Francis Anthony

@FreeMsian He set up ABN… a cable tv network….supposedly a serious competitor to Astro… loan in excess of 250 million from BPMB… what a rip-off…

Man took a RM450 million from Bank Pembangunan (Malaysians) during era of Rosmah Mansor and never paid back. I suppose that money we can only demand in next world.

@therapeuticvids Punch in 10 years time

😂 Look at this clever Punch Kun Zookeepers just handed him the keys from inside the gate… and looks like he already knows exactly what they’re for Watch him carefully inspecting each key like: “Hmm… which one opens the gate boss? 🗝️🐒

@YbPertikaian Parti Kicap Rakyat

[Mahu Malukan Rafizi, Tapi Sebenarnya Hina Peserta IPR] - “Lain kali kalau pilih menteri ekonomi kena pilih baik-baik” - “RM750j dipakai utk vending machine nak jual nasi lemak." - “Kita keadaan ekonomi macam ni, tapi yang digunakan macam tu” Serius aku nak tanya, ini Konvensyen PKR ke atau pentas Raja Lawak? @datoramanan kau sedar tak apa yang kau cakap tu sebenarnya bukan setakat sindir Rafizi, tapi secara tak langsung kau “ludah” muka PMX @anwaribrahim sendiri? “Lain kali pilih Menteri Ekonomi kena pilih baik-baik” Eh hanat! Siapa kau yang nak bagi nasihat macam tu? Jadi apa tujuan kau nak bagitahu satu dewan tu? Nak malukan Rafizi atau kau memang nak tunjuk lagak “this is my floor” kau boleh nak cakap suka hati mak bapak kau depan PMX. Macam tu? Lepas tu kau petik angka RM750 juta konon “nak jual nasi lemak guna vending machine”. Ini lagi satu masalah kau ni. Suka main petik nombor, lepas tu pusing cerita bagi nampak bodoh. RM750 juta tu keseluruhan pakej program IPR (INTAN, INSAN, IKHSAN) bukan projek vending machine semata-mata. Yang vending machine tu cuma sebahagian kecil (INSAN). Tapi kau sumbat jadikan jumlah semua itu untuk “jual nasi lemak” je? Dah la kau main tembak program IPR tu, hal yang paling aku tak boleh terima bila kau petik “hanya nak jual nasi lemak” tu sebenarnya kau dah hina senua peserta program IPR tu. Kau ingat peserta Program IPR tu siapa? Dorang tu bukan kroni dan bukan ada kabel. Majoriti mereka dari golongan B40/M40 yang dah setahun lebih join program tu dan dah mula jana pendapatan. (Lihat video). Kau berlagak atas pentas mengata ke kerajaan bagi peruntukan untuk program IPR tu macam membazir, tapi kau sedar tak kau tengah perlekeh usaha orang cari makan? Aku tak tau kari apa kau makan sampai kau merepek “Keadaan ekonomi macam ni, tapi digunakan macam tu”? Program IPR dah start sejak 2023. Ini bukan projek baru semalam dirasmikan macam madani mart tu la mangkuk! Tak ada kena mengena pun dengan “ekonomi sekarang” yang kau cuba spin tu. Jadi apa sebenarnya point kau? Nak kritik polisi? Langsung tak tepat. Nak jadi hero? Tak kena tempat dan tak ada gaya langsung. Nak jadi kelakar? Baik kau jadi badut sarkis je lah. Bagi aku kau sudah buka pekung kau sendiri yang langsung tak tahu beza antara beradab dengan biadab dan beza kritik berfakta dengan sembang kosong kedai mamak. Macam ni cara kau nak yakinkan anggota parti dan pengundi yang kau mampu deliver 80 kerusi untuk PKR di PRU16 akan datang? Ghuyub!!! Tegas Savage Rebel #TSR

@amanshah_sp @alif_haidar @amer7211 @RajaKucing_YNWA Parti Kicap Rakyat

Bodoh nya Ramanan.. Guna pentas Konvensyen atrack Rafizi Ramli .. Tup2 bila YB Hassan Karim bangun tegur... tiba-tiba video dipotong gitu ja.. memalukan... Itu lah padahnya bila kutip sisa pepejal dari MIC.. 🤮 @alif_haidar @amer7211 @RajaKucing_YNWA #ExMicSampah

