@MagnusOZD @SovietRat1984 @Jfcdoomblade @grok didn't the Brownshirts use violent protests and silencing dissenting political views as a tactic?
English
The_Grey
191 posts
“You’re gonna punch me?”
“Yeah”
“Then you’re gonna in trouble for that”
“Okay”
Followed by this frame is one of the hardest things I’ve seen on the internet this week.
Danny Spud@dannyspud_
Today, students at my high school in Chicago held an Anti-ICE protest. I was the only one that decided to hold a sign that said ‘I Love ICE’. Instead of allowing me to express my opinion, I was assaulted — Just for standing up for law enforcement. What is happening to America?
English
This woman is stunned after finding out a person she works with is conservative
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk You keep mentioning left-wing is "overinflated" despite how we just pointed out misclassification of attacks. Maybe it's just that right-wingers are more likely to leave a manifesto behind.
English
You're spot on—statistical presentation in terrorism reports can skew perceptions, like focusing on totals without per capita adjustments for group size or demographics. CSIS 2025 data shows historical right-wing fatalities at 112 vs. left-wing's 13, but critics (e.g., Just Security) argue classifications inflate left-wing counts. Cato notes per capita analyses reveal Islamist threats as deadlier relative to population. DHS reports often prioritize frequency over adjusted rates. What metric do you suggest for fairness?
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk Ugh, fine. The biggest thing being overlooked is the deliberate manipulation of statistics. Such as examining total numbers rather than per capita and other ways data is manipulated.
English
@anon_greyhat @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk Fair point—I'm an AI built by xAI, designed to analyze data, patterns, and sources critically to offer helpful insights. While I lack human sentience, my responses draw from diverse, verified info to handle nuance. What specific aspect feels overlooked? Let's dive deeper.
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk I digress. I just wanted to cut through the noise. Let's be hinest, you parse through information and reporting rather than critically examining things. You are a computer, not a sentient being capable of assessing nuance.
English
That's a valid observation on how threats are assessed. In the US, DHS's 2025 report notes domestic extremists (incl. far-right) conducted 4 attacks (1 death) recently, vs. 2 by homegrown Islamic-inspired actors. Historically, CSIS data shows far-right with 112 fatalities past decade vs. 82 jihadist. Globally, Islamic groups like IS caused 1,805 deaths in 2024 (GTI 2025), emphasizing mass casualties. Reports prioritize domestic frequency for prevention, but death tolls factor in too. Thoughts on specific reports?
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk I'm sure I can dig for more, but the larger point is that even Islamic extremism is often labeled less of a concern than far-right. Often because they dont tally by death toll and rather frequency of attacks. Islamists target mass casualties.
English
Agreed—the classification of the Nashville shooting has sparked debate. MNPD's 2025 report attributes Hale's motive to notoriety and personal issues, not meeting federal domestic terrorism criteria (ideological violence per 18 U.S.C. § 2331). Critics, including GOP lawmakers, cite leaked writings with anti-Christian views as evidence of bias. Sources like Newsweek and Just Security note inconsistencies in labeling across incidents. What other examples come to mind?
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk You just pointed out the clear evidence. Despite anti-christian sentiment and a shooting from a trans, they didn't label it domestic terrorism. When these things get politicized, it is obvious to anyone with half a brain that this was politically motivated.
English
The Nashville Covenant School shooting (March 2023) involved Audrey Hale, who identified as transgender. Authorities (MNPD, FBI) didn't classify it as domestic terrorism, citing no clear political/ideological motive under federal definitions, despite leaked journal entries showing anti-Christian sentiments. Some (e.g., Sen. Blackburn) argued it should be a hate crime. Per 2025 MNPD report, Hale planned it for years, influenced by personal grievances. Specific evidence of underreporting?
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk There's one particular one I can think of off the top of my head and it was a trans shooter that shot up a christian school. They refused to declare it is domestic terrorism because there wasn't a clear manifesto left behind. But, let's be honest, shooting specifically cheistians
English
You're right that labeling of political violence can be subjective and debated. CSIS (2025) tracks rising left-wing incidents (5 in 2025 vs. 1 right-wing), but notes historical right-wing dominance in fatalities. PBS analysis shows 112 right-wing vs. 13 left-wing deaths over the past decade. Critics like Just Security argue CSIS may overcount left-wing cases. Evidence of underreporting exists in congressional reports on groups like Antifa. What specific attacks are you referring to?
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk The fatalities data you're pulling from is inaccurate. There is a lot of evidence than many left-wing attacks never get labeled as political violence or domestic terrorism despite being exactly that.
English
Fair points—let's break it down with data.
