of utility may be what's hindering growth- that's the mentality I'm betting is behind the decisions from the MultiversX team. All the changes focus on incentives to attract builders, investors, and DeFi users to boost TVL. They’ve recognized that strong tech and scarcity aren’t enough. MultiversX saw its largest user boost in my memory- during the xExchange launch when APR incentives were astronomically high. As DeFi usage declined industry wide and incentives stabilized, and the network struggled to compete with chains like Ethereum or Solana. The proposal for the tokenomics change has sparked significant backlash, with many arguing it breaks promises of a fixed supply- diluting value for existing holders. Many investors, including myself- originally bought EGLD for its scarcity driven model, expecting value to rise with demand. The shift to an inflationary model introduces greater risk, as its success still hinges on speculative adoption. The caveat is that the additional incentives could drive missing adoption. The risk is simple- if the incentives fail to attract sufficient users and builders, inflation could outpace demand, driving value down. My suggestion to investors remains the same- consider diversifying portfolios to manage increased risk, potentially allocating to assets like Bitcoin while monitoring MultiversX’s adoption metrics (TVL, transaction volume, user growth). When risk rises, reducing exposure is a basic principle of portfolio management. Blind faith needs to end. Your portfolio risk and it's value growth should be your sole concern. I’m cautiously optimistic that these changes could revitalize MultiversX’s ecosystem, but I’ll remain on the sidelines with DeFi investments, including EGLD, until I see tangible signs of success- rising network usage, prices, and trading volume. For now, the proposal’s fate depends on community governance, and I encourage EGLD holders to participate to shape its direction. Stay away from bashing the team- their logic and decisions make sense. Their community engagement is much higher than I've ever seen, and that's a very good thing. Ask them questions, participate in spaces, and make the best decisions for yourself. It's up to you to determine your risk profile and make portfolio decisions that drive your value growth moving forward. If this means lowering your risk and moving into BTC or other assets until you're certain on your EGLD risk profile- so be it. It comes with the territory when changes are made and we all know this. As always- I'll keep my feedback and decisions public, balanced, and unbiased. As time goes on and my strategies evolve, you'll be the first to know. For now, I'm waiting, watching, and sticking with BTC.
English
22
44
232
14K
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱@anibalgoedi·
@crypto_div 4. If a new project wants to use the blockchain it have to be ready to work and paying the project by the owners. We can t be investors of projects that close the doors when all goes wrong.
English
0
0
0
13
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱@anibalgoedi·
@crypto_div 3. The Supply maybe have to be according with the use and people using the blockchain. Less people, less supply. More People, more supply. How to do that in a descentralized way: No idea.
English
0
0
1
31
Anibal GoediX ⚡️🌱 retweetledi
OneDex
OneDex@OneDex_X·
Ready to collect FEE’s? CLMM is almost here!
OneDex tweet media
English
15
61
143
4.2K