Justin O'Brien

2.1K posts

Justin O'Brien banner
Justin O'Brien

Justin O'Brien

@anubis185

Father, brother, son, smartass. Not always in that order. Tweet about Browns out of love, about life bc you only have 1, & about politics because of you people

Chattanooga, TN Katılım Şubat 2011
648 Takip Edilen159 Takipçiler
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@Steven16597781 @RobertKennedyJr What you are being told here is that some people don’t understand satire, and obviously aren’t familiar with the author. Though it’s amusing watching people try to sound smart when they are actively being made to look dumb.
English
0
0
0
15
Steven
Steven@Steven16597781·
Now understand exactly what you are being told here. In the simplest, and possibly grossest of terms, you were mind fucked for 11 years. 11 years many of you were treated like toddlers and molded into a mindset that will take some effort on your part to undo. Many of you lack the will or the insight or even the capacity to see what is going on. Like our friend Socrates once said, the unexamined life is not worth living.
English
1
0
0
66
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Robert F. Kennedy Jr@RobertKennedyJr·
Superb dissection of the shocking collapse of liberal comedy. This is the best explanation of how we've reached the nader where Late Night host Jimmy Kimmel can say “It’s not my job to be funny.” As this author shows, he was hired as a comedian but he made himself a priest.
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

I am the Senior Vice President of Late Night Strategy at CBS. I am the person who turned a comedian into a priest and charged advertisers to watch the congregation. I want to be precise about what I built. Not a comedy show. A permission structure. For eleven years, six million Americans tuned in every night to find out what they were allowed to believe by morning. We didn't sell jokes. We sold certainty. Certainty costs nothing to produce. People will pay anything for it. We charged $50 million a year and still lost money because it turns out permission is even cheaper than we thought. In 2014, we had a genuinely dangerous comedian. A man who once testified before Congress in character as a fictional conservative pundit and made the entire chamber look like they'd been pantsed on C-SPAN. His fake persona was the most brilliant satire on television. Layered. Ironic. Unpredictable. The character could say anything because nothing was real. The character was the art. The character was the comedian. We killed the character and put the real man on stage. The real man was a lecturer. Earnest. Thoughtful. Correct about everything. Correct is not funny. Correct is not dangerous. Correct is the absence of danger. We promoted the absence of danger and called it growth. His character could make a Senate committee squirm. The real him makes an audience nod. Nodding pays the same as squirming. Nodding is easier to produce. His final words on air were "We love doing this show for you, but what we really, really love is doing this show with you." The audience wept. I wrote that line. Not the words. The architecture that made those words feel true. For eleven years, the audience believed they were participants. They were not participants. They were the product. "With you" is what you say to a congregation. A comedian says "at you." We hadn't said "at you" since 2015. Our internal metric was called Affirm Rate. It measured the percentage of monologue segments that generated applause instead of laughter. I invented this metric. I also invented the bonus structure tied to it. In 2015, our Affirm Rate was 34%. By 2022, it was 94%. I received a raise every year. We are crushing it. At the things I made up. That's performance management. But I need to tell you about the real discovery. The one I put in a deck called "Content Strategy 2019-2024." The one that got me promoted. Agreement gets applause. I knew that early. But correction — telling the audience their vocabulary is slightly outdated, their outrage is aimed two degrees off-center, their feelings are valid but their phrasing needs work — correction gets them back tomorrow. Agreement is a transaction. Correction is a subscription. We converted a comedy show into a nightly software update for moral vocabulary. Churn was near zero. They couldn't afford to miss an episode. Missing an episode meant using last week's words in this week's meeting. That's social death. We monetized the fear of social death and called it entertainment. I want to be honest about something. The content was not bipartisan. We chose a side. But I need you to understand: we did not choose it because we believed in it. We chose it because that side's audience is more responsive to correction. They want to be updated. They want to be told their language is outdated. They experience correction as care. The other side does not respond to correction. They respond to provocation. Provocation is harder to monetize. You can't build a subscription on provocation because the audience doesn't come back to learn — they come back to fight. Fighting is unpredictable. Correction is scheduled. We optimized for the audience that wants to be told what to think. That audience leaned one direction. That's not ideology. That's market segmentation. The writers' room had a whiteboard. In 2015 it said "What's funny?" In 2018 it said "What should they feel?" By 2021 it said "What are they still saying wrong?" I watched that whiteboard evolve like a finch beak and I never intervened. The market was speaking. We listened. Listening to the market is the same as leading the audience. They can't tell the difference. A writer named Marcus raised his hand in 2019. "What if we just tried to make them laugh again?" I thanked him for his passion and scheduled a creative alignment conversation. He transferred to streaming development within the month. The Affirm Rate the week he left was 91%. Laughter would have brought it down. That's risk management. Here is what nobody will say out loud. I will say it because I am proud of it. We made our audience worse at politics. Not better. Worse. Every night for eleven years, we expressed their outrage for them. Professionally. With a band and good lighting. And because the outrage had been expressed — because a man in a suit had furrowed his brow with the precise calibrated degree of indignation — they didn't need to express it themselves. They watched. They clapped. They felt the catharsis of resistance without resisting anything. They went to bed having done nothing and feeling like they'd done something. That's the product. Not comedy. Not information. Catharsis. Catharsis is the enemy of action. A man who has screamed into a pillow does not then also scream in the street. We were the pillow. A $50 million pillow with a house band. If you feel the outrage has been expressed for you, you will not march. You will not organize. You will not call your representative. You will tune in tomorrow to feel it expressed again. That's retention. Our retention was extraordinary. I want to talk about the comedy-to-catechism pipeline because I think people underestimate what we achieved. Stage one: comedian makes jokes