St George Crusader

A Reminder of the Real Architect Behind This Saga This entire Brereton saga was orchestrated from the top by then-ADF Chief General Angus Campbell (2018–2024) in a blatantly political, virtue-signalling, left-ideological manner. From the timing to the wording, the whole affair reeks of national betrayal by the Chief of the Defence Force. 1. It began with a "Welcome to Country" .seriously! 2. The damning quote that defined the narrative: "The report finds that some Special Air Service Regiment commanders in Australia fostered within the SAS what Justice Brereton terms a self-centred warrior culture, a misplaced focus on prestige, status and power, turning away from the Regiment’s heritage of military excellence fused with the quiet humility of service." What the hell does "self-centred warrior culture" even mean? Special Forces selection and operations are built on high performance, aggressive mindset, mental toughness, and an unapologetic competitive warrior ethos — exactly the qualities required to hunt and defeat hardened insurgents in brutal combat. Labelling these traits as a "misplaced focus on prestige, status and power" is a direct ideological attack on what makes SAS soldiers effective in the first place. "Quiet humility" sounds like a corporate HR seminar platitude, not the reality of small SAS patrols operating with extreme autonomy under relentless stress during repeated high-intensity deployments in Afghanistan. 3. The dangerous implication By framing "self-centred warrior culture" as the root problem, the statement strongly implied that the broader SAS identity and leadership culture either enabled or actively encouraged the alleged crimes. This fed the toxic "bad culture" narrative that was then used to justify sweeping reforms, endless unit reviews, and the initial push for collective punishment — including the attempted revocation of the Meritorious Unit Citation. Many veterans saw this as classic scapegoating: smear the Regiment’s culture to deflect from uncomfortable questions about flawed strategy, restrictive rules of engagement, excessive rotation cycles, command oversight failures, and accountability at much higher levels. 4. Public humiliation by design Campbell didn’t deliver this internally to the military. He chose to read it aloud in a formal national press conference, with the full weight of his office and the national media watching. The emotive, loaded language was broadcast widely, generating predictable headlines about the SAS’s “misguided warrior culture” and “profound betrayal.” This wasn’t oversight, it was deliberate. It publicly shamed the Regiment, handed propaganda gifts to Australia’s adversaries, and perfectly aligned with the ADF’s longer-term internal agenda of “culture change”, prioritising progressive organisational values over raw combat effectiveness. 5. Sweeping condemnation of the entire Regiment The Brereton Report itself examined specific incidents, individual patrols, and a limited subset of personnel. Yet Campbell presented it as a sweeping indictment of the SAS ethos itself. Elite operators who had served multiple combat tours were effectively painted as arrogant prestige-seekers rather than highly skilled professionals operating in one of the most extreme, high-risk, high-tempo environments imaginable. ADF Chief General Angus Campbell never faced real backlash for his actions.

One must wonder if the @AusFedPolice hadn't spent the last 10 years going after BRS they might have not let Sajid and Naveed Akram, the Bondi terrorists, slip through the cracks and 15 Australians might still be alive Krissy Barrett you must resign now

@VoteLewko @AFPAssociation have no credibility. Krissy Barrett is a joke posing with her participation medals. Its DEI hires like this explains why crime is rampant across the country

Watching AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett's press conference on the allegations against Ben Roberts-Smith I'm reminded she claimed the Islamist terror attack at Bondi Beach was "not motivated by religion".

@JimThom90458694 @Channel9 This is disgraceful. Boycott channel 9 advertisers until he is gone

Let's make this fcuking dog famous🤬🤬🤬 #IStandWithBenRobertsSmith #Hero #fcuktheAFP #FcukNickMcKenzie @Ageinvestigates 🤮🤮🤮

@jgrogan222 Andrew Hastie is finished. ONE NATION is our only path to get Australia back

Where is Andrew Hastie's presence on X? He says he has leadership ambitions, but is he afraid of scrutiny?

@telesynth_hot Boycott @Channel9

Peak insult when a muslim girl reports on our hero, Ben Roberts-Smith.

@RadioGenoa This is a long time coming.

Clashes between British patriots and Islamic immigrants in London. The UK is about to implode.

The Australian government is running Arabic language ads encouraging foreign non-citizens to access the “First Home Owner’s Grant” - subsidising non-citizens to buy homes in Australia even if they have property overseas. The First Home Owner scheme allows non-citizens to purchase homes in Australia with a 5% deposit, regardless of whether they own a home overseas. The Australian government acts as a guarantor for the remaining 15 per cent of the deposits, allowing the first homebuyer to avoid paying lenders mortgage insurance (LMI). Just unbelievable how badly our country is managed

Breaking: Ben Roberts-Smith's lawyers offered in writing to the AFP to make him available to authorities to be arrested, but instead, we got that spectacle yesterday. #Credlin The AFP brought a media team to Sydney to manage the show. Outrageous, Krissy Barrett should be sacked.

