Anita Bandrowski

732 posts

Anita Bandrowski banner
Anita Bandrowski

Anita Bandrowski

@Anitabandrowski

I love to think about reproducible science, #RRID, and other fun things; scientist, author, tinkerer, mother, CEO of a baby startup.

Katılım Mayıs 2009
666 Takip Edilen490 Takipçiler
Anita Bandrowski retweetledi
Guillaume Cabanac ⟨here and elsewhere⟩
Guillaume Cabanac ⟨here and elsewhere⟩@gcabanac

🤖 #ChatGPT's “Regenerate Response” in the bibliography of a @PLOSONE article. Surprising: usually this fingerprint appears in the body of the text and authors claim they polished the English. Not much to polish in a reference section. Hallucination? pubpeer.com/publications/7…

English
0
1
1
2.3K
Anita Bandrowski retweetledi
SPARC.science
SPARC.science@sparc_science·
Introducing our new walkthrough video on YouTube, designed to help you explore the SPARC portal in depth. Uncover features, understand the tools & resources available, and optimize your experience. Find, Use, and Share with SPARC. bit.ly/3TH3hGE #openScience #openDATA
English
0
5
6
457
Anita Bandrowski
Anita Bandrowski@Anitabandrowski·
Our bioRxiv preprint just posted, asking the very scandalous questions whether resources like organisms need an impact factor. doi.org/10.1101/2024.0…
English
0
3
2
1.1K
Elisabeth Bik
Elisabeth Bik@MicrobiomDigest·
Male stock investor wants to sue a woman science critic because he thinks her reputation is dangerous. He wants me to stop and stripped of my PhD. Please tell @mattNachtrab what you think of his plan to sue me - for being regarded an expert, I guess?
English
96
124
829
299.9K
Anita Bandrowski retweetledi
Elisabeth Bik
Elisabeth Bik@MicrobiomDigest·
Matt lost money because two men who shorted the stock, helped by a lawyer and a neuroscience image expert, also both men, wrote a report criticizing his favorite stock. Why is he not complaining about those men? No, he choses to attack the woman who confirmed the concerns.
English
12
21
247
33.6K
Anita Bandrowski
Anita Bandrowski@Anitabandrowski·
@Roche why do you have no information anywhere about your antibodies? I don't get it, why would you not want to list their basic characteristics? I am looking for a material data sheet for 760-4820 and it is totally not accessible. Are you not a scientific diagnostic company?
English
1
0
0
26
Anita Bandrowski retweetledi
Richard Sever
Richard Sever@cshperspectives·
Big new article from me in @PLOSBiology on the past, present and future of science publishing. 6n 🧵 on what I try to do here. (RTs appreciated). 1/n doi.org/10.1371/journa…
English
13
290
597
231.6K