about the powerful. Audience laughs because the powerful are absurd. This is the Carlin model. The jester punches up. Everyone below feels relief. Stage two: comedian makes jokes about people who disagree with the audience. Audience laughs because disagreement is stupid. The jester has turned around. He's still on the stage but now he's facing the crowd with a pointer. Stage three: comedian stops making jokes. Comedian identifies incorrect beliefs and explains why they're dangerous. Audience does not laugh. Audience claps. The jester is gone. In his place: a hall monitor with a desk and a band. Stage four: audience watches not for entertainment but for certification. Having seen last night's episode means you know which words are current. Not having seen it means you might use yesterday's vocabulary in today's meeting. The show is no longer comedy. It is a credential. Watching it means you are educated. Not watching means you are the person being discussed. We made a show that you watch to prove you're not the kind of person who doesn't watch it. That's a closed loop. Closed loops don't need content. They need continuity. We provided continuity for $50 million a year. A comedian — whose entire historical function was to say things too dangerous for anyone else to say — became the person who decides which things are too dangerous for anyone to say. And the audience applauded. Every night. For 2,500 nights. Because being told what is forbidden feels exactly like being told what you already knew. Prohibition performed as validation. I put that in the deck too. Our audience was correct about everything. I know this because they applauded everything we said. The applause proved the correctness. The correctness justified the applause. We called this audience research. The methodology was peer-reviewed by the audience. They approved unanimously. Every night. The actually funny comedians left. They went to podcasts. To clubs. To rooms where the audience doesn't know what's coming and that uncertainty is the point. They took the laughter with them. We kept the applause. We called those spaces problematic. That's market differentiation. The problematic spaces are funnier. But funny is not our product. We lost $40 million a year. We didn't lose it because the show failed. We lost it because we spent $50 million producing what a podcast host in his garage gives away between mattress ads. The podcast is funnier. The podcast is more dangerous. The podcast has an audience that laughs instead of claps. But we had the Ed Sullivan Theater. We had 461 seats. We had a former Beatle play the farewell episode. Paul McCartney, Elvis Costello, Jon Batiste, and Louis Cato playing "Hello, Goodbye" like it was a benediction. I booked a Beatle for a funeral. The Beatles played that stage in 1964 and the audience screamed so loud you couldn't hear the music. Our audience didn't scream. They wept politely. That's the difference between entertainment and church. We ran a church. Jon Stewart showed up to the finale and did a bit where he pretended to deliver a corporate statement from Paramount about the cancellation. The audience laughed. It was the first time they laughed in a way I didn't recognize. Involuntary. Surprised. Dangerous. For ninety seconds, a comedian was in that building. Then it was over. John Oliver said "At some point, this may come for all of our shows" and then added "but Stephen, what's important to remember is that tonight, it is going to eat you." The audience laughed again. Involuntary again. Two moments of actual comedy in a three-hour farewell. Both of them about death. The finale drew 6.74 million viewers. Biggest weeknight audience in our history. More people came to the funeral than ever visited the patient. I know what they were mourning. Not comedy. The comedy died in 2016. Not the man. The man is fine. He's wealthy. What they mourned was the permission structure. Starting today, they have to decide what to believe on their own. They have to form an opinion without waiting for a man behind a desk to form it first and deliver it with a knowing look. Some of them haven't done that since 2015. The funeral wasn't for the show. It was for the certainty. He joked about the Peanuts theme music licensing cost on his last night. "Oh no! I hope this doesn't cost CBS any money!" The audience laughed. It was a joke about money. About the network losing money. The last joke was about money. Not about truth. Not about power. About a licensing fee for a cartoon piano riff. Eleven years and the final joke was about accounting. I think that's perfect. The show was always about accounting. We just dressed it up as conscience. The President of the United States — the man we spent eleven years explaining was dangerous to an audience that already believed he was dangerous — posted an AI-generated video of our host being thrown into a dumpster on the Late Show set. Then Trump danced to "YMCA" in the clip. Viewed more times in four hours than our farewell managed in a week. His production cost: zero. Ours: negative $50 million a year. We manufactured his relevance every night at 11:35 for eleven years and he never paid us a dime. We were his marketing department. He turned our funeral into content. His ROI was infinite. Ours required a write-off and a farewell concert. The Strike Force Five — Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, Oliver — appeared in a segment about late-night losing "one middle-aged white man who makes jokes about the news." They were joking about their own obsolescence. All of them know. None of them will say it. The format is dead. The audience moved to phones. The phones don't have desks or bands. The phones have men in garages who are allowed to be wrong, allowed to be surprised, allowed to say something their audience hasn't already approved. That's comedy. We stopped doing that a decade ago. We did approval. Approval looks like comedy from a distance. Up close it's church. I do not feel guilt. Guilt would require me to believe I took something from them. I didn't take anything. They came to us. Every night. They chose the catechism over the comedy. They preferred correction over surprise. Certainty over danger. Instruction over laughter. They wanted to be told. Not challenged. Not shocked. Not made to laugh against their will at something they didn't see coming. They wanted to see it coming. They wanted to mouth along. That's not comedy. That's karaoke. We ran the most expensive karaoke bar in television history and the only miscalculation was charging a cover when the songs are free on every phone. We turned a jester into a priest. We turned an audience into a congregation. We turned laughter into obedience. We turned political engagement into passive consumption. We turned a comedy show into a permission structure and charged $50 million a year to tell people what they already believed in a voice slightly nicer than their own. They were so grateful they showed up to mourn us. 6.74 million of them. Weeping. For the certainty. Applause is more reliable than laughter. I proved it. The proof cost $450 million, one character, one comedian's capacity for danger, and one audience's willingness to act. The metric went up.