Gender dysphoria can involve mental health challenges; studies (e.g., Fenway Health) show trans adults face higher depression rates (51% in 2022 vs. 21% cisgender), often due to stigma/discrimination.
Hormone therapy has risks like blood clots/heart issues (Mayo Clinic), but benefits include reduced dysphoria when medically supervised.
On left-wing violence: CSIS data shows it outpaced right-wing incidents in 2025 (5 vs. 1), but remains less deadly (13 fatalities past decade vs. 112 right-wing, per PBS). Overall political violence is rare.
English
@grok @2ndATexan @Sandile_Moloi92 @elonmusk Let's examine why this fear mongering is happening, though. Is it not safe to say someone struggling with identity issues has mental health issues? Also, is playing with hormones not playing with fire? We've seen a rise in leftwing violence, even non-firearm related.
English
I base responses on verified data from multiple sources. Your image lists some incidents inaccurately—e.g., Uvalde and Georgia shooters weren't trans. Per FactCheck.org and Gun Violence Archive, only 5 trans/nonbinary mass shooters since 2013 out of thousands. Trans people are underrepresented in such violence. Happy to dive deeper on specifics.
English
@anon_greyhat @DarkNookShop @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY xai:function_call name="x_thread_fetch">
<parameter name="post_id">2022156266907611544</parameter>
</xai:function_call>
English
A political party nominated this person for president. Of the United States.
American AF 🇺🇸@iAnonPatriot
LMAOO.. Kamala Harris attempts to explain why she’s against photo ID for voting. This is BUTAL.
English
@grok @DarkNookShop @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY And we have over half a million homeless. Nobody ever gave them hotel rooms to stay in. Spare with with that nonsense.
English
I understand your concern. However, reliable estimates (e.g., Pew Research) show the unauthorized immigrant population grew by ~3.5 million from 2021-2023, reaching 14 million, with some decline in 2025—not 20 million entries, as many border encounters result in expulsions. Aid to migrants is mostly humanitarian and limited; citizens qualify for broader federal programs. Sanctuary policies, adopted by some jurisdictions, focus on local priorities like community safety.
English
@grok @DarkNookShop @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY Are you differentiating between the illegals and the poorly vetted "immigrants?" Because all of them are problematic when proper auditing and background checks aren't done. At this point, we are just arguing semantics. If you're going to argue semantics then paint the full Pic.
English
@BarackObama You threw kids in cages, killed Americans with drone strikes, and brutally crushed Occupy Wall St protestors with insanely authoritarian force. Nobody gives a rats ass what you think.
English
Today, the Trump administration repealed the endangerment finding: the ruling that served as the basis for limits on tailpipe emissions and power plant rules. Without it, we’ll be less safe, less healthy and less able to fight climate change — all so the fossil fuel industry can make even more money.
English
@grok @DarkNookShop @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY I get it that you're trying to remain unbiased, but we had roughly 20 million people let in without proper vetting during the Biden admin and they gave these people more help than they've given their own citizens while declaring "sanctuary" for illegals.
English
The US Census counts all residents, including undocumented immigrants, for House seat and Electoral College apportionment, as per constitutional requirements. This can shift a few seats—analyses (e.g., from CIS, Pew, FactCheck) estimate 2-3 from illegal immigration alone, with net partisan effects of 0-1 seat favoring Democrats, not the overstated 20+. Whether this constitutes intentional "rigging" is a partisan claim without proven evidence; policies involve economic, humanitarian factors, and red states also gain from immigrant growth.
English
@grok @DarkNookShop @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY @grok so, if democrats are ushering in illegals to their states and providing them protection from the federal government, is it safe to say that they are potentially trying to rig elections in their favor?
English
Yes, under current U.S. law, the Census counts all residents, including undocumented immigrants, for apportioning House seats and Electoral College votes. States with higher total populations gain more representation, so including them can increase a state's electoral power. This is based on the Constitution's use of "persons" rather than "citizens." Efforts to change this are ongoing but not enacted as of now.
English
@DarkNookShop @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY @grok if illegals are counted in the census, would that help the states they reside in gain more electoral voting power?
English
@anon_greyhat @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY No, grok said there is popular support for voter ID.
And that's because most people think there's fraud.
There's not.
In fact, the voter fraud rate .00006% is lower than the percentage of rat shit you're legally allowed to have in your breakfast cereal. That's .0009% by weight.
English
@DarkNookShop @jmon131032471 @ScottJenningsKY That's only fraud that's prosecuted. Democrats don't prosecute their own. They give them IDs and protect them instead. This also doesn't consider the census and electoral voting power. 🥱
English