@mkini_bm Parti Kicap Rakyat

Bekas timbalan presiden PKR, Rafizi Ramli mendakwa presiden parti, Anwar Ibrahim merayu kepadanya dengan genangan air mata supaya bersetuju membenarkan ahli perniagaan, R Ramanan bertanding sebagai calon pada pilihan raya umum ke-15 lalu. Rafizi berkata dia memberitahu Anwar bahawa keputusan akhir terletak di tangan presiden PKR, namun selaku timbalan presiden dia meminta Anwar berjanji untuk tidak melantik Ramanan ke sebarang jawatan dalam parti mahupun kerajaan. “Saya tetap tidak berganjak dan menyatakan keputusan Jawatankuasa Calon bahawa R Sivarasa adalah calon yang lebih sesuai dari segenap aspek. “Akhirnya, Datuk Seri Anwar, dalam keadaan kami sama-sama duduk, memegang lutut saya dan merayu untuk lepaskan Ramanan jadi calon." Berita penuh: malaysiakini.com/news/771982

@amerhadiazmi It’s not just shocking but a global embarrassment.. but then again, even the foreign worker centralized management system is privatized at huge costs to the public. Nothing surprising with the government of the day anymore.

Isn’t it concerning that the security of our passports, ID cards and digital ID systems can be at the mercy of “boardroom tussles”?

@rafiziramli From reformasi to reformafia… at the end reformati

IT WASN’T ME 🤣 Kecoh pasal ahli parlimen PKR terima RM9.5 juta dari Victor Chin. Terima lemak di perut bahana raya ✅ Terima RM9.5j ❎ Tapi sebab masih mood raya, saya komen esok saja lah 😂

@IvarCripple @Rodziah_Ismail @Tok_Hang67 Hehehe 😂

@Rodziah_Ismail @Tok_Hang67 Setiap kali Ramadan, Mr. R akan tiba

MP PKR “Mr R” 🤔. For sure not Rodziah !! Silap lah kalau nak babitkn saya. Agak2 siapa yg dikatakan?? #LawanRasuahHabis2n

@NST_Online We know exactly what you would do, like how you tried to screw MH before… privatize the profits, corporatize the debts..take all the profitable routes and pass to MH all the non-lucrative routes.. and take the profits but transfer debts to MH.

#NSTsports "Fernandes would be willing to lead FAM and take Malaysian football from its current low point," said a source close to the businessman. bit.ly/46PeyLc

My 2sen: If Najib wants to win his appeal, his lawyers only need to provide evidence that the donation was from the Arab prince is real and does exists. All they need to do is produce a letter signed by the relevant authorities. Easy, right? The problem is that no Arab

@malaymail So why are the first two lanes closed ? Only for VIPs?

Malaysia Airports has begun fully enforcing the Vehicle Access Management System (VAMS) at KLIA to improve traffic flow at the terminal kerbside. Vehicles are allowed a maximum of 10 minutes for pick-ups and drop-offs, with fines applied for longer stays. So remember, there are alternative waiting options if you need extra time!

@Wisdom_HQ 2

@NyakundiReport It’s about time to ban all kinds of animal rides globally. This is profiteering at the expense of animal slavery and cruelty.

A recent incident at Shelly Beach in Likoni has drawn public attention after a camel appearing frail and weak appeared to be forced by a handler to stand, sparking concerns about animal welfare in the popular tourist activity. The case has renewed discussions about ethical treatment and proper care of animals used in commercial tourism.

@Beno10_MFC 8

How many dots do you see?? 🤔 Many have Failed. 🤦‍♂️

@wallstengine It’s a human

XPENG recently dropped its next-gen iron humanoid robot… Is that thing human or actually a real robot? I’ll believe whatever wins in the comments

@stfuesh Godzilla

@Jimgymgem12345 @WesternLensman A good read.