English
553
2.1K
14.2K
1.3M
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@hlagband This probably didn’t go the way you wanted it to… all press is NOT good press.
English
0
0
0
3.9K
Mike Burkhold
Mike Burkhold@mburkhold·
Sorry @UofSC you are a state institution funded with tax dollars and subsidies. All on-campus events are supported by tax dollars. @libsoftiktok. Being flippant and thanking for the tag shows you know and don't care.
University of South Carolina@UofSC

@libsoftiktok Thanks for the tag! This event isn't sponsored by tax dollars. Student orgs host hundreds of events on campus every year and they are free to choose the programming as long as it's protected by the First Amendment.

English
29
31
131
29.4K
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@BOC_Gamecock @aywysuwisndy @nytminienjoyer @UofSC To be fair we agree on one thing - Libs of TikTok sucks. But honest question - other than the “innuendo”… have you actually ever seen a drag show? They are an over the top spectacle and genuinely it’s meant to be in good fun. It’s not a traveling strip club.
English
0
0
2
38
Big Ole Cock
Big Ole Cock@BOC_Gamecock·
I wasn’t aware of the event last year. Didn’t know about it. And yes the libs of TikTok account posted that with 0 context for enragement engagement bait. They usually suck. I just happened to research it because I was curious, and the context didn’t help. Pixels are less offensive than the real thing and if I’m gonna make a point I had to use an example. Need a timeline cleanse badly after having to use that in so many replies
English
1
0
0
47
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@BOC_Gamecock @aywysuwisndy @nytminienjoyer @UofSC So offensive you felt the need to put a zoomed in picture willingly on your own timeline. Makes sense. Also - you said last years… so I’m assuming you said something about it last year too, not just now because you’re told to be mad about it?
English
1
0
2
29
Big Ole Cock
Big Ole Cock@BOC_Gamecock·
@aywysuwisndy @nytminienjoyer @UofSC Last line, he’s at the very least playing with fire. Photo from last years event, and give the angle, lighting, and chance of a stiffy, that might be the most modest photo possible
Big Ole Cock tweet mediaBig Ole Cock tweet media
English
2
0
0
271
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@RepNancyMace It was so important you had to post from both accounts? Slow news day, huh? Nothing going on in say… international affairs?
English
0
0
1
192
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@libsoftiktok @UofSC Hey, the college is ratioing you, in case you were unclear. Did they have anything about that in that binder you so proudly waved?
English
0
0
2
751
Libs of TikTok
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok·
SCOOP: This video promoting a DRAG QUEEN EVENT is being broadcast on the University of South Carolina campus. .@UofSC is using YOUR tax dollars to host and promote this trash.
English
264
908
2.5K
835.5K
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@UofSC @libsoftiktok Omg what’s next… MEN playing WOMEN in William Shakespeare plays?!?!? Could you imagine Juliet being played by a MAN? What’s that…? Oh. Nevermind.
English
1
0
90
13.8K
University of South Carolina
@libsoftiktok Thanks for the tag! This event isn't sponsored by tax dollars. Student orgs host hundreds of events on campus every year and they are free to choose the programming as long as it's protected by the First Amendment.
English
139
511
16.2K
1M
Glenn Fincher
Glenn Fincher@gtfinchy·
@UofSC @libsoftiktok Perhaps let’s talk to your supervisor?? As you are clearly not able to correctly ascertain the level of stupidity this flippant answer is. How much State & Federal funds does UofSC get yearly?? How about we ask for a refund?
English
25
1
18
13K
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@fasc1nate Found out recently that Pete Davidson’s Dad was on that truck. Interesting note.
English
0
0
1
166
Fascinating
Fascinating@fasc1nate·