🔥BREAKING 🔥 A Muslim woman has been charged after attempting to drown her two young daughters by throwing them in the Georges River at Liverpool. ‘Go to heaven now’ she tells them. Remigration NOW!

This is the state of our country today. Unfucking believable.

What on earth is Australia doing🤦🏽‍♀️🤯 #australianews #australiangovernment #australiapolitics

@orlaminihane Does he have life threatening injuries that may result in his death? Asking for 3 innocent girls at a dance party

What a terrible shame… 🙄

Something is really bothering me about the Ben Roberts-Smith case. Nobody likes being a hypocrite. Unlike most, I actually go for a walk when I suspect myself of being one. On one hand, this prosecution stinks of liberal bias. Out of thousands of potential war crimes cases the social justice warrior police chief could have pursued, she picked THE most decorated soldier on the entire continent. That isn’t justice. That’s a public humiliation ritual. On the other hand, I do believe actual war criminals should stand trial regardless of rank or honors. And I know what’s coming: “John, Roberts-Smith already lost the 2023 defamation case. Justice Besanko found he committed the murders.” Yes. On the balance of probabilities. 51 percent. That’s the civil standard. Criminal conviction requires 99 percent. The same fragile evidence that barely cleared a coin flip is now supposed to send a man to prison for life. Here’s why my post is not hypocrisy. When the school got hit in Iran weeks ago, I said mistakes aren’t war crimes, but if it was intentional or grossly negligent, someone should be court-martialed. That strike is recent. Physical. Investigable. The Roberts-Smith allegations are 20 years old. And here’s what the Brereton Inquiry, for all its 510 witnesses & four years of work, could never get: No crime scene access. The Taliban didn’t let investigators into Uruzgan. No Afghan witnesses interviewed. No secured scene. No blood-spatter analysis. No DNA No autopsies. No recovered bodies. No weapons tied to victims. The investigators themselves admitted they “lacked access to Afghan crime scenes and were missing the physical evidence that would normally anchor a murder prosecution.” So what’s left? Memory. Twenty-year-old memory from men in the fog of war. The science is unambiguous. Countless research studies confirms memory is reconstructive: later suggestion, media exposure, and repeated questioning distort it. This is the textbook misinformation effect. Confidence and accuracy decouple within months, let alone decades. Studies on soldiers who suffer PTSD show the gaps get even larger. I admittedly don’t know 🇦🇺 law but US courts admit decades-old testimony but warn juries it is inherently fragile, not scientific proof. Australia is treating it as load-bearing concrete. The media says “20 former soldiers testified against him.” Fine. Was all their testimony actually against him? How clear was it? Did 20 people watch him murder a civilian in broad daylight? And even if they did, you still have to prove the dead man wasn’t Taliban. In Uruzgan. In 2009. Without a body. Some will say I’m being pedantic. Yes. I. Am. Because Ben Roberts-Smith was charged with murder, and under war-crimes law the same act can be framed as murder, willful killing, or killing a person hors de combat depending on the framing. How it gets framed sets precedent for every future war. And here’s the question nobody in Canberra wants asked: Why is the trigger-puller in the dock while the officers who wrote the rules of engagement, approved the missions, and signed the after-action reports keep their pensions? The Victoria Cross winner hangs. The chain of command walks. Past “War crime” cases with more hard evidence remain “unsolved” That isn’t accountability. That’s a scapegoat ritual. You do not get a Victoria Cross just for killing. You get it for extraordinary gallantry, valour, self-sacrifice & devotion to duty in the presence of the enemy. And here is what Australia just told every soldier watching: the reward for a VC is fame which will make you a target for future show trials built on 20-year-old memories, prosecuted by a police chief with no combat but more ribbons on her uniform than you. If murder can be proven without hard evidence decades later. That isn’t justice even if he is guilty. Proof of guilt matters. That’s a Marxist humiliation ceremony leading to national strategic disarmament by lawfare.

Aussies are furious after learning nearly 50,000 immigrants have received government assistance to buy homes since mid-2023, in the middle of a housing crisis. "How is this not treason?"

@oelma__ I can fix her

What is your first thought when you see a Nose ring?

@Geniustechw Deport him - take him 20 miles off shore and then throw him off the boat

🚨 JUST IN — Pakistan migrant arrives in UK for only 5 days and tries to rape a 12yo girl and two 13yos. British patriots stopped him. What do we do with this monster? A. Life sentence B. Deport C. Execute and deport the remains

Your taxes are helping people who aren’t Australian citizens buy a first home in Australia. Not only are they pushing up home prices for everyone, they’re getting into a home that should have gone to an Australian citizen. Enough is enough. Cut off the benefits, cut migration, ban foreign ownership and start deporting.