English
Anyonymous
402 posts
English
I wish this trend of women taking off their hijab and posting the before/after as a trend stops
English
@Ali_Storage @namelessfard You can still name your preferences. It is still haram to deceive.
English
@namelessfard Because it's nonsensical, if you want to ask a God fearing woman she would be insulted
a non pious woman would just lie
If you want to test via first blood half of women don't get it, and there are many ways to emulate it happening
You can never be sure that's the thing
English
People are reacting very negatively to this post. I am struggling to see the motive for such strong reactions.
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@namelessfard I would say, it is a false sense of rahmah. If someone wants a virgin wife, he would also reject divorced women, but it is somehow wrong, when it comes to ex-fornicators according to some.
English
A woman asking for financial security is her RIGHT and a man’s RESPONSIBILITY, a man/woman demanding “virginity” for marriage isn’t their right becs u can’t have conditions over someone’s past, put conditions for their future as u both please.
Pathetic take, may Allah guide u.
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@anonymousSE2025 @whysomeanAhmad the entire concept of repentance is getting cleared of the sin. sure you can have a preference but dont insult Allahs mercy by judging someone based on sins Allah mightve forgiven them for
English
Freely commit zina, get into haram relationships, increase your body count, then repent before marriage. After that, if someone asks for a clean past, just say that revealing past sins is itself a sin. That’s the logic of brainless pseudo feminists
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@anonymousSE2025 @whysomeanAhmad @albxtraoz He married 10. Only 1 was. His first was a widow and 15 years older. He didn't tell you otherwise with his lifestyle. Sit down and stop disrespecting the religion
English
@mafkrocap1 It is about virginity. Divorced women are also not virgin, and it matters with them, too.
English
@kaialuvtae @whysomeanAhmad I don't speak about exposing sins, but having preferences.
English
@anonymousSE2025 @whysomeanAhmad I don’t know where you all are bringing this from nikkah is not a business contract its different and proof of virginity is definitely not a part of it. All major scholars say asking women to expose their sins after they repent is not allowed.
English
@potato_coush The Prophet also generally advised men to marry virgins.
English
Though it's a ragebait but.....
Our deen says man is bound to fulfil the promises he makes at the time of nikah, fixed pocket money, no polygamy etc.
Man can't dig his woman's past (it's for both though).
Hehe go cry hard
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@kaialuvtae @whysomeanAhmad Assuming good is correct, but in a contract this does not work like that. You don't ask directly, you give a list, for example, and give the other party the benefit of doubt like saying "If you don't fulfil anything leave the meeting please" without saying the specific reason.
English
@anonymousSE2025 @whysomeanAhmad All unmarried people are assumed to be chaste unless you have evidence otherwise, how would you even know unless you ask them? Asking about someone’s sins is not allowed & she is within her right not to tell you her sins The one who repents is like the one who hasnt sinned at all
English
@sarcastic_hn2 @Poonch_History According to the majority of madhabs the condition is valid and according to all madhabs it is sinful to deceive.
English
@Poonch_History Marrying virgins is recommended, not obligatory. The Prophet SAWW married non-virgins too.
Preference is fine, but Shariah never made it a condition or a right to demand.
English
The hypocrisy is yours, not society’s. Demanding “virginity and a clear past” is not a right, its you trying to police and control a woman’s past because you cant provide the same financial security. Stop pretending its the same thing. One is Shariah-given, the other is just ego.
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@whysomeanAhmad The Messenger (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “The one who repents from sin is like one who did not sin at all.” Narrated by Ibn Maajah, 4250.. this applies to all sins done privately..If Allah has forgiven someone who are you to ask them to reveal their sins?
English
@danyasaqiib @whysomeanAhmad The Prophet generally advised to marry virgins and repentance doesn't undo the past experiences.
English
@whysomeanAhmad Allah himself has allowed repentance and forgiveness for all sins. your hyper fixation on someones past is your problem, but saying its ‘brainless logic’ is really disrespectful to even Allah whos promised mercy. these people can be better muslims than you for all u know lol
English
English
@whysomeanAhmad @albxtraoz No ahmad. One is a right and what you are asking is preference. Both aren't the same. Islam didn't make it a thing cz there is no way one can determine virginity. Hymen doesn't prove it as well. Same goes for men. Imagine a woman preference as a chaste virgin husband. Impossible
English
@IbneKhan01 @whysomeanAhmad Ok, you are most probably referring to the clause of polygny, it is enforceable in the Hanbali madhab and it is still sinful to deceive according to all madhabs.
English
@IbneKhan01 @whysomeanAhmad But sinful to deceive. And according to the majority of scholars it is enforceable. (See Ibni Taymiyyah)
English
@whysomeanAhmad It is allowed to make virginity a condition and it is sinful to deceive. This isn't the same as exposing sins. Indeed, the Prophet generally advised to marry virgins.
English
@o_c_oh @whysomeanAhmad The Prophet advised to marry virgins.
English
@whysomeanAhmad A person being so much interested in past shouldn't marry at first place as he/she is suffering from some mental illness that can corrupt marriage. Eventually you will impose unnecessary guards or boundaries merely on the basis of a doubt, and it's enough to make life a hellhole
English