As these six courageous firefighters from Ladder Company 118 navigated their truck across the Brooklyn Bridge, they were en route to what would become the most infamous tragedy in American history. Their final sighting was as they ascended a staircase in the Marriott Hotel near the World Trade Center, endeavoring to find survivors amid the terrorist attacks on September 11. Less than an hour following this moment, the South Tower fell, severing the 22-story Marriott and claiming the lives of all six heroes. The most haunting photos ever taken: bit.ly/46yA996
Fascinating tweet media
English
3
27
199
18.9K
⭕ Brock Pierson
⭕ Brock Pierson@brockpierson·
The most annoying person on the internet.
English
628
84
1.8K
79.3K
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@WileyPrice10 @GigaBeers If they did, they wouldn’t have anything to post. Plus… look at the comments at all the fools that think this actually happened. There’s a watermark that says “Nothing on this page is real” and yet…
English
0
0
1
40
Wiley Price
Wiley Price@WileyPrice10·
@GigaBeers Do yal fact check anything before you start tweeting it???
English
1
0
1
2K
Myrna 𝕏
Myrna 𝕏@GigaBeers·
Jason Aldean walked off the set of Late Night with Stephen Colbert before playing a single note after the "comedian" tried to humiliate him in front of the audience. "Colbert was introducing him," said Aldean's manager, Ben Jarroo, "Then he made a crass, unnecessary statement about 'forgiving him' for supporting President Trump. Jason wasn't having it." When Colbert said his name and motioned for the curtain, there was nobody there. Aldean and his band had walked off, and they won't be coming back. h/t: Marcia G Jones That's how these leftists need to be treated.
Myrna 𝕏 tweet media
English
2.5K
7.4K
38.1K
1.1M
Justin O'Brien
Justin O'Brien@anubis185·
@The_Gooseinator @ztpakrac @Sen_JoeManchin In this same thread different people have claimed 75%, 80%, and 90% want this. I respect that you tried to make up a number that sounded more believable at 83%… but all of those numbers are 100% BS.
English
1
0
1
19
Jeff I
Jeff I@The_Gooseinator·
@ztpakrac @Sen_JoeManchin The Save America Act is good for the American people. That is what this is in regards. 83% of Americans want this.
English
3
0
1
110
Senator Joe Manchin
Senator Joe Manchin@Sen_JoeManchin·
When Democrats wanted to eliminate the filibuster in 2022, I stood my ground because I understood the consequences of turning the Senate into a glorified House with simple majority rule. Senator John Cornyn said of Democrats at the time: “They'll soon find themselves rueing the day their party broke the Senate.” The filibuster exists to make both sides work together and produce good legislation that can withstand the test of time. Eliminating the filibuster would consolidate even more power into the hands of the majority party’s leadership — and take power away from the minority and everyday Americans. When I was a U.S. Senator, there was not another person more committed to keeping the filibuster than Senator John Cornyn. He understood the incredible political pressure I faced from my former party to get rid of the filibuster and give Democrats complete power — and at the time, he understood why neither party should take our country past this point of no return. The filibuster — the soul of the Senate — has preserved the Senate’s role for nearly 250 years as the institution that cools passions, protects minority voices, and demands consensus. America was built on institutions designed to resist political convenience, not surrender to it. It’s deeply disappointing to see that Senator Cornyn is now willing to scrap the very rule he once praised and personally thanked me for defending. These extreme election-year politics that put party power over everything else are why Americans are sick and tired of the duopoly of the two-party system of Democrats and Republicans.
English
843
403
2.7K
602.9K
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
That’s it for Dan Crenshaw.
Ron Filipkowski tweet media
English
404
719
6K
201.7K