The Dangerous Seed: How Democratic Messaging on "Illegal Orders" Undermines Military Discipline and the Chain of Command In recent weeks, a video produced and circulated by Democratic lawmakers and aligned activists has gone viral among military audiences. Featuring prominent figures warning service members that they must refuse to obey "illegal" or "unconstitutional" orders from a president, the clip frames itself as a patriotic reminder of the oath to the Constitution. Yet beneath the noble rhetoric lies a far more corrosive message—one that plants doubt, fear, and hesitation in the minds of the very men and women tasked with executing lawful orders without question. Military effectiveness has always rested on one foundational principle: instantaneous, unquestioning obedience to lawful authority. The soldier, sailor, airman, or Marine does not pause on the battlefield to consult a constitutional scholar or convene a debate about the legality of a command. From the moment the order is given, the presumption is that it is lawful unless it is manifestly, obviously criminal—ordering the massacre of civilians, for example. This bright-line rule is not bureaucratic rigidity; it is the only way a military force can function under fire. The Democratic video deliberately blurs that line. By repeatedly invoking the specter of "illegal orders" without defining what constitutes one (beyond vague references to domestic deployment or political loyalty), it injects uncertainty into the one place uncertainty cannot exist: the mind of the warfighter. A young sergeant hearing that he might one day be asked to "choose between the Constitution and the President" does not file that away as abstract civics. He internalizes it as a live possibility. Every future order now carries a shadow question: "Is this the illegal one they warned me about?" That hesitation—however brief—is the seed of chaos.History is littered with examples of armies paralyzed by politicized doubt. The French Army in 1917 nearly collapsed when soldiers, bombarded with socialist propaganda about the war's legitimacy, began questioning orders en masse. The Russian military's performance in the early stages of the Ukraine conflict suffered when junior officers, steeped in years of state media questioning Western motives, hesitated to execute aggressive maneuvers. In both cases, the damage was not caused by actual illegal orders but by the prior planting of suspicion that any order might be illegitimate. The analogy is stark: imagine handing every rifleman a memo warning that his weapon "might be defective and could explode in his face" while refusing to specify which weapons or under what conditions. The rational response is not heightened safety—it is widespread hesitation to fire at all. The Democratic video functions as precisely that memo for the American military: a preemptive warning that the Commander-in-Chief might issue defective orders, without ever clearly identifying what those defects would look like. This is not mere political rhetoric; it is a direct assault on Article II of the Constitution, which vests plenary authority in the President as Commander-in-Chief. The Framers deliberately concentrated military authority in one civilian to prevent precisely the kind of fractured, politicized chain of command that arises when subordinates are encouraged to second-guess their superiors based on partisan messaging. The proper mechanism for checking presidential overreach already exists: Congress controls funding and declarations of war, the courts can rule on constitutionality after the fact, and service members retain the narrow right to refuse manifestly illegal orders. What does not exist—and should never exist—is a system where political parties produce campaign-style videos encouraging troops to treat every future presidential directive with suspicion. The Democratic leadership knows this. Their video is not a civics lesson; it is psychological preparation for resistance. By sowing doubt now, they create the conditions under which future lawful orders—perhaps involving border security, disaster response, or civil unrest—can be portrayed as the very "illegal" commands they warned about years earlier. In the end, the damage is done long before any specific order is given. The seed is planted. The hesitation is cultivated. And when the moment of crisis arrives, the American military—once the most disciplined and apolitical in the world—will have been primed by one political party to question the very authority the Constitution vests in the presidency. That is not defense of the Constitution. That is the quiet subversion of it.

Slotkin invokes Nuremberg in her defense of Democrat 'illegal orders’ video: “'Well, they told me to do it' is not an excuse…People were prosecuted." Democrats are threatening legal retaliation as an intimidation tactic. Same thing they’ve been doing to ICE agents.

@AntiLeftMemes A stripper

@GuntherEagleman Turned out he was the ‘Brokeback Barack’ instead 🤣

LOL!!! Hakeem Jeffries said he was the "Brooklyn Barack" in an email to Jeffrey Epstein begging for money! 🤣🤣🤣

@Matt_Pinner Lychee

Gun to your head, name a fruit without the letter A